GORGEOUS_GIRL

[king tarzan]

AW link number 1932980

Needed a quickie shag, found her near my location.
Found place, she opened the door and immediately my banana shot up.
she is tall, she was wearing lingerie and suspenders!!
she has been heavily airbrushed in pictures, her actual figure I would say is a curvy firm size 12, no saggy bits at all.
face no make up at all, face very naturally pretty.. later told me she is 30, about right..
sexy polish woman by the way..
gave her money and grabbed her, heavy dfk for a minute or so..
she comes back in gently push her on to bed, off with her suspenders etc, and just all over her, licked her
mango, sucked and mauled her tits, she enjoyed that, snogged her senseless, she got hold of my banana, gave me owo
sucked my banana, one of the best owo i have ever had, screwed her in missionary and doggy, she loved getting pounded in doggy.
told me as we were getting dressed, she has very high sex drive, she is in relationship, but does this for money and to keep getting screwed, she needs sex constantly..
judging by the way we virtually ate each other (gently but firmly) I believe her..

ATTITUDE 10/10
SERVICES 10/10
PHYSICAL CONSTRUCTION 7

[JamesRockford]

Needed a quickie shag...
gave her money and grabbed her,...
PHYSICAL CONSTRUCTION 7

Me Tarzan, You Natalie

Size 12?  Pics show a slimmer lady.  "What is your favourite food? ice crem, ... praline, steak" That would explain it.

External Link/Members Only

[king tarzan]

100% her.. well worth a visit, 100% hot passionate encounter..

[king tarzan]

I did write in review pictures airbrushed.. she is definitely size 12, but firm and curvy, no flabby saggy bits at all..

nice arse to squeeze very firmly too, she enjoys that!!

[lewishamguy]

I did write in review pictures airbrushed.. she is definitely size 12, but firm and curvy, no flabby saggy bits at all..

nice arse to squeeze very firmly too, she enjoys that!!

But was she more attractive than this girl?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[king tarzan]

that is her..
she looks ok in picture, but face to face she is appealing...with body very sexy.. my banana did not shoot up for nothing!!

[Type_O_Negative]

£150/hour 
She looks like ordinary housewife...
But we have different taste 

[king tarzan]

i paid for a quickie, £50 for 20 mins, a lust shag!!!
would not of paid her £150 for 1 hour though...

[gekiro]

I saw her a few weeks back. Paid for half hour at £70.

Showed me her recent checkup certificates before we began, without me prompting. Didn't leave room to count money and was offered a range of drinks, soft and alcoholic before beginning. Nice warm up like this does make a difference to me rather than a mechanical, straight to action approach, though others may prefer that.

Time itself was not rushed, with nice DFK throughout, OWO, RO (I believe she came; certainly seemed to enjoy it), before sex (covered) in a few positions before popping during a hard doggy finale - her timer beeping moments after I shot my load. No rush to leave with a warm shower offered afterwards and some light, friendly chat as I got dressed.

Quite an intimate time, plenty of eye contact for a lot of the action despite only having a brief time together. She even thanked me and joked it should have been her paying me, because she enjoyed it. Obviously a ruse to boost the ego, but I'll take it!

I would definitely return.

[jason26]

But was she more attractive than this girl?

Hidden Image/Members Only

To be fair to the OP some people just don't look as attractive in photos as in real life. So even though from the photo she may not look that attractive, you might be pleasantly surprised if you saw her in person.

[raylondoner]

Strange that profile switches between first and third person

[Meursault]

I walked from this woman a while back.
She is very average looking but a firm 14/16.
Not a fat lass, but way too big for my tastes. Heavy legs and a big, admadmittedly firm, looking arse.
I'd put her around 35 years old.
I remember the flat being really nice; at the top of a narrow flight of stairs with no lift and opposite a very civilised Islington pub.

[Meursault]

Excuse the smartphone crap typing btw.

[Jimmyredcab]

To be fair to the OP some people just don't look as attractive in photos as in real life. So even though from the photo she may not look that attractive, you might be pleasantly surprised if you saw her in person.

Grossly overpriced at £150 an hour, looks more like an £80 an hour housewife to me.   

[Marmalade]

She's 28 on this link:
External Link/Members Only
and that was in 2013.

Beautiful main page photo - nice, photography, nice freebie makeup session in the high street, nice photoshop removal of any skin pores... bit of a shame about the rather average face underneath... But LewishamGuy, how did you get hold of the verification photo?

[Marmalade]

regarding photos, I will sometimes spend 50p or £1 on PGs if I am undecided. Often they go awol putting honest photos up that they think will turn a guy on. Because she has a guy's cock in her mouth we're not supposed to notice the hairy lip, or the saggy breasts cos her nipples are showing, or the tattooed, flabby thighs cos there's a twat oozing cum. That was £1 well-spent saving me money. I think of that famous line:

"Her photos don't do her justice"

And I think, "No they don't. The ones on the profile were attractive!!"

In this case, it seems another instance of just a middle-of-the-road hooker simply passing herself off as some elite European glamour babe. Should reduce prices and do a new photo session to represent something closer to what the punter actually will get.

[mrhappypants]

Grossly overpriced at £150 an hour, looks more like an £80 an hour housewife to me.   

Agreed.  I have pointed out the glaring inaccuracies on reviews on certain girls, so let me first that NOT having seen her I couldn't comment on the accuracy of this review.  A constellation of features, age over 25, rate over 120ph large directory of flattering photos and, dare I say it, a generally positive review from a member with a high post and punt rate supported vociferously by a number of other members might be worthy of closer inspection.  I am not saying that any of those features apply in this case of course, just a plea for vigilance. 

Dave

[Jimmyredcab]

She's 28 on this link:
External Link/Members Only
and that was in 2013.

Lesson of the day ----------------------- never believe escort agency photos, they could make me look attractive, OK, maybe that is going too far.   

Hidden Image/Members Only

[lewishamguy]

She's 28 on this link:
External Link/Members Only
and that was in 2013.

Beautiful main page photo - nice, photography, nice freebie makeup session in the high street, nice photoshop removal of any skin pores... bit of a shame about the rather average face underneath... But LewishamGuy, how did you get hold of the verification photo?

I saved the verification photo from her profile a while ago. Perhaps she forgot to hide.

 

[Meursault]

She's 28 on this link:
External Link/Members Only
and that was in 2013.

Beautiful main page photo - nice, photography, nice freebie makeup session in the high street, nice photoshop removal of any skin pores... bit of a shame about the rather average face underneath... But LewishamGuy, how did you get hold of the verification photo?

She's no where near 28 and even the verification photograph is reasonably flattering, compared to the reality, in my memory.
I was reasonably sober when I met the woman and she was not good looking to my eye.
If Tarzan fancied her though, good news. One man's meat is another man's poison etc.
Loads of men like the fuller figure too. I don't, hence I walked.