I am not saying that some reviews (even my own have in the past) give too much infoemation so that the WG will be able to place the review to a a particular face. BUT that is 100% not what this thread is about.
This thread is about a guy who for whatever reason (spite / malicious I would imagine 
) thought it was OK to add a non public picture to his review and actually name the escort NOT by her working name BUT by her REAL NAME! That is way out of order and nothing to do with whether a review is too detailed or not.
The OP is clearly in the wrong and knew what he was doing.
The point I'm trying to make is that some reviews contain details about the SP that have absolutely nothing to do with the booking or the SP's ability to deliver a service. We don't need to know the exact location or even the street of an SP's work location, we don't need to know about the conversations that took place on the booking, we don't need to know if they're married or have kids and how many and their ages, etc. Just stick to the basic facts of the booking. Revealing the irrelevant details can cause SPs and SSs problems with wronguns hanging around in the street collecting details of SSs, the SP's neighbours confronting or reporting SS car regs to the police, SSs that the SP is trying to avoid discovering where they're working and causing them problems, robbers knowing too much detail of how the SP handles their money and threatening and robbing them, ex-partners of SPs outing them, etc.. Private information should be shared on a need to know basis and us SSs don't need to know all this stuff. The SP is not going to thank you for sharing the irrelevant details.
Also providing the details of private conversations that took place in a booking will help the SP identify who you are and they may not see members of UKP, so the next time you ask for a booking you may be denied.
You wouldn't like it if SPs shared personal information about you on forums, so respect their privacy just as they respect yours.
Think before you share.
