Growth of fake and shite FRs on AdultWork

[Taggart]

Am I alone in finding it harder to sift out the shit FRs on AW from potentially genuine ones?   Poor grammar, spelling, and utter fluffiness being the main trait.

I am also wondering if certain people are posting FRs with absolutely awful WGs in a vain bid to drum up some business for them, such as this one: External Link/Members Only

Each to their own, to claim "without a doubt the sexiest women on adultwork".  FFS.  How many more like this are there lurking.
Maybe those that are really good and we hold a candle for dont need any more FRs?

Whatever it is, these shite FRs are bit-by-bit turning me off punting, or at least returning to the same two or three I know will satisfy me.

[dilettante]

Yep, to me they fall into these main categories -

- rubbish illiterate ones where the author can't even string 150 words together - you just think "Why did you bother, there was no need to write one." 

- ones crafted together by pimps by sticking lots of cliche phrases together, some of them are clever at it but no native English speaker would express themselves quite like that

- well-written ones but a bit stilted and old-school, eg as has been already mentioned, why say "A gentleman doesn't disclose details" when that's the whole point of doing the FR in the first place!!

- the genuine article - give a good rounded opinion with a bit of human interest and a nice turn of phrase too, sadly by far the minority.

[smiths]

Am I alone in finding it harder to sift out the shit FRs on AW from potentially genuine ones?   Poor grammar, spelling, and utter fluffiness being the main trait.

I am also wondering if certain people are posting FRs with absolutely awful WGs in a vain bid to drum up some business for them, such as this one: External Link/Members Only

Each to their own, to claim "without a doubt the sexiest women on adultwork".  FFS.  How many more like this are there lurking.
Maybe those that are really good and we hold a candle for dont need any more FRs?

Whatever it is, these shite FRs are bit-by-bit turning me off punting, or at least returning to the same two or three I know will satisfy me.

So use this site to locate recommended WGs by punters you find credible.

[dilettante]

Typical one written by a pimp - External Link/Members Only

[Roland D Hay]

Only ever believe the negative ones would be my advice!

[JV547845]

I am also wondering if certain people are posting FRs with absolutely awful WGs in a vain bid to drum up some business for them, such as this one: External Link/Members Only

That one just reads like an advert towards the end but didn't even get her price right unless she's upped them by 50%.