Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: EnglishRosie - Euston  (Read 1647 times)


12 review(s) for HotHollyEnglish (7 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline oinki

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Booking: 1 hr @ £120 agreed initially but rearranged to 30 minutes @ £80

Looks: 3.5/5, someone mentioned Riley Reid, the body yes, but not the face. She has more of a Katherine Ryanesque face than cute /plump face of Riley Reid.

Body: The body is very petite, if I remember right she listed herself at 5.1which seems accurate. She has long hair, dyed dark brown / black. For the type of body she had I was looking forward to penetrate and see how she rides. A cup perky tits.

Communication: Pre arranged over UKE about 5 days in advance for a morning booking at Euston hotel. In the end we started about 15 minutes later than agreed.

Location: Safe, hotel room, double bed.

Services had:

DFK - very passionate with tongue. This was great, kissing passionately occassionally. I think it was the fact that she had a small mouth so you could feel all of her tongue reaching into my mouth.

OWO- OK, she didnt vary much and sucked on it gently mostly. Enough saliva to make the cock wet and occassionally licked balls.

Reverse oral (69) - was her first for the day, it was fresh, and very lickable sweet pussy - I enjoyed it. Her labia minora was not big nor inwards just protruding slightly.

No Penetration (protected) - Here is why this is negative. No penetration had because she had misplaced or run out of condoms. When this was realised we had maybe already spent 20 minutes of our time and a further 5min looking for her packages. She offered to run out to the shops to get some, but I was not too keen on this given that i only had limited time in the morning and we had already started 15 minutes later. I decided to just finish off with oral and cut the time short to 30 minutes. A good service provider would have given back a bit more of the fee in my opinion as the Main course so to say could not be performed. Running out of condoms is very unprofessional / amateur like.

CIM: Suck to completion without hands, but she ran quickly to the toilet to spit it out. No sucking til dry.

Demeanour throughout - very chatty, and friendly but definetely not afraid to voice her opinion. She got a bit flustered / annoyed when she couldnt find her condoms which killed the mood hence the cutting time short.

Nonetheless, not having tools of the trade for an appointment is an automatic negative.

Interested to hear how others would have handled this situation (first for me)!

mcgee121

  • Guest
I think this neg is harsh it reads more like a neutral to me.  I always have a few condoms on me so I wouldn't encounter this problem.

Offline puntingpumping1920

I think this neg is harsh it reads more like a neutral to me.  I always have a few condoms on me so I wouldn't encounter this problem.

 
I would give a negative too, its very unprofessional from the whore
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

SaneOnes

  • Guest

 
I would give a negative too, its very unprofessional from the whore

+1

Offline Link7

Negative is justified. Come on, its an escort booking. No condoms?? Does a builder turn up for work without his toolbox? Ridiculous.

You handled it well. What else could you do but try to make the best of a bad situation? You cut the time in half, ideally she would've agreed to cutting the price in half (or perhaps you could've suggested that), given that it was she who had let you down. But then again, at that point, you've just realised you're not getting a shag, you aren't looking for an argument as well. Getting £40 back and getting on with it is OK.

Given what had happened, she should've given you the BJ of your life, to try and make it up to you a little. Disappointing that she didn't even wholeheartedly commit to sucking you empty (especially when other reviews sugggest she has done for other punters, who had sex as well!).

An unlucky day at the office pal, better luck next time!  :hi:

Offline Thepacifist

It's not the punters job to bring condoms. No excuses for a WG to run out of them. I would give a neg also.

Offline puntingpumping1920

 She most likely didn't want penetrative sex and said there is no condoms. 

 Or maybe
 
She must be green, or she open to bareback
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Online Cunning Punt

Blimey. As quickly as this newbie's star shot up, it's crashed back down again - 2negs and 1 neutral in a single day after a couple of positive reviews caused a bit of a frenzy.
Some balance has been added, so thanks to those who've penned reviews.

That's the second review today that's mentioned she did not have any condoms, which is unforgiveable for a prossie.
However, as has been said, it is always advisable to take condoms just in case, but no it isn't our job.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2017, 12:29:19 am by Cunning Punt »

Offline Link7

She most likely didn't want penetrative sex and said there is no condoms. 

Good point, this is possible. A girl abroad once declined my request for round 2, by claiming she was running out of condoms so had to limit each punter to 1 only. A well-known trick of the trade.

Then again, inexperienced girl, seeing a lot of men in short space of time, it's possible she just really is that disorganised. But if the OP was first punter of the day, seems less likely. How did she not realise she'd run out the evening before, or that morning?  :unknown:

Offline LLPunting

It used to be that wgs wouldn't trust punter condoms because some sick fucks would tamper with them either to split for a bareback or leak to transfer fluids and infections.

OP, if you saw her am Sunday then she played us both for fools with the condom scam. Which would suggest her default behaviour is to inconsiderately exploit.  See my review for further evidence of said trait.

She seemed quite awestruck about how much she was earning.  Said something about hoping to earn 15 grand in a few months.  To her credit she said she wasn't a machine working back to back.

Put this all together with a gobby Manc and the chances of this girl being a quality SP are as slim as her voting Labour next time round.

Punters be warned.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2017, 01:23:49 am by LLPunting »

Offline Belgarion

Not having condoms is highly unprofessional and a negative is well deserved.

James999

  • Guest
I think this neg is harsh it reads more like a neutral to me. 


Total bollocks, it was an exchange of sex for cash, she couldn't provide the sex  :thumbsdown:

Offline claretandblue

Run out of condoms :wackogirl: what a joker