Cathy the famous one - Leeds

[Everhard115]

External Link/Members Only

Well reviewed here hence I took the plunge. Would keep it short:

Comms: Excellent via aw and then sms
Dressed: As requested
1 hour

Reached near sent a text. Stood outside the flat and saw a punter existing from the same flat. Got the text in as soon as exited to come in. In i went and unfortunately found her to be extremely average looking facially. Thought oh well am here now so might as well see this through. Asked if I wanted to freshen up. Bath tub was extremely dry indicating that minimal washing had happened as the previous punter left. Bit of a clean guy my end so this put me off more.

All services on AW were on offer. She made effort to get things going but I really struggled to get over the hygiene bit thinking the previous punters cum could be anywhere! Nice bj not toot deep but wet went for the doggy position first and saw a good few hair sticking from here ass not too many but still and that really put me off. From there I was thinking about a porn star I jerk off too all the time and not looking at who I was with! Cim for round 1 which she took like a champ. Asked me if i wanted massage as still have time left. Went for a massage and a BJ which resulted in cim.

Started to dress up as she started to dress up for the next punter.  All wipes no shower. As I walked out saw the next punter lurking around.
I thought long and hard this could be a neutral but for me misleading extremely photoshopped pics, very tired unattractive face, poor hygiene, not waxed ass and too much of an assembly line process made it not so much of an enjoyable experience.

Fair play to her services wise she does try so if you are after VFM type  she might do the trick but for me this was not the case.

[vw]

thanks for the review, sounds awful and running a conveyor-belt is no good if you are seeing before and after punters.

[twwb]

uh oh, best make sure she has no way of connecting this review to yourself, based off her previous reactions

thanks for the review though

[cueball]

Bloody hell, there's conveyor belts and conveyor belts 

Even the bad ones leave enough time for a quick swill and a brush of their hair.

Sounds like you're likely to bump into the next chap in the doorway 

She's famous alright, famous for ranting down your punting phone about a negative review..... I hope you've covered your tracks appropriately op... her fanboys will be reporting back to her 

Thanks for sharing though and re affirming my thoughts of avoiding this one.... the pudding club can keep this one

Note... I also suspect that there are a lot more negatives about this lass that don't hit the boards for fear of retribution.... her reviews stats don't accurately reflect imo

[DarthDingler]

I have a few suspicions about this review.

First of all I've seen Cathy a few times (including this week) and she is always really well presented so unless she's got some kind of rapid hair growing disorder I can't see that hair thing being true.

Secondly I personally hate being late so I always get to a punt at least 15 minutes early. In all the times I've seen Cathy ive never seen any other punters around nevermind leaving before me or waiting after.

And finally Everhard has only done 3 reviews and all of them are negative. That's very suspicious to me. Either he's had a really bad run of luck or there's something else going on.

There's been a lot of discussions on other reviews about Cathy's looks. Personally I think she's an attractive woman but that's always subjective. She's also openly admitted to being older than her posted age (but all girls do that). As far as the photos are concerned I beleive some are older from when she was working for an agency (they are watermarked). I think the most recent picture is probably the one with her in front of the big mirror as that's definatly in her flat. I'd say this accurately shows the body you get to play with too.

Like I said I've got my suspicions about this review but there are some fair points and some that to me sound like complete fabrication.

[cueball]

I have a few suspicions about this review.

First of all I've seen Cathy a few times (including this week) and she is always really well presented so unless she's got some kind of rapid hair growing disorder I can't see that hair thing being true.

Secondly I personally hate being late so I always get to a punt at least 15 minutes early. In all the times I've seen Cathy ive never seen any other punters around nevermind leaving before me or waiting after.

And finally Everhard has only done 3 reviews and all of them are negative. That's very suspicious to me. Either he's had a really bad run of luck or there's something else going on.

There's been a lot of discussions on other reviews about Cathy's looks. Personally I think she's an attractive woman but that's always subjective. She's also openly admitted to being older than her posted age (but all girls do that). As far as the photos are concerned I beleive some are older from when she was working for an agency (they are watermarked). I think the most recent picture is probably the one with her in front of the big mirror as that's definatly in her flat. I'd say this accurately shows the body you get to play with too.

Like I said I've got my suspicions about this review but there are some fair points and some that to me sound like complete fabrication.

Well done 

At least you'll stay in her good books and she'll not shout at you after you've defended her honour and reputation.

A cuddling reward coming your way me thinks 

Having said that, I've read the other reviews (including yours) and I've also read the meltdowns, threats and subsequent bannings that followed this nutter getting criticised.

[vw]

I have a few suspicions about this review.

First of all I've seen Cathy a few times (including this week) and she is always really well presented so unless she's got some kind of rapid hair growing disorder I can't see that hair thing being true.

Secondly I personally hate being late so I always get to a punt at least 15 minutes early. In all the times I've seen Cathy ive never seen any other punters around nevermind leaving before me or waiting after.

And finally Everhard has only done 3 reviews and all of them are negative. That's very suspicious to me. Either he's had a really bad run of luck or there's something else going on.

There's been a lot of discussions on other reviews about Cathy's looks. Personally I think she's an attractive woman but that's always subjective. She's also openly admitted to being older than her posted age (but all girls do that). As far as the photos are concerned I beleive some are older from when she was working for an agency (they are watermarked). I think the most recent picture is probably the one with her in front of the big mirror as that's definatly in her flat. I'd say this accurately shows the body you get to play with too.

Like I said I've got my suspicions about this review but there are some fair points and some that to me sound like complete fabrication.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Brazilian Martian]

Hidden Image/Members Only

 

[James999]

Sounds like she's doing back to back / conveyor belt style bookings 

[DarthDingler]

Hahaha.... Thanks for the white night complement fellas. The bottom line for me is that I've always had a good time with Cathy. Sure I've seen the other comments and reviews but that's not been my experience of her. There's loads of good reviews for her and a couple of bad ones. I take my chances in punting by weighing up the odds and for me cathy is a good punt.

We've all had bad punts form well reviewed girls though. Just because I like Cathy doesn't meen the next punter will. Like I said though my biggest concern on this review is the reviewer themselves. Only 3 reviews and all negative. Doesn't smell right to me.

[vw]

Sounds like she's doing back to back / conveyor belt style bookings 

this darth likes speaking for her.   

She said she was asked to do something she considered un-hygenic and when she refused the punter got a annoyed. She said she then made the mistake of responding to his comments after a few drinks. Cathy is an Irish Catholic (what could possibly go wrong after a few drinks??!). She regretted responding as soon as she woke up the next day but by then it was too late.

Bet he is one of the buddies tallboy2 misses   

[cueball]

I have a few suspicions about this review.

And I've got my suspicions about you.

After reading your comments on your review thread on her...
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=156233.msg1713152#msg1713152

you're either her number one ukp mole or you're the prossie herself.

Either way,, you're not to be trusted.

[James999]

And I've got my suspicions about you.

After reading your comments on your review thread on her...
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=156233.msg1713152#msg1713152

you're either her number one ukp mole or you're the prossie herself.

Either way,, you're not to be trusted.

So basically he's either the pro$$ie or her mouthpiece 

[DarthDingler]

I'm just putting over my experience of a WG I've seen a few times and enjoy seeing. Like I've said many times now not everyone has the same experience. I've had poor punts with well reviewed girls too. Just not this one.

[muffin]

While i am a newbie to this site i have neen punting over 10 years. I saw Cathy a few years ago. Facially she is a smoker and the smoke has damaged her complexion. Secondly i detected the whiff when shagging doggy. I summed her up as a parlour punt in a flat.

[cueball]

I'm just putting over my experience of a WG I've seen a few times and enjoy seeing. Like I've said many times now not everyone has the same experience. I've had poor punts with well reviewed girls too. Just not this one.

If that's the case then why don't you just take the review for what it is.... somebody else's experience.... you posting a defence/rebuttal/dis credit stinks imo

You say you've had bad punts with well reviewed lasses, so you know it's ymmv.

Plus, by your own admittance, you discuss ukp with her.

You're not to be trusted... you're her mole

[James999]

I'm just putting over my experience of a WG I've seen a few times and enjoy seeing. Like I've said many times now not everyone has the same experience.

You put over your experience in your review, here you are calling the other reviewer a liar and acting as the pro$$ies mouthpiece, trying to hijack this negative review 

She's going to be so pissed off that you have brought so much attention to this review, that's if she gets time to see it between back to back bookings 

[James999]

i detected the whiff when shagging doggy. I summed her up as a parlour punt in a flat.

What was the whiff of?

[DarthDingler]

You put over your experience in yoru review, here you are calling the other reviewer a liar and acting as the pro$$ies mouthpiece, trying to hijack this negative review 

She's going to be so pissed off that you have brought so much attention to this review, that's if she gets time to see it between back to back bookings 

If the original review is genuine then I'd have neg'd her too. But only 3 reviews and all neg's!!? Doesn't sit right with me. That's why I posted my experience. If she doesn't like my comments pushing the neg review to the top than not my problem. Remember though opinions are like arse holes, everyone has one and they are all different. I come on this to post reviews and add comments to posts that reflect my personal experience.

[vw]

If the original review is genuine then I'd have neg'd her too. But only 3 reviews and all neg's!!? Doesn't sit right with me. That's why I posted my experience. If she doesn't like my comments pushing the neg review to the top than not my problem. Remember though opinions are like arse holes, everyone has one and they are all different. I come on this to post reviews and add comments to posts that reflect my personal experience.

some posters only share negative reviews, they are the most important IMO.

you posted your experience as you are a white knight and to save her.

[DarthDingler]

you posted your experience as you are a white knight and to save her.
[/quote]

So I'm not supposed to post anything that disagrees with your opinion? I'll bow to you're superior experience then and remember to contact you before I form my own view.

[vw]

So I'm not supposed to post anything that disagrees with your opinion? I'll bow to you're superior experience then and remember to contact you before I form my own view.

why disagree with a  negative review you were not there.   

you attempts to discredit OP failed and you discredited yourself.   

[James999]

If the original review is genuine then I'd have neg'd her too. But only 3 reviews and all neg's!!? Doesn't sit right with me. That's why I posted my experience.

But unless you were at the meet she had with the client you have no experience of the meet, so to say that's not how it happened would mean you're either the pro$$ie or her mouthpiece 

[DarthDingler]

why disagree with a  negative review you were not there.   

you attempts to discredit OP failed and you discredited yourself.   

Good point....... I'm guessing you were there then which gives you the right to agree with it. Sorry I didn't realise.

You're credibility remains outstanding while mine is in tatters. 

[DarthDingler]

But unless you were at the meet she had with the client you have no experience of the meet, so to say that's not how it happened would mean you're either the pro$$ie or her mouthpiece 

All I did was express my concerns about the credibility of the original review based on my personal experience. Clearly there are a couple of posters on here who have an issue with her for whatever reason however I didn't t believe they are the only ones who can have an opinion.

[vw]

Good point....... I'm guessing you were there then which gives you the right to agree with it. Sorry I didn't realise.

You're credibility remains outstanding while mine is in tatters. 

I'm defending his right to share his experience, something wk's and fanboys don't understand and feel the need to try and discredit. 

Was tallboy2 your master or was TheEgo ?

[James999]

there are a couple of posters on here who have an issue with her for whatever reason however I didn't t believe they are the only ones who can have an opinion.

Did she tell you that / or did she tell you to say that 

It's difficult to know if you represent yourself when you speak or are doing so on her behalf 

[mrfishyfoo]

A justified negative in my book. 

As for the other stuff on this string FFS she's well know for being a flaky conveyour belt punt that can't handle critism.

Those that like her can keep her.   

[vw]

Clearly there are a couple of posters on here who have an issue with her for whatever reason

This echo's tallboy2's suicide post on uke.   

External Link/Members Only

[DarthDingler]

I'm defending his right to share his experience, something wk's and fanboys don't understand and feel the need to try and discredit. 

Was tallboy2 your master or was TheEgo ?

I won't rise to your attempts to provoke me. I've already said if it's genuine then it's shocking. I've also said that if she doesn't like the attention this post is getting them that's her problem. I'm just as entitled to have an opinion as you are and I respect anyone who disagrees with my view. But again like I've said, it's just my view based on my experience. You may not like that I enjoy her but that's your problem not mine.

[James999]

Darth, why doesn't she come on here and speak for herself, instead of you acting as her agent 

[DarthDingler]

Darth, why doesn't she come on here and speak for herself, instead of you acting as her agent 

Darth, why doesn't she come on here and speak for herself, instead of you acting as her agent 

I've no idea James999.  But just so I'm clear, I'm not supposed to give my point of view? I thought the idea of this site was for people to share their experiences to help other punters decide which girl they want to book but maybe you know better.

I'll look forwards to reading your first review when you post it. Hopefully you're experience will help me with my next punt.

[James999]

I've no idea James999.  But just so I'm clear, I'm not supposed to give my point of view?

But you were not at the meet so how can you have a point of view on it, or is it just what she's told you to say, it wouldn't be the first time you've acted as her mouthpiece on here 

[vw]

I've no idea James999.  But just so I'm clear, I'm not supposed to give my point of view? I thought the idea of this site was for people to share their experiences to help other punters decide which girl they want to book but maybe you know better.

I'll look forwards to reading your first review when you post it. Hopefully you're experience will help me with my next punt.

You attacked the review and reviewers credibility making you a white knight.

Now you are playing the cathy is a victim card and claim some have it in for her. 

You sound pahtetic

More ewok that sith

[DarthDingler]

But you were not at the meet so how can you have a point of view on it, or is it just what she's told you to say, it wouldn't be the first time you've acted as her mouthpiece on here 

I never said I was at the meet I simply gave my experience of my meets with her in a review I'm very sceptical of.

You should get yourself out there and punt hopefully you'll be able to use other punters reviews and comments to good use. If you check my reviews you'll soon realise in no one's mouthpiece. I've posted a glowing then negative review of the same WG before. If Cathy ever gives me a punt like this one I guarantee you I'll be poasting a big negative one for her too.

[DarthDingler]

You attacked the review and reviewers credibility making you a white knight.

Now you are playing the cathy is a victim card and claim some have it in for her. 

You sound pahtetic

More ewok that sith

Nope.... Trolls are pathetic I'm just a punter with an opinion.

[Podger]

The negative review is an important review.  I have had bad experience with in the past where i have had to stop punting because of psycho/stalkers.  So i feel negative reviews are important

[vw]

Nope.... Trolls are pathetic I'm just a punter with an opinion.

you don't even realise you are the troll here.   

Hidden Image/Members Only

[DarthDingler]

The negative review is an important review.  I have had bad experience with in the past where i have had to stop punting because of psycho/stalkers.  So i feel negative reviews are important

+1    as long as you can trust that source I couldn't agree more.

[Podger]

+1    as long as you can trust that source I couldn't agree more.

I dissagree, why are you defending her?

[James999]

I never said I was at the meet

So how can you possibly try to discredit his review if you were not there 

[James999]

im no one's mouthpiece.

Looks like you clearly are 

I'm posting what she said.....

She said she was asked to do something she considered un-hygenic and when she refused the punter got a annoyed. She said she then made the mistake of responding to his comments after a few drinks. Cathy is an Irish Catholic (what could possibly go wrong after a few drinks??!). She regretted responding as soon as she woke up the next day but by then it was too late.

She freely discussed her age too as she knows it's a subject that's been talked about. She's 37 and says she (like nearly all girls) lies about her age because it puts her in a different age search bracket so gets more punters that way.

Like I said I'm just posting the other side of the argument and in my experience the truth is somewhere in the middle. She doesn't know I'm posting this but personally I think she's a nice girl who provides excellent service so I wanted to balance things up a bit.

[DarthDingler]

So how can you possibly try to discredit his review if you were not there 

And how do you know it's genuine if you weren't nt there? 

If Virtualwaster had posted this review I'd be shocked and probably wouldn't have another punt with her thinking she'd gone downhill rapidly. It all comes down to trusting the reviewer. Virtualwaster has a good mix of positive and negative reviews so I'd trust him to give a fair view of a WG. This poster however only has 3 reviews and they are all negative, that makes me suspicious from the start. Plus I only saw her a few days ago and can confirm there wasn't a hair on her from the eyebrows down but the review says she's magically grown them on her arse in a couple of days!! My comments are simply my view of Cathy and I've already said if this review is genuine it's shocking but I don't believe the reviewer is genuine.

Again before all the haters jump on me this is just my opinion.

[DarthDingler]

Looks like you clearly are 

11907 comments 0 reviews from you James999. Speaks volumes in itself.

[James999]

What's that post supposed to do, make me fall silent and stop calling you out as the white knight / pro$$ie mouthpiece you clearly are 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[DarthDingler]

What's that post supposed to do, make me fall silent and stop calling you out as the white knight / pro$$ie mouthpiece you clearly are 

Just pointing out some statistics about you fella. I think it adds an appropriate level of credibility to your coments.  I hope you have a great day.

[Billy no mates]

Again before all the haters jump on me this is just my opinion.

I really think you're missing the point.

You are 100% entitled to your opinion, we can read your version of events on your reviews.
It's just when you come and voice your opinion again on this review it looks like you're white knighting.

I have reviewed a number of girls, and given positives, only for them to be given,  neutrals or negatives in other reviews. What I don't do, is post in that review reminding them about my positive or saying how they might be wrong/harsh scoring/bad day etc

That's why people are suspicious of your motives

[James999]

Just pointing out some statistics about you fella.

No need, they are clearly stated under my username,  did Cathy tell you to say that and try and deflect from the issue of you being her mouthpiece 

[DarthDingler]

I really think you're missing the point.

You are 100% entitled to your opinion, we can read your version of events on your reviews.
It's just when you come and voice your opinion again on this review it looks like you're white knighting.

I have reviewed a number of girls, and given positives, only for them to be given,  neutrals or negatives in other reviews. What I don't do, is post in that review reminding them about my positive or saying how they might be wrong/harsh scoring/bad day etc

That's why people are suspicious of your motives

I get that fella and to be honest if the reviewer was you I wouldn't even have commented because I'd trust you based on your previous reviews.  Only neg reviews and saying something I can personally confirm isn't true because I've seen her in the last few days makes me not trust the reviewer which is the only reason I defended her on this. I'm no white night as people will see from my reviews. I'd neg her in a heartbeat if I had a punt like this.

[James999]

I never said I was at the meet

So how can you say (with any validity) what you said below, you can't possibly know if she saw the clients back to back and was a bit whiffy, or are you basing that on what she told you, you seem to discuss with her her bookings and other clients 

saying something I can personally confirm isn't true