Michelle of Gatwick

[Wayang]

Let down by my long term booked Dianne of Gatwick (with 24 hours notice) I found Michelle.
An excellent MILF and great in bed - only downside (to some ) would be small boobs - but very sensitive nipples.
And she could not totally hide the fact that she smokes.
If you have to fly out through Gatwick, she is an excellent punt.

[Jimmyredcab]

Link ?????????????????????????

Is this the lady ----------------- not into MILF's myself.

External Link/Members Only

[Wayang]

Jimmyredcab]Link ?????????????????????????

Is this the lady ----------------- not into MILF's myself.



Yes

[afriendofafriend]

I know that beauty is only skin deep, but that first mm is important to me if I am paying to experience her from close quarters.  I just had a look at the lady's gallery and she has got to be the "least attractive" escort I have ever seen!

I can understand why some escorts might want to fuck me with their eyes closed but I'll be damned if I'd put myself in a position where I had to close mine!

AFoAF

[Jimmyredcab]

I know that beauty is only skin deep, but that first mm is important to me if I am paying to experience her from close quarters.  I just had a look at the lady's gallery and she has got to be the "least attractive" escort I have ever seen!

I can understand why some escorts might want to fuck me with their eyes closed but I'll be damned if I'd put myself in a position where I had to close mine!

AFoAF

Maybe a bit harsh but I must admit that I have never considered a 47 year old lady for a paid sexual encounter --- but each to their own.

[Marmalade]

Not my taste for a punt either, but a cursory glance suggests she has good client satisfaction.

What interested me more about Wayang's post was that this type of report (especially if fleshed out a bit more - travelling times & costs from Gatwick especially please) can provide a very useful reference. FRs mostly only help people in the area, whereas 'airport quickies' are worth saving as most if us will pass through an airport at some time. For those outside London, it might even be a case of fitting something in between flights, hence the usefulness of timings.

Someone did something similar for Heathrow (after quite a bit of cajoling) on the appropriate ISG thread.

[Jimmyredcab]

I know that beauty is only skin deep, but that first mm is important to me if I am paying to experience her from close quarters.  I just had a look at the lady's gallery and she has got to be the "least attractive" escort I have ever seen!

I suggested you were being a bit harsh ---------------- after checking out the photos I have to make you 101% right.

[Jimmyredcab]

I suggested you were being a bit harsh ---------------- after checking out the photos I have to make you 101% right.

There must be a mistake on her profile ------------ it says £150 an hour, that can't be right surely. ???????

[afriendofafriend]

£150 per hour might be right for some of her fanbase... but not thee or me ;-)

AFoAF

[Keen Punter]

Christ, she would have to pay me.

[Wayang]

Whether or not MILF's are to your personal taste and whether or not a lady's photos are good or bad, I take great exception to the torrent of ill-advised criticism from members who have had no experience of punting with this particular WG.

There is no point in having a section on 'gooduns' if members are going to pour scorn and abuse on a particular lady on the basis of her photos (yes they are not that good).  The report I gave was fair and I specifically pointed out the strengths and weaknesses of the WG.

I have no liking for 20 year old bimbos but I would never post a commment to the effect of 'not with yours' had I not had personal experience of the WG in question.

Grow up guys and use this section for useful additions to 'gooduns.'  If you don't like MILFs then belt up.

[Jimmyredcab]

I don't think this has anything to do with not liking MILF's, the lady is simply not attractive ------- some may say we all have different tastes but I struggle to see the appeal of this particular WG.
When you recommend a lady you have to accept that you may receive negative comments -------especially as negativity on %%% is now frowned upon.

[Wayang]

I don't think this has anything to do with not liking MILF's, the lady is simply not attractive ------- some may say we all have different tastes but I struggle to see the appeal of this particular WG.
When you recommend a lady you have to accept that you may receive negative comments -------especially as negativity on %%% is now frowned upon.

Bluntly - bullshit.  A string of you with no knowledge of this WG post negative comments - some because you don't like MILFs and some based on typical WG's photos.  Had any one actually seen this WG I would respect their comments. I think comments like 'not with mine' and similar are a waste of time.
I don't comment on others taste in women albeit that I derive no pleasure with a 20 year old bimbo, and merely posted a recommendation for a WG in Gatwick.
I do not think this thread should be used for other than personal recommendations.  If you are not looking for an MILF in Gatwick, go recommend a 20 year old in Dartford - it is far more productive -and I won't comment.

[Jimmyredcab]

Bluntly - bullshit. 

I am sorry you have taken offence, I can only suggest that people check out the ladies gallery and decide for themselves.

[Jacob]

I tend to agree with Wayang, though I did add comment, albeit about VFM, on the Nicoletta thread. Punters have different tastes as far as age ranges, body size and looks etc. If 'Michelle' isn't your type why ridicule her cos she isn't your 'cup of tea'. Maybe she isn't very photogenic, how many times do we see a comment like "her pictures don't do her justice' or "she's better in the flesh". As Marmalade mentioned her feedback indicates good customer satisfaction. IMO making 'fun' of a prossie who has not asked for it, unlike 'Chloe Mafia', is not really very productive and casts her in bad light that as far as I can see isn't deserved.

[Jimmyredcab]

IMO making 'fun' of a prossie who has not asked for it, unlike 'Chloe Mafia', is not really very productive and casts her in bad light that as far as I can see isn't deserved.

Please don't let us go down the road where negative comments are not allowed ------- that would put us on a very slippery slope.

[Jimmyredcab]

Please don't let us go down the road where negative comments are not allowed ------- that would put us on a very slippery slope.

This thread would also be deemed unacceptable ---------

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=536.0

[Wayang]

I am sorry you have taken offence, I can only suggest that people check out the ladies gallery and decide for themselves.

 I have not taken offence.
What I am concerned about is the principle that recommended WGs should be subject to slanging by punters who have not seen them.
The lady in question is an MILFand her photos, like many non-airbrushed WGs, are not great but if you want a good MILF at Gatwick I recommended her.  No more, no less.
People are welcome to look at any WGs photos and make up their minds but 'not with a barge pole' type comments do nothing to add to the thread.

[Jacob]

This thread would also be deemed unacceptable ---------

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=536.0

Funny you should mention that thread as it also popped into my mind also, though she wasn't being recommended and the OP was inviting comment about her look. What I should add is that I see nothing 'fake' about 'Michelle' and IMO that's the sort of thing that should be highlighted. If a prossie is misrepresenting things then please do add your thoughts. Just not sure about having a go because one doesn't find her attractive particularly on a thread where she is being recommended. Not 100% sure either that some may put 'looks' aside if 'likes' and availabilty and location all match up.

This thread is also similar but about a prossie who is a little 'plump'.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=276.0

[Jimmyredcab]

 What I should add is that I see nothing 'fake' about 'Michelle' .

Yes, on that point I can agree.

[6upxxx]

I tend to agree with Wayang, though I did add comment, albeit about VFM, on the Nicoletta thread. Punters have different tastes as far as age ranges, body size and looks etc. If 'Michelle' isn't your type why ridicule her cos she isn't your 'cup of tea'. Maybe she isn't very photogenic, how many times do we see a comment like "her pictures don't do her justice' or "she's better in the flesh". As Marmalade mentioned her feedback indicates good customer satisfaction. IMO making 'fun' of a prossie who has not asked for it, unlike 'Chloe Mafia', is not really very productive and casts her in bad light that as far as I can see isn't deserved.

All this rubbish about "Chloe Mafia" asking for it. She simply gave out stick because a lot of you guys were dishing it out. It showed this forum in appalling light that she was basicaly drummed off it. Rather than an open forum where all can express opinions without fear of moderation, we appeared as a narrow minded group of punters with a 14 year old boys mentality.
Chloe is now part of the management set up at Miltonkeynesescorts having worked as a WG for a couple of years. She is/was very much the sort of working girl that we want out there. Offering full services in a lustful wattant style. So please back off as she cannot defend herself.

[Jacob]

All this rubbish about "Chloe Mafia" asking for it. She simply gave out stick because a lot of you guys were dishing it out. It showed this forum in appalling light that she was basicaly drummed off it. Rather than an open forum where all can express opinions without fear of moderation, we appeared as a narrow minded group of punters with a 14 year old boys mentality.
Chloe is now part of the management set up at Miltonkeynesescorts having worked as a WG for a couple of years. She is/was very much the sort of working girl that we want out there. Offering full services in a lustful wattant style. So please back off as she cannot defend herself.

You seem very confused my friend. 'Chloe Mafia' is the X-Factor Prossie who was discussed at length here because of the nonsense on her Adultwork Profile. WTF as that got to do with the other Chloe with at least 4 different identities who trolled UKP at great length (amongst other anti UKP propaganda behind the scenes) and was then shown human kindness by the administrator by allowing her and her nonsense to be erased from the board. I'd forgotten about her, thanks for reminding me, NOT!! When you say 'we' can you please count me out and kindly get your facts straight before insulting me by quoting something that is nothing to do with your apparent complaint whatsoever, eh? And what's with waiting over a month to comment? Just seems to be raking up old ground IMO.  Cheers. 

[mattylondon]

I also took a punt on "Michelle Gold" of Adultwork, about a year back. It was one of those punts you take when nobody else is available and you just need to unload. I did mitigate the financial risks by opting for a 15 minute quickie. A quick fondle, splash and dash. On that particular day, she was offering a quickie at £40, so I thought I had very little to loose!

Frankly speaking, she looked exactly like her pics.. very skinny, very old looking with saggy, loose hanging skin (add on at least 15 years to her stated age of 49 - no chance she's 49!) and stank of tobacco, with a heavy smoker's cough.

I didn't want to kiss her, quite frankly, so resorted to receiving some oral without and fucking her doggy style, so that I wouldn't have to look at her face. I wasn't particularly impressed that she could last more than 2-3 minutes of mild fucking without complaining that she was "hurting", so God knows how she managed to do any of her videos? She did try to make an effort at being raunchy with some dirty talk and a lot of noise, but far from convincing and was putting me off my stroke! I don't get all the positive reviews for her... must be from guys over 60 or something?! But we all know that a lot of AW reviews are BS and a lot done through fear of receiving a negative feedback in return.

My advice, don't waste your time. A wank is a lot cheaper!

[James999]

add on at least 15 years to her stated age of 49

So that would make her 64 / 65 ?

Was "she" defiantly female, as her pictures raise concerns 

[Jimmyredcab]

She actually has a web- site now, let our members be the judge-----

External Link/Members Only

[mattylondon]

 

Yes, I can vouch that she was indeed female, even though, come to think of it, I had my eyes shut for most of the time!

To be honest, I did consider walking away when I saw her, but sometimes your dick rules your brain and I'd travelled 20 miles to see her!

A polite enough old lady, but as close to necrophilia as I'm likely to or ever want to get! On a serious note, I think there's something slightly pathetic and sad about a lady of nearly or above 60 (I'd say) year old lady still doing something like this. Why?

Yup, made a mistake and hold my hands up on that one!

[James999]

I had my eyes shut for most of the time!

Don't balem you 

[1234]

I am certainly into MILFS (fit, attractive ones).

I'd say she is 55ish at least.

I'd have to see her to comment on her services, but as I hate smoking WGs that ain't gonna happen.

150 an hour - no luv, you've got it all wrong. 

[riskytimes]

saw her once and thought id been had over as she looks like a geezer up close !! put me right off as all i could think of was what happens if she got meat and two veg down there !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[loopy]

I don't comment often ..but this thread made me chuckle! As did the pics of this escort..!:)

[Milky911]

Christ, she would have to pay me.

How much! lol

Fuck that or as the case maybe no way would I fuck her!

[Jimmyredcab]

How much! lol

Fuck that or as the case maybe no way would I fuck her!

I am totally amazed that she is still charging £150 an hour, one ghastly looking woman, I have seen better looking trannies. 

[James999]

I have seen better looking trannies.

It must be a joke surely ?

External Link/Members Only

[Tailpipe]

It must be a joke surely ?

External Link/Members Only

I hope it is that's just gross 

[MisterP]

£150 to shag Nigel Lythgoe????

The one time you would hope this was just a saggy vagine..

External Link/Members Only

[James999]

£150 to shag Nigel Lythgoe????

Nigel looks a lot younger and in better condition though 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[MisterP]

He actually does!

[Jimmyredcab]

I have seen better looking trannies. 

In case you don't believe me ------- ( the one on the right)



Hidden Image/Members Only

[James999]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[pukkapunt]

ive asked her if she would let be put a paper bag over her head while we fuck. its something ive wanted to do and this seems fair.... we shall see