Sugar Babies
Shemales
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Why allow non nude pics in Private Gallery?  (Read 971 times)

MrBridger

  • Guest
« on: May 15, 2015, 12:32:27 pm »
Particular gripe of mine - why the hell  should we be expected to pay to see pictures of fully clothed women? To my mind AW should have a rule that PG is only for either 'explicit' or face pics. Anything else goes in main gallery.

Probably pissing in the wind here but has anyone ever raised this with AW?
« Last Edit: May 15, 2015, 12:33:49 pm by MrBridger »

Offline Corus Boy

« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2015, 12:37:21 pm »
No because I don't pay to look at Private Galleries especially is the pictures are tagged NN, showing that they are not nude.

Simplysimon

  • Guest
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2015, 01:25:09 pm »
AW is all about raking in as much money as possible , I'm sure they permit the fake profiles to run a few more days so they can then close them down and keep even more of our cash , or am I just a cynicle old sod?

Tony Montana

  • Guest
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2015, 01:46:38 pm »
Some girls look amazing in lingerie and lace dresses.

I do think AW should show when a PG has face pics... probably the only reason why I pay for a PG

Siadwel

  • Guest
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2015, 01:56:17 pm »
I always regard a PG as as much of a gamble as an unknown, un-reviewed punt.

Been disappointed on more than one occasion, but that's the way the cookie crumbles. Win one, lose a few.

Don't think AW are about to impose anything that might hurt their cut of the PG price, whatever it is. At least they have the 'NN' flags for non-nude pics. Too many of those, and I walk on by.

Sureshot

  • Guest
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2015, 09:46:23 pm »
If you type the word "porn" into google, you'll find lots of pictures of pretty ladies wirh no clothes on. And its free :dash: :dash:

Offline Daffodil

« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2015, 11:12:30 pm »
Quote from: Tony Montana on May 15, 2015, 01:46:38 pm
Some girls look amazing in lingerie and lace dresses.

I do think AW should show when a PG has face pics... probably the only reason why I pay for a PG

Agree regarding face pics. It's the only reason I buy pgs too.

Siadwel

  • Guest
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2015, 02:43:33 pm »
Quote from: Jackson808 on May 15, 2015, 09:46:23 pm
If you type the word "porn" into google, you'll find lots of pictures of pretty ladies wirh no clothes on. And its free :dash: :dash:

But seldom, if ever, ones of the WG you're thinking of punting that day/afternoon/evening.

I always regard face pics as a bonus, but I usually like to see pics of her naked, as a taster, as insurance. I'm far more likely to book a girl if I've seen a photo of her naked. Not necessarily open-leg, axe-wound shots but certainly a standing up, full-frontal shot. Better still if she knows how to pose and doesn't just stand there like a sack of spanners.

Beats me, though, why some girls have naked pics freely available, but a PG full of 'NN' pics.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »