First there was this https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=177530.0 then there was this review.
Spot the difference as the former seemingly goes to great effort to correct any misunderstanding or wrong assumptions about the lady’s services, wrongly on her behalf. I’ve no problem with another positive for ER but it just looks suspiciously like sycophantic waffle. Too many contradictory comments correcting the previous review. Maybe I’ve misunderstood the intention myself!
Isn’t ER so very capable of speaking for herself, on here (and through her extensive reviews) She’s already stated that chatting might sometimes need to end and getting on with things is generally what most want, even in a GFE. A flagging member is frustratingly no fun when you’ve forked out £100 and you have a pretty lady all ready in front of you.
Just saying, Apologies I might be wrong.
I’m sorry that you found too many contradictory comments and sycophantic waffle in my review. I certainly didn’t intend my review to come across that way.
I’ve read through the review again and I’m satisfied that it reflects my experience during the one hour that I saw Rebecca in her flat last month.
It’s a case of horses for courses. You and many others are probably looking for a different experience than I’m looking for.
As I said in my review of Elyssa in November, I have “rather vanilla tastes”. I’m not looking for a PSE. As stated in my review of Rebecca, I like a good chat myself. At my age I couldn’t manage an hour of PSE. I want a slow build up and I don’t necessarily need intense DFK within 5 seconds of the door being opened.
I said at the end of the review: "
If you’re looking for a PSE with minimal conversation then Rebecca may not fit the bill." I added that to assist fellow punters. I didn’t intend to come across as a sycophant. That was my first meeting with Rebecca. I would certainly see her again because I had a good time, but it won’t be any time soon as there are many others on my hotlist.