UKP Clients BANNED 🥴😂

[Doc Holliday]

Except that 'pendulous breasts' sounds kinda positive (to a big boob lover like me at least), whereas 'droopy tits' is definitely a negative.

That was kind of my point. They both describe the same physical feature. Droopy tits definitely reads as negative but pendulous breasts is more neutral and could lean towards positive perhaps, depending on the reader's preference.

For example you could say either "I loved her large pendulous breasts" or "I found her large pendulous breasts somewhat unattractive"

[Doc Holliday]

We would definitely benefit by having more WG's on here.

Irrespective of whether people agree whether that is a benefit or not, it simply isn't going to happen 

[Steely Dan]

In hindsight I think some of my negatives are due to me:

- Going with a plan B or a short notice booking meaning I go for whoever is available instead of an SP I actually want to see.  I walk in the door and immediately regret it. In these cases I usually walk now or just keep my money in my pocket until I find someone I really want to see.  I ised to try to get 3 or 4 bookings in a week and sometimes it was a struggle to find 3 or 4 good new to me SPs a week. I was just doing bookings because I was bored and had the opportunity.

This is not due to you.  Nothing on the surface wrong with meeting a plan B - one escort I have been seen regularly for years was a plan B the first time I met her.

But it is particularly important that you review these (and you do = well done).  The next punter needs to know that the plan B escort was Positive, Neutral or Negative, so he can make an informed choice.

No punter deserves a bud punt, even when he meets up with plan B.

[PilotMan]

Escorts don't have to disclose their working identities publicly, they do have to disclose they are SPs and reveal their working names to the mods or admin if asked.

Some sign up using their working names others don't but will say they are the SP concerned if replying to a review.

Makes perfect sense.

[PilotMan]

If it weren't so important, there wouldn't be so many SPs who deliberately set out to deceive in these matters.

Exactly!

[PilotMan]

Irrespective of whether people agree whether that is a benefit or not, it simply isn't going to happen 

Please explain.

[RandomGuy99]

This is not due to you.  Nothing on the surface wrong with meeting a plan B - one escort I have been seen regularly for years was a plan B the first time I met her.

But it is particularly important that you review these (and you do = well done).  The next punter needs to know that the plan B escort was Positive, Neutral or Negative, so he can make an informed choice.

No punter deserves a bud punt, even when he meets up with plan B.

Going with a plan B might lead to me to go off type as I go with who is available instead of who I'd actually like to see, so I've probably set myself up to have a bad experience. 

[Doc Holliday]

Please explain.

The UKP die has been cast over the last decade. Very few SP's contribute other than a small group of respected members.

Even if in the unlikely event Head1 decided tomorrow, the ethos would change from a 'punter's' forum to a 'punting' forum, it just wouldn't evolve into such and in attempting to do so, you risk losing many of your core audience.

EDIT that's the short answer 

[Iloveoral]

Even if in the unlikely event Head1 decided tomorrow, the ethos would change from a 'punter's' forum to a 'punting' forum

A million percent he won’t be doing that  I can officially say that from something he said yesterday to me 

[MissWolf]

It's very difficult given that a physical description is normally required. There are ways of using descriptive language though.. one man's 'droopy tits' could be another's 'pendulous breasts' etc.

I absolutely agree Doc, a reviewer is between a rock and a hard place, a description of the SP, the facilities and the service are all needed to make a decent review that is worth reading and I'm not suggesting that this freedom of speech is curtailed I'm simply saying this is the reason ukp is disliked, in fact hated by so many.

I have a slightly thicker skin when it come to the written word and someone else's opinion of me, It comes from many years married to a man who's favorite line was...I love you, I just don't fancy you so can we have the light off   

[Bonker]

I'm in favour of blunt, honest reviews.
I write them for the benefit of punters, not to avoid upsetting WGs.

The reviews, including mine, are opinions. From my perspective. From my experience on that particular day.

I don't expect them to be taken as gospel.

As for the "saggy tits" vs "pendulous boobs" argument, I say let the WG take the criticism in the same vein. One punter's saggy tits is another one's juicy udders. There are plenty of punters for every size, shape, age and peculiarity.

If the criticism is deemed to be inaccurate, dishonest, defamatory - then point it out on the profile.

Otherwise, stop posting photos that are old. Stop lying about your age. Stop stealing other girls' pics. Stop generating fake reviews.

And yes, I know that all WGs on AW don't do this.  But many do.

[s0whatsnew?]

Sorry to say, i don't know the meaning of  'pendulous'.    The  'ous'  usually means  'of'.   But of what ?  Pending?  Pendulum?   Doesn't make sense!

 So I'm in favour of brutal honesty; heavy, weighed down, etc.  As many have said, there's many punters wanting every kind of female body.  Just call a spade a spade.

[scutty brown]

Sorry to say, i don't know the meaning of  'pendulous'.    The  'ous'  usually means  'of'.   But of what ?  Pending?  Pendulum?   Doesn't make sense!

Enlighten yourself

External Link/Members Only

[Doc Holliday]

... and I'm not suggesting that this freedom of speech is curtailed I'm simply saying this is the reason ukp is disliked, in fact hated by so many.

Indeed and I am not sure everyone appreciates just how strong that dislike/hatred is. Cannot be fixed though and it is what it is.

[MissWolf]

Indeed and I am not sure everyone appreciates just how strong that dislike/hatred is. Cannot be fixed though and it is what it is.

It is indeed what it is,  I actually find statements like....I'd like/have a go on her .....worse, it makes us sound like a donkey ride at Blackpool beach 

Lines like....I stuck my hard cock in her and fucked her really well for 10 mins in doggy/mish also make me roll my eyes cos let's face it if your cock wasn't hard its not going in and well is absolutely subjective 

But each to their own and if someone feels the need to write in that kind of detail then crack on, as long as identifying details as per the site rules are not included it's all good

[Jonestown]

  I actually find statements like....I'd like/have a go on her .....worse, it makes us sound like a donkey ride at Blackpool beach 

Have you looked at some of the language girls use to describe themselves on AW, makes a donkey ride sound quite polite and refined.

[MissWolf]

Have you looked at some of the language girls use to describe themselves on AW, makes a donkey ride sound quite polite and refined.

I have it makes my eyeballs burn 

[Doc Holliday]

I have it makes my eyeballs burn 

Perhaps you should have taken ex hubby's advice and turned the light off?

[MissWolf]

Perhaps you should have taken ex hubby's advice and turned the light off?

It would certainly have improved my view   

[southcoastpunter]

Indeed and I am not sure everyone appreciates just how strong that dislike/hatred is. Cannot be fixed though and it is what it is.

oh it could, over time, if we wanted to.  But we can't even be polite and respectful to each other / other punters let alone WG/SP's.

But the question is - does it matter? The site (quite rightly) puts the interests of punters first but the argument that in time, if more and more girls ban all UKP members, then that is not in our best long term interest is, at this stage, a big leap to take!

[scutty brown]

Have you looked at some of the language girls use to describe themselves on AW, makes a donkey ride sound quite polite and refined.

More reminiscent of a donkeyshow than a donkeyride

[Iloveoral]

 

But the question is - does it matter? The site (quite rightly) puts the interests of punters first but the argument that in time, if more and more girls ban all UKP members, then that is not in our best long term interest is, at this stage, a big leap to take!

The theme of the site isn’t going to get us fans outside of our circle, we aren’t going to be invited to the mumsnet Christmas due this year, it is what it is.
We review paid for sex services, said service providers may not be happy with all the reviews, as mentioned a good service generally gets a good review, likewise the bad services get bad reviews.
Unfortunately we do on occasion get fake reviews and vindictive reviews, we do try to iron them out.

Old admin allowed SP’s to join here even though it’s a punters site for punters, I disagree with having to tone reviews down to pamper to our guests.

There are sites out there that are for both escorts and punters to mix, advertise, discuss meets, this obviously isn’t one of those.

Surely the best foot forward is always not to tell an escort your a member here, she’s probably not going to be impressed, it won’t do you any favours and she will be in a back foot from the off.

[RandomGuy99]

SPs and SSs have a symbiotic relationship.  Without SS the SPs wouldn't make the good money they do and us SS would be forced back to our relationship with Palm-ela.

Ideally, both SSs and SPs should treat each other with respect. When the respect breaks down negative reviews occur. I guess lots of negative reviews will impact the bad SPs.

We all need to play nicely.

SPs and SSs can both do without the drama and grief associated with negative reviews.

[southcoastpunter]

i agree with you iloveoral - maybe i didn't express my point very well. i was (slighly) disagreeing with the Doc by making the point that there is always something that could be done but questioning whether it was in our colective best interests to try.

[versace]

It would certainly have improved my view   

And vice versa 

[MissWolf]

And vice versa 

🥱

[Iloveoral]

🥱

Is that the new choking emoji ?

[MissWolf]

Is that the new choking emoji ?

Not on something that size its definitely a yawn 😴

[PilotMan]

Otherwise, stop posting photos that are old. Stop lying about your age. Stop stealing other girls' pics. Stop generating fake reviews.

And stop using photo manipulation apps that change your appearance.

[Bonker]

Is that the new choking emoji ?

There's an idea!
Can you design one for the 'choker'? I would use that for work emails and meetings.

[tynetunnel]

Surely the best foot forward is always not to tell an escort your a member here, she’s probably not going to be impressed, it won’t do you any favours and she will be in a back foot from the off.

Absolutely. Never discuss UKP, feign ignorance if the girl mentions it, leave a suitably long gap post punt before reviewing, and don’t give more detail than necessary in your review

[Iloveoral]

I remember a punt and the girl asking me about UKP, I replied never heard of it, is it a dating app? She kicked of a full blown slagging match of the place and one of her reviews, deffo admit to nothing 

[myothernameis]

I remember a punt and the girl asking me about UKP, I replied never heard of it, is it a dating app? She kicked of a full blown slagging match of the place and one of her reviews, deffo admit to nothing 

I know of an escort I have seen, and she told me she knows of UkPunting, and accepts what it is, but we never got into memberships.   She knows she gets reviewed on the site, and all the reviews are positive, so she happy with this.