WGs who read UKP reviews

[Maverick1138]

I was told by a WG that because I didnt like one aspect of their body feature despite leaving an overall positive review, she wouldnt see me again unless I changed the review and removed that review of her feature. This to me sounds really petty. And I sometimes worry about WGs who come on this site and read their own reviews. I suspect they are insecure. Dont mind if they get a kick out of it, but the site is designed to provide feedback - good or bad. And looks and features are subjective, what one person thinks may not be what another person feels?

What are your views on this? The type of work they are in, surely they should expect all sorts of feedback good and bad, including subjective feedback on looks?

[OakTree]

I was told by a WG that because I didnt like one aspect of their body feature despite leaving an overall positive review, she wouldnt see me again unless I changed the review and removed that review of her feature. This to me sounds really petty. And I sometimes worry about WGs who come on this site and read their own reviews. I suspect they are insecure. Dont mind if they get a kick out of it, but the site is designed to provide feedback - good or bad. And looks and features are subjective, what one person thinks may not be what another person feels?

What are your views on this? The type of work they are in, surely they should expect all sorts of feedback good and bad, including subjective feedback on looks?

I try to distance myself from the review. Leave a fair bit of time before reviewing, change a few details or at least make some things vague like wether it was a hotel or apartment.

Most importantly never discuss UKP and if she does ask about the site feign complete ignorance of the subject.

[tesla]

big question how did she know it was you that wrote the review?


advice :- don't put anything in a review that could identify you, as previous posters have said. you can change date, time, venue without altering the main element of the review i.e. the SP service

[daviemac]

I was told by a WG that because I didnt like one aspect of their body feature despite leaving an overall positive review, she wouldnt see me again unless I changed the review and removed that review of her feature. This to me sounds really petty. And I sometimes worry about WGs who come on this site and read their own reviews. I suspect they are insecure. Dont mind if they get a kick out of it, but the site is designed to provide feedback - good or bad. And looks and features are subjective, what one person thinks may not be what another person feels?

What are your views on this? The type of work they are in, surely they should expect all sorts of feedback good and bad, including subjective feedback on looks?

That's one of the consequences of a lack of discretion, why members tell escorts they are members here is beyond me, quite often a WG is able to identify the reviewer. 

It's been said countless times don't let them know you are on here. As already said leave a bit of time between the booking and the review and there's nothing wrong in changing meaningless points like the day or time. As long as the main points are a true reliction of how the booking went all's good.

[Foxtail17]

I have had an escort tell me she didn’t like being reviewed on here. ‘What about the other review sites then’ I asked.
She honestly didn’t have a clue about any others.

I have had girls say they know who I am on here, even telling me my UKP name. On both occasions they were totally wrong, even putting me 200 miles away from my home once😂

Some girls bring UKP up, I deny any knowledge of the site, but most don’t mention it at all.

[Steely Dan]

I wish more escorts would read their own review here and that of others.  And act on it.  Ok, they may be grumpy for a time. Fair enough.  I am like that at work after my review.  But if they start *acting* like those with 100+ positive reviews, then they could become legendary too.  The top girls are not ugly, but nor are they cover girls for lads mags.  It is all about service. (End-to-end service, including booking and time keeping, not just fucking).

Some get their view on how to escort from Pretty Woman or that Billie Piper show. Or they hear advice from other escorts with dusty phones.

If more got the hard truth from UKP, there would be more happy punting around here. Here is a old page on PW.  It was shared with an escorting forum.  Many didn't like things it said, but most of the best ones admitted this was indeed what many punters want. They may not want to kiss. And they are entitled to not offer this.  But it nonetheless is a service that many punters want, and one that all the escorts with 100+ positive reviews offer.
External Link/Members Only

[Bru1901]

Some girls do like reviews.

I remember reviewing one and the next time teied to book her she said she would see me because i left a positive review here

I guess she figured out who i was but as it was positive there were no issues

She was agency who went indi

[Vice Admiral]

If you put any girl's Adult Work ID into Google, the first or second link on the search results page will almost always be to UK Punting.

It wouldn't be surprising for a girl in an idle moment to do a Google search on herself and see what comes up – and UKP will then be impossible for her to miss.

I suspect therefore that more girls know about UKP than many of us probably think.  Which is why, as others have pointed out, camouflage and delay are advisable in reviewing – particularly if the reviewer is thinking of seeing again a girl about whom his comments, while generally favourable, have not been universally so.

I'm pretty sure I once got caught out in this respect, for I encountered a significant change of attitude that was otherwise difficult to explain.  I had practised both camouflage and delay in my review – but perhaps insufficiently so.

[TrampZ]

I have had an escort tell me she didn’t like being reviewed on here. ‘What about the other review sites then’ I asked.
She honestly didn’t have a clue about any others.

I don,t know about other review sites either.  Could you post some links please

[daviemac]

I don,t know about other review sites either.  Could you post some links please

11 Other punting forums
Discussion about other punting forums is not prohibited, but many are often very hostile. Other forums are also anti-punters; therefore, it is not in punters' interests to give them publicity. Posting links to other sites is prohibited, as is slagging off. Use your noodle. We are allowing links in Punting Abroad section.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

[big-al93]

I would imagine that the majority of SP's read their reviews from time to time, people tell them that they've been reviewed. I reviewed one and due to something mentioned was identified, I know this as when I next visited she asked me if I was reviewing not to mention that I recieved a particular service which was not on her list (no not BB or anything concerning, before anyone asks). I wouldn't have mentioned it anyway but that's how I knew I'd been identified. She wasn't annoyed that I had reviewed or anything and didn't bring it up until the end of the booking.

[Topgun1]

I was told by a WG that because I didnt like one aspect of their body feature despite leaving an overall positive review, she wouldnt see me again unless I changed the review and removed that review of her feature. This to me sounds really petty. And I sometimes worry about WGs who come on this site and read their own reviews. I suspect they are insecure. Dont mind if they get a kick out of it, but the site is designed to provide feedback - good or bad. And looks and features are subjective, what one person thinks may not be what another person feels?

What are your views on this? The type of work they are in, surely they should expect all sorts of feedback good and bad, including subjective feedback on looks?

Unfortunately OP this is the way of the world. What you have to remember is you’re not reviewing a: car, meal or movie yet, another person (in a sense). Even in many civvy scenarios how many times have you overheard a woman say “do I look fat in this?” and so forth. No, not all women are the same however, I imagine a woman that’s selling sex will be more prone to insecurities to say the least.

In your particular scenario I wouldn’t think too much of it. If she doesn’t want to see you again over something ‘so petty’ then move on. Plenty of other WG’s out there, who are smart enough to read their reviews and simply not give a shit. Believe me, I’ve met plenty who are very aware of this site although, intentionally don’t get involved as it only opens a can of worms for them. Even on a personal level.

The girls who ‘obsess’ over reviews tell you more about them than they do you. It does indeed display a lot of insecurity on their part and imo, it’s really quite sad. Worrying about something that is out of your control is pointless. This site is an amazing resource and helps so many SS’s.

As in any case in society… 9 out of 10 times a man will be logic orientated. Naturally, trying to look for reason and solutions. Women on the other hand act on ‘their feelings.’

For e.g.

Woman: does something stupid.

Man: “why did you that?”

Woman: “I don’t know… I just felt like it!”

Same context as in this situation has arose and many others like it I’m sure. She’s clearly ‘feeling’ down and like shit to some extent to raise the issue. On the other hand… for many…

“This is their claim to fame!”

[puntingpumping1920]

I was told by a WG that because I didnt like one aspect of their body feature despite leaving an overall positive review, she wouldnt see me again unless I changed the review and removed that review of her feature. This to me sounds really petty. And I sometimes worry about WGs who come on this site and read their own reviews. I suspect they are insecure. Dont mind if they get a kick out of it, but the site is designed to provide feedback - good or bad. And looks and features are subjective, what one person thinks may not be what another person feels?

What are your views on this? The type of work they are in, surely they should expect all sorts of feedback good and bad, including subjective feedback on looks?

 

If you want to continue to see a girl regularly don't review her
 
I don't post reviews of all my punts
 
I've seen four girls from Aprov this month, but I will only review 1 (maybe)

[big-al93]

I review the majority of mine, but if well reviewed I might wait until I've been back a couple of times, partly to double check and partly so that if they won't see me again afterwards it's less concerning. Mind you if they then see you as a repeat booking may well see you even if you do review.

[JonasG]

It's not hard to not get identified, just change a few minor details etc.

I've reviewed all my regulars and no issues with repeat visits. Only one has identified me cos I got complacent in my review but she's not bothered.

[big-al93]

It's not hard to not get identified, just change a few minor details etc.

I've reviewed all my regulars and no issues with repeat visits. Only one has identified me cos I got complacent in my review but she's not bothered.

Possibly quite a few have identified who wrote the reviews (in general, not just yours or mine), but as long as it's the truth discretion means that most won't mention it, in my example above it was only mentioned to make sure the additional service was not mentioned in a subsequent review.

[myothernameis]

If you put any girl's Adult Work ID into Google, the first or second link on the search results page will almost always be to UK Punting.

I suppose to avoid this happening, you put the escort's aw link, down as text, and not a hyperlink.  So would assume, id the escort searches for reviews on here, this review shouldnt show up

[daviemac]

I suppose to avoid this happening, you put the escort's aw link, down as text, and not a hyperlink.  So would assume, id the escort searches for reviews on here, this review shouldnt show up

Waste of time doing that, apart from a link is required in the review it would be added as a hyperlink by a mod or a helper in any case.

[myothernameis]

Waste of time doing that, apart from a link is required in the review it would be added as a hyperlink by a mod or a helper in any case.

Thanks

[itk]

I try to distance myself from the review. Leave a fair bit of time before reviewing, change a few details or at least make some things vague like wether it was a hotel or apartment.

Most importantly never discuss UKP and if she does ask about the site feign complete ignorance of the subject.

^This, every single time.

[shed]

^This, every single time.

Totally agree. Can never understand why punters mention or admit to being a member of UKP. I have never had a service provider ask if it was me who reviewed them. Just don't give any details that can identify you. Simple really.

[Submissivebbwwhore]

I don’t mind reading my reviews, and I’m more than happy with feedback on what I can do better. What I found upsetting on the negative on here was the harshness. Ok, if you think I’m 10x the size of my photos or my photos are mega old then fair dos, you’re allowed to have an opinion. But it’s when it becomes nasty and calling me names. There was absolutely no need. especially when you can’t really provide proof that he’s “wrong”.

Tbh, I didn’t know about it until a punter told me during a booking. The first few days I was more upset than sulking, but now I’m over it. Brush it off and move on. Can’t please everyone sadly.

[JonasG]

On that note, it's very tragic when a punter tells a WG about reviews they've got.

[Submissivebbwwhore]

On that note, it's very tragic when a punter tells a WG about reviews they've got.

Especially when they go on to tell them they was going to cancel because of it… luckily he enjoyed himself and left a positive review 🙄😂

[Whiteknight]

On that note, it's very tragic when a punter tells a WG about reviews they've got.

TBH, those fan boys probably hoping they can get some brownie points with the SP and have additional benefits, sad case 

[Atrueyorkie]

On that note, it's very tragic when a punter tells a WG about reviews they've got.

+1, i honestly think what runs through their brain when they do that. I think they believe they’ll unlock a new secret level of service. But instead a get a pat on the back and sent their way. Mugs.

[The Owl]

Reading reviews of your business or product is mentally risky, so that applies to escorts too. The main problem is our Brian's are more likely to respond to a negative comment far more than they are to respond to a positive comment. It's like some weird survival instinct from the past that has evolved to work in modern society now we have the internet. If you get 10 positive responses  to something but 1 negative one you're more likely to fixate on that, even though the ratio is 10 ro 1 for positive comments. To understand it, imagine being told by several people a new area you're moving to is really nice, then imagine 1 person starts telling you about some of the negative things from the are, like a local gang causing trouble or a spate of burglaries that happened recently.

Based on that, it's important to wait before posting a review, taking advantage of the 6 month time frame. If you have any concerns that a prostitute might dox you for a completely fair review of her poor service then stick to the core faults with her work that earned her a negative but change irrelevant aspects of the booking to mess with the timeline so she will find it harder to connect FatFred on AW with Dave Lightening on UKP, as an example.

Also consider if you need to review an escort if it posses a real risk. If you had a row on a forum with an escort in the past but then punted her and she was brilliant is it worth the risk of a review? You might out yourself to her, get barred from future bookings and possibly end up on one of the platforms used by escorts normally to warn of dangerous clients. However if you keep your mouth shut, enjoy the sex and she gets a good pay day with a new reg that's no hassel then everyone wins despite thinking each other was an arsehole 6 months ago.

The forum can't stop escorts reading comments made about them. Even if it goes to private some could join under different names or have their fanboys run to them with info to curry favour. If you have any concerns Intel you pass on could cause you trouble then work on how you share it.

[JonasG]

+1, i honestly think what runs through their brain when they do that. I think they believe they’ll unlock a new secret level of service. But instead a get a pat on the back and sent their way. Mugs.

TBH, those fan boys probably hoping they can get some brownie points with the SP and have additional benefits, sad case 

Yeah lol exactly. Such simp behaviour.

A few regulars have said to me about how this guy told me about a negative etc. So many of these clown guys about.

[southern punter]

I try to distance myself from the review. Leave a fair bit of time before reviewing, change a few details or at least make some things vague like wether it was a hotel or apartment.

Most importantly never discuss UKP and if she does ask about the site feign complete ignorance of the subject.

This has always been my policy, but I still had one SP identify me somehow.  I dont know how much more I could have changed or left out or made up without the review becoming too fictional to be valid here.  It's made me very cautious.  The really mad part is that it was a glowing positive and when I went back for a repeat, and got challenged about the review (feigned ignorance), everything she had done that I praised in the review as making it an excellent punt, she didnt do again.  Went from thinking she would be a new regular I would visit as often as I could afford, to never going back.

[Atrueyorkie]

Reading reviews of your business or product is mentally risky, so that applies to escorts too. The main problem is our Brian's are more likely to respond to a negative comment far more than they are to respond to a positive comment. It's like some weird survival instinct from the past that has evolved to work in modern society now we have the internet. If you get 10 positive responses  to something but 1 negative one you're more likely to fixate on that, even though the ratio is 10 ro 1 for positive comments. To understand it, imagine being told by several people a new area you're moving to is really nice, then imagine 1 person starts telling you about some of the negative things from the are, like a local gang causing trouble or a spate of burglaries that happened recently.

Based on that, it's important to wait before posting a review, taking advantage of the 6 month time frame. If you have any concerns that a prostitute might dox you for a completely fair review of her poor service then stick to the core faults with her work that earned her a negative but change irrelevant aspects of the booking to mess with the timeline so she will find it harder to connect FatFred on AW with Dave Lightening on UKP, as an example.

Also consider if you need to review an escort if it posses a real risk. If you had a row on a forum with an escort in the past but then punted her and she was brilliant is it worth the risk of a review? You might out yourself to her, get barred from future bookings and possibly end up on one of the platforms used by escorts normally to warn of dangerous clients. However if you keep your mouth shut, enjoy the sex and she gets a good pay day with a new reg that's no hassel then everyone wins despite thinking each other was an arsehole 6 months ago.

The forum can't stop escorts reading comments made about them. Even if it goes to private some could join under different names or have their fanboys run to them with info to curry favour. If you have any concerns Intel you pass on could cause you trouble then work on how you share it.

You raise some good points.

I think majority review “most” of their punts and some take the approach of not reviewing regulars. Both are fine. I know some who review once their done and others who review if they have no intention of revisiting 

I think it’s down to the individual. Reviewing in general is a risk. And agree the punter will need to decide whether or not the risk factor is okay for them to take and what can potentially happen when you hit that post button.

I can only recall my own incident. Was new, Unfortunately due to the unique service provided and mentioned it didn’t take a detective to put two and two together. Along with the review count exploding didn’t help either.

Then a text, which was the most draining experience ever.

But you learn and adapt. So whether that’s for me, not including every single detail. Just the main points. I.e facial features, physique, rating of service etc.

Timing is important. I’m unlikely to review on the same day I visit. That’s illogical to me. Give it plenty of time.

It makes me laugh when people ask, what date or the specific date/time you visit. It’s like they might as well request your passport and license too.

[Lou2019]

I don’t mind reading my reviews, and I’m more than happy with feedback on what I can do better. What I found upsetting on the negative on here was the harshness. Ok, if you think I’m 10x the size of my photos or my photos are mega old then fair dos, you’re allowed to have an opinion. But it’s when it becomes nasty and calling me names. There was absolutely no need. especially when you can’t really provide proof that he’s “wrong”.

Tbh, I didn’t know about it until a punter told me during a booking. The first few days I was more upset than sulking, but now I’m over it. Brush it off and move on. Can’t please everyone sadly.

A thick skin is a requirement of the job hun

[Kelvin Smyth]

I posted a neutral review on here for a SP I used to see fairly frequently prior to covid, but hadn't seen for a few years.

She'd put on the beef in the intervening years and I emphasised this in the review (one of the reasons she was rated neutral).

My user name on here is very similar to my adultwork one (I know this is a naive thing to do).

Anyway after the meet/review the SP emailed my adultwork account, making a sarcastic comment about the "nice" review I'd posted on this forum.

I was a little taken aback at the time, but her email could have been more cutting considering the honesty of my review. With hindsight I'm not that bothered as I was never going to meet her again anyway.

   

[JonasG]

Yeah, WGs I'm never gonna see again I usually review ASAP.

Negatives and low neutrals I usually review the day after. Never gonna see them again and all they have is a punting phone number to attribute if they do work out it's me, so not bothered.

[funfungoodguy]

WGs certainly do read reviews on here and feedback on AW. It is important to make sure these two do not match one another in the series of girls you have seen otherwise it it fairly easy for a WG to identify who you are just by the fact that your review the same series on here as you have FB for on there.

[jeanphillipe]

I had a tofft of an s.p who promised to look after me as my review appeared to have a surge in bookings.

I'm usually very careful with timings etc but rushed this one.

I was tempted but the mystery is part of the thrill for me and I havent to date seen the same s.p twice .

[billybobsmith]

Response wise, I suppose it depends on who the provider is.

There might be some who read "her fake moans were OTT" and she tones it down a little for future clients.
Others, such as a slim 19yo teen girl from say the Manchester area, may have a steady throughput of clients, and no matter how neutral or negative her reviews are here, men want to shag a fit teen girl and will keep on coming.

[guymids-72]

I've had providers ask me if I'm UKP and I've always answered honestly, denying knowledge of the site that I'm pretty sure 99% of all punters know about seems a bit pointless.

[daviemac]

I've had providers ask me if I'm UKP and I've always answered honestly, denying knowledge of the site that I'm pretty sure 99% of all punters know about seems a bit pointless.

If you think 99% of all punters are aware of or are members of this site then you are sadly mistaken.

What do you hope to gain by telling them you are a member? you have been here long enough to know that your membership of this site should not be mentioned.

As an aside you openly discussing UKP with escorts casts doubt on your reviews being a genuine account of what happened.

[Colston36]

I don’t mind reading my reviews, and I’m more than happy with feedback on what I can do better. What I found upsetting on the negative on here was the harshness. Ok, if you think I’m 10x the size of my photos or my photos are mega old then fair dos, you’re allowed to have an opinion. But it’s when it becomes nasty and calling me names. There was absolutely no need. especially when you can’t really provide proof that he’s “wrong”.

Tbh, I didn’t know about it until a punter told me during a booking. The first few days I was more upset than sulking, but now I’m over it. Brush it off and move on. Can’t please everyone sadly.

You need to know what customers think in any business or you can't improve.You also need to spot the occasional arsehole, because there are always a few, and not get upset.

[OakTree]

I've had providers ask me if I'm UKP and I've always answered honestly, denying knowledge of the site that I'm pretty sure 99% of all punters know about seems a bit pointless.

Why would they ask you that just out of the blue? It’s a bit like going into a restaurant and they start banging on about trip adviser.

Surely you must give some indication about the site and the fact you’re quite happy to tell them you’re on it leads me to believe you probably initiate the subject.

[JonasG]

Tbf to him Oak, I've had many mention the site to me unprompted, find it weird.

Not exactly like his as in are you UKP, but have you heard of this review site more specifically.

Happened just 2 weeks ago last time, but that was a mention of it not asking me.

[Fuzzyduck]

Tbf to him Oak, I've had many mention the site to me unprompted, find it weird.

Not exactly like his as in are you UKP, but have you heard of this review site more specifically.

Happened just 2 weeks ago last time, but that was a mention of it not asking me.

I've never been asked if I'm a member but a few SPs have mentioned UKP in passing, possibly on fishing expeditions. I deny any knowledge of it. Why on earth would you openly admit it to a SP? It changes the dynanic of the relationship IMO with the potential for either party to be manipulated by the other, either a simp punter coming in to bat for his beloved on here or the extortionate cunt bastard exchanging free punts for good reviews.

[MissWolf]

I don't ask if someone is a member here its pointless, they are likely to lie and if someone is going to review then me knowingif they are or aren'tmakes no difference.

However I have on a few occasions suggested that guys join here when they have told me they have had some bad experiences or are struggling to find suitable escorts or specific services and thats not to gain reviews as I've no idea if any of them ever did but to help them get a better punting experience.

[FineWine69]

I'm surprised to read at how much shady/backhanded gossip goes on, I may still be a bit green to this or at least not on the professional punting level of a lot of you, but I've never had anyone ask me about here, nor have I mentioned it in passing obviously. A real eye opener.

Aside from some inane chit-chat/banter I don't think I've ever had any sort of conversation with an SP certainly not about the industry or punters. Although I've also not had anything like what some would consider a regular, A) I can't afford to and B) there's too many out there to try to keep going back to the same one! I think the most visits I've done with the same SP is two and that was with a long period between as the second time was a plan B.

It all sounds a bit Coronation Street or Eastenders to me, 'he said she said this that or the other'- I'm allergic to drama or confrontation so maybe I just naturally manage to avoid getting involved with all of it. I've never thought of being a bit vague with my reviews as to avoid being identified, again maybe I'm just being too naive but I don't have enough going on in my personal life to be worried about getting outed or identified.

[shed]

Happened just 2 weeks ago last time, but that was a mention of it not asking me.

And what was your reply? 

[myothernameis]

Right when it comes to working girls reading reviews on ukpunting, does it really matter, that we have reviewed them, good or bad

But when it comes to the dislike of ukpunting, what's the reason for this, now I would say its not the review in its self.   But rather the comments, we provide afterwards, and maybe some of these are on the harsh side

Reviews on ukpunting, or even adult work, some will be positive or negative, so no real difference, only difference we openly talk about the escorts

[Watts.E.Dunn]

It does make me wonder just how many of the punting populace are UKP members overall?..

[tp69]

I've only had 1 girl mention a review and it's my most regular reg who I see often - she knew it was me due to an incident that happened which we've subsequently laughed about many times. Anyway all she said was "I read your review of me, it was funny, thank you" to which I replied "oh, do you read all your reviews?" and her response was "yes of course, I need to know how to get better, I like reading them". She's never mentioned reviews ever since.

For a switched on WG this site is gold dust. They could use it to improve every part of their service, but not everyone will see it the same and I imagine it can be difficult to read if the review is particularly harsh, as it's so personal, but that's par for the course.

[guymids-72]

Tbf to him Oak, I've had many mention the site to me unprompted, find it weird.

Not exactly like his as in are you UKP, but have you heard of this review site more specifically.

Happened just 2 weeks ago last time, but that was a mention of it not asking me.

Cheers JonasG
It's happened a few times. I'm just honest and say yes I'm aware.

[JonasG]

And what was your reply? 

It was just in passing from someone I was seeing for the 1st time about how someone gave her a negative on a "punter forum" years ago (checked and it was like in 2017 lol) and she thought it was harsh but I just sort of agreed and nodded and moved on.

Think she was talking about her regulars or something she'd been seeing for years and then she just mentioned the bad review she got.