Bohemianbabey - Newcastle

[g510]

Has anybody had any experience interactions with Bohemianbabey on aw?

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[daviemac]

At £100/£170 and no services listed, can't see her doing much in this area.

[Lewwy]

I've met her via her SA profile - almost identical name (I won't post a link here unless someone in authority says it's okay). She's actually a canny lass but I have to say that she doesn't strike me as AW material. Quite a reserved lass and more suited to SA rather than AW, to be honest.

Photographs amazingly well, though.

[datwabbit]

I've met her via her SA profile - almost identical name (I won't post a link here unless someone in authority says it's okay). She's actually a canny lass but I have to say that she doesn't strike me as AW material. Quite a reserved lass and more suited to SA rather than AW, to be honest.

Photographs amazingly well, though.

SA can create whores but her AW profile points to a non-sex escort. I've spoken to her but she wasn't my type. She'll need to think a bit more sex work starting off with letting people know what she's happy with doing. Something is telling her that she's got what it takes to be a higher rate hooker.

[g510]

Photographs amazingly well, though.

This suggesting she is not half as pretty as her pictures make out? The one that catches my eye is the one when she is on the beach to be fair.

[datwabbit]

£200 an hour now.

No likes
Simple profile.

Think she can be classed as a timewaster or really doesn't understand what an escort does nowadays.

[Desperate Dan]

I've met her via her SA profile - almost identical name (I won't post a link here unless someone in authority says it's okay). She's actually a canny lass but I have to say that she doesn't strike me as AW material. Quite a reserved lass and more suited to SA rather than AW, to be honest.

Photographs amazingly well, though.

What was your meet with her like? Would you return? Were all services on offer?

[datwabbit]

I've met her via her SA profile - almost identical name (I won't post a link here unless someone in authority says it's okay). She's actually a canny lass but I have to say that she doesn't strike me as AW material. Quite a reserved lass and more suited to SA rather than AW, to be honest.

Photographs amazingly well, though.

She's on AW so you can review her now 

[Lewwy]

What was your meet with her like? Would you return? Were all services on offer?

As I've said, I met her via SA which is an entirely different dynamic to an AW meet. SA profiles make no no mention of "services", indeed, it is specifically prohibited to discuss things on SA. 

[Lewwy]

She's on AW so you can review her now 

Not unless I'd met her again via her AW profile.

[Kev3773]

Not unless I'd met her again via her AW profile.

Why can't you give some information on what she is like, several girls advertise on different platforms 

[Fragilehand]

As I've said, I met her via SA which is an entirely different dynamic to an AW meet. SA profiles make no no mention of "services", indeed, it is specifically prohibited to discuss things on SA.

Did you get to shag her, kiss? Give her oral etc hardly top secret stuff mate.
Messaged her on AW offering her more real world rates she politely declined. 

[Lewwy]

Why can't you give some information on what she is like, several girls advertise on different platforms 

I have given information on what she's like. But it's in the context of seeing her as an SA arrangement rather than as an AW meet.

Girls don't go onto SA expecting detailed descriptions of meets to be posted to prossie reviewing sites. Yes, she's on AW mow but that was after I'd met her. If I'd seen her as an escort meet then I'd say (and review) but I didn't so I'm respecting her privacy.

[Kev3773]

I have given information on what she's like. But it's in the context of seeing her as an SA arrangement rather than as an AW meet.

Girls don't go onto SA expecting detailed descriptions of meets to be posted to prossie reviewing sites. Yes, she's on AW mow but that was after I'd met her. If I'd seen her as an escort meet then I'd say (and review) but I didn't so I'm respecting her privacy.

You've given very little information on what she is like, I don't see the point of you coming on replying to the op then giving no details 

[Lewwy]

Did you get to shag her, kiss? Give her oral etc hardly top secret stuff mate.
Messaged her on AW offering her more real world rates she politely declined. 

Nope, as I've said, I met her on SA and that sort of info isn't what someone on there would expect to be made public. I'm going to respect her privacy as I would expect anyone to respect mine. Adult Work is a different matter and it's up to anyone else who sees her to give a review. Besides, if she's made the decision to go on AW then whatever I may say about her may be totally unrepresentative of whatever service she's giving on there.

[Lewwy]

You've given very little information on what she is like, I don't see the point of you coming on replying to the op then giving no details 

My initial post (no3) on the thread gave more info than the op even asked for. I could have just answered "yes" but I chose to go a little bit further and say that in my opinion she's probably more suited to SA than AW. Make of that what you will. I think most people can see where I'm coming from.

Again, apologies but I met her via SA and I'm not going to invade her privacy in providing what will amount to an AW level comments.

[Kev3773]

My initial post (no3) on the thread gave more info than the op even asked for. I could have just answered "yes" but I chose to go a little bit further and say that in my opinion she's probably more suited to SA than AW. Make of that what you will. I think most people can see where I'm coming from.

Again, apologies but I met her via SA and I'm not going to invade her privacy in providing what will amount to an AW level comments.

If you'd chosen just to say 'yes' you'd have come across as a prick.

[Lewwy]

If you'd chosen just to say 'yes' you'd have come across as a prick.

Well, quite! Hence, I didn't.

I didn't meet her on AW though so there is a different level of privacy incumbent here.

[Kev3773]

Well, quite! Hence, I didn't.

I didn't meet her on AW though so there is a different level of privacy incumbent here.

You haven't helped the op who asked If anyone had experience of the girl in question on AW. As you can only relate to SA maybe you should discuss her on the dedicated SA thread.

[Lewwy]

You haven't helped the op who asked If anyone had experience of the girl in question on AW. As you can only relate to SA maybe you should discuss her on the dedicated SA thread.

If I'm not going to betray someone's privacy on this thread then why would you think I'd do it on another?

You just don't seem to be getting it; SA and AW are totally different platforms and people go on them for different reasons. Now, you may have a valid point if she had been on both at the same time (as a few girls have been, one notable local escort/sb of mediocre review comes to mind) but she wasn't when I met her. She may be after totally different things and, importantly, conducting herself in an entirely different way - especially as regards what private or personal information she gives out - now that she's on AW and I'm not getting into what occurred under a different frame of reference in case I give out info that she doesn't want being exposed to guys she might meet on AW. I fail to see how anyone could have an issue with that.

[Kev3773]

If I'm not going to betray someone's privacy on this thread then why would you think I'd do it on another?

You just don't seem to be getting it; SA and AW are totally different platforms and people go on them for different reasons. Now, you may have a valid point if she had been on both at the same time (as a few girls have been, one notable local escort/sb of mediocre review comes to mind) but she wasn't when I met her. She may be after totally different things and, importantly, conducting herself in an entirely different way - especially as regards what private or personal information she gives out - now that she's on AW and I'm not getting into what occurred under a different frame of reference in case I give out info that she doesn't want being exposed to guys she might meet on AW. I fail to see how anyone could have an issue with that.

Can you point out where you've helped the op ? I seem to have missed that part 

[Lewwy]

Can you point out where you've helped the op ? I seem to have missed that part 

I've already pointed out where I've helped him. Reply no2.

[Kev3773]

I've already pointed out where I've helped him. Reply no2.

That's of little help, all you have said is you've met her but won't divulge any details  I take back what I said earlier, you're now coming across as a condescending prick.

[daviemac]

I've already pointed out where I've helped him. Reply no2.

If you saw her via SA why did you answer the question "Has anybody had any experience interactions with Bohemianbabey on aw?" complete with a link to her AW profile.

You haven't helped anyone, she's a prossie on AW, you have seen her but won't share even basic information.   

[datwabbit]

.
Girls don't go onto SA expecting detailed descriptions of meets to be posted to prossie reviewing sites. Yes, she's on AW mow but that was after I'd met her. If I'd seen her as an escort meet then I'd say (and review) but I didn't so I'm respecting her privacy.

She's now an escort. You're a punter. This is an escort review forum for punters.

She's not the woman who's being selective in choosing her men i.e. money and personality will get you the meet. She's decided to go for money alone. In fact, she's showing more of her face than most. Hence my belief that she doesn't actually understand what escorting is.

If she applies SA selection logic to escorting which might explain her lack of services (basically everything is at discretion) then a clean, respectful client with the right money on time might find he gets nothing because there's no connection. That would be very bad.

I understand that SA women are not seen as sex workers so are given privacy but she's now a sex worker. Your loyalty to her is misjudged in my opinion. She's become the sex worker at her choice remember.

[Fragilehand]

I sent a message regarding what kind of women I like without services listed she replied very eagerly, then replied with what I thought those women should charge her response was much less enthusiastic  she had auora kush vibes hence I messaged but rates are too high

[Lewwy]

If you saw her via SA why did you answer the question "Has anybody had any experience interactions with Bohemianbabey on aw?" complete with a link to her AW profile.

You haven't helped anyone, she's a prossie on AW, you have seen her but won't share even basic information.   

I have helped. I said that in my opinion she's better suited to SA rather then AW. I'm sure that the OP will understand what I'm getting at there.

[Lewwy]

She's now an escort. You're a punter. This is an escort review forum for punters.

She's not the woman who's being selective in choosing her men i.e. money and personality will get you the meet. She's decided to go for money alone. In fact, she's showing more of her face than most. Hence my belief that she doesn't actually understand what escorting is.

If she applies SA selection logic to escorting which might explain her lack of services (basically everything is at discretion) then a clean, respectful client with the right money on time might find he gets nothing because there's no connection. That would be very bad.

I understand that SA women are not seen as sex workers so are given privacy but she's now a sex worker. Your loyalty to her is misjudged in my opinion. She's become the sex worker at her choice remember.

Well, going from her "likes" on AW she's barely an escort in the terms we are expecting on here. As I think someone has said, she's giving the impression of being more of a social escort than a sex worker.

Yes, I get that she's now (we think) a sex worker and if I ever book her - which is highly unlikely at those prices - then I'll review her on those terms. I'm not going to invade her privacy by going into any details of what happened when she wasn't a sex worker, however.

[daviemac]

I have helped. I said that in my opinion she's better suited to SA rather then AW. I'm sure that the OP will understand what I'm getting at there.

The OP asked for anyone's experience with her on AdultWork, you answered with your experience with her on SA, that is not what the question was. Once you replied you should have given the details you were asked for, if you didn't want to do that then you should not have replied at all.

You've been here since 2015 you should know the site is about sharing information and not keeping it to yourself.

What's with the 'privacy' bollocks, she's on AW as a prostitute. If your information is privy to SA you should have posted on the SA thread and not here.

[Lucky Luciano]

I’ve just noted that she’s received her first review on AW being a positive one. I know some of the reviews on AW can be taken with a pinch of salt; but I suppose it’s somewhat reassuring that she maybe offering escort services now.

[datwabbit]

I'm curious what an evening of 3 hours would cost on SA. It's £510 on AW.

If she's not making enough on SA (not enough guys interested or won't pay what she wants), I wonder what her plan is with AW. How many hour long bookings she is planning to do a week.

She's still on SA so that could be a complex diary if AW guys are book, meet and leave but SA guys want more chat before meet.

(When I say curious - I'm not that curious)

[Desperate Dan]

The OP asked for anyone's experience with her on AdultWork, you answered with your experience with her on SA, that is not what the question was. Once you replied you should have given the details you were asked for, if you didn't want to do that then you should not have replied at all.

You've been here since 2015 you should know the site is about sharing information and not keeping it to yourself.

What's with the 'privacy' bollocks, she's on AW as a prostitute. If your information is privy to SA you should have posted on the SA thread and not here.

100% agree with this.

I don’t understand why you replied to the question regarding her AW profile in the first place if you were not prepared to share your experience.   

Thanks for nothing.

[The Outsider]

Well, going from her "likes" on AW she's barely an escort in the terms we are expecting on here. As I think someone has said, she's giving the impression of being more of a social escort than a sex worker.

Yes, I get that she's now (we think) a sex worker and if I ever book her - which is highly unlikely at those prices - then I'll review her on those terms. I'm not going to invade her privacy by going into any details of what happened when she wasn't a sex worker, however.

She was a sex worker.  She sold sex.  You bought sex.  You could tell us about the paid sex you had with her.   

You're splitting hairs to try and pretend it's something different.   

[datwabbit]

A lot of her photos have gone so someone has advised her.

Btw anuush is now at £150 so anyone who calls themselves a hippy (as they both do) must mean expensive. What happened to free love 

[Fragilehand]

A lot of her photos have gone so someone has advised her.

Btw anuush is now at £150 so anyone who calls themselves a hippy (as they both do) must mean expensive. What happened to free love 

amount of fucking weed they smoke, or maybe using the funds to pay the lecky so they can grow their own

[johnny34]

I have given information on what she's like. But it's in the context of seeing her as an SA arrangement rather than as an AW meet.

Girls don't go onto SA expecting detailed descriptions of meets to be posted to prossie reviewing sites. Yes, she's on AW mow but that was after I'd met her. If I'd seen her as an escort meet then I'd say (and review) but I didn't so I'm respecting her privacy.

Looks like she's offering you a free meet now for being a gentleman & respecting her privacy.

[daviemac]

Looks like she's offering you a free meet now for being a gentleman & respecting her privacy.

Using UKP to gain favours from prossies gets members banned. That's not what we are here for.

I wonder if that was his intention all along.   

[tynetunnel]

Well, going from her "likes" on AW she's barely an escort in the terms we are expecting on here. As I think someone has said, she's giving the impression of being more of a social escort than a sex worker.

Yes, I get that she's now (we think) a sex worker and if I ever book her - which is highly unlikely at those prices - then I'll review her on those terms. I'm not going to invade her privacy by going into any details of what happened when she wasn't a sex worker, however.

You’ve taken a lot of stick on this since you noted she is a canny lass having met her on SA. I’ve never met her on there, but we certainly chatted and I’d agree she is canny. I imagine you wish you’d not said anything now and just went about your life. However I think you’ve acted well in this, you met her on SA not AW and those are completely separate things with entirely different expectations. So it’s right that you maintained her privacy. I may get shot down for this, I don’t really care. This is a punters forum but you didn’t meet with her as a punter. In hindsight you should have said nothing. But having done so, you’ve acted well in my opinion 

[daviemac]

But having done so, you’ve acted well in my opinion 

By commenting that he'd seen her then playing the 'respect her privacy' card he's used this site to obtain a free booking.

The question asked was "Has anybody had any experience interactions with Bohemianbabey on AW?" the answer for him was no, he hadn't had any interactions with her on AW, instead he chose to bring SA into it and as a result he's outed his name on here and got a free booking. Not what this site is about.

Edit

He still hasn't given an answer to this question. -

If you saw her via SA why did you answer the question "Has anybody had any experience interactions with Bohemianbabey on aw?" complete with a link to her AW profile.

He maintains he's helped but he has answered a question that wasn't asked, if the OP had wanted to know what she was like on SA he would have asked on the relative thread.

Plus her saying on her profile that she will give UKP members free bookings in return for favours gives the totally wrong impression of this site.

[CaptBeef]

You’ve taken a lot of stick on this since you noted she is a canny lass having met her on SA. I’ve never met her on there, but we certainly chatted and I’d agree she is canny. I imagine you wish you’d not said anything now and just went about your life. However I think you’ve acted well in this, you met her on SA not AW and those are completely separate things with entirely different expectations. So it’s right that you maintained her privacy. I may get shot down for this, I don’t really care. This is a punters forum but you didn’t meet with her as a punter. In hindsight you should have said nothing. But having done so, you’ve acted well in my opinion 

Tend to agree with this - we can all take this from a particular angle but I don’t think we have to take every OP question too literally - if they’re asking for info on someone a related snippet is surely better than saying nothing at all - if it’s not what you want then move on, I don’t really get all the neg for someone trying to help ( in an admittedly limited way) 

[The Outsider]

SA and AW are both online sites to facilitate sex between willing partners, one of whom pays for the pleasure.  I appreciate that the approach is different and so are the delusions expectations.  However, they are both about the exchange of cash for services. 

Lewwy should either have kept quiet or actually offered information.  If we start splitting hairs where does it end?

Should I not comment on an SP because I saw her through AW and a punter is asking about her agency profile? 

Should I keep quiet because I saw her on a Tuesday morning and the other punter wants to book her on Sunday night and I can't be confident she'd be the same? 

[Lewwy]

Using UKP to gain favours from prossies gets members banned. That's not what we are here for.

I wonder if that was his intention all along.   

At no time have I asked, persuaded, coerced or done anything what-so-ever as an attempt to induce anyone to give me anything for free. The merest suggestion that I have, or may have, is beyond the pale, quite frankly.

As to the last sentence - do you honestly believe that in saying what I have said on this thread I had some deluded fantasy that I'd get offered a free fuck from this lady? If you had actually read the tab on her AW page you will notice that she has no idea who I am and that she has made the very specific point that I have not contacted her to let her know who I am or that this discussion was even taking place. I haven't even communicated with her in weeks. I had no idea that she'd put that on her AW page until it was brought to my attention by another member here via private message. 

I have no intention of taking up her offer - which you can check as I've already said that to the member who contacted me and I'm sure that a mod has most likely got access to the PM system. 

[Lewwy]

You’ve taken a lot of stick on this since you noted she is a canny lass having met her on SA. I’ve never met her on there, but we certainly chatted and I’d agree she is canny. I imagine you wish you’d not said anything now and just went about your life. However I think you’ve acted well in this, you met her on SA not AW and those are completely separate things with entirely different expectations. So it’s right that you maintained her privacy. I may get shot down for this, I don’t really care. This is a punters forum but you didn’t meet with her as a punter. In hindsight you should have said nothing. But having done so, you’ve acted well in my opinion 

Many thanks for the kind words mate.

[Lewwy]

Tend to agree with this - we can all take this from a particular angle but I don’t think we have to take every OP question too literally - if they’re asking for info on someone a related snippet is surely better than saying nothing at all - if it’s not what you want then move on, I don’t really get all the neg for someone trying to help ( in an admittedly limited way) 

Thank you. People seem to be obsessing about the phrase "on adult work" used by the OP and reading into that that he only wanted info on her if people had seen her though that platform. That seems illogical, quite frankly. His question was clearly relating to the person and not purely her AW persona. This site is meant to be an information exchange and the notion that someone should say nothing if they had met under any other circumstances is ridiculous, especially given that any sensible reading of the question does not restrict its scope purely to her AW profile.

[The Outsider]

Thank you. People seem to be obsessing about the phrase "on adult work" used by the OP and reading into that that he only wanted info on her if people had seen her though that platform. That seems illogical, quite frankly. His question was clearly relating to the person and not purely her AW persona. This site is meant to be an information exchange and the notion that someone should say nothing if they had met under any other circumstances is ridiculous, especially given that any sensible reading of the question does not restrict its scope purely to her AW profile.

Lewwy, it's you that was obsessing about the distinction between AW and SA. You did so to justify your "What happened remains between us" stance.  You can still share information now if you wish.  What's her flat like? Does do OWO? Is she a decent shag?

[Lewwy]

SA and AW are both online sites to facilitate sex between willing partners, one of whom pays for the pleasure.  I appreciate that the approach is different and so are the delusions expectations.  However, they are both about the exchange of cash for services. 

Lewwy should either have kept quiet or actually offered information.  If we start splitting hairs where does it end?

Should I not comment on an SP because I saw her through AW and a punter is asking about her agency profile? 

Should I keep quiet because I saw her on a Tuesday morning and the other punter wants to book her on Sunday night and I can't be confident she'd be the same? 

With respect, that isn't really true. There are lots and lot of girls on the former who are not looking for sex at all - they want platonic relationships, online relationships, to sell pictures & videos or just to be taken out for dinner occasionally. SA is a very different type of platform to AW which is the very reason I have consistently refused to provide specific/intimate details of this lady. Yes, UKP is exclusively about paid sex/intimacy which leads to lots and lots of the folks on here assuming that every girl on SA is looking to sell sex for money (because it's what we are all looking for on here) but lots of them aren't.

Different platforms = different expectations and, ultimately, people need to adjust their personal privacy filters to take account of same. People on here really need to change their outlook, I think, because these things can go both ways; this lady started off on SA. Meeting people on SA is a totally different dynamic, if for no other reason than both parties are very often a lot more open with their personal information than they are likely to be if meeting via an escort meet on AW. How would guys on here feel if some random girl they had good times with on SA months ago suddenly popped up on AW knowing that this girl knew your real name, job, where you lived, your kids names, etc, etc, and started blabbing to other escorts, her pimp, punters or on online forums about your personal life?

[Lewwy]

Lewwy, it's you that was obsessing about the distinction between AW and SA. You did so to justify your "What happened remains between us" stance.  You can still share information now if you wish.  What's her flat like? Does do OWO? Is she a decent shag?

I'm not obsessing at all. There is a distinction between the two, as you clearly appreciate, and that needs to be respected. I'm not highlighting the difference between the platforms as a justification/excuse for taking a particular stance. SA is very different to AW and people on it do not expect their details to be shared round regardless of what career decisions they might make in the future. It's just basic respect and I'm kinda baffled as to why people are having such a hard time understanding the fact that people may do and act differently when meeting people under different circumstances. I know a lot more about this lady than I've every known about any escort I've met and she knows a lot more about me than I'd ever have told any AW escort. Totally different type of meeting and the level of information provided from the outset is completely different.

This stuff is just basic and fundamental levels of discretion for a person's privacy and I'm really puzzled as to why people are having such a hard time understanding it. 

[daviemac]

Thank you. People seem to be obsessing about the phrase "on adult work" used by the OP and reading into that that he only wanted info on her if people had seen her though that platform. That seems illogical, quite frankly. His question was clearly relating to the person and not purely her AW persona. This site is meant to be an information exchange and the notion that someone should say nothing if they had met under any other circumstances is ridiculous, especially given that any sensible reading of the question does not restrict its scope purely to her AW profile.

The OP asked for information about this escort on the platform he would be booking her through, telling him about how she is on SA is no good at all to him or anyone else. her comms may well be spot on on SA but how does that relate to AW. 

The fact remains you brought SA into it for whatever reason then claimed SA and AW are totally different, however now you are claiming the OP should be told about how she is on SA because they aren't really different, make your mind up.

The situation is you mentioned seeing her through SA then refused to give any details as a result of that you have outed your name on here to her and gained a free booking.

The fact you have refused to give any details and as a result have gained a free booking make you a dodgy member.

By the fact she is offering free bookings as a reward for what is or isn't posted on here makes her a dodgy prossie.

BTW mods can't see PMs that aren't sent to them.

[Lewwy]

The OP asked for information about this escort on the platform he would be booking her through, telling him about how she is on SA is no good at all to him or anyone else. her comms may well be spot on on SA but how does that relate to AW. 

The fact remains you brought SA into it for whatever reason then claimed SA and AW are totally different, however now you are claiming the OP should be told about how she is on SA because they aren't really different, make your mind up.

The situation is you mentioned seeing her through SA then refused to give any details as a result of that you have outed your name on here to her and gained a free booking.

The fact you have refused to give any details and as a result have gained a free booking make you a dodgy member.

By the fact she is offering free bookings as a reward for what is or isn't posted on here makes her a dodgy prossie.

BTW mods can't see PMs that aren't sent to them.

As I've said before, this is just fantasy. You are making stuff up now. Sorry, but you are. I have in no way "outed" my name on here to her because - AS SHE SAYS IN HER AW PROFILE - she has no idea who I am and AS I HAVE SAID - I have zero intention of taking up her offer. Have you actually read what she has written?

Your implication that I have intentionally used my posts here to obtain a free booking is despicable, quite honestly. I have done nothing of the sort, nor would I ever. To make such an implication is coming dangerously close to saying that I'm in some way trying to manipulate or coerce her into providing sex. Sorry, but that's just not on. Like I say, I had no idea she had put that on her AW profile until it was pointed out to me and I have no intention of accepting her offer. Are you saying that I'm lying on those points?

Have you read literally any of my other points as regards having a respect for someone's privacy in relation to how you met them? Are YOU happy that some lass you met on a dating site in the past suddenly pops up as an escort and starts telling every fucker she meets though AW about your private life?

The OP asked for information about her, not specifically about her AW profile. I gave a tiny amount of information about her through meeting her via a different platform. The notion that both platforms operate in a vacuum is ridiculous. If she'd been an injecting Heroin user who shared needles with her aids infected pimp (she isn't and doesn't obvs) and I'd happened to meet her on some dating platform are you trying to say that I should have said nowt because, you know, SA isn't AW, after all?

[tynetunnel]

Looks like she's offering you a free meet now for being a gentleman & respecting her privacy.

It seems she is. Although some here seem to think that an escort offering an unknown punter an unprompted and unasked for freebie is the same as a member “using UKP to gain favours from prossies” : that is not how I see it at all. The member is not responsible for any messages the escort puts up on AW. She doesn’t even know which former SA daddy it is.