Concerned BFs/ Partners

[No None Sense]

I have got a number of PMs after leaving some reviews from obvious concerned SP's partners.
Not sure what to do sometimes.
Shall I let the SPs know about their concerned partners and reveal their IDs so that they can see what their loves are up to? or what?
What do u guys think your girls do with us on a bed?????
Get real!!!!

[professorlove]

I'll listen  Go on explain more in detail because it's a bit ambiguous at the moment, I don't fully understand what you're saying and where it's going...

[No None Sense]

I received private messages from some members here asking some Fine details about the service I received from some particular SPs.
After that those SPs  sent me angry messages and some blocked me and so on obviously because those UKP members  let them know what they knew about them.
I don't wanna ruin anyones relationship but I just posted some honest reviews.
What was I supposed to do?

[Stanford97]

Sounds like a real dilemma, what are these boyfriends/partners saying to you? Sometimes they’re just looking for threesomes, it can be really awesome fucking a chick in the mouth while her boyfriend/partner goes to work on her pussy.

[Fuzzyduck]

Is this multiple members contacting you? About the same girl or different ones?

Why do you think it's a partner? If these members are claiming to be genuine partners, then they should be outed IMO. If anyone contacted me saying they were a partner, I wouldn't give them any information and would report their PM.

My first reaction is pimp. Looking at your recent experiences, you've seen a few Brazillian girls so I'm still thinking pimp. If the people contacting you are credible members then something dodgy is going on, e.g. infatuated client pushing boundaries too far.

To answer your question, don't contact the SPs. You've been blocked anyway and you don't really know what the background is, so better to walk away and not get involved.

Since you're blocked, is there a problem with you sharing the identify of the SPs? Future reviewers then might be aware they need to tread carefully. Also, please continue to post honest reviews, they are the lifeblood of the site.

[LLPunting]

If the "fine" details you're telling these other punters you don't know are personal details shared with you in confidence by the SP then you thoroughly deserve the banning and blocking you're getting.   

If these details are more description of what services you indulged in with the girl beyond what you described in the review the question begs as to why you didn't state it in the review.  You can't have been protecting your anonymity because you outed yourself to the most likely people who would discuss it with the SP.   

Perhaps you're not describing the situation clearly enough in your broken English but at the moment you sound more like a perpetrator than a victim.   

[No None Sense]

The members who asked questions are long time members here. Asking questions like "did she kiss you? CIM? "and etc
And seemed they had a row with the SPs as they messaged me and one asked why I shared the info with the net! (That SP does not speak english at all and there is no way she can understand the reviews. It's worse than my broken English Mr LLPunting!)
The other one sent a text asked me not to call her again although we seemed to have a VERY good time together and obviously was paid for her services and she was not Brazilian.
Anyways thanks for the comments.

[massagepuntingfan]

Not sure what the complete context is here, but if you're posting a review soon after a punt, followed by added information to members questions about the SP then you are likely to give yourself away. An SP might not have a good grasp of language but she'll likely have someone close to her that does(pimp, friends, partner etc) who is capable of reading the review. Posting reviews of escorts comes with caveats - many won't like the way they are reviewed on here and it looks like its come back to haunt you. If you are to give information maybe get the member to PM you and share that way, also if a review is recent maybe leave out or change specific information that might incriminate you to the SP(i.e. change the date of the meet).

[Jonestown]

I have got a number of PMs after leaving some reviews from obvious concerned SP's partners.

Are you saying that you have received PMs from members on this forum that are the partners/pimps of SPs that you have seen and reviewed ?

[Strawberry]

How can you be sure these members are partners of the SPs?

[Hobbit]

The members who asked questions are long time members here. Asking questions like "did she kiss you? CIM? "and etc
And seemed they had a row with the SPs as they messaged me and one asked why I shared the info with the net! (That SP does not speak english at all and there is no way she can understand the reviews. It's worse than my broken English Mr LLPunting!)
The other one sent a text asked me not to call her again although we seemed to have a VERY good time together and obviously was paid for her services and she was not Brazilian.
Anyways thanks for the comments.

Hmmm, Something not right here, or maybe I am just cynical with old-age.

We punters sometimes ask for more information such as "did she kiss or swallow" et cetera. These are valid questions to ask and to be honest if people write good reviews then I would expect them to give as much information in the review about the service provided so we don't have to ask.

I very much doubt that long-time established members would go back to an SP and say "why do you do that with him and not with me"? By doing that they would be asking for trouble.

So that's why I am a little sceptical about what you are saying as to me it sounds like Bullshit!

[No None Sense]

You take it the way you want and I don't give a shit
But if you have a question about someone's experience with a SP you ask in public and don't send a private message!
quote author=Hobbit link=topic=287794.msg3000682#msg3000682 date=1605605004]
Hmmm, Something not right here, or maybe I am just cynical with old-age.

We punters sometimes ask for more information such as "did she kiss or swallow" et cetera. These are valid questions to ask and to be honest if people write good reviews then I would expect them to give as much information in the review about the service provided so we don't have to ask.

I very much doubt that long-time established members would go back to an SP and say "why do you do that with him and not with me"? By doing that they would be asking for trouble.

So that's why I am a little sceptical about what you are saying as to me it sounds like Bullshit!
[/quote]

[Hobbit]

You take it the way you want and I don't give a shit
But if you have a question about someone's experience with a SP you ask in public and don't send a private message!

I disagree. Ideally, if it's relating to a review that is very recent, then yes you can ask in public but if it's relating to an old review then it is perfectly fine to send a PM, in my opinion.

I still think your story has more holes in it than a cheese grater, so I'm still going to label it bullshit.

[Fuzzyduck]

You take it the way you want and I don't give a shit
But if you have a question about someone's experience with a SP you ask in public and don't send a private message!

Sure, so why did you reply on PM?

You still haven't answered the question about whether these members claimed to be the partners of these girls, or whether you came to that conclusion.

Also, will you share who the SPs are?

[Fuzzyduck]

I very much doubt that long-time established members would go back to an SP and say "why do you do that with him and not with me"? By doing that they would be asking for trouble.

I'm not so sure. Just because a member is well established, it doesn't mean they don't act like a dick by talking about reviews to get what they want.

[hendrix]

Hang on, you're saying:

After reviewing, you've received PMs from UKP members asking for more info about services received?

Then, you're getting messages from those WG's angry with you for sharing that information? Which means that those UKP members are telling the WG's that you've shared that info?

Where do BF's/partners come into this?

[Hobbit]

I'm not so sure. Just because a member is well established, it doesn't mean they don't act like a dick by talking about reviews to get what they want.

I guess it would depend on which SP they are talking to. I always advise against discussing UKP with any SP but I know some do and have shown reviews in the past. When it comes to sex and money, I guess people would do anything. 

[winkywanky]

I personally have been blocked from future bookings by a couple of SPs who didn't like the level of detail I gave in a review of a previous booking(s) with them.

Can I help it if I'm God's gift to women and they do allsorts with me, that others simply don't get?     

Part of me blames myself because I get to lose out, part of me blames flaky WGs. And by the way, I have little doubt that UKP members have alerted WGs about my reviews in the past, the WGs in question don't routinely frequent these boards yet suddenly they appear, have a gander and then send me a text about it  . Infact I know it for sure because occasionally a WG will tell me that so and so is a bit sweet on them and that they've contacted her about a review.

There are indeed some jealous little twats on here who would wish to put others in the shit to curry favour with their special WG, with whom they have that special relationship  . Who knows, they probably even get a discount, or perhaps extra time as their beloved WG tries extra-hard to revive their flagging dick.

I'm actually on good terms with a couple of WGs who are reviewed on here, and share the odd WhatsApp or three. But I would never ask for or expect a discount, I will review as I usually review, and I will refrain from shooting down others' reviews when their experience is less good than mine. Everyone has their own experience with a WG, and after all, these are paid encounters where in 99% of cases you 're literally seen as no different from the other 20 guys she saw this week.

So the OP's thread doesn't surprise me at all. I suspect they're not really bfs at all, they think they are, and they're the very ones who read the EAS threads avidly, like some Barbara Cartland fan. Or possibly they are pretty well the girls' pimps, and occasionally that also gets revealed here.

[Hobbit]

I personally have been blocked from future bookings by a couple of SPs who didn't like the level of detail I gave in a review of a previous booking(s) with them.

Can I help it if I'm God's gift to women and they do allsorts with me, that others simply don't get?     

Part of me blames myself because I get to lose out, part of me blames flaky WGs. And by the way, I have little doubt that UKP members have alerted WGs about my reviews in the past, the WGs in question don't routinely frequent these boards yet suddenly they appear, have a gander and then send me a text about it  . Infact I know it for sure because occasionally a WG will tell me that so and so is a bit sweet on them and that they've contacted her about a review.

There are indeed some jealous little twats on here who would wish to put others in the shit to curry favour with their special WG, with whom they have that special relationship  . Who knows, they probably even get a discount, or perhaps extra time as their beloved WG tries extra-hard to revive their flagging dick.

I'm actually on good terms with a couple of WGs who are reviewed on here, and share the odd WhatsApp or three. But I would never ask for or expect a discount, I will review as I usually review, and I will refrain from shooting down others' reviews when their experience is less good than mine. Everyone has their own experience with a WG, and after all, these are paid encounters where in 99% of cases you 're literally seen as no different from the other 20 guys she saw this week.

So the OP's thread doesn't surprise me at all. I suspect they're not really bfs at all, they think they are, and they're the very ones who read the EAS threads avidly, like some Barbara Cartland fan. Or possibly they are pretty well the girls' pimps, and occasionally that also gets revealed here.

I am not saying that he hasn't received messages from other UKP members, he possibly has. But it sounds extremely unlikely that they are their partners and boyfriends. That's where it sounds odd to me because he's not saying where he's come to that conclusion. That's why I smell bullshit.

[winkywanky]

Perhaps his refence to them being bfs was his way of being sarcastic?

Who knows, it's for the OP to say, and hopefully he shall.

[hendrix]

I personally have been blocked from future bookings by a couple of SPs who didn't like the level of detail I gave in a review of a previous booking(s) with them.

Can I help it if I'm God's gift to women and they do allsorts with me, that others simply don't get?     

Part of me blames myself because I get to lose out, part of me blames flaky WGs. And by the way, I have little doubt that UKP members have alerted WGs about my reviews in the past, the WGs in question don't routinely frequent these boards yet suddenly they appear, have a gander and then send me a text about it  . Infact I know it for sure because occasionally a WG will tell me that so and so is a bit sweet on them and that they've contacted her about a review.

There are indeed some jealous little twats on here who would wish to put others in the shit to curry favour with their special WG, with whom they have that special relationship  . Who knows, they probably even get a discount, or perhaps extra time as their beloved WG tries extra-hard to revive their flagging dick.

I'm actually on good terms with a couple of WGs who are reviewed on here, and share the odd WhatsApp or three. But I would never ask for or expect a discount, I will review as I usually review, and I will refrain from shooting down others' reviews when their experience is less good than mine. Everyone has their own experience with a WG, and after all, these are paid encounters where in 99% of cases you 're literally seen as no different from the other 20 guys she saw this week.

So the OP's thread doesn't surprise me at all. I suspect they're not really bfs at all, they think they are, and they're the very ones who read the EAS threads avidly, like some Barbara Cartland fan. Or possibly they are pretty well the girls' pimps, and occasionally that also gets revealed here.

Ah, that would make sense, assuming that's the Op's intention.

[Fuzzyduck]

Perhaps his refence to them being bfs was his way of being sarcastic?

Who knows, it's for the OP to say, and hopefully he shall.

Doubt it. He uses variants of the phrase "concerned" BFs/partners" 3 times. This suggests (again we don't know due to his reluctance to clarify) that members are making certain claims about their relationship with the SPs. Whether these claims are true or fabricated to elicit deeper intel is also unknown.

I may be wrong but I personally don't think OP is acting suspiciously; it feels like he's caught in the middle of something deeper. The implied behaviour of these "concerned partners" is what bothers me.

[winkywanky]

I do wish he'd just spill the beans, it could be the best entertainment we've had all week. And God knows we need some currently  .

[Hobbit]

I do wish he'd just spill the beans, it could be the best entertainment we've had all week. And God knows we need some currently  .

I had some good entertainment a few days ago,  Nevertheless, We can never have enough entertainment, especially during lockdown.

[king tarzan]

I disagree. Ideally, if it's relating to a review that is very recent, then yes you can ask in public but if it's relating to an old review then it is perfectly fine to send a PM, in my opinion.

I still think your story has more holes in it than a cheese grater, so I'm still going to label it bullshit.

The 3 🐅 team are on the case

John Rambo
Bruce Lee
James Bond

Fact or fiction soon will be revealed????

[Hobbit]

The 3 🐅 team are on the case

John Rambo
Bruce Lee
James Bond

Fact or fiction soon will be revealed????

Have you been smoking again?

[Mr Sinister]

 Once had a wg tell me a punter on here gave false info on her prices, she got inundated with calls, messages on it. I say If a wg does something extra for you best keep it to yourself.

[Malvolio]

All sounds a bit odd - I reckon I've had less than ten PMs since I joined here and don't see why the OP would be bombarded with queries.

If I have a question about the services a WG offers after reading a review, or if something wasn't clear in the review, I'll put my question on the review thread - that's the whole point of the forum.  The only question I would ever ask by PM is a question about the specific location of the WG, which shouldn't be shared on the forum.

[golden bull]

Defo something isn’t right. How would the SP link the OP posting on here unless she knows his username?
He couldn’t be her only customer surely?
Smells 🐟🎣🐟🐟

[Bassman]

Defo something isn’t right. How would the SP link the OP posting on here unless she knows his username?
He couldn’t be her only customer surely?
Smells 🐟🎣🐟🐟

Some just figure it out. Depends on the detail in the review, dates, locations, conversations had, sexual activity.....

I know 2 that figured mine out despite me usually waiting for a while before I review and generally not going into too much detail on the above points. The two that guessed who o was I wouldn’t think would be able to guess from my review as I’m not doing anything that 100 other people haven’t done with them.

[Heph]

Some just figure it out. Depends on the detail in the review, dates, locations, conversations had, sexual activity.....

I know 2 that figured mine out despite me usually waiting for a while before I review and generally not going into too much detail on the above points. The two that guessed who o was I wouldn’t think would be able to guess from my review as I’m not doing anything that 100 other people haven’t done with them.

Interesting, isn't it? Perhaps it's certain words or phrases that we use. I've been holding back on several prospective reviews in order to avoid such problems, and I still haven't quite yet worked out how I can fly under the radar with more-or-less-certain impunity.

[Fuzzyduck]

Interesting, isn't it? Perhaps it's certain words or phrases that we use. I've been holding back on several prospective reviews in order to avoid such problems, and I still haven't quite yet worked out how I can fly under the radar with more-or-less-certain impunity.

Rather than trying to depersonalise some of the finer elements of your review (a time consuming exercise), perhaps you need to try a totally different style? Your reviews are detailed with a reasonable amount of description and narrative, so a 10 line max review might get the bare bones info out there yet gives little away. For example, RAJEC doesn't hang around with his reviews.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=195125

On another note, it's disappointing that OP seems reluctant to answer the obvious questions his post has raised.

[Heph]

Rather than trying to depersonalise some of the finer elements of your review (a time consuming exercise), perhaps you need to try a totally different style? Your reviews are detailed with a reasonable amount of description and narrative, so a 10 line max review might get the bare bones info out there yet gives little away. For example, RAJEC doesn't hang around with his reviews.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=195125

On another note, it's disappointing that OP seems reluctant to answer the obvious questions his post has raised.

Actually, in my case, a more straightforward account, which was a reasonably faithful description of the hanky-panky, is most likely what would give me away. I personally don't enjoy reading many of the more basic, plain-speaking reviews - I'm just not interested in reading the rotation of what went in which hole and when, so it's unappealing to write in that way myself. My No1 priority is to alert fellow punteurs to any scam, slap-dash treatment or crappy standards; or, in the event all was sound, to give an overall impression of what they can expect in general terms. I appreciate it's not many people's idea of a useful style guide, but there we are.

Anyway, we shall see in due course.

[Fuzzyduck]

Actually, in my case, a more straightforward account, which was a reasonably faithful description of the hanky-panky, is most likely what would give me away. I personally don't enjoy reading many of the more basic, plain-speaking reviews - I'm just not interested in reading the rotation of what went in which hole and when, so it's unappealing to write in that way myself. My No1 priority is to alert fellow punteurs to any scam, slap-dash treatment or crappy standards; or, in the event all was sound, to give an overall impression of what they can expect in general terms. I appreciate it's not many people's idea of a useful style guide, but there we are.

Anyway, we shall see in due course.

I agree, I do think most reviewers tend to write the kinds of reviews they prefer to read themselves. I'll trust you'll find a way!

[king tarzan]

I agree, I do think most reviewers tend to write the kinds of reviews they prefer to read themselves. I'll trust you'll find a way!

Fair opinion.... Everyone has different styles...
As long as services received are covered I don't care how brief and short it is.

[bushman]

Some just figure it out. Depends on the detail in the review, dates, locations, conversations had, sexual activity.....

I know 2 that figured mine out despite me usually waiting for a while before I review and generally not going into too much detail on the above points. The two that guessed who o was I wouldn’t think would be able to guess from my review as I’m not doing anything that 100 other people haven’t done with them.

You have a fair amount of reviews to your name so if 2 figured it out that 4% of reviews.
The OP has much less and talk about multiple WG knowing who he is, which comes to a 40% hit rate. I would suggest he is careless about the info he divulge to escorts or their pimps.

[bushman]

All sounds a bit odd - I reckon I've had less than ten PMs since I joined here and don't see why the OP would be bombarded with queries.

If I have a question about the services a WG offers after reading a review, or if something wasn't clear in the review, I'll put my question on the review thread - that's the whole point of the forum.  The only question I would ever ask by PM is a question about the specific location of the WG, which shouldn't be shared on the forum.

Same here, two recommendations and a couple PM's with management.
Only one WG figured out who I was, and was annoyed I gave her a 7/10 rating and not an 8. She ended up being a regular who I would now give an 8.5.

[rndom]

This would have been said before


let admins know of the unsolicited PM


that aside

you arent a relationship counsellor its highly unlikely that the partner is really their partner
if they are then they should hash it with the provider than the customer (if you didnt bang the provider for cash another customer will as thats the service the provider provides)

that aside i doubt they can do more than send you an annoying message unless they know more about you than they should

sorry for vague answers but the post was very vague i know you dont want to throw anyone in the middle of it but at least admins should be able to help

[last_days_of_logan]

this is odd