Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Travel companions, website escorts, travel escorts or escorts who don’t have AW  (Read 10199 times)

Offline mace-window

Hello again.

Writing again as I came across a couple of escorts on Twitter who have their websites and other methods of selling their business. What I noticed is that most of them don’t have AW profile or many have been reviewed here.

So I wonder why no one has seen them before the lockdown and would you see a WG without AW account (and non-agency WG mind you)? I for one find most of them very attractive though I do understand most are expensive and only tour the UK a couple of times a year. That said many punters has paid far more for seeing escorts with AW profile. So I would be curuios on your answers.

Here are some examples of some escorts or “travel Companions”:

Valerie August: External Link/Members Only

Alicia Darling: External Link/Members Only

Louisa Knight: External Link/Members Only

Darla Blake: External Link/Members Only

Anya Amasova: External Link/Members Only

Chrissie Gordon: External Link/Members Only

Amelia Swann: External Link/Members Only

Suzie Blue: External Link/Members Only

Faye Summers: External Link/Members Only

Claude Love: External Link/Members Only

Billie Brooks: External Link/Members Only

Phoebe Huxley: External Link/Members Only

Chloe Vega: External Link/Members Only

Sophia Duvall: External Link/Members Only

Erin Paige: External Link/Members Only

Giselle Rosewood: External Link/Members Only

Carla & Darla: External Link/Members Only

Jessa Jones: External Link/Members Only

Ivy Grace: External Link/Members Only

Nicolette Bond: External Link/Members Only

Ophelia Wilde: External Link/Members Only

Amber Bowen: External Link/Members Only

Risqué Rebecca: External Link/Members Only

Amy Blakely: External Link/Members Only

Anna Alba: External Link/Members Only

Sapphire: External Link/Members Only

Scarlett May: External Link/Members Only

Verity Thorne: External Link/Members Only

Paris Rose: External Link/Members Only

Bunny BBW: External Link/Members Only (Already has an AW account)

Annie Lilja: External Link/Members Only

Adél Jett: External Link/Members Only

Penelope Bond: External Link/Members Only

Amelia Laurent: External Link/Members Only

Arazatah: External Link/Members Only  (Already has an AW account)

Joanne Campbell: External Link/Members Only

Olivia Valentina: External Link/Members Only

Rosie James: External Link/Members Only (Already has an AW account)

Offline Golden Hind

I think girls with websites are trying to attract a certain kind of punter that believes in a luxury experience and is bought in by a nice website with text about how she likes fine wine and is educated, rather than an AW profile which they might find seedy, maybe travelling businessmen from America as they don't mind high prices. Also the first escorts I ever saw came from google searching and coming across websites such as the ones you linked, before I discovered UKP and AW and found it to be much better value, so they pick up that traffic too.

This one Verity Thorne: External Link/Members Only  - I saw her years ago and reviewed as neutral on here, so she had a AW at the time.


Offline mace-window

I think girls with websites are trying to attract a certain kind of punter that believes in a luxury experience and is bought in by a nice website with text about how she likes fine wine and is educated, rather than an AW profile which they might find seedy, maybe travelling businessmen from America as they don't mind high prices. Also the first escorts I ever saw came from google searching and coming across websites such as the ones you linked, before I discovered UKP and AW and found it to be much better value, so they pick up that traffic too.

This one Verity Thorne: External Link/Members Only  - I saw her years ago and reviewed as neutral on here, so she had a AW at the time.

Yeah. That what I get the feeling off from their websites. That said, I find a quite a number of those website WG's are more attractive than a typical AW profile WG.That said I don't think it is a huge number of attractive Website WG compared to AW profile WG. We do have keep in mind if these website WG's will deliver the goods as most don't have many reviews on UKP. As you mentioned Verity Thorne was a neutral so a big risk to go blind on a expensive WG. I believe Businessmen don't care if the service is great as they are more concerned on the attractiveness of the WG. Which I don't fully understand as if they did some research, they would find a site like UKP and save good amount of money for more positive experiences.

Offline Mr Doodle

Also, they will advetise on other boards.. Chrissy Gordon, for example, is on massage republic and punterlink.. Twitter is another form of marketing, as is AW.. Using twitter (and probably instagram for some) is a way to get their names spread..

THere  are many WGs on AW with websites, too...

I find the more fancy the website, the more expensive they are, but, as GH points out, cost isn't necessarily correlated to service. In fact looking at the first 4 on your list, I wouldn't touch them with a barge pole, even if they were free (well, maybe free.. and then, only wiht a barge pole ;-))

Offline JamesKW

Personally I wouldnt pay their high fees,you could have a few Phoenix parties(and be completely shagged out)for the fees of these girls. I bet they have been really hit hard with no travelling businessmen so you might get a deal.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2020, 09:19:31 am by JamesKW »

Online Colston36

Incredibly good selling and writing. One other who is along those lines is Louisa Smith in Plymouth.

Offline mace-window

Also, they will advetise on other boards.. Chrissy Gordon, for example, is on massage republic and punterlink.. Twitter is another form of marketing, as is AW.. Using twitter (and probably instagram for some) is a way to get their names spread..

THere  are many WGs on AW with websites, too...

I find the more fancy the website, the more expensive they are, but, as GH points out, cost isn't necessarily correlated to service. In fact looking at the first 4 on your list, I wouldn't touch them with a barge pole, even if they were free (well, maybe free.. and then, only wiht a barge pole ;-))

I know we all got different taste in Women but you seriously don't find the attractive???? I myself do and would seriously not mind fucking their brains out. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess. 

Anyways I agree with you Mr Doodle on cost isn't necessarily correlates to a good service. I just rarely seen this WG's being talked about here. That and I don't know if they have punterlink or know anything about them on twitter or Instagram that much as I don't have those social media accounts myself.

Offline mace-window

Incredibly good selling and writing. One other who is along those lines is Louisa Smith in Plymouth.

Yeah. I would imagine these website WG's would get more business having a AW account. But maybe don't as AW is a niche market I guess.

Anyways thanks for the recommendations Colston36. Will check Louisa Smith later.


[Just added now]

Nvm. I know who she is and she is on my hotlist. Hope she tours the North or at least London. She looks fucking fine in my eyes.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2020, 01:53:08 pm by mace-window »

Offline mace-window

Looks like these escorts share a website were you can find most of the London website WG at one place.

External Link/Members Only

Some of the escorts are on the site who have been reviewed here but never thought they had their own websites.

Offline Mr Doodle

I know we all got different taste in Women but you seriously don't find the attractive???? I myself do and would seriously not mind fucking their brains out. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess. 

<snip>

I am slightly warped, and yep, they all have pucker bods, but for the prices:
  • Valerie August's face is too harsh for me.. Those dark solid eyebrows, wide cheeks and harsh mouth.. Her eyes seem piercing.. Nope.. not my style..
  • Alicia Darling looks great but full pubic and au naturel armpit hair as well as hairly legs when she feels like it....  :scare:
  • Louisa Knights looks pretty good, but too flat-chested for me.
  • Anja Amasova - similar to Valerie August - face to too harsh.. also when she is sitting, those hips take an oxybottle look

I didn't look at the rest... Maybe not touching them with a barge pole was a little harsh, but they wouldn't be on my HL... Conversly, I am sure I wouldn't be on theirs!
« Last Edit: September 22, 2020, 04:00:04 pm by Mr Doodle »

Offline mace-window

I am slightly warped, and yep, they all have pucker bods, but for the prices:
  • Valerie August's face is too harsh for me.. Those dark solid eyebrows, wide cheeks and harsh mouth.. Her eyes seem piercing.. Nope.. not my style..
  • Alicia Darling looks great but full pubic and au naturel armpit hair as well as hairly legs when she feels like it....  :scare:
  • Louisa Knights looks pretty good, but too flat-chested for me.
  • Anja Amasova - similar to Valerie August - face to too harsh.. also when she is sitting, those hips take an oxybottle look

I didn't look at the rest... Maybe not touching them with a barge pole was a little harsh, but they wouldn't be on my HL... Conversly, I am sure I wouldn't be on theirs!

Fair enough. We all got our ideally woman out there. I myself don't mind to much natural armpit hair or hairy legs as long as it not to crazy. As for wide cheeks, harsh mouth (whatever that mean), flat-chested, dark solid eyebrows or piercing eyes, I don't know. I still think they are still very attractive and I do love a girl with piercing eyes looking at me while she suck my dick. And for flat-chested girls I don't mind as long as those girls still have nice nipples.

Yeah when I saw you avoid them with a barge pole, I though you know something I don't (like some of that are Trans  :scare:). 

Offline rockinghut

I've seen a couple of these, including ScarlettMay, who advertises as Switch Scarlett on AW (my review: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=263409.0).

The main difference in my experience is the effort made pre-booking to understand your requirements, and tailor an experience for you. This typically means exchanging emails (or perhaps calls) in advance to discuss what you want. In my experience this is generally delivered on as well, and so when you do want a tailored experience then this is a good option.

As for value for money, well I guess that's subjective. These certainly aren't regular punts, and having found some other WG's that deliver a similar service for drastically less I'm not sure I would try these again.

Offline Steely Dan

So I wonder why no one has seen them before the lockdown and would you see a WG without AW account (and non-agency WG mind you)? I for one find most of them very attractive though I do understand most are expensive and only tour the UK a couple of times a year.
You almost answered your own question.  Why pay £400/hr (or for at least one of these $1500/hr ... following an annoying screening procedure etc) for the same experience one can have for 3 times less?  It could be argued that the whole point of this site is to help guys have a £400 experience for £120.  And you are asking why we don't review them?

I bet they are fine looking and nice fucks.  But no better than any of the AW escorts with 20+ positive reviews on this site. 

Quote
That said many punters has paid far more for seeing escorts with AW profile. So I would be curuios on your answers.

Many? no way.  A very very small number pay this sort of rate.  And not 'far more' than $1500/hr!

Net, waste of money.  Like owning a yacht.  If you have a yacht, and plan to punt with these sort, really, little point of hanging out back in the tail with us lot.

Next month is October.  Used to be Tontober.  We all dream about £100/hr not £400/hr.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2020, 11:58:12 pm by Steely Dan »

Offline mace-window

You almost answered your own question.  Why pay £400/hr (or for at least one of these $1500/hr ... following an annoying screening procedure etc) for the same experience one can have for 3 times less?  It could be argued that the whole point of this site is to help guys have a £400 experience for £120.  And you are asking why we don't review them?

I bet they are fine looking and nice fucks.  But no better than any of the AW escorts with 20+ positive reviews on this site. 

Many? no way.  A very very small number pay this sort of rate.  And not 'far more' than $1500/hr!

Net, waste of money.  Like owning a yacht.  If you have a yacht, and plan to punt with these sort, really, little point of hanging out back in the tail with us lot.

Next month is October.  Used to be Tontober.  We all dream about £100/hr not £400/hr.

Sorry about that. I should of meant I seen some punters spending money on expensive escorts. That said I have not seen any escort I listed costing near to £1500 (may have to double check). Though most of the escorts I mentioned above do have those annoying procedures.

Anyways is Tonober still happening during this lockdown period?

Offline Steely Dan

That said I have not seen any escort I listed costing near to £1500 (may have to double check).
External Link/Members Only

Offline expeller

Scarlett May &  Annie Lilja both used to have AW pages.

Offline mace-window

Scarlett May &  Annie Lilja both used to have AW pages.

Got the links to these WG's?

Offline mace-window

External Link/Members Only

 :scare: :scare: :scare: :scare:.

Looks like she is for do meets were you introduce yourself, have lunch, watch a play and then fuck (along with some wine and gifts for her). Yeah she is a hard pass for me. I don't understand why some punters would want to spend time with a WG outside the bedroom. Only time I would understand a punter doing something like that is if the WG is a regular and that's a big if for me. Get a girlfriend for that instead or hang out with your friends. 

And brief encounters (the actually punts) are very expensive thanks for going for lunch and dinner before the action. I mean she is attractive but not not drop dead gorgeous (in my eyes - though I understand if other guys think that). I will need to see her face to make up my mind. Anyways no reviews on her or anything on her website for customer feedback. So a big gamble for a regular punter to see her. That and her website seems quite pretentious. As someone said on this site about punting, you pay for your filthy pleasures/desires and not hers (to an extent in my opinion). Then you leave. Not spending a 2 day holiday with a WG. Just my 2 cent.

Offline DAlpine1980

Why do Breightling charge so much for something that tells the time the same as a Timex, or Bentley charge so much for something that gets you from A to B. They've chosen the market they want and I guess are doing very well out of it. I would imagine that these women are aiming for those who have the money and inclination for a very 'boutique' experience.

To be honest I often think I could take some business tips off them, I bet they don't sit looking at their computer and think "how the f am I going to resolve this" with a bic biro and an instant coffee  :D

Offline davidgood

I have not done any cross referencing but I suspect that some of these travel companions will have been mentioned in the various threads over the years about Ski Bunnies and sex in the high end ski resorts.

Regards,

davidgood

Online Colston36

Yeah. I would imagine these website WG's would get more business having a AW account. But maybe don't as AW is a niche market I guess.

Anyways thanks for the recommendations Colston36. Will check Louisa Smith later.


[Just added now]

Nvm. I know who she is and she is on my hotlist. Hope she tours the North or at least London. She looks fucking fine in my eyes.

I don't think she tours the North. She is probably of the two kinkiest woman I have ever seen. I think many if not most of the ladies listed have decided fewer meets at higher prices works best. So they try to find people they think they would get on with, whose particular tastes they would study and cater for. I guess in theory a bit like having that rarity - a sexy wife who keeps coming across. Only one of my three fitted that bill.

Offline mace-window

I don't think she tours the North. She is probably of the two kinkiest woman I have ever seen. I think many if not most of the ladies listed have decided fewer meets at higher prices works best. So they try to find people they think they would get on with, whose particular tastes they would study and cater for. I guess in theory a bit like having that rarity - a sexy wife who keeps coming across. Only one of my three fitted that bill.

Well she will be high on my list if I every travel around her area.

Offline blend57

It is the old school way for a Wg to advertise on the internet - a personal web site. Up until about 5 years ago (give or take a year) most escorts would have had a personal web site. Sometimes simple, sometimes something quite elaborate. Some WGs even created the websites themselves. I remember on one old forum seeing a thread where WGs and Punters were discussing the pros and cons of various FTP clients of all things.

Nowadays WGs use AW: It has become the google and Facebook of the UK punting world (for better and for worse).

Offline davidgood

It is the old school way for a Wg to advertise on the internet - a personal web site. Up until about 5 years ago (give or take a year) most escorts would have had a personal web site. Sometimes simple, sometimes something quite elaborate. Some WGs even created the websites themselves. I remember on one old forum seeing a thread where WGs and Punters were discussing the pros and cons of various FTP clients of all things.

Nowadays WGs use AW: It has become the google and Facebook of the UK punting world (for better and for worse).

I agree that AW has enabled a lot of SPs to market themselves easily, extensively and at low cost. In addition, with sites like Only Fans they can market their vids and photos, especially those that are minor porn stars.

However I suspect that none of the Travel Companions mentioned at the start of this thread are on AW. If they are then it is likely to be under a different name.

These high end, high cost TCs will always invest in professionally produced web sites as they want to promote themselves as special escorts, not run of the mill working girls. Also their potential clients are unlikely to use AW unless they are looking for a bit of rough.

Regards,

davidgood

Offline bushman

Looks like these escorts share a website were you can find most of the London website WG at one place.

External Link/Members Only

Some of the escorts are on the site who have been reviewed here but never thought they had their own websites.
Found a similar link to a couple of non-AW TC. Will try and dig it out.

Offline Gordon Bennett

I'd happily book one of them if they took my fancy. Adultwork is just a platform and I don't care if she decides to use other platforms instead. I suppose I'd have it in my mind why were they not on Adultwork and maybe have my guard up during the initial contacts and I'd definitely want to speak on phone too but aside from that tiny bit extra caution I'd go for it.

Offline ilovekungfu

Sorry to revive an old thread but I didn't notice this during lockdown last year. The style of these WG's websites always reminds me of how providers advertise in the US, including the much higher rates compared to AW.

I would say a good proportion of your list has an AW account even if they keep it on the down-low. At least some of the time this might be because their AW rates are lower than their website. To pick out just three at random (not saying these have different rates though);-

Madeleine Winter External Link/Members Only | External Link/Members Only
Amelia Swann External Link/Members Only | External Link/Members Only
Olivia Valentina External Link/Members Only | External Link/Members Only

At a glance there are at least another half dozen with AW profiles, probably more.

For better or worse, AW is the center of gravity for arranging meets in the UK. I have seen a couple of providers who advertise in this manner and been fortunate enough to have good to excellent experiences. I think the hit rate would be pretty good and you could discount any chance of bait and switch but I've seen at least a couple of providers with objectively bad reviews targeting the high end of the market with their glossy websites so as always YMMV.

As an aside, I've always been curious as to what extent "Fly me to you" (FMTY) is actually a thing. Perhaps its just me but if I was suitably loaded and travelled a lot I'd be looking more at the creme-of-the-crop at my destination or perhaps taking a favourite with me but flying someone out for a meet always strikes me as something that must be rarer in practice than these providers make out and more aimed at ensuring the riff-raff don't get ideas about making enquiries.

Offline blend57

This thread takes me back a bit. It used to be the norm that an escort would have her own website, complete with nice pictures and their own domain name and internet address. All before the rise of adultwork.

I must admit I quite like such websites, especially if the pictures and design are well done. Reminds me of the better quality top shelf magazines that I used to read for the quality journalism.  :lol:

I must admit that I am a little nostalgic for the days of every escort needing to have their own web site. Granted, adultwork is useful as a one stop shop for ones punting needs, but sometimes I feel that something was lost in the transition.

Offline mace-window

Sorry to revive an old thread but I didn't notice this during lockdown last year. The style of these WG's websites always reminds me of how providers advertise in the US, including the much higher rates compared to AW.

I would say a good proportion of your list has an AW account even if they keep it on the down-low. At least some of the time this might be because their AW rates are lower than their website. To pick out just three at random (not saying these have different rates though);-

Madeleine Winter External Link/Members Only | External Link/Members Only
Amelia Swann External Link/Members Only | External Link/Members Only
Olivia Valentina External Link/Members Only | External Link/Members Only

At a glance there are at least another half dozen with AW profiles, probably more.

For better or worse, AW is the center of gravity for arranging meets in the UK. I have seen a couple of providers who advertise in this manner and been fortunate enough to have good to excellent experiences. I think the hit rate would be pretty good and you could discount any chance of bait and switch but I've seen at least a couple of providers with objectively bad reviews targeting the high end of the market with their glossy websites so as always YMMV.

As an aside, I've always been curious as to what extent "Fly me to you" (FMTY) is actually a thing. Perhaps its just me but if I was suitably loaded and travelled a lot I'd be looking more at the creme-of-the-crop at my destination or perhaps taking a favourite with me but flying someone out for a meet always strikes me as something that must be rarer in practice than these providers make out and more aimed at ensuring the riff-raff don't get ideas about making enquiries.

Thanks for the Intel ilovekungfu. Yeah most of these high end WG’s tend to be for punters that travel or punters around the world as they travel while they work. Yeah quite a lot of the WG’s on my list have AW account as well. Like Bunny BBW and Arazatah who both have positive reviews on this site. But my guess is that most of the online WG’s will provide great service to their clients. That said I don’t think their rates are lower than their website prices though I have not checked myself.

Speaking of reviews, Medeleine Winter is one those WG’s that are very pretentious attitude which I do think most have same attitude sadly. That said I prefer booking these WG’s on AW if I can. As their screening process is quite intense to the point that you giving out your identity to just fuck them which is a no no for me and most punters here.

Though I myself will never fly these hoes to me or any place I am visiting for a holiday or work if I had the money. I rather pay for a friend or a family member to fly to my place or holiday before I ever think about flying a WG. To me a WG is for fucking and not your personally girlfriend for a weekend or a week. And no, WG’s are not worth first class ticket to whatever holiday place plus £2000 + fucking them on a regular basis for a week or so. And frankly I think doing such behaviour is kind of a simp/beta behaviour. 

As an aside, I've always been curious as to what extent "Fly me to you" (FMTY) is actually a thing. Perhaps its just me but if I was suitably loaded and travelled a lot I'd be looking more at the creme-of-the-crop at my destination or perhaps taking a favourite with me but flying someone out for a meet always strikes me as something that must be rarer in practice than these providers make out and more aimed at ensuring the riff-raff don't get ideas about making enquiries.

Offline Boristheboy

I have seen Alicia Darling a few years ago. She was damn good.
It's interesting that the theme with girls who want to come across as "high class courtesans" is to give themselves a surname, so rather than Raunchy Rebecca she will be Rebecca Williams, etc.

Offline brandnewday75

Thanks for the links. I’ll be looking at some of them later out of curiosity.

I follow on Twitter quite a few "service providers" in the USA and admittedly they are all stunning but as mentioned above, you can tell the client they are looking for is on another level. All of them ask for around $2000 for a one or two hour meeting plus. Overnights are ten grand in some cases. Some are what I would call fairly ordinary looking (compared to some stunning Russians on Diva for example) and are still in the $1000 hour bracket.

Always posting up pictures of expensive gifts they’ve been given, etc. lol. One has just moved into a luxury New York apartment via her "work".

Certainly is an interesting world....anyway their daily posts are certainly very entertaining and the pictures make me wish I could have a small lottery win maybe. Lol.

The difference is most of these stateside ladies are in their 20’s and in comparison most of the ladies on Twitter in the UK are 30’s and much older I find. Which is fine but I tend to prefer them a little younger, or they are just very specialist in the services they provide. Which is fine if that’s what you are looking for.

Good detective work though.

Offline Bru1901


Offline mace-window

Thanks for the links. I’ll be looking at some of them later out of curiosity.

I follow on Twitter quite a few "service providers" in the USA and admittedly they are all stunning but as mentioned above, you can tell the client they are looking for is on another level. All of them ask for around $2000 for a one or two hour meeting plus. Overnights are ten grand in some cases. Some are what I would call fairly ordinary looking (compared to some stunning Russians on Diva for example) and are still in the $1000 hour bracket.

Always posting up pictures of expensive gifts they’ve been given, etc. lol. One has just moved into a luxury New York apartment via her "work".

Certainly is an interesting world....anyway their daily posts are certainly very entertaining and the pictures make me wish I could have a small lottery win maybe. Lol.

The difference is most of these stateside ladies are in their 20’s and in comparison most of the ladies on Twitter in the UK are 30’s and much older I find. Which is fine but I tend to prefer them a little younger, or they are just very specialist in the services they provide. Which is fine if that’s what you are looking for.

Good detective work though.

No problem brandnewday75.

Yeah most of these WG’s will have a twitter accounts. To me they treat their service like a business which I got no problem with. Just shows that they take their work very seriously which is a good thing if you ask me. That said I agree that most of these WG’s target audience are those high value guys that can pay for £2000 per hour to have their wicked ways with them. I mean do what you will with the money but like you said some of these WG’s are ordinary looking and personally I can look for better looking WG’s for far cheaper the price if you look hard enough. But that’s the today sexually dating market if you ask me. Top 10% of guys will pay £2000 for ordinary looking women as they don’t know their own value – those guys could pay the same price for super model looking WG if you ask me.

By the way this is why I don’t date or marry any woman that is a Instagram “model” or a girl that always seem to travel to all these fancy places multiple times a year even though she works at regular ass job. It is very telling that these woman aren’t paying for their flights or expensive gifts by their jobs, business or investments if any of these girls know what is investment in stocks is really is. Of course interesting world but not something I would want to spend a long time in but for a couple of hours if you get my drift.

And from your observation of WG’s from the USA and UK, most of the high value people of the world will be in the USA. So most of their demands will be the best cream of the crop which is young, very attractive 20’s year olds. The UK is very small and most of high value people live in London which is not that much compared to the USA. That said from what you are said, most of the UK high value men are bit beta/simps compared to the USA due to them paying high prices for 30’s WG. Don’t get me wrong there are many attractive 30’s women out there, but high value man will have many options to choice the best and one would think he would go for attractive, young 20’s women instead the 30’s women. 

End of the day they can spend whatever money they want. I think spending over £1000 for ordinary WG plus flying them to spend a holiday with you is too much and just show how desperate men are in today’s society. And this kind of explain why the sexual market is messed up for most average guy.


Offline JontyR


And from your observation of WG’s from the USA and UK, most of the high value people of the world will be in the USA. So most of their demands will be the best cream of the crop which is young, very attractive 20’s year olds. The UK is very small and most of high value people live in London which is not that much compared to the USA. That said from what you are said, most of the UK high value men are bit beta/simps compared to the USA due to them paying high prices for 30’s WG. Don’t get me wrong there are many attractive 30’s women out there, but high value man will have many options to choice the best and one would think he would go for attractive, young 20’s women instead the 30’s women. 

Evidence? You'd be as justified to suggest that people who believe things like this are found sat on the front seat of the bus clutching a thermos.

Offline Mango_007

i've wondered about these escorts. i think it would be a professional meeting, but i dont know how good they are, is it more sensual sex, or screw my brains our sex? who knows... elitebritishblonde was one that i was tempted by, she's gone now thou - and had mixed reviews here.

that said, anyone seen Amy Blakely?

Offline mace-window

i've wondered about these escorts. i think it would be a professional meeting, but i dont know how good they are, is it more sensual sex, or screw my brains our sex? who knows... elitebritishblonde was one that i was tempted by, she's gone now thou - and had mixed reviews here.

that said, anyone seen Amy Blakely?

To your whole question, it is rare for regular punter on here who have seen these WG's. So I doubt anyone has seen Amy Blakely for that matter. That and we don't know what kind of service these type of WG's provide as again very few reviews of them on here. Their websites do explain what to expect but end of the day we don't know if your wasting £1K on a crap service or great service.

Offline Home Alone

I've seen a couple of these, including ScarlettMay, who advertises as Switch Scarlett on AW (my review: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=263409.0).

The main difference in my experience is the effort made pre-booking to understand your requirements, and tailor an experience for you. This typically means exchanging emails (or perhaps calls) in advance to discuss what you want. In my experience this is generally delivered on as well, and so when you do want a tailored experience then this is a good option.

As for value for money, well I guess that's subjective. These certainly aren't regular punts, and having found some other WG's that deliver a similar service for drastically less I'm not sure I would try these again.

I'm finding this a strange thread. It's still on page one, and has been going, fitfully, for over a year; 'hibernating' after a few posts, then being resurrected for a few more comments.

Before I had an accident which has affected my mobility, both inside and outside the bedroom, during this year's lockdown, I corresponded with an SP who has her own website - which, as has been pointed out, used to appear a more common occurrence than it seems nowadays - with a view to meeting up after lockdown. I was hoping to see her because she came across as someone whom I'd perhaps think of as being 'out of my league'. Now I guess I'll never know. :unknown:

But the main reason I'm posting on here now is tied in with rockinghut's comment which I've emboldened. There are SPs who, afaik, only advertise on AW but with whom a sensible punter - NOT one whose initial AW message is "Hi. R U available?"!  :scare: - who books someone he hasn't seen before can have a pre-meeting conversation with an SP on AW about how he'd like the meeting to go. It's not just the SPs who have their own websites who work like that.

Offline lillythesavage

I'm finding this a strange thread. It's still on page one, and has been going, fitfully, for over a year; 'hibernating' after a few posts, then being resurrected for a few more comments.

Before I had an accident which has affected my mobility, both inside and outside the bedroom, during this year's lockdown, I corresponded with an SP who has her own website - which, as has been pointed out, used to appear a more common occurrence than it seems nowadays - with a view to meeting up after lockdown. I was hoping to see her because she came across as someone whom I'd perhaps think of as being 'out of my league'. Now I guess I'll never know. :unknown:

But the main reason I'm posting on here now is tied in with rockinghut's comment which I've emboldened. There are SPs who, afaik, only advertise on AW but with whom a sensible punter - NOT one whose initial AW message is "Hi. R U available?"!  :scare: - who books someone he hasn't seen before can have a pre-meeting conversation with an SP on AW about how he'd like the meeting to go. It's not just the SPs who have their own websites who work like that.

A good point I have mentioned about meeting other ways, if you come across as all about money, services and availability with no personality, you can only expect to get the same in return if you do actually get a reply and manage to meet.
Of course some SP,s are like that anyway, and that suits some punters, others on both sides prefer a personality to shine through a little, horses for courses as always.

Your example or " how much for x, y and z, in a first contact is not going to gain much interest from another human being and many just delete this type of approach, well, so the ones I meet tell me.

Offline jimbobted

I've fucked Scarlett May off that list a couple of times (think I reviewed her actually).
She was smoking hot, and did take time to understand what I wanted and put a lot of effort and focus into making sure I had a great time with her on both occasions. But her relatively limited services (no OWO, no anal, no cum anywhere except in the bag) and prices escalating to stupid levels meant I stopped seeing her.
How these girls can claim to be "High class courtesans" though... I have great memories of fucking Scarlett's face and throat as hard as I fucked her pussy (she claims to enjoy throat fucking more and encouraged me to be as rough as I wanted with her). Great fun. Classy? :crazy:

I've enquired with Louisa Knight on a couple of occasions but she never even replied. And I see know she wants ID and employment details, err nah love!
« Last Edit: August 04, 2021, 11:22:30 am by jimbobted »

Offline mace-window

I've fucked Scarlett May off that list a couple of times (think I reviewed her actually).
She was smoking hot, and did take time to understand what I wanted and put a lot of effort and focus into making sure I had a great time with her on both occasions. But her relatively limited services (no OWO, no anal, no cum anywhere except in the bag) and prices escalating to stupid levels meant I stopped seeing her.
How these girls can claim to be "High class courtesans" though... I have great memories of fucking Scarlett's face and throat as hard as I fucked her pussy (she claims to enjoy throat fucking more and encouraged me to be as rough as I wanted with her). Great fun. Classy? :crazy:

I've enquired with Louisa Knight on a couple of occasions but she never even replied. And I see know she wants ID and employment details, err nah love!

Glad you had a great time but for me I can't see a WG who don't do OWO or CIM at those prices regardless how Scarlett May is. And I think that's the fear why many punters on here don't see those type of WG's. They maybe very attractive, young and professional but you can't justify paying +£300 for subpar service especially with no reviews here. 

Offline jimbobted

Glad you had a great time but for me I can't see a WG who don't do OWO or CIM at those prices regardless how Scarlett May is. And I think that's the fear why many punters on here don't see those type of WG's. They maybe very attractive, young and professional but you can't justify paying +£300 for subpar service especially with no reviews here.
She was on AW at the time with much more reasonable rates. I think she's still on AW but doesn't list her rates now, with some bollocks about every date being unique blah blah aka I'll see how much I think k can fleece the punter for. Who knows she might even be doing OWO and CIM for the right money now, but it would be silly prices and she must be over 30 now (she told me her real age during one of our meets) so not worth the prices she charges now.

Offline bushman


Offline mace-window

A number of these independent escorts are on External Link/Members Only

Yeah I noticed that as well. Most of the Travel companions, website escorts, travel escorts or escorts are on Tryst. I don't know why most of them prefer tryst other AW but yeah they like that website.

Offline SamOmar

Yeah I noticed that as well. Most of the Travel companions, website escorts, travel escorts or escorts are on Tryst. I don't know why most of them prefer tryst other AW but yeah they like that website.

Are you really planning on paying 5000 pounds+ , deposits. Divulge your real name , submit documents and all the other requirements most of these girls have for just a couple of days? Good luck with that
Banned reason: Undesirable, convicted sex trafficker / pimp
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Yankee41

Ive really been considering bringing a girl from the uk over to america for a couple days or a week of fun.  Its like a barren waste land here for girls. I need to look at that some more.

Online hendrix

Ive really been considering bringing a girl from the uk over to america for a couple days or a week of fun.  Its like a barren waste land here for girls. I need to look at that some more.

Whenever I visit the USA, I take regs from here with me. It's much easier (for me) than trying to arrange anything over there.

Offline Yankee41

Yeah, if i was visiting i would but im living here now so its not as easy.  I have a few regs i may ask to come over when everything opens up but im not sure if they will.  Having all the links in this thread certainly gives me more options.

Offline a1000punts

this is complete non-sense, I bet that all of these charge a fortune, and they don't even look that good plus are old

if one is willing to spend that kinda dough, I bet you can convince civilians to come with you on a short trip, expenses paid
Banned reason: Abusive, troll like posts.
Banned by: daviemac

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,315
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
this is complete non-sense, I bet that all of these charge a fortune, and they don't even look that good plus are old

if one is willing to spend that kinda dough, I bet you can convince civilians to come with you on a short trip, expenses paid
Very strange post for a new member, accusing others of nonsensical posts and speculating on looks, prices, age and who would be available.   :unknown:

Offline bushman

this is complete non-sense, I bet that all of these charge a fortune, and they don't even look that good plus are old

if one is willing to spend that kinda dough, I bet you can convince civilians to come with you on a short trip, expenses paid
They do... those civilians are called Sugar Babies. They are not cheap either.