Not a single SP has replied back! Anyone else having the same issue?

[Crackanut]

Is anyone else having issues with availability at the moment? I've messaged around 10 SP about booking them on the weekend and not a single one has replied back and it's been more than 24 hours now.

Really interested to see if others are having a similar experience. Hardly anyone of the 45+ girls on my AW HL are even showing green.

Normally in that time frame I've had like 80% of them reply back.

Just weird.

[TP84]

Is anyone else having issues with availability at the moment? I've messaged around 10 SP about booking them on the weekend and not a single one has replied back and it's been more than 24 hours now.

Really interested to see if others are having a similar experience. Hardly anyone of the 45+ girls on my AW HL are even showing green.

Normally in that time frame I've had like 80% of them reply back.

Just weird.

Yes, i even had to text/call my self to check my phone was working 

[pantywetter]

The same.  Trying to avoid Diva Escorts as the service is shite, but dealing with indies on AW is painful for decent reasons.

Sad times for our hobby!

[Crackanut]

It's absolutely mental. Is punting just dying a death. I don't get a chance to punt much anymore but before I was a member on here and ironically punted a lot more this was never a problem.

Just texted another SP and again no response. Lol.

[puntingking]

That's weird. Me too.
I even downloaded that app that all the wgs seem to have (I can't remember the name of it now) to see if I was blacklisted for being a timewaster 
But no. All appears normal.
If nothing changes it does seem I would have no choice but stick to the me and you spa place in South Woodford. 

But I won't give up just yet. Thanks for letting me know that it ain't just me. 

[lillythesavage]

Does nobody just try calling the number given?

[winkywanky]

I have no idea whether there are less WGs than there used to be (pre-Brexit/pre-Covid?) but if you are finding it so hard to get a booking then bascially demand is exceeding supply.

[oinki]

I have always found London punting during the weekend a bit of a desert.

[Fuzzyduck]

Is anyone else having issues with availability at the moment? I've messaged around 10 SP about booking them on the weekend and not a single one has replied back and it's been more than 24 hours now.

Really interested to see if others are having a similar experience. Hardly anyone of the 45+ girls on my AW HL are even showing green.

Normally in that time frame I've had like 80% of them reply back.

Just weird.

You're not alone. School holidays, many are going on on holiday themselves (because they can) and a smaller pool generally.
I'm struggling to find someone new to see but 3 or 4 of my go-to fucks are around at the moment so I'm not expecting to have a problem scratching the itch over the next few days.

As oinki said, weekends are pretty poor, particularly for indies. You're more reliant on agencies or the likes of HOD.

[Crockers]

I like to have a pool of regs with the odd newbie. This way, I always a go to.

I've got a meeting arranged with a reg next week. However another reg is on a month's holiday. Another one is getting her tits done. Another one is taking a break. One has done a runner for scamming others. One only works now and then.

Saw a newbie last week, who I'd like as a regular but she only works very, very, occasionally. (Will review her once I am certain I cannot be IDed.

London is quiet at the mo' anyway. The centre is quiet.

Holidays innit.

[LLPunting]

I like to have a pool of regs with the odd newbie. This way, I always a go to.

I've got a meeting arranged with a reg next week. However another reg is on a month's holiday. Another one is getting her tits done. Another one is taking a break. One has done a runner for scamming others. One only works now and then.

Saw a newbie last week, who I'd like as a regular but she only works very, very, occasionally. (Will review her once I am certain I cannot be IDed.

London is quiet at the mo' anyway. The centre is quiet.

Holidays innit.

Could you share please:

Who is the scammer?

Who is the newbie?

[LLPunting]

Is anyone else having issues with availability at the moment? I've messaged around 10 SP about booking them on the weekend and not a single one has replied back and it's been more than 24 hours now.

Really interested to see if others are having a similar experience. Hardly anyone of the 45+ girls on my AW HL are even showing green.

Normally in that time frame I've had like 80% of them reply back.

Just weird.

Have you ever considered how many messages an SP receives every day, particularly a popular one?  The abuse, harassment, timewasting, incoherence (from non-English speaker to non-English speaker)?  And having to deal with that on top of the phone calls (of all types) and perhaps those who just turn up at the door?  Now consider how much worse that could be after lockdown.

Unless you already have a history of business with an SP or their management then first contact should be by calling.  If they don't answer but respond by text you have an indication that they are available/interested in discussing business.  Any lingering sense of entitlement to a reply (and being serviced) speaks to the caller's expectations more than the SP's.

Allowing for general flakiness and day of week I've not had any great or unusual difficulty in contacting regular or new providers by calling/follow-up messaging.  I've called established/popular SPs and parlours as well as lots more unknowns/unmentioned of both.

[Crockers]

Could you share please:

Who is the scammer?

Who is the newbie?

Scammer I've already reviewed and plenty commented on. Courtney English. She was always spot on with me.

Seen three newbies over last few weeks. 2 I've already already reviewed but not turning them into regs.

New newbie I saw last week only works very occasionally. Not reviewing or naming her now though as she will ID me. Gonna give her a good few months as per guidelines anyway.

That's if she does ever come back. Not working for a few weeks now anyway.

All my regs have been reviewed

I like to have a harem of about 4/5 girls, which means at least 1 or 2 are always around. These girls come and go, hence always looking for a  new reg.

[jamiekinkxxx]

That's weird. Me too.
I even downloaded that app that all the wgs seem to have (I can't remember the name of it now) to see if I was blacklisted for being a timewaster 
But no. All appears normal.
If nothing changes it does seem I would have no choice but stick to the me and you spa place in South Woodford. 

But I won't give up just yet. Thanks for letting me know that it ain't just me. 

What the app they use?

[puntingking]

What the app they use?

i did pointed out that i forgotten the name of the app however I managed to find the app on google for you. The name of the app is "Clienteye".

[FiveKnuckles]

so i'm not the only one.   
phoned (and text) a few girls last week and only one replied.  didn't confirm a time and turned up only for someone to walk in ahead.      waited 40mins and decided to come back another day.   

weekend called the same set girls before noon and not one replied, then got lucky with one turning green. she had the morning shopping.

...then 11.30pm start receiving text replies.   

[Crackanut]

Have you ever considered how many messages an SP receives every day, particularly a popular one?  The abuse, harassment, timewasting, incoherence (from non-English speaker to non-English speaker)?  And having to deal with that on top of the phone calls (of all types) and perhaps those who just turn up at the door?  Now consider how much worse that could be after lockdown.

Unless you already have a history of business with an SP or their management then first contact should be by calling.  If they don't answer but respond by text you have an indication that they are available/interested in discussing business.  Any lingering sense of entitlement to a reply (and being serviced) speaks to the caller's expectations more than the SP's.

Allowing for general flakiness and day of week I've not had any great or unusual difficulty in contacting regular or new providers by calling/follow-up messaging.  I've called established/popular SPs and parlours as well as lots more unknowns/unmentioned of both.

I totally understand all of that, hence why I'm comparing it to what I'm used to seeing previously. I'm not in anyway expecting an instant reply but just shocked at the general lack of comms from them.

[lillythesavage]

I totally understand all of that, hence why I'm comparing it to what I'm used to seeing previously. I'm not in anyway expecting an instant reply but just shocked at the general lack of comms from them.

You obviously do not , you stated in the OP you text or email, LLP and I have both suggested calling is the only way to contact a new SP and you have completely ignored that point.

[Crackanut]

You obviously do not , you stated in the OP you text or email, LLP and I have both suggested calling is the only way to contact a new SP and you have completely ignored that point.

I'm comparing like for like. I always text SPs and previously they replied at a certain percentage which is considerably higher than what it is now.

[lillythesavage]

I'm comparing like for like. I always text SPs and previously they replied at a certain percentage which is considerably higher than what it is now.

Lol, when are you comparing with? There are significantly less advertising these days so that might have something to do with it, School holidays too. Supply is being outstripped by demand it would seem and a message lost in a sea of others, where as a call may or may not get answered, or get a text reply, if not you know not to bother instead of waiting for replies to come, that is why the phone was invented

[Anadin]

I thought it was just my bad luck but yeah I had the same issue. That being said Weekends are always crap but this week hasn't been much better.

[luv2kiss54]

Yes agree its hard work at the moment. My HL has never been shorter and those on it are either not working or not replying.

Demand is definately exceeding supply thats why prices are so high the girls know if you dont pay it the next punter will. Time for another break 

[Malvolio]

If the WGs are sensible they will have a separate work phone - so if they're having a break they won't be looking at your messages.

Unless you've got someone you particularly want to see, I'd suggest waiting until the weekend and seeing who's available at that point - although my hot list always has fewer WGs available at the weekend than in midweek.

[jamiekinkxxx]

i did pointed out that i forgotten the name of the app however I managed to find the app on google for you. The name of the app is "Clienteye".

Ta

[LLPunting]

Scammer I've already reviewed and plenty commented on. Courtney English. She was always spot on with me.

Seen three newbies over last few weeks. 2 I've already already reviewed but not turning them into regs.

New newbie I saw last week only works very occasionally. Not reviewing or naming her now though as she will ID me. Gonna give her a good few months as per guidelines anyway.

That's if she does ever come back. Not working for a few weeks now anyway.

All my regs have been reviewed

I like to have a harem of about 4/5 girls, which means at least 1 or 2 are always around. These girls come and go, hence always looking for a  new reg.

Thanks for the scammer details.   

Where do you find all these part-timers?  Is there a filter on AW I've just not considered?     

[user1437]

Similar experience for me as well. I usually text 3-5 SPs, get about 2-3 answers minimum, and if I can't arrange a good time try to text some more

I've tried to punt over the last 3ish months and every single time it was text/call 10+ SPs for maybe one single answer. Money saved I guess. My regulars are all not working at the moment as well so I don't even have a "this is 100% going to work" plan either 

[LLPunting]

Similar experience for me as well. I usually text 3-5 SPs, get about 2-3 answers minimum, and if I can't arrange a good time try to text some more

I've tried to punt over the last 3ish months and every single time it was text/call 10+ SPs for maybe one single answer. Money saved I guess. My regulars are all not working at the moment as well so I don't even have a "this is 100% going to work" plan either 

Where in London are you trying to punt at what price point?  I've not had any such issues South of the River or in West London or East Ham/Stratford.

[puntingking]

Where in London are you trying to punt at what price point?  I've not had any such issues South of the River or in West London or East Ham/Stratford.

Really?

Maybe you are just lucky 
Because it appears others on here are having the same problem with wgs.

I also think this problem is more prevelent with aw wgs and not with vs wgs. I could be wrong. Just a feeling I got.

[Junkyardgrunze]

Me too. I have seen so many “British” girls register and have their profile verified too.. but non has answered my email or they have not signed in or shown “Available” after the initial registration. Is there a big scam going on or something? Its not only in London but all over. Anyone knows anything?

[puntingking]

Me too. I have seen so many “British” girls register and have their profile verified too.. but non has answered my email or they have not signed in or shown “Available” after the initial registration. Is there a big scam going on or something? Its not only in London but all over. Anyone knows anything?

Not that I'm aware off.
 

[Malvolio]

Not sure how failing to respond to punters can ever be a scam? 

[Junkyardgrunze]

Not sure how failing to respond to punters can ever be a scam?

Its not the failing to reply but accounts being verified and not logged in after. Seen few of them.. specially with British wg. Just sharing what i am seeing.

[LLPunting]

Me too. I have seen so many “British” girls register and have their profile verified too.. but non has answered my email or they have not signed in or shown “Available” after the initial registration. Is there a big scam going on or something? Its not only in London but all over. Anyone knows anything?

PG and video scams would explain the lack of response to enquiries about escorting/bookings.

[LLPunting]

Really?

Maybe you are just lucky 
Because it appears others on here are having the same problem with wgs.

I also think this problem is more prevelent with aw wgs and not with vs wgs. I could be wrong. Just a feeling I got.

My calls to AW girls have been fine.  That's why I asked about price point because I'm only shopping sub 130ph.   
Nationality at the price point you're searching? 
I'm looking at all skin colours and have been avoiding Roms, BBers and SPs sporting pics of fake tits, arses and lips, which actually reduces the "market" substantially. 

[Crockers]

Thanks for the scammer details.   

Where do you find all these part-timers?  Is there a filter on AW I've just not considered?     

All my girls have been reviewed and linked to.

[LLPunting]

All my girls have been reviewed and linked to.

Not all.  No issues with you not wanting to be ID'd by a review but you can share how you found this latest newbie.

[Crockers]

All my regs and girls prior to the newbie have been reviewed and linked. If you have any questions about them, you can re-read my reviews and ask there. In this way, I will not have to reshare intel about who they are etc. I believe I have just under 20 reviews at this stage.

Only one not reviewed is the newbie, for reasons mentioned. One the time is right, I will do so, as my track record shows.

I found her by perusing AW in the Lonfon, Surrey and West Midlands AW regions. If you can point me to a UKP site rule that states I have to share this info now, please do so. AFAI'm aware I have to give no intel at all for six months, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

As it goes, I have another newbie tomorrow, as I'm in Norfolk for the weekend. I will also name and review her in due course.

Why are you so specifically interested in me, my harem and the girls I've seen?

I'm giving you no more info about the last and next newbies. About the girls I've already reviewed, you can ask further about them on those posts.

Thank you.

[LLPunting]

All my regs and girls prior to the newbie have been reviewed and linked. If you have any questions about them, you can re-read my reviews and ask there. In this way, I will not have to reshare intel about who they are etc. I believe I have just under 20 reviews at this stage.

Only one not reviewed is the newbie, for reasons mentioned. One the time is right, I will do so, as my track record shows.

I found her by perusing AW in the Lonfon, Surrey and West Midlands AW regions. If you can point me to a UKP site rule that states I have to share this info now, please do so. AFAI'm aware I have to give no intel at all for six months, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

As it goes, I have another newbie tomorrow, as I'm in Norfolk for the weekend. I will also name and review her in due course.

Why are you so specifically interested in me, my harem and the girls I've seen?

I'm giving you no more info about the last and next newbies. About the girls I've already reviewed, you can ask further about them on those posts.

Thank you.

I am only specifically interested in you because you have dangled a positive meet with a supposed SP (i.e. she has advertised that she is selling sex to punters) but won't share who she is.  I'm not asking you for any compromising details, just the trading name of the SP, so unless you're the one and only punter this girl has ever serviced then there is no threat to your identity or future relations with her.

The "rule" I'm asking you to honour is the raison d'etre of this board as a forum specifically created to help punters find good SPs and avoid bad ones.

[Junkyardgrunze]

PG and video scams would explain the lack of response to enquiries about escorting/bookings.

Bingo. I would think the same. Be careful lads.

[Crockers]

I am only specifically interested in you because you have dangled a positive meet with a supposed SP (i.e. she has advertised that she is selling sex to punters) but won't share who she is.  I'm not asking you for any compromising details, just the trading name of the SP, so unless you're the one and only punter this girl has ever serviced then there is no threat to your identity or future relations with her.

The "rule" I'm asking you to honour is the raison d'etre of this board as a forum specifically created to help punters find good SPs and avoid bad ones.

Eh? Yes. I'm meeting a SP next week. Another one possibly in Norfolk this week.

I don't have to tell you who they are.

1. You're starting to creep me out.
2. Complain to the mods if I have broken any rules.
3. From now I am not even going to mention any prospective meets.
4. Stop creeping me out by being so obsessed with my sexual pattern
5. I refer you to 1&2.

I will review my girls, in my own time, within the rules of this forum.

Goodbye.

[LLPunting]

Eh? Yes. I'm meeting a SP next week. Another one possibly in Norfolk this week.

I don't have to tell you who they are.

1. You're starting to creep me out.
2. Complain to the mods if I have broken any rules.
3. From now I am not even going to mention any prospective meets.
4. Stop creeping me out by being so obsessed with my sexual pattern
5. I refer you to 1&2.

I will review my girls, in my own time, within the rules of this forum.

Goodbye.

Yup, keep on making fantasist claims and avoiding the simplest,  unintrusive question of value on this board.

[Crockers]

I'm a fantasist 'cos I said I 'm seeing a reg girl next week?

Hahahahahaa. Readers here can make up their minds if writing that one is seeing a girl in a few days makes you a fantasist.

I refer you to my previous posts.

I knew there were people on this forum that I wouldn't really want to have a pint in the pub with, but... jeeeez.

I'm in hysterics. Hahaha.

[MrMakers]

I am only specifically interested in you because you have dangled a positive meet with a supposed SP (i.e. she has advertised that she is selling sex to punters) but won't share who she is.  I'm not asking you for any compromising details, just the trading name of the SP, so unless you're the one and only punter this girl has ever serviced then there is no threat to your identity or future relations with her.

The "rule" I'm asking you to honour is the raison d'etre of this board as a forum specifically created to help punters find good SPs and avoid bad ones.

This made me quite curious on why someone would be so hard up for information, so I took a look at your reviews.  28 of them in the last year and a half and only 3 positives, what terrible luck!  No wonder you are desperate for any leads.  However, while berating someone for not reviewing on your preferred timetable, looking at your replies in this thread, specifically #11 and #26, you imply you have also had some positive punts which I don't see reviewed. So can I get the trade names of all these ladies, in the spirit of the forum of course?  I mean, the other options are that you are referring to your negative punts reviewed already, which would be useless in the context of this thread.  Or, that you haven't had any issues contacting SPs but for some reason didn't set up meets with them... which would be an argument for Crockers holding back a review for discretionary reasons

[LLPunting]

This made me quite curious on why someone would be so hard up for information, so I took a look at your reviews.  28 of them in the last year and a half and only 3 positives, what terrible luck!  No wonder you are desperate for any leads.  However, while berating someone for not reviewing on your preferred timetable, looking at your replies in this thread, specifically #11 and #26, you imply you have also had some positive punts which I don't see reviewed. So can I get the trade names of all these ladies, in the spirit of the forum of course?  I mean, the other options are that you are referring to your negative punts reviewed already, which would be useless in the context of this thread.  Or, that you haven't had any issues contacting SPs but for some reason didn't set up meets with them... which would be an argument for Crockers holding back a review for discretionary reasons

Oh Christ another one harping on about the proportion of Negs...  Debated to death... 
<sigh>
The vast majority of my updates are TOFTT in parlours and flats because I like to try and find new talent.  By all means take into account all the parlour girls I've mentioned in the time of those 28, it probably doesn't improve the ratio much but then again most of them are TOFTTs.  I don't review my repeats unless the performance warrants a change in their previous rating and I don't have any genuine regulars (year on year) because I'm not a regulars kinda guy, but as you asked, girls I've seen again since June which you might be inferring to be "positives" are Sam, Tia, Diana, Kelly, Tina and Yoyo all mentioned previously.

So whilst you think you may have posited fairly reasonable explanations for my stats you may want to consider the facts as borne out by my record; which is that I don't generally see well reviewed SPs and I no longer use agencies i.e. I take punts on unknowns and I let the community know how badly (or well) they go.

Now reflect on your 10 reviews in the last 2 years and all those joyful moments had because you chose women who were previously reviewed and consider the error of presuming your mo for punting might be particularly similar to mine.

Lastly consider this:  I've been asking for just the name in an open forum not by DM, so that benefits who, considering she is supposedly advertising openly for business?  Yet you have presumed because I'm asking I'm only asking for myself.  I fully respect Crockers want for anonymity but his refusal to disclose just her name prevents any of us trying this lady before she disappears or gets jaded or when he decides he can write a review.  So go postulate on why a punter might not share a girl's name... of which your above attempts are only some.

[stayer]

I believe that part of the problem is due to the pandemic which encouraged many EEs to return home. After all, what was the point in staying here, with little income, and being hounded to pay your debts when you can live for free in your parents' home. I also believe that most of them have not returned to the UK, so there may well be a continuing shortage of WGs as vaccinated men become less leery about punting again.