Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Government Minister’s secretary is a Sugar Baby getting £5k a month  (Read 4457 times)

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
A Government minister’s diary secretary is on a Sugar Daddy site earning around £5,000 a month as a Sugar Baby.
The Daily Mirror has exposed her work on the side although judging by her comments Housing Minister Dominic Raab’s 20 year old assistant ‘Lisa’ sounds very stupidly naive and indescreet.
Just hope she was paying income tax on the £60k a year she was allegedly earning on top of her salary.

External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: April 26, 2018, 12:18:21 am by Barry Shipton »

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
Missed the best bit - an extra piece to the story says you can shag her on his desk for £750! Although from the pics she doesn’t look all that so maybe it’s the surroundings you are paying for  :D

External Link/Members Only

Offline G.Raff

This made me chuckle:

“I have two rules. Rule number one is that everything is protected.

"Rule number two is that only one area is used out of the two areas that can be used.”

 :lol:

Online bhudda

he straight up offered her £750? what a mug, should have started at £100.

Offline Trenlover

he straight up offered her £750? what a mug, should have started at £100.

my guess is at £750 he wont be a "regular"  :sarcastic:

Offline magnetico

If it was a guy he would have been  named and shamed.
But it's a woman, she deserves her privacy  :dash:


Offline dfg

…now allegedly sister to a ‘major’ Channel 4 star. As yet un-named.

Offline willie loman


Offline Bangers and Gash

She looks like Fizz, off Corrie.  :(

Offline mexicola

Quite easy to figure out who she is from searching the Internet.  K.


Offline peter purves

I wonder if any of our SA members here have come across her??  :P

The woman – who we will call Lisa, not her real name – posted a string of pictures of herself on seekingarrangement.com, a controversial site that allows “sugar daddies” to make financial arrangements with “sugar babies”.
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Kev40ish

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,944
  • Likes: 22
  • Reviews: 24
I wonder if any of our SA members here have come across her??  :P

The woman – who we will call Lisa, not her real name – posted a string of pictures of herself on seekingarrangement.com, a controversial site that allows “sugar daddies” to make financial arrangements with “sugar babies”.

The problem is you speak to so many girls on SA you lose track and they start to look the same. Seeing her picture I and probably lots of other could have spoken to her.

NotThePrimeMinister

  • Guest
The journalist saw her twice. The first time in a hotel. So he shagged her?

Also, how did he know she was the PA of a minister? Did he know before booking her?

Offline claretandblue


Offline Clitheroelad

External Link/Members Only

She looks like a munter to be honest. I doubt shes working for Mr Raab anymore.

Online Kev40ish

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,944
  • Likes: 22
  • Reviews: 24
External Link/Members Only

She looks like a munter to be honest. I doubt shes working for Mr Raab anymore.

All her links to government sites are no longer available. So I doubt it very much

Online bhudda

The journalist saw her twice. The first time in a hotel. So he shagged her?

Also, how did he know she was the PA of a minister? Did he know before booking her?

I suspect the dozy cow told all her punters, and one decided to re-coup his expenses by selling the info to a newspaper - who then set up an SA account and contacted her.   

Offline Drekszter

Uh oh, busted. Apparently MI5 are investigating her now because she knows so much.

I'm sure there's other PAs out there who have some undercover jobs too. Some just leak it out/behave less discreet than others...

Offline Fuzzyduck

The journalist saw her twice. The first time in a hotel. So he shagged her?

Also, how did he know she was the PA of a minister? Did he know before booking her?

I smile every time I see the line "he made his excuses and left".

If your work is effectively paying for a free fuck, why wouldn't you? I'd consider it as digging deeper for more intel. In fact I'd demand to be paid more for effectively whoring myself out for the benefit of the paper and the truth. What a hero.

I can imagine the kinds of reporter who do this type of work have few scruples anyway. What's the worst that could happen? She calls the reporter out publicly? Unlikely to happen. I suspect she's keeping a low profile and keeping her mouth (and legs) shut.

The worrying thing about this case is why isn't MI5 already on the fucking case? Surely anyone close to people in power are routinely checked out or even monitored (not that they'd admit to it)? Or maybe not.

Offline Fuzzyduck

This made me chuckle:

“I have two rules. Rule number one is that everything is protected.

"Rule number two is that only one area is used out of the two areas that can be used.”

 :lol:

So I presume she takes it up the tradesman's happily but won't let you fuck her pussy as well? Sod that.

Offline anotherwoody69

I wonder if these PA's chat among themselves..... :D :D

When I was on SA last year I hooked up for one night with a PA to one of the more "junior" ministers for £350, and she was happy to discuss the workings of his department.

I've not been on the site for a while, but she was active a few months ago.

(She was a lot cheaper I guess as she wouldn't take it up the shitter   :angry: )

Online A Decent Fist

Quote
I smile every time I see the line "he made his excuses and left".

If your work is effectively paying for a free fuck, why wouldn't you?

Because the entire encounter is audio recorded and will be played back by his bosses and there will usually be another reporter lurking nearby with the photographer who would know if he switched off the tape to have a quick shag. If any kind of legal challenge resulted from the story all of this evidence would have to be produced and could end up being played in court. Every step of the information-gathering also has to stay with the limits of various codes of conduct.

Also, you (along with every TV drama ever and everyone else in the whole fucking world) have got it wrong about tabloid reporters. These are usually young, friendly, super-smart and straight-ahead people with wives or GFs, young families very often, and they don't screw around (or at least not on work time).

I used to be very close to that world and every time I see a sleazy, conniving, repellent snake of a reporter on EastEnders or whatever, I marvel at the writer's ignorance.

Offline willie loman

Because the entire encounter is audio recorded and will be played back by his bosses and there will usually be another reporter lurking nearby with the photographer who would know if he switched off the tape to have a quick shag. If any kind of legal challenge resulted from the story all of this evidence would have to be produced and could end up being played in court. Every step of the information-gathering also has to stay with the limits of various codes of conduct.

Also, you (along with every TV drama ever and everyone else in the whole fucking world) have got it wrong about tabloid reporters. These are usually young, friendly, super-smart and straight-ahead people with wives or GFs, young families very often, and they don't screw around (or at least not on work time).

I used to be very close to that world and every time I see a sleazy, conniving, repellent snake of a reporter on EastEnders or whatever, I marvel at the writer's ignorance.
good post, also who is going to throw away his career for a shag.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Also, you (along with every TV drama ever and everyone else in the whole fucking world) have got it wrong about tabloid reporters. These are usually young, friendly, super-smart and straight-ahead people with wives or GFs, young families very often, and they don't screw around (or at least not on work time).

I stand corrected. You're clearly closer to the current world than I am. And yes, I can believe it all has to be fully above board. I was perhaps painting a scenario based on ignorance so fair dinkum.

My personal experience of tabloid reporters is admittedly limited and based on meeting 3 people working at different papers at different times, some years ago. One was a slimy racist, one was cheating on his wife by shagging everything he could at the paper and the other was a total untrustworthy cunt. None of them fit the description you paint. They were all sharp mind and had this sense of unjustified self-importance that were somehow doing a public service. I've not met any reporters recently (I work in a different industry now) and I'm sure times have changed so I'll have to take your word for it.

Online bhudda

Because the entire encounter is audio recorded and will be played back by his bosses and there will usually be another reporter lurking nearby with the photographer who would know if he switched off the tape to have a quick shag. If any kind of legal challenge resulted from the story all of this evidence would have to be produced and could end up being played in court. Every step of the information-gathering also has to stay with the limits of various codes of conduct.

Also, you (along with every TV drama ever and everyone else in the whole fucking world) have got it wrong about tabloid reporters. These are usually young, friendly, super-smart and straight-ahead people with wives or GFs, young families very often, and they don't screw around (or at least not on work time).

I used to be very close to that world and every time I see a sleazy, conniving, repellent snake of a reporter on EastEnders or whatever, I marvel at the writer's ignorance.

Theyre such nice people they are willing to destroy peoples lives and twist the truth or just plain make things up to sell their rags

Offline Fuzzyduck

good post, also who is going to throw away his career for a shag.

Err really? Many intelligent, powerful men have got themselves in bother over a skirt. Profumo, Clinton...
One of the reporters I mentioned in my previous post said he fucked his bosses wife. Does that not count?

Offline misterali

good post, also who is going to throw away his career for a shag.
Love this. Top post of the thread. The irony is the dumb bint threw her career for a shag :wackogirl: I suppose she will be doing porn now.

I still can't get over how ugly she is in the shots taken by the newspapers compared to her profile pictures from SA. It's all witchcraft I tell you :thumbsdown:

Online bhudda

apparently her sister is one of the waitresses in first dates! I'd like to find her on SA  :P

Offline Paris69

External Link/Members Only

She looks like a munter to be honest. I doubt shes working for Mr Raab anymore.

McDonalds body... for a young lass she looks so podgy, and unfit as fuck. Wouldn't pay £50 to shag her
Banned reason: Idiot fantasist
Banned by: daviemac

JamesFD

  • Guest
Because the entire encounter is audio recorded and will be played back by his bosses and there will usually be another reporter lurking nearby with the photographer who would know if he switched off the tape to have a quick shag. If any kind of legal challenge resulted from the story all of this evidence would have to be produced and could end up being played in court. Every step of the information-gathering also has to stay with the limits of various codes of conduct.

Also, you (along with every TV drama ever and everyone else in the whole fucking world) have got it wrong about tabloid reporters. These are usually young, friendly, super-smart and straight-ahead people with wives or GFs, young families very often, and they don't screw around (or at least not on work time).

I used to be very close to that world and every time I see a sleazy, conniving, repellent snake of a reporter on EastEnders or whatever, I marvel at the writer's ignorance.
You mean like the scummy fuckers who gave hope to a dead girl's parents when they hacked into her mobile phone voicemails & deleted them to make space for new ones they wanted to download?. Or the Fake Sheik? He was a real "straight-ahead" guy.

Offline Paris69

News readers, tabloid hacks et al actually believe that they are 'journalists' seeking truth and breaking stories that'll change lives as they unveil wickedness/deceit etc etc..
In reality they are shallow, headline seekers who 'write' biased garbage for a press that seeks sensationalism over fact.
Banned reason: Idiot fantasist
Banned by: daviemac

Offline willie loman

Err really? Many intelligent, powerful men have got themselves in bother over a skirt. Profumo, Clinton...
One of the reporters I mentioned in my previous post said he fucked his bosses wife. Does that not count?

Fair point, but the majority of people important or nonentities like myself, make a mature risk v reward assessment.

Online A Decent Fist

Quote
You mean like the scummy fuckers who gave hope to a dead girl's parents when they hacked into her mobile phone voicemails & deleted them to make space for new ones they wanted to download?.

Never happened. Nick Davies, the Guardian reporter whose story to that effect led directly to the closure of the News of the World admitted he got it wrong a long time after the event. This admission was buried on an inside page of course.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Fair point, but the majority of people important or nonentities like myself, make a mature risk v reward assessment.

I'm not so sure. I don't think importance is the main driver, though there is a certain arrogance that goes with importance (or perceived self-importance). Like you say, I think most people make sensible risk assessments in this game (e.g. when choosing a new SP) but when you've got the lust (i.e. cock driving, brain in neutral) then all manner of bloke (Presidents or nonentities like us both) can make poor decisions that might threaten the status quo in their lives. I've seen normal guys with lovely wives and families just piss it all away because they've chased some young thing. You talk to them and they know they shouldn't do it. But they still do.

The difference in this scenario is that I think the reporter would probably have his game head on - he is there to work rather than being in lust - so less likely to slip up. Doesn't it mean it couldn't happen or hasn't happened in the past.

Offline Steve2

apparently her sister is one of the waitresses in first dates! I'd like to find her on SA  :P

This one?

External Link/Members Only

Offline Steve2

The journalist saw her twice. The first time in a hotel. So he shagged her?


If we were journalists, can you imagine any of us making our excuses and leaving , especially as our boss had given us £750 to get the "evidence". It would have taken most of the night and

I'd have probably ordered room service too  :lol: :lol: :lol:


Online bhudda

If we were journalists, can you imagine any of us making our excuses and leaving , especially as our boss had given us £750 to get the "evidence". It would have taken most of the night and

I'd have probably ordered room service too  :lol: :lol: :lol:

Id have offered her £150 and kept the rest for her sister

Offline Jerboa

So a average looking ginger bird expects £3k-£5k a month! That's insane.  :wackogirl:

Offline Thecunninglinguist

good post, also who is going to throw away his career for a shag.
Thousands have!