Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: bareback photos on adultwork  (Read 10586 times)

rogerc23

  • Guest
I wondered what the general view of escorts that dont offer bareback but have galleries full of it on awork with"long term partners/industry professionals".I would never punt a girl offering bb but there are some girl's fitting the above criteria who tempt me.is it something others consider or am I worrying too much?

vorian

  • Guest
I wondered what the general view of escorts that dont offer bareback but have galleries full of it on awork with"long term partners/industry professionals".I would never punt a girl offering bb but there are some girl's fitting the above criteria who tempt me.is it something others consider or am I worrying too much?

It is just another example of a badly thought out profile. Shows they are not professional about the job, it is misleading for them to say no BB (And rightly so) and then show a load of movies/picture of the boyfriend, why because they are not serious about making it all about the punter. Same as the ones which only show hardcore fucking with 10in cocks. They think all punters are looking for a PSE because that is all they can think of. If I want porn I watch porn. If I want a prossie, I want someone who gives good customer service and take care of my needs.

Offline munterhunter

I don't punt with women who advertise BB on AW. I am fairly sure that some if not all of the women I do punt with will do BB maybe with their partner or with a guy they might fancy on a night out. So it's protected sex for me.

When a WG puts BB pics on their profile even with "Their Partner" it's bound to attract some of the punters on Aw that want BB so it follows they are going to be seeing some punters who will want BB and trying to argue "But it's in your gallery pics".
I think that would put a lot of girls off the idea of putting the pics up.

There are risks involved in seeing any WG for me it's a question of enjoying the punt but taking precautions to limit the risks. I'm not sure whether I'd book a WG with BB pics on their profile....but that's just me.


Offline smiths

I wondered what the general view of escorts that dont offer bareback but have galleries full of it on awork with"long term partners/industry professionals".I would never punt a girl offering bb but there are some girl's fitting the above criteria who tempt me.is it something others consider or am I worrying too much?

I dont wish to see cocks on a WGs profile personally as its not cock i am interested in. I dont pay to view a WGs Private Galleries though so some might help such pictures in them that i have no idea about.

Offline blue

I wondered what the general view of escorts that dont offer bareback but have galleries full of it on awork with"long term partners/industry professionals".I would never punt a girl offering bb but there are some girl's fitting the above criteria who tempt me.is it something others consider or am I worrying too much?

The bareback part doesn't really bother me as there's no way of knowing what the WG gets up to behind closed doors, for all you know, she probably does BB with her BF / Pimp and every other Tom, Dick or Abdul - Of course it's best to avoid ones who offer it.  I think it's distasteful to show such photos - It puts me right off.

Roland D Hay

  • Guest
There's no doubt that a lot of WG's have BB sex with their partners and use the snaps for their galleries. Not a good move in my view but kind of understandable. On balance I generally avoid anyone with BB pics even if they claim they're taken with husbands or personal fuck buddies etc.

vorian

  • Guest
I don't punt with women who advertise BB on AW. I am fairly sure that some if not all of the women I do punt with will do BB maybe with their partner or with a guy they might fancy on a night out. So it's protected sex for me.

When a WG puts BB pics on their profile even with "Their Partner" it's bound to attract some of the punters on Aw that want BB so it follows they are going to be seeing some punters who will want BB and trying to argue "But it's in your gallery pics".
I think that would put a lot of girls off the idea of putting the pics up.

There are risks involved in seeing any WG for me it's a question of enjoying the punt but taking precautions to limit the risks. I'm not sure whether I'd book a WG with BB pics on their profile....but that's just me.

Makes sense what you are saying, but even assuming it is not. Then the fact that they show it on a profile shows poor judgement and is an indicator to me of how serious they are. I don't think for a second that a WG does'nt do BB in her personal life but you don't put that on your profile if you have any sense and want to project the right image.

Offline CBPaul

Makes me hit the back button.

I avoid WGs who advertise bareback in any form and when I view a profile I want to see the girl, if she is sucking / fucking a cock then it does not entice me.

Timo

  • Guest
The ones to worry about are the ones who have more than one profile and use different working names on the different profiles. Having different likes on the profile is also a big give away that all is not as it seems.
Personally, l don't understand why a prossies partner would want his photos on her profile. What does it prove, that the prossy has sex??!!

vorian

  • Guest
The ones to worry about are the ones who have more than one profile and use different working names on the different profiles. Having different likes on the profile is also a big give away that all is not as it seems.
Personally, l don't understand why a prossies partner would want his photos on her profile. What does it prove, that the prossy has sex??!!

A lot of boyfriends/husbands get turned on by it they don't all hate what their partners do as a job.

The President

  • Guest
I wondered what the general view of escorts that dont offer bareback but have galleries full of it on awork with"long term partners/industry professionals".I would never punt a girl offering bb but there are some girl's fitting the above criteria who tempt me.is it something others consider or am I worrying too much?

Yes just seen a creampie and says no bb hmmm thanks but now I wont take risk!

Timo

  • Guest
A lot of boyfriends/husbands get turned on by it they don't all hate what their partners do as a job.

I agree. Infact some boyfriends/husbands/pimps get so turned on by it that they advertise on cuckold sites for other blokes to fuck their prossy girlfriends/wives bareback for free!

James999

  • Guest
I wondered what the general view of escorts that dont offer bareback but have galleries full of it on awork with"long term partners/industry professionals"

That term tends to mean "Pimp" or just an excuse as they forgot those pics were bareback  :music:

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28
IMHO if they have pictures of bareback,but genuinely don't offer it I wonder why they put up the pictures. Surely pictures should be a representation of what is available.

There was a topic on GUM clinic certificates which is related:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=8509.msg125188#msg125188

Val Doonican

  • Guest
Guys let’s get real on this post thread.

How many of us enjoy porn where guys wear condoms – I’ll bet it’s a very small minority.
Many WG’s must use a partner, boyfriend or pimp to take her photos for the profile so if showing the act being done it’s obviously  going to be WITHOUT cover. Or does she say WAIT get a Jonnie on else I get done for trade description act.

FFS most of their profiles are full of crap anyway it’s all about marketing and being noticed from the hundreds of other ads'

I like seeing a stretched pussy or cum dripping on her lips or chin even if a cock is in picture too.
I just take it as a sign she’s up for a right good pump session and all that goes with it.

Doesn’t mean I think I’ll get to do BB with her (I agree with most here and don’t even see girls that list in likes that incl BB offered) but it does (usually in my experience) mean you can assume its BBBJ
 
Some WG’s may only list ‘Oral’ rather that clearly state OWO and don’t even state ‘Protected Oral’ so if she did say cover up for oral I’d refer her to her photos that imply OWO as she didn’t say wear a hat. Never had one yet refuse me BBBJ so can’t verify
 
Let’s face it all WG’s fuck for living and will all have a partner(s) that all go in unprotected. We all appear to like BJ and even RO so let’s not kid ourselves there is absolutely no risk involved its only Bareback skanks that could give you something.
 
Most WG’s are probably much more promiscuous than our own home partner and are fucked and sucked half a dozen times a day including from their punters and partners. So when she lovingly blows your cock slurping away and or even you reciprocate eating the peach don’t you ever wonder what else has been there at the back of her throat as you and every other wants to blow a load into her mouth!!!

A good read was a couple of earlier post threads ‘Oral on her’ & ‘10 showers a day’ that discussed some risks associated and both a very good read
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=21653.msg322836#msg322836
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=22072.msg328715#msg328715

So if it’s just WG’s that show photo’s that include bareback pictures even although they don’t offer bareback service that annoy you then THINK again
Every WG has so many numerous regular cocks and tongues in each hole from god know where so who knows what may have brought to her  - so buyers beware!!!

vorian

  • Guest
Guys let’s get real on this post thread.

How many of us enjoy porn where guys wear condoms – I’ll bet it’s a very small minority.
Many WG’s must use a partner, boyfriend or pimp to take her photos for the profile so if showing the act being done it’s obviously  going to be WITHOUT cover. Or does she say WAIT get a Jonnie on else I get done for trade description act.

FFS most of their profiles are full of crap anyway it’s all about marketing and being noticed from the hundreds of other ads'

I like seeing a stretched pussy or cum dripping on her lips or chin even if a cock is in picture too.
I just take it as a sign she’s up for a right good pump session and all that goes with it.

Doesn’t mean I think I’ll get to do BB with her (I agree with most here and don’t even see girls that list in likes that incl BB offered) but it does (usually in my experience) mean you can assume its BBBJ
 
Some WG’s may only list ‘Oral’ rather that clearly state OWO and don’t even state ‘Protected Oral’ so if she did say cover up for oral I’d refer her to her photos that imply OWO as she didn’t say wear a hat. Never had one yet refuse me BBBJ so can’t verify
 
Let’s face it all WG’s fuck for living and will all have a partner(s) that all go in unprotected. We all appear to like BJ and even RO so let’s not kid ourselves there is absolutely no risk involved its only Bareback skanks that could give you something.
 
Most WG’s are probably much more promiscuous than our own home partner and are fucked and sucked half a dozen times a day including from their punters and partners. So when she lovingly blows your cock slurping away and or even you reciprocate eating the peach don’t you ever wonder what else has been there at the back of her throat as you and every other wants to blow a load into her mouth!!!

A good read was a couple of earlier post threads ‘Oral on her’ & ‘10 showers a day’ that discussed some risks associated and both a very good read
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=21653.msg322836#msg322836
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=22072.msg328715#msg328715

So if it’s just WG’s that show photo’s that include bareback pictures even although they don’t offer bareback service that annoy you then THINK again
Every WG has so many numerous regular cocks and tongues in each hole from god know where so who knows what may have brought to her  - so buyers beware!!!

You raise some good points and very well put. I agree with you regarding the implied hygiene issues and the reality of the situation. For me it is about a lack of thought put into the creation of the profile. It is not a porn site and yes I prefer to see porn, uncovered cock and cum the lot. When I watch porn I am not thinking about meeting the stars in real life and fucking them.

 However when I am reading a WG profile which is basically advertising, then I am assessing even if it it subconsciously the suitability of that WG for me. AW profiles are not porn (Too expensive for that). If she shows covered sex then she won't lose that many potential punters as protection is expected on the whole. By showing BB she many lose potential punters for no real gain.

This to me shows a lack of thought of the part of the WG and hence an unprofessional profile.

Val Doonican

  • Guest
Hi Vorian I can accept your point but I don't see too many pictures in AW profiles that do show cocks with covers on to make an explicit point. Come to think of it I don't really see many pictures at all that include cocks either.

However amidst the hundreds of ads its the visual profile pic that catches the eye first (well mine anyway) so as long as the face is visible I'm happy and think those girls brave enough to show their face let alone have a cock in pic too are surely up for a horny session.

I've just looked through AW for a profile I saw recently in Scotland where a WG's profile pic showing Lovely looking blonde facing camera with her head and shoulders visible and had a huge black cock draped across her shoulder pointing towards her lips - Cant find it right now?
NOW that profile advert stood out from the pack and I immediately read profile and that was my point is very competitive and good marketing can help a WG get noticed at least without us punters being totally fooled.   

Just made me think what if the only 3 photos that WG's were able to add to a profile were
Lips
Breasts
Pussy

Would surely expose the theory they all look the same.
   

vorian

  • Guest
Hi Vorian I can accept your point but I don't see too many pictures in AW profiles that do show cocks with covers on to make an explicit point. Come to think of it I don't really see many pictures at all that include cocks either.

However amidst the hundreds of ads its the visual profile pic that catches the eye first (well mine anyway) so as long as the face is visible I'm happy and think those girls brave enough to show their face let alone have a cock in pic too are surely up for a horny session.

I've just looked through AW for a profile I saw recently in Scotland where a WG's profile pic showing Lovely looking blonde facing camera with her head and shoulders visible and had a huge black cock draped across her shoulder pointing towards her lips - Cant find it right now?
NOW that profile advert stood out from the pack and I immediately read profile and that was my point is very competitive and good marketing can help a WG get noticed at least without us punters being totally fooled.   

Just made me think what if the only 3 photos that WG's were able to add to a profile were
Lips
Breasts
Pussy

Would surely expose the theory they all look the same.
 

I see your point for me a profile should contain at least one full face and body picture with minimal editing. After that don't mind what else is shown if I'm being honest. You are right it is the overall standard of the profile that counts to draw you in. I do look at how much effort has gone into creating a profile and use that as a key indicator in deciding how professional WG is likely to be

Toshiba

  • Guest
It is just another example of a badly thought out profile. Shows they are not professional about the job, it is misleading for them to say no BB (And rightly so) and then show a load of movies/picture of the boyfriend, why because they are not serious about making it all about the punter. Same as the ones which only show hardcore fucking with 10in cocks. They think all punters are looking for a PSE because that is all they can think of. If I want porn I watch porn. If I want a prossie, I want someone who gives good customer service and take care of my needs.


Brilliantly put, simple as this fellow

Online Rickrabbit

Hi Vorian I can accept your point but I don't see too many pictures in AW profiles that do show cocks with covers on to make an explicit point. Come to think of it I don't really see many pictures at all that include cocks either.

However amidst the hundreds of ads its the visual profile pic that catches the eye first (well mine anyway) so as long as the face is visible I'm happy and think those girls brave enough to show their face let alone have a cock in pic too are surely up for a horny session.

I've just looked through AW for a profile I saw recently in Scotland where a WG's profile pic showing Lovely looking blonde facing camera with her head and shoulders visible and had a huge black cock draped across her shoulder pointing towards her lips - Cant find it right now?
NOW that profile advert stood out from the pack and I immediately read profile and that was my point is very competitive and good marketing can help a WG get noticed at least without us punters being totally fooled.   

Just made me think what if the only 3 photos that WG's were able to add to a profile were
Lips
Breasts
Pussy


Would surely expose the theory they all look the same.
 

I am in London, so unlikely to visit, but taken from another thread here, I thought that if AW profiles were like this one as a minimum, they would be so much more informative and attractive to the average punter trying to make a choice (I haven't looked at the PG)  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

vorian

  • Guest

Brilliantly put, simple as this fellow

Thanks, I don't believe as punters we absorb how a profile is constructed enough when searching for a potential booking.  It can tell you so much about a WG and her attitude to her work. It is after all the purest form of advertising one can get. Apart from the obvious picture element which is number one of course. A good profile can draw you in and say so much about the level of thought and focus a WG has to her work. In fact I may start a thread to discuss the pros and cons of profiles.

Mystique46m

  • Guest
I am in London, so unlikely to visit, but taken from another thread here, I thought that if AW profiles were like this one as a minimum, they would be so much more informative and attractive to the average punter trying to make a choice (I haven't looked at the PG)  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

There's lots of duplicated pictures in the free gallery which isn't great.

vorian

  • Guest
I am in London, so unlikely to visit, but taken from another thread here, I thought that if AW profiles were like this one as a minimum, they would be so much more informative and attractive to the average punter trying to make a choice (I haven't looked at the PG)  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

For me too  basic but I do live in a world of details. I have seen a lot worse and it does nothing to engage with the punter. Minimal effort has been put in.

Offline smiths

Thanks, I don't believe as punters we absorb how a profile is constructed enough when searching for a potential booking.  It can tell you so much about a WG and her attitude to her work. It is after all the purest form of advertising one can get. Apart from the obvious picture element which is number one of course. A good profile can draw you in and say so much about the level of thought and focus a WG has to her work. In fact I may start a thread to discuss the pros and cons of profiles.

Where you say we that doesnt include me. Personally i dont like it when posters use we when they cant know if its true or not, it might be for some but not for others in my view.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2014, 10:23:46 am by smiths »

vorian

  • Guest
Where you say we that doesnt include me.

Didn't think for a moment it would smiths. Of course as you have said before UKP only hits a tiny percentage of punters in the UK. Still even a small percentage of a consumer base can move the market in the right direction even if it is only very small steps one at a time. I would be very interested to get your input into a debate about profiles.  I am at the CBF today and thank you for your advice but when I get back tonight I will start a thread on the subject of AW profiles.

vorian

  • Guest
Where you say we that doesnt include me. Personally i dont like it when posters use we when they cant know if its true or not, it might be for some but not for others in my view.

I apologise for using the term we you are of course quite correct and I will be more careful about generalisations in the future.

Offline smiths

I apologise for using the term we you are of course quite correct and I will be more careful about generalisations in the future.

No worries Vorian, i rate your posts so far in the main. ;)

Online Rickrabbit

You raise some good points and very well put. I agree with you regarding the implied hygiene issues and the reality of the situation. For me it is about a lack of thought put into the creation of the profile. It is not a porn site and yes I prefer to see porn, uncovered cock and cum the lot. When I watch porn I am not thinking about meeting the stars in real life and fucking them.

 However when I am reading a WG profile which is basically advertising, then I am assessing even if it it subconsciously the suitability of that WG for me. AW profiles are not porn (Too expensive for that). If she shows covered sex then she won't lose that many potential punters as protection is expected on the whole. By showing BB she many lose potential punters for no real gain.

This to me shows a lack of thought of the part of the WG and hence an unprofessional profile.

Are we to assume that profiles are written in the main by the  WG herself? You know what they say, to assume will only make an "Ass out of u and me"

Online wristjob

I have BB liked excluded from my searches. To be honest possibly a mistake as sometimes girls appear from nowhere and I wonder if they were previously offering BB. Anyway best not get tempted by what I won't book.

if the girl has BB pictures in her PG I pretty much agree with Vorian - its not professional really. The way I see it the profile is to make you want to book them - and the PG is there to offer more enticement such as face/naked pics that they don't really want in the public domain. I doubt hardcore pics persuade anybody to book a girl, and less so BB pics. Apart from that rule number 1 of WGs - they lie about mostly everything. I just assume they do/did BB and give it a wide berth.

vorian

  • Guest
Are we to assume that profiles are written in the main by the  WG herself? You know what they say, to assume will only make an "Ass out of u and me"

Even if it is not written by the prossie herself, it is about her and her business and as such she should take responsibility for how is is presented. If it is not written by her and she is not bothered it is still an unprofessional approach and shows as such.

Online Rickrabbit

Even if it is not written by the prossie herself, it is about her and her business and as such she should take responsibility for how is is presented. If it is not written by her and she is not bothered it is still an unprofessional approach and shows as such.
This should apply if the WG is truly independent. In reality, for many of those who aren't independent or offering a sexual service out of necessity or circumstances that they are in, I suspect that although the profile may appear to be written by them and about them, it is not a given that it is her business much less hers to control to that degree. Look at how many profiles are passed on, obviously written by the same person and cloned through cut and paste.   :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
This should apply if the WG is truly independent. In reality, for many of those who aren't independent or offering a sexual service out of necessity or circumstances that they are in, I suspect that although the profile may appear to be written by them and about them, it is not a given that it is her business much less hers to control to that degree. Look at how many profiles are passed on, obviously written by the same person and cloned through cut and paste.   :hi:

I totally agree but nevertheless if a profile is poor it does not matter to me why the profile is poor just the fact that it is. If Tesco's advertising is good or bad I don't care about the reasons why just if it is good or bad and how that influences me as the consumer.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2014, 01:44:15 pm by vorian »

Online Rickrabbit

I hear what you say, if Tesco has bad advertising and enough consumers complain in the interest of commerce they will look to do something to improve it. If a pro$$ies profile is being written by a pimp and that pimp doesn't give a toss, then bringing the pro$$ie into focus for some stick will perhaps not result in a tightening up of the standard of her profile, even if she herself gives a good service to those who meet her. That being said, I do react in much the same way that Vorian does when I see a sloppy profile. There are many other things however that trigger my disinterest more than the quality of the prose.... "that's all I have to say about that"  :hi:

Online wristjob

This should apply if the WG is truly independent. In reality, for many of those who aren't independent or offering a sexual service out of necessity or circumstances that they are in, I suspect that although the profile may appear to be written by them and about them, it is not a given that it is her business much less hers to control to that degree. Look at how many profiles are passed on, obviously written by the same person and cloned through cut and paste.   :hi:

Offering out of necessity or circumstance doesn't mean she's not the one controlling it.  Mostly it;s the EE profiles that are passed on in my experience and in this area they all have the same pattern - maybe 3 profile pics and an expensive PG. They aren't the ones having BB sex in the galleries.

Its usually the British independent chavvy types. Also be aware of what you are saying - too much control over the girl borders on trafficking and we don't want to see those anyway.

rogerc23

  • Guest
I kind of agree that generally it does put me off but if I thought the girl in question was superhot I would overlook it but insist on all activities being covered

vorian

  • Guest
I hear what you say, if Tesco has bad advertising and enough consumers complain in the interest of commerce they will look to do something to improve it. If a pro$$ies profile is being written by a pimp and that pimp doesn't give a toss, then bringing the pro$$ie into focus for some stick will perhaps not result in a tightening up of the standard of her profile, even if she herself gives a good service to those who meet her. That being said, I do react in much the same way that Vorian does when I see a sloppy profile. There are many other things however that trigger my disinterest more than the quality of the prose.... "that's all I have to say about that"  :hi:

Your right of course I should have been clearer when I use the word write or badly written.  I should use constructed as the written text is only part of the overall presentation of the profile and not necessarily the most important part.

Offline Daffodil

As far as I'm concerned, all prossies do bareback. Whether it's with punters, partners, or one-nighters.

I rubber up and don't worry too much about it.

vorian

  • Guest
As far as I'm concerned, all prossies do bareback. Whether it's with punters, partners, or one-nighters.

I rubber up and don't worry too much about it.

I my mind the most sensible and best post on this thread sums it up really.

broksonic

  • Guest
I would not see any girl that has bareback pictures in her private gallery.  It gets me when you read in their FAQ that they never do bareback.  when it clear to anyone that they do it from looking at their pg  pictures

Offline Anadin

I like pornstars & webcam girl so I know a lot of them do tested BB and as I rubber up it really doesn't bother even a little bit.