Paying more to price out undesirable clientele

[MrRiz]

First up - I've only punted once (abroad - and it was shit) but I intend to start...

I was wondering whether any of you (far more experienced punters) like the idea of paying more for the 'exclusivity factor'.

Let me explain as the two friends I've had this discussion with didn't at first understand why I would want to pay more. Essentially it is for the same reason that gentlemen's clubs charge high membership fees and certain casinos and bars charge seemingly pointless cover charges: it's just to price out the riff raff.

If one were to pay £1000 for a girl for a couple of hours, I assume that one may enjoy the mental satisfaction of believing that she's only shagging guys who can afford to pay her £500/hr rate, which prices out a lot of men.

Of course this presupposes that it's satisfying to think that your WG doesn't just sleep with anyone - which is a notion you can only take so far seeing as sex is her trade and profession - and perhaps for some people they genuinely don't regard this as a factor (maybe always using protection for everything so the decreased STD risk, which is probably negligible, isn't even a factor) - but for the rest of you, do you ever think about this?

If you were a multi-millionaire who punted, you'd presumably get the highest class WGs. But isn't there a gradation in the market for the rest of us - price doesn't seem to be discussed much and it's puzzling me.

The things which could burst my logic:

- She charges £500/hr when she can get it, but to stay busy during dry spells she lowers her fees and essentially still keeps 'busy'. (But still, the kind of men she shags will on the whole be better if she's generally expensive most of the time).
- It's a nice feeling but not worth several hundred pounds an hour, especially if you punt regularly.
- You like girls who treat you in a certain way and paying more per hour doesn't guarantee that.

Am I missing something obvious? 

[password02]

Seriously - I feel asleep after the 5th line - lot of bullocks talking

Good luck with any sensible answers

[mr small]

Maybe she is ugly or provides shit service so knows she wont last long in the general ( £100 - £140 ph ) market because she will get reviewed here
How many reviews on here for £500ph girls

Easier to find two rich idiots per week than 10 guys who will be a little more careful who they throw their money at.

How many guys are going to tell that they paid £500 - £1000 for a shit service ?

 

 

[MrRiz]

Mm interesting.

But rich clients are probably repeat clients too right? So if she's shit, she's have to be constantly on the look out for new guys. 

[mr small]

Mm interesting.

But rich clients are probably repeat clients too right? So if she's shit, she's have to be constantly on the look out for new guys. 

Not necessarily, some guys will like a regular, some will like variety, don't see salary influencing this.

[daviemac]

What a total load of bollocks you're talking here of paying £500 per hour 

Let me explain as the two friends I've had this discussion with didn't at first understand why I would want to pay more

 

but this from one of your other posts -

I reverse image searched a few girls that I like the look of and they come up on other agencies too unsurprisingly. Will see which offers the lowest rate and book them through there if I can...

Make your mind up

[rafatheira]

The riff-raff?

There's people on here who spend 30-50 k a year on punting. I'm guessing they make a hell of a lot of more money than that, and seem nice, sensible people on top of it.

Coming from someone who can afford to, and has in the past paid 300-600 quid for an hour in London and abroad (just cause I fancied the girl a lot, not cause of some weird exclusivity fetish), I can 100% say that there are girls in London for under 150 an hour who are not only 10/10 stunners but give you outstanding service on top of it. If you want to pay 6 times that for an hour for the exclusivity, may I direct you to %%%.

[smiths]

First up - I've only punted once (abroad - and it was shit) but I intend to start...

I was wondering whether any of you (far more experienced punters) like the idea of paying more for the 'exclusivity factor'.

Let me explain as the two friends I've had this discussion with didn't at first understand why I would want to pay more. Essentially it is for the same reason that gentlemen's clubs charge high membership fees and certain casinos and bars charge seemingly pointless cover charges: it's just to price out the riff raff.

If one were to pay £1000 for a girl for a couple of hours, I assume that one may enjoy the mental satisfaction of believing that she's only shagging guys who can afford to pay her £500/hr rate, which prices out a lot of men.

Of course this presupposes that it's satisfying to think that your WG doesn't just sleep with anyone - which is a notion you can only take so far seeing as sex is her trade and profession - and perhaps for some people they genuinely don't regard this as a factor (maybe always using protection for everything so the decreased STD risk, which is probably negligible, isn't even a factor) - but for the rest of you, do you ever think about this?

If you were a multi-millionaire who punted, you'd presumably get the highest class WGs. But isn't there a gradation in the market for the rest of us - price doesn't seem to be discussed much and it's puzzling me.

The things which could burst my logic:

- She charges £500/hr when she can get it, but to stay busy during dry spells she lowers her fees and essentially still keeps 'busy'. (But still, the kind of men she shags will on the whole be better if she's generally expensive most of the time).
- It's a nice feeling but not worth several hundred pounds an hour, especially if you punt regularly.
- You like girls who treat you in a certain way and paying more per hour doesn't guarantee that.

Am I missing something obvious? 

I want VFM as I see it in punting so no I wouldn't pay more than I know I have to from experience to get that. ANY WG could be getting up to anything with anyone irrespective of what she charges and unless a punter has her under 24/7 survellience its impossible to find that out for definite.

There will certainly be punters who will and do pay high rates in the hope it means the riff raff like I imagine they would view me as hasn't punted with the WG, that doesn't mean she doesn't fuck her pimp who could be a total low life though, or indeed anyone else, so there is no guarantee of her being in anyway exclusive.

Punters who are willing to pay more aren't necessarily on the whole better as you put it as that depends on the punter NOT what he pays, I am amazed anyone would think otherwise and gives an insight into how you think.

[MrRiz]

What a total load of bollocks you're talking here of paying £500 per hour   

but this from one of your other posts -

Make your mind up

OK you can dislike me if you like but at least have the decency to read my posts before writing inflammatory replies.

1. When did I say I would pay £500 an hour? It's written in the hypothetical. And my first line was that I haven't punted before (one experience excluded).

2. My other post was about booking a specific girl who is between £300 an hour and £450 an hour across multiple agencies. In that case, it makes sense to pick the cheapest rate because that's the rate that she is charging the lowest end of her customers (at least publicly) and so one cannot price out below the higher rate by paying £450 when there's clear evidence that an hour of her time is available at £300.

Have I decrypted the 'total load of bollocks' or do you still need some help?

[yorkshire123]

OK you can dislike me if you like but at least have the decency to read my posts before writing inflammatory replies.

1. When did I say I would pay £500 an hour? It's written in the hypothetical. And my first line was that I haven't punted before (one experience excluded).

2. My other post was about booking a specific girl who is between £300 an hour and £450 an hour across multiple agencies. In that case, it makes sense to pick the cheapest rate because that's the rate that she is charging the lowest end of her customers (at least publicly) and so one cannot price out below the higher rate by paying £450 when there's clear evidence that an hour of her time is available at £300.

Have I decrypted the 'total load of bollocks' or do you still need some help?

To be honest I struggled with your first post but now I know why, I live in the real world

[MrRiz]

I want VFM as I see it in punting so no I wouldn't pay more than I know I have to from experience to get that. ANY WG could be getting up to anything with anyone irrespective of what she charges and unless a punter has her under 24/7 survellience its impossible to find that out for definite.

There will certainly be punters who will and do pay high rates in the hope it means the riff raff like I imagine they would view me as hasn't punted with the WG, that doesn't mean she doesn't fuck her pimp who could be a total low life though, or indeed anyone else, so there is no guarantee of her being in anyway exclusive.

Punters who are willing to pay more aren't necessarily on the whole better as you put it as that depends on the punter NOT what he pays, I am amazed anyone would think otherwise and gives an insight into how you think.

Yeah very fair points.

And re the last point - it's just cynicism but I think most people would deep down have the same apprehensions, even if it is not as prominent a factor as it is for me.

I wouldn't regard most people on here as the type of people you'd want to avoid sharing a sexual partner with. But say there was a WG who looked pretty good but she was well below market rate - say £40/hr - wouldn't it cross your mind that she's sleeping with anyone who can pay £40 bucks? If so, I suppose my point is just the flipside of that reasoning.

(I'm being blatantly honest because I don't have to censor myself online. Of course in the real world people don't say such things publicly. Hence why people pay for first class rail travel for the 'extra leg space' and not for the absence of screaming chavs...)

[MrRiz]

The riff-raff?

There's people on here who spend 30-50 k a year on punting. I'm guessing they make a hell of a lot of more money than that, and seem nice, sensible people on top of it.

Coming from someone who can afford to, and has in the past paid 300-600 quid for an hour in London and abroad (just cause I fancied the girl a lot, not cause of some weird exclusivity fetish), I can 100% say that there are girls in London for under 150 an hour who are not only 10/10 stunners but give you outstanding service on top of it. If you want to pay 6 times that for an hour for the exclusivity, may I direct you to [banned-site-auto-censor].

Yeah see my last post above mate - I'm clearly not referring to people here as the riff raff you'd want to be wary of sharing a sexual partner with (if I was I wouldn't be posting my query on this site lol).

I suppose the point was that anyone with £X could have that girl... There could be dirty, diseased and otherwise very off-putting men using such girls - and the query I raised was, would you not want to pay more to make it such that your girl is less likely to have slept with such men?

It's not even about having more money; it could be achieved by punting less, e.g. one girl for 400 rather than two for 200 in a set period of time.

But I'm gleaning a better understanding of how people here generally view what you want from the serious replies on here so thanks to those posters. 

[foreverandever]

Clearly more cash than sense mate. Most fella's on here appear to be wage earners one way or another and look for value for cash. Personally speaking if I had the money you mentioned I would probably use it 7 or 8 times on the bird I like and not on one hit.

[MrRiz]

Clearly more cash than sense mate. Most fella's on here appear to be wage earners one way or another and look for value for cash. Personally speaking if I had the money you mentioned I would probably use it 7 or 8 times on the bird I like and not on one hit.

Mate I never referred to how much money I might have! That's truly irrelevant, especially since none is currently spent on WGs.

See my post above - it was a genuine query into your desires. But thanks for your reply: wanting 7 or 8 experiences rather than blowing it all on one hit makes perfect sense. I suppose for the people spending large sums on punting the same reasoning features.

[smiths]

Yeah very fair points.

And re the last point - it's just cynicism but I think most people would deep down have the same apprehensions, even if it is not as prominent a factor as it is for me.

I wouldn't regard most people on here as the type of people you'd want to avoid sharing a sexual partner with. But say there was a WG who looked pretty good but she was well below market rate - say £40/hr - wouldn't it cross your mind that she's sleeping with anyone who can pay £40 bucks? If so, I suppose my point is just the flipside of that reasoning.

(I'm being blatantly honest because I don't have to censor myself online. Of course in the real world people don't say such things publicly. Hence why people pay for first class rail travel for the 'extra leg space' and not for the absence of screaming chavs...)

I would punt with ANY WG I fancied if it was VFM as I see it, I have punted at many parties where the WGs are getting fucked right, left and centre by loads of punters, I am not squeamish which is a big advantage in punting.

Having money doesn't make a person better than those who don't have money as what makes a person is themselves and how they think and act.

[MrRiz]

I would punt with ANY WG I fancied if it was VFM as I see it, I have punted at many parties where the WGs are getting fucked right, left and centre by loads of punters, I am not squeamish which is a big advantage in punting.

Mm OK so I'm certainly part of the squeamish crowd, at least for now lol.

Having money doesn't make a person better than those who don't have money as what makes a person is themselves and how they think and act.

Yeah and so the good book tells us (that and much more)... but a drug addicted HIV+ hobo who may have traces of dog piss on his skin is still far more likely to muster £20 to fuck a cheap WG before she comes to fuck me than he is to afford a £200 girl right?

Or are my hypotheticals just unrealistic? In which case, I'm barking up the wrong tree.

[smiths]

Mm OK so I'm certainly part of the squeamish crowd, at least for now lol.

Yeah and so the good book tells us (that and much more)... but a drug addicted HIV+ hobo who may have traces of dog piss on his skin is still far more likely to muster £20 to fuck a cheap WG before she comes to fuck me than he is to afford a £200 girl right?

Or are my hypotheticals just unrealistic? In which case, I'm barking up the wrong tree.

Yes your barking up the wrong tree from the wrong forest in my view but that's up to you. An expensive WG could be a HIV+ woman for all you would know, or indeed any punter who got infected by her pimp. Your viewing money as a determining factor when you wont know if it IS or not, and in punting there is no way of knowing for sure what any WG could of been doing and with whom.

[MrRiz]

Yes your barking up the wrong tree from the wrong forest in my view but that's up to you. An expensive WG could be a HIV+ woman for all you would know, or indeed any punter who got infected by her pimp. Your viewing money as a determining factor when you wont know if it IS or not, and in punting there is no way of knowing for sure what any WG could of been doing and with whom.

I can't say I speak from experience like you but surely that's collapsing the obvious into vacuous doctrine.

Your viewing money as a determining factor when you wont know if it IS or not, and in punting there is no way of knowing for sure what any WG could of been doing and with whom.

Isn't this just circular?

I take extremes to illustrate the point (though a few people in this thread don't seem to be able to process that idea) but isn't it far more likely that an expensive girl doing her trade in Monaco is going to be cleaner than a cheap girl working in a run down neighbourhood in London? Plus there's the mental element that you will be aware that she's only slept with guys who can afford her - whereas with other girls, while many people will be perfectly fine like I presume most guys on this site, she is equally bookable by anyone who can afford her lower rate. This latter factor clearly doesn't figure in your thinking though, which is fair, and is what I wanted to discern from asking this question on this site.

And if that more obvious probability comparison is believable, then it is a corollary that there are gradations for girls in between the extremes.

I think we're going round in circles so I won't go on. Thanks for your contributions nonetheless. 

[smiths]

I can't say I speak from experience like you but surely that's collapsing the obvious into vacuous doctrine.

Isn't this just circular?

I take extremes to illustrate the point (though a few people in this thread don't seem to be able to process that idea) but isn't it far more likely that an expensive girl doing her trade in Monaco is going to be cleaner than a cheap girl working in a run down neighbourhood in London? Plus there's the mental element that you will be aware that she's only slept with guys who can afford her - whereas with other girls, while many people will be perfectly fine like I presume most guys on this site, she is equally bookable by anyone who can afford her lower rate. This latter factor clearly doesn't figure in your thinking though, which is fair, and is what I wanted to discern from asking this question on this site.

And if that more obvious probability comparison is believable, then it is a corollary that there are gradations for girls in between the extremes.

I think we're going round in circles so I won't go on. Thanks for your contributions nonetheless. 

I am posting my views, I am not trying to or wishing to change your views as that's up to you to do so or not as you wish. Yes we are now going round in circles as my view on this differs to yours and my view is fixed and wont be changing.

[pianodave]

My thoughts:

1. It's just a shag. I could afford £500 an hour, but it's not worth that much. I could afford £1000 for a mars bar. Even if I was a billionaire I wouldn't pay £500 for a shag because it isn't vfm. It's still just a vagina, and they are all pretty similar.
2. I don't care how many other men she is fucking, couldn't care less, don't think about it. I care about her attitude - including how easy the booking process is - and the service only.

But in theory if the "exclusivity" factor is worth it to you, go ahead. Although, you have no idea anyway - there are outcall girls charging £100 an hour who see 1 or 2 guys a week and agency girls on £200 an hour being driven around hotel to hotel without washing.

[MrRiz]

My thoughts:

1. It's just a shag. I could afford £500 an hour, but it's not worth that much. I could afford £1000 for a mars bar. Even if I was a billionaire I wouldn't pay £500 for a shag because it isn't vfm. It's still just a vagina, and they are all pretty similar.
2. I don't care how many other men she is fucking, couldn't care less, don't think about it. I care about her attitude - including how easy the booking process is - and the service only.

Thanks for this. I think you've summed up the dominant attitude crisply.

But in theory if the "exclusivity" factor is worth it to you, go ahead. Although, you have no idea anyway - there are outcall girls charging £100 an hour who see 1 or 2 guys a week and agency girls on £200 an hour being driven around hotel to hotel without washing.

I see. Yes that makes good sense.

So if this is what I want, I guess I'd be in the market for a sugar-daddy type set-up, where she'd probably have a bf or some casual ONSs at most and not much else, i.e. not fucking for money generally. Can see myself getting bored of just one girl though lol.

[Ben4454]

If you want to be the only one fucking your girl then get a girlfriend - and hope shes loyal.

[Hawkwind71]

Mr Riz, I would suggest that you read up on this stuff. Read reviews, read posts on this site. Nothing beats knowledge of the subject. Not a 100% rule but most girls with positive reviews on this site are reasonably priced, get tested for STI's regularly and give you a damn good fucking.

More importantly they are a million miles from the pro$$ie on the street giving £40 punts to drug takers. Any reading this would be offended by such an implication. The WG's will also check your reviews so you are under the spotlight too.

Finally I spend a lot of time researching, some time even chatting to WGs on my time. One experienced girl told me the £500 prossies in Westminster work in Milton Keynes etc in the week in massage parlours at £80 ph. They have their mobile phones on and as soon as they get a call, its a quick trip down to London then back to MK for the next massage. So much for your exclusive high priced punt.

[shagbambi]

There is a well known Brazilian girl that is priced at 500 an hour on exclusive agency sites.

However she sells herself for 150 an hour AW.  Kind of tells you all you need to know about the pricing of pussy, it's all in the mind of the punter and what he thinks it's worth.

[G.Raff]

There is a well known Brazilian girl that is priced at 500 an hour on exclusive agency sites.

However she sells herself for 150 an hour AW.  Kind of tells you all you need to know about the pricing of pussy, it's all in the mind of the punter and what he thinks it's worth.

+1
TBH the OP is misguided in his assumptions. There are also inherent contradictions in his theory.
If exclusivity is so important then a WG hardly the place to find it.
IMO judge a WG individually for how she looks, attitude, etc and block out of your mind who she might have seen before you.

[daviemac]

OK you can dislike me if you like but at least have the decency to read my posts before writing inflammatory replies.

1. When did I say I would pay £500 an hour? It's written in the hypothetical. And my first line was that I haven't punted before (one experience excluded).

2. My other post was about booking a specific girl who is between £300 an hour and £450 an hour across multiple agencies. In that case, it makes sense to pick the cheapest rate because that's the rate that she is charging the lowest end of her customers (at least publicly) and so one cannot price out below the higher rate by paying £450 when there's clear evidence that an hour of her time is available at £300.

Have I decrypted the 'total load of bollocks' or do you still need some help?

Yes I think I do -

Let me explain as the two friends I've had this discussion with didn't at first understand why I would want to pay more

that is a statement of fact.   

If one were to pay ...............

is the start of your hypothetical part.

It has nothing to do with whether I like or dislike you, but I do object to someone coming on here and accusing me and others like me, of being "riff raff" just because I couldn't afford the regular membership fees of a 'gentlemen's club'.

How much money you have has no relevance to what type of person you are, some of the nicest people I've met have been the ones with the least, whereas some with more money than sense are the biggest wankers.


 

[Hawkwind71]

+1
TBH the OP is misguided in his assumptions. There are also inherent contradictions in his theory.
If exclusivity is so important then a WG hardly the place to find it.
IMO judge a WG individually for how she looks, attitude, etc and block out of your mind who she might have seen before you.

My favourite sees lots of guys, tested regularly, fantastic business manner, impeccably clean and well priced. I think she is a safer bet than a more amateur girl seeing fewer guys and maybe not as careful as she should be.

[Quesadilla]

Agree entirely the OP is missing the point. There are very few if any genuinely "exclusive" WG's - those that advertise at higher prices with agencies are mostly also available elsewhere to the "riff raff" at more regular rates. I can't deny there may be some who make enough at the higher end to not have to see punters at lower rates but you can absolutely never know this for sure.

I would say your best bet for something more like exclusivity would be a sugar daddy / sugar baby arrangement where exclusivity is a condition of the agreement. Some girls genuinely don't want to be seen as prostitutes and view the Sd/SB arrangement as an acceptable alternative. For £2-5k per month I am sure you would find a decent looking student who would fit the bill.

However of course you can still not guarantee exclusivity and she may well be fucking other guys, and for someone who is a civvy I'd say theres more chance she'd be  barebacking them.

No matter what you do there are risks.  You pay your money you take your chances.

[Jimmyredcab]

OK you can dislike me if you like but at least have the decency to read my posts before writing inflammatory replies.

It is not a case of anyone not liking you but quite frankly you are talking total nonsense --------- possibly because you have never punted in this country, paying £500 an hour does not guarantee a good service.   

[GreyDave]

It is not a case of anyone not liking you but quite frankly you are talking total nonsense --------- possibly because you have never punted in this country, paying £500 an hour does not guarantee a good service.   

admin I reckon Jimmys accounts been hacked

[Andre 3000]

The whole idea of 'exclusivity' falls apart when you realise that there are also very rich "riff raff" as well. What do we do about them?

Also for me part of the turn on of punting is knowing I can pay a 20-25yr old to come to my house with no pretentious ideas as to what we'll be getting up to. Drop her knickers, suck me off and shag to completion. I've noticed the more expensive WG's love to really sell the rose tinted bullshit fantasy diary of a callgirl experience where all they're punters are well toned hunks not overweight balding account managers who they really fancy.

All I care about is is the WG fun? And will I enjoy emptying my balls in a satisfactory manner, not to feed my ego, and get one over on less well off punters.

[vw]

I guess I'd be in the market for a sugar-daddy type set-up.

Mug !  Will all end in your tears !  Boo Hoo

Maybe try External Link/Members Only

[Hawkwind71]

Seems Mr Riz went to bed at 1.30 last night and has not been on since.

Leaving us to chew the cud on his important issue.

Time to close this thread ???

[Daffodil]

My experience is that price and service do not correlate. I've had great and terrible punts at many price brackets.

In terms of "exclusivity" I understand the OP's rationale, but a) "exclusivity" doesn't bother me a jot, and b) you can never know with prossies. The same girl who is charging £500ph in an "upmarket" agency is likely also selling herself for £100ph on AW. That in addition to fucking all comers on a Saturday night in The Fox and Hound.

[Steely Dan]

It is a generalisation, but I think many of the girls who have sex a lot are better at sex.  And more sex doesn't make them dirty or make them loose.  So you may pay more for a worse experience.  Why not queue up to try one of the girls who have 40 positives from this site?

[GreyDave]

My experience is that price and service do not correlate. I've had great and terrible punts at many price brackets.

In terms of "exclusivity" I understand the OP's rationale, but a) "exclusivity" doesn't bother me a jot, and b) you can never know with prossies. The same girl who is charging £500ph in an "upmarket" agency is likely also selling herself for £100ph on AW. That in addition to fucking all comers on a Saturday night in The Fox and Hound.
[/quote

Thats how it seems to go

[password02]

There is a well known Brazilian girl that is priced at 500 an hour on exclusive agency sites.

However she sells herself for 150 an hour AW.  Kind of tells you all you need to know about the pricing of pussy, it's all in the mind of the punter and what he thinks it's worth.

+1

[password02]

In my experience there is NO correlation between higher price and better service - Live in the real world

[MrRiz]

If you want to be the only one fucking your girl then get a girlfriend - and hope shes loyal.

Yeh did that for a few years but by the end she wasn't lol...

Finally I spend a lot of time researching, some time even chatting to WGs on my time. One experienced girl told me the £500 prossies in Westminster work in Milton Keynes etc in the week in massage parlours at £80 ph. They have their mobile phones on and as soon as they get a call, its a quick trip down to London then back to MK for the next massage. So much for your exclusive high priced punt.

Yeh I suspected that that was the reason my logic wouldn't work. Thanks for confirming from experience.

Mug !  Will all end in your tears !  Boo Hoo

Maybe try External Link/Members Only

Yeah I wasn't actually going to do it... nice link though lol.

My experience is that price and service do not correlate. I've had great and terrible punts at many price brackets.

In terms of "exclusivity" I understand the OP's rationale, but a) "exclusivity" doesn't bother me a jot, and b) you can never know with prossies. The same girl who is charging £500ph in an "upmarket" agency is likely also selling herself for £100ph on AW. That in addition to fucking all comers on a Saturday night in The Fox and Hound.

This is probably the knock out reason then. Thanks, and to all the serious posters.

In my experience there is NO correlation between higher price and better service - Live in the real world

I thought you couldn't get past the fifth line?

At least I beat your prediction of no serious answers buddy.

[MrRiz]

Yes I think I do -  that is a statement of fact.     is the start of your hypothetical part.

It has nothing to do with whether I like or dislike you, but I do object to someone coming on here and accusing me and others like me, of being "riff raff" just because I couldn't afford the regular membership fees of a 'gentlemen's club'.

How much money you have has no relevance to what type of person you are, some of the nicest people I've met have been the ones with the least, whereas some with more money than sense are the biggest wankers.

You're just an idiot who can't comprehend quite basic abstract points tbh mate. I don't even think I can explain how you've failed to understand the most basic points I was making because they were in pretty plain English already. Will ignore you hereonin.

[wristjob]

If one were to pay £1000 for a girl for a couple of hours, I assume that one may enjoy the mental satisfaction of believing that she's only shagging guys who can afford to pay her £500/hr rate, which prices out a lot of men.

Of course this presupposes that it's satisfying to think that your WG doesn't just sleep with anyone - which is a notion you can only take so far seeing as sex is her trade and profession

You want to pay £250 for a girl to suck your cock and £750 for some mental satisfaction? That's a strange fetish.

I would guess that a £500/hour hooker has a day job to cover the bills between the odd customer she gets every 2 months. That and all the time she spends shagging her bricklayer boyfriend - bet that makes you feel exclusive.

[LL]

OP, I read your post and it just made me think of this Harry Enfield character - is this you?

Hidden Image/Members Only
"I am considerably richer than yow!"

[vw]

Hey Riz

Can I ask is this a religious thing ?

[Madone1]

Even the lowest rate girls on AW charge more an hour then most people make a day so don't go adding fuel to this stupid idea of price increases. And when you have a rubber on 500 pound pussy will feel the same as 80 pound an hour pussy.

And I couldn't give a fuck how many guys have fucked her on that day as long as she punts in a decent effort when I'm fucking her.

Like others on here have said if you want to be the only guy fucking her get a wife or a girlfriend.

[vw]

Even the lowest rate girls on AW charge more an hour then most people make a day so don't go adding fuel to this stupid idea of price increases. And when you have a rubber on 500 pound pussy will feel the same as 80 pound an hour pussy.

And I couldn't give a fuck how many guys have fucked her on that day as long as she punts in a decent effort when I'm fucking her.

Like others on here have said if you want to be the only guy fucking her get a wife or a girlfriend.

The only different sensation is £500 or regret for a bad punt rather than £100 of regret, that could push someone over the edge !

[LoneWolf2020]

reading between the lines of your post why dont you just see girls that don't offer the quickie service?

[vw]

reading between the lines of your post why dont you just see girls that don't offer the quickie service?

Because they (The Hooker) can still do 16 1 hour (60 mins) non quickies and get 8 hours sleep per day (Some need less), your logic is flawed !

[Hawkwind71]

Because they (The Hooker) can still do 16 1 hour (60 mins) non quickies and get 8 hours sleep per day (Some need less), your logic is flawed !

I would love to see the state of a pro$$ie after that kind of successful day. If she's any good that is and doesn't waste the one hours in idle chatter. Bet she walks like she's ridden a horse across the prairies.

[vw]

I would love to see the state of a pro$$ie after that kind of successful day. If she's any good that is and doesn't waste the one hours in idle chatter. Bet she walks like she's ridden a horse across the prairies.

Would you want to be last !

At 2 pops a punter, 30 days in a month she would need 960 condoms

[akauya]

[...]

Like others on here have said if you want to be the only guy fucking her get a wife or a girlfriend.

Even then there is no guarantee the wife/girlfriend will be fucking him only...