KazXox. Cancelled a £150 incall booking. All for asking for a mobile number

[Sparta Prada]

Thanks for sharing the review OP and commiserations for being fucked around.

Not sure why people are having a go at you.

It's only one person who is having a go at the OP.

[cueball]

Hidden Image/Members Only

£1:99 a tin at aldi at the minute.... will sell fast I think 

[puntingpumping1920]

Thanks for the review, OP
 
People in this thread having arguments about a prostitute Hidden Image/Members Only

[NightKid]

With admins permission I'd like to post some screen captures of the full adultwork e-mail exchange with KazXox.

This will put to rest any doubt that, I never said anything rude to the escort, she confirmed a booking was happy to see me and this review is genuine.

Ofc I'll black out any confidential info either from my end or KazXox so no info is openly revealed that wouldn't be otherwise.

Warning in advance, some posters, who like this escort, will see how rude she can be via e-mail. This is uncalled for just because she couldn't supply a mobile number in a readable format.

So do you still want this proof or not?

While it's obvious that many of the sensible blokes won't doubt what you've said, if I were you I'd go ahead and do that nonetheless in order to completely dispel any doubt that potential white knight twats would try and cast on you.

[vw]

With admins permission I'd like to post some screen captures of the full adultwork e-mail exchange with KazXox.

This will put to rest any doubt that, I never said anything rude to the escort, she confirmed a booking was happy to see me and this review is genuine.

Ofc I'll black out any confidential info either from my end or KazXox so no info is openly revealed that wouldn't be otherwise.

Warning in advance, some posters, who like this escort, will see how rude she can be via e-mail. This is uncalled for just because she couldn't supply a mobile number in a readable format.

So do you still want this proof or not?

Maybe as well post it.  If you could post the abuse ones too.  Just for entertainment value please.   

[mrfishyfoo]

Jeez that took me a full box of popcorn and 2 bottles of pop to get through that lot. Fuck me I've read some shite in my time.   

Sorry to hear you didn't get your end away OP. 

A justified negative in my book.

[GolfNut]

Of course not Golfie, and not the first time you've opened with that kind of statement. You react to any less than favourable review of one of your favourites......

tcm

If we're talking contradiction then tell me tcm which side of the fence you're sitting on as it's not immediately obvious 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[kaj314]

  this is still going on? I left it at post 9 

[GolfNut]

this is still going on? I left it at post 9 

Yeah it's really quite funny how people's actions contradict their arguments. Pissing myself at those making themselves looking like dicks saying one thing and acting the opposite.

[delta69]

I might as well pull up a seat 

[GolfNut]

I might as well pull up a seat 

Might join you 

[GolfNut]

If we're talking contradiction then tell me tcm which side of the fence you're sitting on as it's not immediately obvious 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

threebraincells more like 

[threechilliman]

threebraincells more like 

Touched a nerve have I?

tcm

[threechilliman]

If we're talking contradiction then tell me tcm which side of the fence you're sitting on as it's not immediately obvious 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

No contradiction fella. My earlier comment was about WK'ing, her pics are good and I reckon most guys would be attracted to her, so nothing against her whatsoever.

tcm

[Belgarion]

If we're talking contradiction then tell me tcm which side of the fence you're sitting on as it's not immediately obvious 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Not sure I see the contradiction. He commented on a nice photo and you left out the photo caption that said something along the lines of, been a while since I posted a photo.

So, that's the reason behind the comment on that photo.

You will note however that he has no tried to rubbish the review, reported it to Admin or tried to belittle the reviewer or cast aspersions as to his motives or character.

So I am not sure what the contradiction is to be honest.

[GolfNut]

No contradiction fella. My earlier comment was about WK'ing, her pics are good and I reckon most guys would be attracted to her, so nothing against her whatsoever.

tcm

Dunno if I'd be sucking up to a bad un personally! 

[GolfNut]

Touched a nerve have I?

tcm

Yeah ! HYPOCRITE is how it's spelled I think.

[Belgarion]

Dunno if I'd be sucking up to a bad un personally! 

Nah, I'm just pointing out that you dishonestly copied and edited that photo and his comment to make him look bad.

External Link/Members Only

That's the photo with all its comments and title;

"Because its been days since I've posted a picture. X"

[GolfNut]

Nah, I'm just pointing out that you dishonestly copied and edited that photo and his comment to make him look bad.

External Link/Members Only

That's the photo with all its comments and title;

"Because its been days since I've posted a picture. X"

He posted after the review so dunno how that makes me dishonest?

[stevedave]

Oh dear, yet another negative review descends into chaos due to White Knighting. It's almost like some people don't even realise they're doing it.

 

[GolfNut]

Oh dear, yet another negative review descends into chaos due to White Knighting. It's almost like some people don't even realise they're doing it.

 

Yeah Machoman on here suckupman over there. Quite amusing I think. 

[Belgarion]

He posted after the review so dunno how that makes me dishonest?

You cropped out the title of the photo which is clearly what his comment refers to.

Why did you do that?

Besides, what does his comment have to do with this review? He can still appreciate a photo and criticise the SP for poor performance

[GolfNut]

You cropped out the title of the photo which is clearly what his comment refers to.

Why did you do that?

Besides, what does his comment have to do with this review? He can still appreciate a photo and criticise the SP for poor performance

I don't suck up to bad uns.

[stevedave]

I don't understand the attack on tcm...he's commented on a advertising photo on UKE. That is exactly the point of UKE?!

He may think she's hot (she looks decent to me too), but he hasn't waded in to defend her on a bad review.

[Belgarion]

I don't understand the attack on tcm...he's commented on a advertising photo on UKE. That is exactly the point of UKE?!

He may think she's hot (she looks decent to me too), but he hasn't waded in to defend her on a bad review.

He's attacking tcm for calling him up for White Knighting.

That's really unfortunate

[Belgarion]

I don't suck up to bad uns.

The only bad un here is you to be honest. Your White Knighting is not helping your lady friend as it keeps bumping the thread.

She won't be happy with you for this you know.

[GolfNut]

He's attacking tcm for calling him up for White Knighting.

That's really unfortunate

Nah he's just just jumped on the bandwagon in typical tcm style.

A very fave of mine LucieBee had a well deserved neg last week and lo and behold WK GolfNut was nowhere to be seen other than on the side of the disappointed punter and after my suggestion he now has a free punt.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=122459.0

[GolfNut]

The only bad un here is you to be honest. Your White Knighting is not helping your lady friend as it keeps bumping the thread.

She won't be happy with you for this you know.

Yet another Hypocritical statement.

I'm not trying to defend a "Lady Friend" I am stating an "Opinion" based on a review. That's what we so here isn't it?

[Belgarion]

Yet another Hypocritical statement.

I'm not trying to defend a "Lady Friend" I am stating an "Opinion" based on a review. That's what we so here isn't it?

I'm not sure you understand the meaning of hypocrisy. On this thread you argued with another member whilst white knighting and attacking the reviewer including 2 reports to the admin for his comments.

Then, you attack tcm falsely for contributing to the thread by dishonestly posting a photo comment without context to make him look bad as well.

Not sure why you are doing this to be honest and would not like to speculate as to your motivation but it is not in keeping with the spirit of this forum especially considering you were banned for this kind of behaviour

[GolfNut]

I'm not sure you understand the meaning of hypocrisy. On this thread you argued with another member whilst white knighting and attacking the reviewer including 2 reports to the admin for his comments.

Then, you attack tcm falsely for contributing to the thread by dishonestly posting a photo comment without context to make him look bad as well.

Not sure why you are doing this to be honest and would not like to speculate as to your motivation but it is not in keeping with the spirit of this forum especially considering you were banned for this kind of behaviour

Did you read my last post before posting that drivel?

[Belgarion]

Did you read my last post before posting that drivel?

Yes I did, you did not defend Lucie. Perhaps you should have used that approach here too.

Would have saved Kaz the negative publicity.

Think first before donning your armour and lance as you have actually put the fair damsel in more distress.

[GolfNut]

Yes I did, you did not defend Lucie. Perhaps you should have used that approach here too.

Would have saved Kaz the negative publicity.

Think first before donning your armour and lance as you have actually put the fair damsel in much distress.

 

[Belgarion]

This thread reminds me of a song called Bump, bump, bump

The great thing about this site is that it allows you to formulate opinions about people on it.

Used to think your reviews were useful. I know better know 

[Ludwig]

- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking.


The circumstances of the OP's booking met the criteria for a review.

The OP's experience was negative, so he wrote a negative review.

This whore is a favourite of Golfnut's.

Golfnut twice tried to persuade Admin that the OP's post not be considered a Review in the hope that it would not be linked as a Neg to her other reviews.

Pretty straightforward really

In fact, so straightforward that even Golfnut gets it (notwithstanding his continual deflecting of course)...



Once a White Knight, always a White Knight ...

[GolfNut]

This thread reminds me of a song called Bump, bump, bump

The great thing about this site is that it allows you to formulate opinions about people on it.

Used to think your reviews were useful. I know better know 

Your call. I have absolutely no problem with that.

Interesting to see the that the email the OP was going to post as of yet have not materialised?

[GolfNut]

Yes I did, you did not defend Lucie. Perhaps you should have used that approach here too.

Would have saved Kaz the negative publicity.

Think first before donning your armour and lance as you have actually put the fair damsel in more distress.

Because I looked at the review. I think the title says it all. The OP is saying he got a bad experience for asking for a number. Do you really believe that?

[SamLP]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Belgarion]

Because I looked at the review. I think the title says it all. The OP is saying he got a bad experience for asking for a number. Do you really believe that?

That's not what he said. Even if he said that, why make it a personal crusade?

[GolfNut]

That's not what he said. Even if he said that, why make it a personal crusade?

Because you don't get blocked just for asking for a mobile number. Do I really need to spell it out?

[threechilliman]

Not sure I see the contradiction. He commented on a nice photo and you left out the photo caption that said something along the lines of, been a while since I posted a photo.

So, that's the reason behind the comment on that photo.

You will note however that he has no tried to rubbish the review, reported it to Admin or tried to belittle the reviewer or cast aspersions as to his motives or character.

So I am not sure what the contradiction is to be honest.

Precisely. I comment as I see fit.

tcm

[Belgarion]

Because you don't get blocked just for asking for a mobile number. Do I really need to spell it out?

Again, why does this concern you?

[GolfNut]

Again, why does this concern you?

FFS! 

Because this is a review site and misleading reviews mean other punters do not get the full benefit. Already seen punters making decisions based on this review have we not?

Again I thought that would be obvious.

[threechilliman]

FFS! 

Because this is a review site and misleading reviews mean other punters do not get the full benefit. Already seen punters making decisions based on this review have we not?

Again I thought that would be obvious.

Why is it misleading?

tcm

[stevedave]

You're starting to bore me now so I'm out of this thread. 

You should really start listening to your own advice, rather than digging a bigger hole for yourself 

[Belgarion]

Why is it misleading?

tcm

Just what I wanted to ask

[GolfNut]

Just what I wanted to ask

 

So where are the emails?

[GolfNut]

You should really start listening to your own advice, rather than digging a bigger hole for yourself 

I actually agree but his snidey comment needed a response.

[SamLP]

So where are the emails?

Again, trying to shift the burden of proof onto the punter!
Just because your new favourite got a negative 

[GolfNut]

Again, trying to shift the burden of proof onto the punter!
Just because your new favourite got a negative 

I was under the impression he was going to post them to put this to rest

With admins permission I'd like to post some screen captures of the full adultwork e-mail exchange with KazXox.

This will put to rest any doubt that, I never said anything rude to the escort, she confirmed a booking was happy to see me and this review is genuine.

Ofc I'll black out any confidential info either from my end or KazXox so no info is openly revealed that wouldn't be otherwise.

Warning in advance, some posters, who like this escort, will see how rude she can be via e-mail. This is uncalled for just because she couldn't supply a mobile number in a readable format.

So do you still want this proof or not?

I'm curious how asking for a mobile number can result in a barrage of abuse.

[GolfNut]

As much as you think this is about my intentions to protect a damsel in distress you are actually wrong.

For me it is about protecting the integrity of a valuable site.

- Site ethos & mission
This site puts the interests of punters (sex buyers) first. The site serves as a platform to help punters exchange info and make more informed decisions about the purchase of sexual services.