' ---has chosen not to allow their Ratings and Feedback to be viewed.'

[WASA38]

This warning often appears on AW but, oddly, if one hovers over 'Ratings' , usually it shows that they were mostly if not completely positive. So any suggestions  why the SP would have withheld them ?

[One Eyed Snake]

This warning often appears on AW but, oddly, if one hovers over 'Ratings' , usually it shows that they were mostly if not completely positive. So any suggestions  why the SP would have withheld them ?

It’s usually when they’ve something to hide. I personally wouldn’t see anyone who removes there feedback.

[daviemac]

This warning often appears on AW but, oddly, if one hovers over 'Ratings' , usually it shows that they were mostly if not completely positive. So any suggestions  why the SP would have withheld them ?

It doesn't show the 'feedback only' negative ones from unconfirmed bookings so they hide their feedback to hide those.

[jackdaw]

It doesn't show the 'feedback only' negative ones from unconfirmed bookings so they hide their feedback to hide those.

Yes. Some of that so-called neutral feedback can be devastatingly negative...if WG does not confirm booking, no feedback can formally count as negative.

It can also hide stuff like feedback from know barebackers, or a ton of fake feedback from non punters.

I can’t think of any circumstances where I’d see a WG hiding feedback...unless I’d seen her before and received a convincing explanation. Mayhap not even then.

[WASA38]

Thanks guys

[Gustav Klimt]

It happens a lot when the profile has been swapped. I always put the name of the girl when I leave feedback so it will show if the profile is swapped.

[shagmore]

It happens a lot when the profile has been swapped. I always put the name of the girl when I leave feedback so it will show if the profile is swapped.

Good idea,
I would never see anyone that hides feedback, also try to get ones that have a fair amount of feedback, but some 0 feedbacks pop up and little brain starts thinking

[seacat]

Even a WG told me never to see someone with no feedback early on...i've stuck to it.

[PatMacGroin]

Some WG's will decide to hide the feedback even if there was only 1 negative. Possibly, the feeling that 1 negative can carry a lot of weight, when a lot of profiles have none. Even though hiding the feedback is even more of a warning sign for most punters.

I believe the other main reason feedback gets hidden is when a punter has mentioned receiving bareback from that WG. But she is trying to deny that in her enjoys or Q&A's.

[MilleMiglia]

From what I can gather, there are a few on AW who really don't care who they upset, and thus tell it like it is. Hidden feedback is probably covering these.

[seacat]

No feedback is worse than a couple of  negatives...and no dispute is worse than a disputed negative imo.

[Sedition]

Some WG's will decide to hide the feedback even if there was only 1 negative. Possibly, the feeling that 1 negative can carry a lot of weight, when a lot of profiles have none. Even though hiding the feedback is even more of a warning sign for most punters.

I believe the other main reason feedback gets hidden is when a punter has mentioned receiving bareback from that WG. But she is trying to deny that in her enjoys or Q&A's.

I think BB rarely comes into it. They hide it because they are shit sp’s
Hide your FB= no booking.
I’d never book a brass who hides her FB. I don’t care what the reason is

[PatMacGroin]

I think BB rarely comes into it. They hide it because they are shit sp’s
Hide your FB= no booking.
I’d never book a brass who hides her FB. I don’t care what the reason is

I mention it because I spotted it on a profile with hidden feedback, when someone worked out a hack allowing them to be viewed...

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=159728.msg1726816#msg1726816

Unfortunately, AW closed the loop on that hack pretty quickly.

[munterhunter]

If they have hidden feedback I will give them a miss.
If it's a fairly new profile and I'm hot to trot with her I'll risk a half hour punt. Zero feedback doesn't put me off as much as hidden feedback. I am not a big fan of feedback especially on AW. I prefer to read and give reviews on here.

[5th Musketeer]

I can understand when a WG wants to hide her FB, probably for having BB there sometime, but I noticed a punter some time ago who seemed to be a pest trying to get a particular WG to do BB and she refused then blocked him.  But having another look at that WG's profile recently I see he has changed his AW nick and looking at HIS own FB I saw that he has hidden it.  Why would a punter want to hide his FB and why would any WG on AW then want to book him?

[PatMacGroin]

I didn't realise punters could hide their own feedback. Obvious now that we should have the same privacy settings as the WG's.

But I don't see the point. It's the same as WG's hiding feedback. Anyone that can read it can make up there own mind about how bad the comments are. Some people will take your side, others will support whoever wrote the bad comment. But I reckon the vast majority of people won't trust anyone that is clearly hiding something, there's an automatic assumption of being guilty.

[dynatron]

theres always a reason for hiding feedback and its up to you but for me its a no brainer-id give the escort a miss

[scutty brown]

  Why would a punter want to hide his FB and why would any WG on AW then want to book him?

To hide the fact he fucks barebackers
Or to hide the fact he's a violent cunt

[5th Musketeer]

To hide the fact he fucks barebackers
Or to hide the fact he's a violent cunt

Nail.... Head.... Hit.   
My thoughts exactly

[dubs]

There's only one valid reason to hide feedback and that's if some cunt has posted personal information about the girl.  AW will usually remove that kind of thing quickly once its reported and then the girl can unhide the feedback.

Otherwise stay away, it is a massive red flag.

[justapunter]

If you hover over the feedback it won't show the feedback but will say only how many positives or negatives. But not the actual feedback comments. I don't know how it works on the wgs side, but adultwork seems to be pretty complicated for them to work. Or they are too dull to bother spending time on there figuring out how everything works. Maybe there's some sort of box they have ticked or haven't ticked setting up the profile. Some don't realise their feedback isn't showing. Or some deliberately don't show it as it mentions bb or their personal address as been pointed above.

[jamaicansanta]

100% do not see

I'd rather they owned it. If it's a misunderstand then they can explain that. If they are hiding it they must be admitting the bad feedback is true.