Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: When to review and when not to review  (Read 3655 times)

SirFrank

  • Guest
After reading an off topic thread I wondered when do you decide whether or not to review a punt on here and/or on AW (or elsewhere)? I tend to view the process akin to tripadvisor in that I only tend to post reviews in exceptional circumstances - ie a 1* or 5* experience. Anything in between tends to pass me by.

I take the view that if I've got nothing good (or bad) to say I say nothing at all. If it's an ok punt then I tend not to review but if I get a brilliant experience or a terrible experience I'll post a review. What informs your decision of whether to review or not? Apologies if this has been discussed previously

vorian

  • Guest
Personally,  I think you should review as often as you are comfortable with, any information at all will help the next punter,  good, bad or indifferent.

richie

  • Guest
If I've got spare time then I'll knock out a review but as I do everything via my iPhone typing lengthy reviews can take a fair while.

Generally I'd only bother if either something exceptional happened like the last prossie that tried to hop on BB style (I had physically stop her) or if it were an A* or F- experience.

Offline Steve2

Terrible or just OK, I am happy to review to warn others on here

Exceptional..... I will share with members on here that I trust not to fuck up a good thing, never on Adultwork


vorian

  • Guest
Oh yes and never on AW,  worthless rather do the review on UKP.

Offline threechilliman

I didn't start reviewing until I'd done a few. Now I do a detailed review for each WG I see and include info about what made me choose her etc, what happened on the day, the punt itself and whether I'd see them again. Hopefully it'll help others... The main problem with reviews is that we're all different of course, and what I enjoy might not be what someone else enjoys and vice versa.

I think I've been pretty lucky, although I do my homework, as most have been very enjoyable. A couple of early one's weren't so good, mainly because I picked unwisely due to inexperience

What I don't like is short reviews that don't really tell you much, no point doing them. And then we have the 'what happened between us stays between us' clowns - FUCK OFF!

tcm

JV547845

  • Guest
How useful are reviews from fluffy newbies like me?  I'd find it useful still even to know a WG's real and I could spare you all my shitty love poetry and keep it factual.

Offline hendrix

I try and review as much as I can, especially if the punt was exceptional or terrible, which thankfully hasn't happened for a long time. Also, different experiences like the TS or multiple BBC'S as others might find that useful if they're thinking about it.

Offline wristjob

I'm along similar lines to tcm. A girl can be generally good but there's always some detail - level of kissing, how good the BJ is, accuracy of pics, extras - something that is always useful and always unknown. If nothing else it proves to punters that she's good enough, she exists, her pimp isn't in hiding etc.

I reviewed Hush parties a while back. Everyone else was glowing, I gave a neutral with issues of hogging and lineup, and a few others then came out and agreed with those observations and they have subsequently been dealt with. Doesn't always happen but it did here.

Also I've actually gone back to my reviews on occasion when wondering whether to return to a girl to refresh my memory. I don't revisit girls that often but unless anything significant has changed I don't tend to do another review or a followup.

I also had 2 punts the last few months that I didn't review because of "external factors". One was where a girl constantly bitched about her employer and did the hard sell on extras - unprofessional but I sympathised with her and didn't want to stir up trouble for her. The other one was some production line girl and it just depressed me - so not really a reflection on her or her performance.


Offline Quatro

I think the more reviews there are the better the picture that gets built for anyone researching their next punt.

I take SirFranks point though about reviewing the best and the worst.

The negative reviews on here are priceless and must have saved UKP members thousands of pounds in avoided shit punts.


Offline wristjob

How useful are reviews from fluffy newbies like me?  I'd find it useful still even to know a WG's real and I could spare you all my shitty love poetry and keep it factual.

Well if you say how accurate the pictures were and did she provide the services she said she would, and to what level - then they add loads. As you say also proves she exists.


Offline wristjob


The negative reviews on here are priceless and must have saved UKP members thousands of pounds in avoided shit punts.

Negatives add more to my decision making than positives. Sometimes it's handy to be able to cross reference a punters experience with your own on a girl you both saw - so you can get a feel for how they judge things.

Offline threechilliman

Also I've actually gone back to my reviews on occasion when wondering whether to return to a girl to refresh my memory

One of the reasons I do it as well
tcm

Rochdull lad

  • Guest
As an old punter who's getting set in his ways, I don't see many "new" girls these days and it'd be unacceptable for me to leave another FR on here on each of my two Regulars.

So what I do now is to leave a FR on someone I see for the first, and probably the last, time.  And I have to say that, since I joined Ukpunting, my critical faculties have been sharpened.  In the early days of my punting career, I used to leave FRs on either AW or Pro$$ienet [make allowances for me, lads; I didn't know any better!] but now the only place I'll leave one is on here.

LL

  • Guest
I'm like the OP in that I will post great and shit experiences in general and I tend to skip the mediocre ones.

However, have you never had a punt that was so terrible that you can't bear to write about it here as that would be to relive an experience that you're desperately trying to forget?  I have!


LL

  • Guest
How useful are reviews from fluffy newbies like me?  I'd find it useful still even to know a WG's real and I could spare you all my shitty love poetry and keep it factual.

Newbies tend to be the most prolific review-posters.  It's like the longer people have been members here the less regularly they will post reviews.  Of course we have to use common sense to separate the liars from the legit members but it only takes a couple of reviews where other people can confirm your findings, for you to start to win trust from everyone else here.

Offline Marmalade

Not much to add as I agree with every comment so far. Reviews are a lifeblood of UKP but no-one should feel compelled as long as their contributions are valued in some way. If you value a forum, it's good to give something back is my view. But protect your identity since you never know if you will wish you had in the future. I sometimes leave it a few days or longer to make it harder for a prossie to identify me from my review. I always try to be honest and never say anything I'm ashamed of, but it's for punters, not a media-circus of the occasional whacko who might read it. Prossies have mates who are prossies (often it's the only sort of 'mates' they have) which is why perfectly normal, decent, 'punter-supportive' prossies can turn and "stick together with their sisters" at a moment's notice. Not only prossies, but your boss at work might read it (how do you know he's not a 'reformed' punter?) or your wife or worse.

Reviews only have meaning in some sort of context, like knowing the reviewer is genuine and having an idea of their standards.

If a girl is hot and new, given the success of the forum, I maybe want to bang her a few more times before passing on the details publicly. (Though I'll maybe share by private PM to one or two regular members who I can see have similar standards as myself.) Too often after a few good reviews, a prossie puts her prices up and is harder to book. So I think, get your oats and then share them if you have time and inclination, and why shouldn't you?

If you have fucked, or intend to fuck, established female forum members, then bear in mind potential repercussions.

Fluffies can ignore most of this, but if you think giving a good review leaves you shining white in pro$$ie eyes, I disagree, whether it's fluffie or not! I gave a good review once to a hot little number in Edinburgh who went subsequently berserk. She had fantasies above her station and liked people to think she was some superstar to the elite mostly doing four-figure bookings. Prossies want business, and good reviews are business, nothing else (I had a friend once who flogged her fanny for a while and told me, "Do you know, I get genuinely wet at the thought of being paid!")

Reviews on here are for other punters. I try to put myself in someone else's shoes and imagine what the discerning punter would want to know before deciding to book someone. Do I have something to add? A list (without the soft-porn talk) of what services she gave me might be useful, together with a link, price I paid for how long, approximate location, and how I rate her looks and attitude. Just saying what she says she offers, a long paragraph on my knob, and lots of vague adjectives are probably not only less useful for punters but more appropriate to a wankfest or prossie site. If I say she was 'great' or 'good value for money' then it's more helpful if the reader can answer the question, "compared to what?" I know that's hard sometimes and reviews come easier to some people than others, but I keep mentioning these things in case it helps new reviewers.

You could even use the reporter's cliché, the five W's. Who? What? Where? When? Why? That can usually be condensed into one sentenece. Then list factual stuff someone else should want to know. I suppose the other advantage of waiting a day or two is that it is less likely to be one's cock talking.

LL

  • Guest
I suppose the other advantage of waiting a day or two is that it is less likely to be one's cock talking.
Some of my best reviews have been written when I'm still under the effects of post-coital bliss / tristesse.  Perhaps it is my cock talking (but then he's definitely a better writer than I am :))

Offline Marmalade

Some of my best reviews have been written when I'm still under the effects of post-coital bliss / tristesse.  Perhaps it is my cock talking (but then he's definitely a better writer than I am :))
You seem to be discriminating when you're writing which is the main thing. I was thinking more of newbies that write how it was the best blow job in their life and she was the most gorgeous girl on the planet crap. They would be better waiting until they understand things like a 'sense of proportion.' You write good reviews, but a bit wordy for me. A bit like a Daily Mail column without "at this point I made my excuses and left." (You don't have a contributing chapter in Nik's book do you?)  ;)

I'm no-one to talk as I used to write essays like that on ISG. Nowadays I personally prefer the 'short' version. If I need a shag-fix this afternoon there ain't time to read a War an Peace review on each hotlisted prossie.

I admit people have different styles. Some people want a big build up. The question was when to write and not write a review. So for fluffies, it's mostly a case of please don't. For more discerning punters their style is up to them. Just a case of security and privacy that applies to almost everyone using this forum except Jimbo, who advertises the fact publicly and I guess doesn't need to worry really.

 :drinks:

pokenn

  • Guest
After reading an off topic thread I wondered when do you decide whether or not to review a punt on here and/or on AW (or elsewhere)? I tend to view the process akin to tripadvisor in that I only tend to post reviews in exceptional circumstances - ie a 1* or 5* experience. Anything in between tends to pass me by.

I take the view that if I've got nothing good (or bad) to say I say nothing at all. If it's an ok punt then I tend not to review but if I get a brilliant experience or a terrible experience I'll post a review. What informs your decision of whether to review or not? Apologies if this has been discussed previously

I would say review as often as you can. Even if it's just a couple of sentences it's still helpful.

One of the problems on UKP is that the response to reviewers is not always positive. Sarcastic and sometimes downright rude responses are going to put people off posting reviews. 

Offline LostInMackemLand

This is something I've been giving some thought to. Anonymity is an absolute must for me. While I'm extremely careful 'on punt', it wouldn't take a genius to link my AW profile to here. Obviously the name and number I give on AW aren't mine or my real number, but the link between here and there would be too much for me.

I add what I can, when I can, if a pro$$ie I've seen crops up in conversation, but I doubt I'll break my reviewing duck.

James, feel free to cut and paste this as required.

vorian

  • Guest
This is something I've been giving some thought to. Anonymity is an absolute must for me. While I'm extremely careful 'on punt', it wouldn't take a genius to link my AW profile to here. Obviously the name and number I give on AW aren't mine or my real number, but the link between here and there would be too much for me.

I add what I can, when I can, if a pro$$ie I've seen crops up in conversation, but I doubt I'll break my reviewing duck.

James, feel free to cut and paste this as required.

Your choice of course but out of interest why would you be worried about a link to your AW account. Can't see how any of it could be linked to your real identity?

bluewhale

  • Guest
This is something I've been giving some thought to. Anonymity is an absolute must for me. While I'm extremely careful 'on punt', it wouldn't take a genius to link my AW profile to here. Obviously the name and number I give on AW aren't mine or my real number, but the link between here and there would be too much for me.

I add what I can, when I can, if a pro$$ie I've seen crops up in conversation, but I doubt I'll break my reviewing duck.

James, feel free to cut and paste this as required.

I'm new on here but this would be key. I want to be anonymous both here and on AW. If I review it will be after a discrete interval so the escort can't be sure it's me in case I want to go back, and I'd be a little vague about some details

vorian

  • Guest
I'm new on here but this would be key. I want to be anonymous both here and on AW. If I review it will be after a discrete interval so the escort can't be sure it's me in case I want to go back, and I'd be a little vague about some details

Same question I guess, if you did a bad review I assume you would not go back and if it was good then why would the girl have a problem with you?

Offline LostInMackemLand

Your choice of course but out of interest why would you be worried about a link to your AW account. Can't see how any of it could be linked to your real identity?

A good question.

Let's suppose I say something disparaging on here, and a bright spark puts two and two together.

We all know about the power of the notes system on AW, and I as I only use that as opposed to agencies I could easily be blackballed.

Plus I'm a conspiracy theorist.

bluewhale

  • Guest
Same question I guess, if you did a bad review I assume you would not go back and if it was good then why would the girl have a problem with you?

Good question. If I review, I'd want to be honest and give the good, bad and average points. Sometimes there are bad points that I may be happy to put up with but others aren't. I want to be free to share them.

vorian

  • Guest
A good question.

Let's suppose I say something disparaging on here, and a bright spark puts two and two together.

We all know about the power of the notes system on AW, and I as I only use that as opposed to agencies I could easily be blackballed.

Plus I'm a conspiracy theorist.

Fair enough,  the notes system does seem to be an issue, I'm pretty sure in the unlikely event I did get a bad note,  I would just place  three AW bookings with a regular and ask them to put three greens to remove a bad note but I do understand you point of view and it doesn't stop you recommending or warning someone about a pressie who you have seen.

vorian

  • Guest
Good question. If I review, I'd want to be honest and give the good, bad and average points. Sometimes there are bad points that I may be happy to put up with but others aren't. I want to be free to share them.

Fair enough but if you are afraid to do a review then you are not free to share.

bluewhale

  • Guest
Fair enough but if you are afraid to do a review then you are not free to share.

I wouldn't be afraid to review if it's anonymous. And will if I feel I have something worthwhile to say.

Offline LostInMackemLand

Fair enough,  the notes system does seem to be an issue, I'm pretty sure in the unlikely event I did get a bad note,  I would just place  three AW bookings with a regular and ask them to put three greens to remove a bad note but I do understand you point of view and it doesn't stop you recommending or warning someone about a pressie who you have seen.

Cheers V. Not everyone will agree with my stance, but I think the beauty of this forum is it's diversity. You get people who give everything between warts and all, and people that add what they can. Obviously the touts, fluffies and white knights don't seem to add anything constructive, but perversely they do. Be it a red flag, a second thought or what not.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2014, 11:43:48 pm by LostInMackemLand »

vorian

  • Guest
I wouldn't be afraid to review if it's anonymous. And will if I feel I have something worthwhile to say.

It's a difficult balancing act for sure.

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Since joining 6 months ago, I have added a review or comment (on an existing thread) about every girl I have seen since (bar a few recent LMP additions - but that will follow). I have also added due comment on other girls who I saw prior to joining that have popped up on subsequent threads.

The only exception is Madlin Moon, on the basis I really could not top or add anything new to others reviews of her.

Having picked up numerous top tips on here since joining, I feel its only fair to share my experiences.

Offline Marmalade

Your choice of course but out of interest why would you be worried about a link to your AW account. Can't see how any of it could be linked to your real identity?

Only if someone gives too much away, either about things that, when added together, allow someone (eg a wife, who maybe also knows things lke the gaps in your diary) to put two and two together.

But the real question concerns UKP being for punters to exchange information rather than put it in the AW shop window. Vorian - I was quite surprised, given the strength and quality of your posts (which has been picked up by das sisters btw!) that you write only positive reviews, mostly 10/10s. That's your choice, although there is still the possibility that some cow might put little black marks against you one day in their AW notes cos they didn't like what you said about some non-punting related issue. Your positive feedback on AW is a protection against that only so far.

The main concern is for people who also give negative reviews on UKP (not on AW, that is near suicide unless you are made of steel or have a wish to stop using their services). Criticising anybody puts you in a firing line. But I value negative reviews. Say six punters go along to a prossie and have a vanilla missionary experience and don't try to finger her, ask for OWO even if it's on her list, and respect her disinclination for DFK: it sounds great: but it only takes one punter who is has those not unreasonable expectations for the image to shatter. I am not afraid to write things that I think will help punters even if they offend prossies.

Example: an EE I visited recently was a nice girl but her service was shite. Another punter, a newbie, said she was 'wonderful.' But have seeds of doubt been sewn? A good review is reassuring: a negative review can save someone a lot of dosh if the girl does not meet their expectations. But if she knows the review came from her AW customer then she tells her mates that you are a cunt and and it might become harder for you to get a booking with them (just as, hopefully, the poor-service prostitute finds it harder to get bookings and punters get beter service from the grils they do see.)

I know sometimes I try to include things in the review that might count as tips for the prossie to improve if she reads it, as you do. But a lot of them don't really give a shit as long as some poor cunt pays for their Buckfast.

vorian

  • Guest
Only if someone gives too much away, either about things that, when added together, allow someone (eg a wife, who maybe also knows things lke the gaps in your diary) to put two and two together.

But the real question concerns UKP being for punters to exchange information rather than put it in the AW shop window. Vorian - I was quite surprised, given the strength and quality of your posts (which has been picked up by das sisters btw!) that you write only positive reviews, mostly 10/10s. That's your choice, although there is still the possibility that some cow might put little black marks against you one day in their AW notes cos they didn't like what you said about some non-punting related issue. Your positive feedback on AW is a protection against that only so far.

The main concern is for people who also give negative reviews on UKP (not on AW, that is near suicide unless you are made of steel or have a wish to stop using their services). Criticising anybody puts you in a firing line. But I value negative reviews. Say six punters go along to a prossie and have a vanilla missionary experience and don't try to finger her, ask for OWO even if it's on her list, and respect her disinclination for DFK: it sounds great: but it only takes one punter who is has those not unreasonable expectations for the image to shatter. I am not afraid to write things that I think will help punters even if they offend prossies.

Example: an EE I visited recently was a nice girl but her service was shite. Another punter, a newbie, said she was 'wonderful.' But have seeds of doubt been sewn? A good review is reassuring: a negative review can save someone a lot of dosh if the girl does not meet their expectations. But if she knows the review came from her AW customer then she tells her mates that you are a cunt and and it might become harder for you to get a booking with them (just as, hopefully, the poor-service prostitute finds it harder to get bookings and punters get beter service from the grils they do see.)

I know sometimes I try to include things in the review that might count as tips for the prossie to improve if she reads it, as you do. But a lot of them don't really give a shit as long as some poor cunt pays for their Buckfast.

You make some very good points about negative reviews being relatively more important for information than positive ones, something that has made me think about the whole direction of the review system.

 I guess I would put myself in the regular/cautious category as I rarely take on new girls and am far happier with a small group of regulars, if I do try a new girl then lengthy research for me is the key and UKP public and PM contacts are where this often starts and finishes. This has stood me in good stead so far and I have been very happy with my punts. I understand this approach does not appeal to the more adventurous and possibly more frequent last minute guys who prefer variety and a more edgy experience,  I think this maybe a by product of being single,  being open with my friends and family about punting which I appreciate is quite rare.

Offline Marmalade


Offline smiths

I'm new on here but this would be key. I want to be anonymous both here and on AW. If I review it will be after a discrete interval so the escort can't be sure it's me in case I want to go back, and I'd be a little vague about some details

Which is a smart thing to do in my view, just say you punted with the WG recently. Nowadays i punt anonymously by only ringing WGs, all they then have is my mobile number, easily changed and my description. They can make as many notes as they like.

Unless you have to to get a punt which i know in some areas punters do, a punter doesnt need to book through A/Ws booking system and/or have any feedback to get a punt. I have none and have never knowingly had a problem booking WGs i wanted to. The system is rotten to the core. My advice to punters is use A/W as a location tool only and if you want to review WGs do so on here.

As i see it the feedback system suits the WG but isnt in the interests of punters. Obviously though punters decide for themselves what suits them.

Offline wristjob

I'm not sure I entirely get the problem.

I have booked very few punts through AW and so have correspondingly low feedback. There was only 1 occasion I needed to book, other times were just to get some nominal feedback. Anyway so 99% of my punts didn't need AW bookings and unless I plan on going back I can say what the hell I want.

That's the simple side of it. The complicated side is recently because of how things work where I live a lot of my bookings have been at parlours - and if a girl is crap I may/do plan on going back to see different girls. I did worry about this at first but have grown more confident. I will often sit on reviews for weeks maybe, or release 2-3 at a time. One might be 3 weeks old and 1 might be yesterday - and best of luck if they want to try and ID me. If they were really determined they could of course, cross that bridge...

There's always scope on reviews to fudge the detail too - certainly changing a few details and releasing the review weeks later will make it hard to ID you but needn't diminish the review. Another option is Admin did offer to post reviews for people, or nothing to stop 3-4 guys clubbing together and publishing one another's reviews

Reviews aren't the only way of contributing and I certainly wouldn't want a review where membership depended on reviews, but I think it's a shame if people don't try.

vorian

  • Guest
I'm not sure I entirely get the problem.

I have booked very few punts through AW and so have correspondingly low feedback. There was only 1 occasion I needed to book, other times were just to get some nominal feedback. Anyway so 99% of my punts didn't need AW bookings and unless I plan on going back I can say what the hell I want.

That's the simple side of it. The complicated side is recently because of how things work where I live a lot of my bookings have been at parlours - and if a girl is crap I may/do plan on going back to see different girls. I did worry about this at first but have grown more confident. I will often sit on reviews for weeks maybe, or release 2-3 at a time. One might be 3 weeks old and 1 might be yesterday - and best of luck if they want to try and ID me. If they were really determined they could of course, cross that bridge...

There's always scope on reviews to fudge the detail too - certainly changing a few details and releasing the review weeks later will make it hard to ID you but needn't diminish the review. Another option is Admin did offer to post reviews for people, or nothing to stop 3-4 guys clubbing together and publishing one another's reviews

Reviews aren't the only way of contributing and I certainly wouldn't want a review where membership depended on reviews, but I think it's a shame if people don't try.

A good point,  I would have no problem posting a review someone sent me by PM,  of course I wouldn't be able to answer any questions about it and the interaction is one of the best points about UKP reviews.

Offline Marmalade

I have booked very few punts through AW and so have correspondingly low feedback. There was only 1 occasion I needed to book, other times were just to get some nominal feedback. Anyway so 99% of my punts didn't need AW bookings and unless I plan on going back I can say what the hell I want.
Cool. It does depend on area more than some people who don't travel care to admit. I mostly just want a phone number. But there are, and have been for a while, a string of cracking prossies in Edinburgh that insist on an AW booking (usually almost as an afterthought when details have been agreed, but before they text address details). Some of these say quite openly that they will only see guys with good feedback (and I mean damn good whores, not dodgy ones). So I changed my way of working. I tell girls I don't usually leave feedback, or if I do it will just be something bland like, thanks for a nice time. That way I don't feel obliged. Secondly, I top up my own feedback occasionally by booking through AW (most girls will give feedback - never give feedback first).

Quote
Reviews aren't the only way of contributing and I certainly wouldn't want a review where membership depended on reviews, but I think it's a shame if people don't try.
I agree totally.

Offline wristjob

A good point,  I would have no problem posting a review someone sent me by PM,  of course I wouldn't be able to answer any questions about it and the interaction is one of the best points about UKP reviews.

No but you could say it wasn't yours - so what. That or the guy who's review it was could chip in and comment cos "I've seen her too". London's ok, you have 2000 reviews - several regions of the country are barely over 100.

vorian

  • Guest
No but you could say it wasn't yours - so what. That or the guy who's review it was could chip in and comment cos "I've seen her too". London's ok, you have 2000 reviews - several regions of the country are barely over 100.

Good point,  the geographical spread could be a lot better for sure.

Offline wristjob

Cool. It does depend on area more than some people who don't travel care to admit. I mostly just want a phone number. But there are, and have been for a while, a string of cracking prossies in Edinburgh that insist on an AW booking (usually almost as an afterthought when details have been agreed, but before they text address details). Some of these say quite openly that they will only see guys with good feedback (and I mean damn good whores, not dodgy ones). So I changed my way of working. I tell girls I don't usually leave feedback, or if I do it will just be something bland like, thanks for a nice time. That way I don't feel obliged. Secondly, I top up my own feedback occasionally by booking through AW (most girls will give feedback - never give feedback first).
I agree totally.

I find it amazing how the scene in each city is often so different. Leeds is mostly agencies and some indis, and all the parlours have been closed down. Sheffield is all parlours and doesn't seem to be much in the way of agencies/indis and very few touring girls from what I can tell - I guess the parlours undercut them so why not go elsewhere instead. NE is cheapo agencies I think. London has loads of great girls who are often cheaper than the north and Manchester seems to be Mecca. Oh yeah and sparsely populated areas (Wales, SW) - you're buggered.

Offline wristjob

Fair enough,  the notes system does seem to be an issue, I'm pretty sure in the unlikely event I did get a bad note,  I would just place  three AW bookings with a regular and ask them to put three greens to remove a bad note but I do understand you point of view and it doesn't stop you recommending or warning someone about a pressie who you have seen.

That's a new one - can you elaborate?

Offline Marmalade

Good point,  the geographical spread could be a lot better for sure.
I'm sure many bent prossies would welcome your offer though! Makes you a virtual mod deciding if they are genuine or not. How would it be different from guys just registering on ukp as "I_hate_AdultWork" or something equally un-AW-ish?

I suppose it could help someone whose record goes back an awfully long way. Say if Nik wanted to review a sisterhood cow. Then she'll just come gunning for you instead, setting up a Twitter in your name, registering as 'Vorian' on any site that would have her . . .

Nah . . .  :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
I find it amazing how the scene in each city is often so different. Leeds is mostly agencies and some indis, and all the parlours have been closed down. Sheffield is all parlours and doesn't seem to be much in the way of agencies/indis and very few touring girls from what I can tell - I guess the parlours undercut them so why not go elsewhere instead. NE is cheapo agencies I think. London has loads of great girls who are often cheaper than the north and Manchester seems to be Mecca. Oh yeah and sparsely populated areas (Wales, SW) - you're buggered.

Totally agree, I find it fascinating how much punting is different from one region to another.  The NE is dominated by agencies with very few indies and in the SE agencies barely exist at all outside of London. With so much money being spent on punting I do wonder why this is.

Offline wristjob

I'm sure many bent prossies would welcome your offer though! Makes you a virtual mod deciding if they are genuine or not. How would it be different from guys just registering on ukp as "I_hate_AdultWork" or something equally un-AW-ish?

I suppose it could help someone whose record goes back an awfully long way. Say if Nik wanted to review a sisterhood cow. Then she'll just come gunning for you instead, setting up a Twitter in your name, registering as 'Vorian' on any site that would have her . . .

Nah . . .  :hi:

I have no clue what any of that meant??????

vorian

  • Guest
I'm sure many bent prossies would welcome your offer though! Makes you a virtual mod deciding if they are genuine or not. How would it be different from guys just registering on ukp as "I_hate_AdultWork" or something equally un-AW-ish?

I suppose it could help someone whose record goes back an awfully long way. Say if Nik wanted to review a sisterhood cow. Then she'll just come gunning for you instead, setting up a Twitter in your name, registering as 'Vorian' on any site that would have her . . .

Nah . . .  :hi:

Ah didn't think of that,  yes you are quite right wouldn't work at all. No accountability,  zero credibility.

Offline Marmalade

That's a new one - can you elaborate?

Hahaha maybe Vorian could ask one of his wishes-they-were-banned prossies to elaborate  :lol:

It's been covered a couple of times, and it is possible for a dedicated punter to get the info but a prossie sticking her neck out a bit can do it faster if she's verified.
Quote
Client Notes allow members registered as offering escort services, to store notes about members they interact with via email or through the booking system.
To be able to make use of this feature additional criteria applies, such as having been a member for at least a month and being a fully verified member.

Here's something else that hasn't been mentioned much:
Quote
Pro$$ie: If I send a new member to another member's profile, can I still earn on the referrals?
Yes! If you regularly contribute to message boards and forums (other than UKP, where you wil be spotted), you can add to your referrals by following the example below:
Joe Blogs is looking for a size 8, 20 year old lady in Essex.  You are able to use the search facility to find anyone similar on AdultWork.com.  You should then create a referral link to place on that forum or message board to direct Joe Blogs to that profile.
This is how you do it:
To direct anyone to your profile page you would normally enter your unique code for your Profile Page which can be found here
The code isn't very difficult to work out
R = Referral (that's you and your User ID)
T = Target (that is the target profile and their User ID you wish to refer)
So, if your User ID is say 656565 and the profile you wish to send Joe Blogs to is User ID 969696, you would enter this:
External Link/Members Only
It's as simple as that - just remember to enter your User ID and the Target User ID which can be found at the bottom of the profile

Offline Marmalade

well at least we work out these things between us . . . :D  :drinks:

Offline wristjob

Ok so the point is if you didn't do the punt you dunno if it's true? Hmmm maybe, but would you know any of mine (or vice versa) are true. Certainly if someone expected me to do it they would need to have gained a bit of a history on here because I would be taking responsibility for the review.