JOY-IRUS - Bournemouth

[Mickeyp]

Has anyone seen this girl?

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[southcoastpunter]

No - but i think i must try to. Don't know how I have missed her AW profile till now.

For what its worth, her AW feedback includes positives from 2 punters that, whilst I don't know them personally, i do know them as long time local punters who have seen girls I have seen and therefore I am happy that they are genuine punters and their feedback on her will be genuine.

So I am hopefully that she could be a good one. Only down side for me is that she doesn't include owo in her list of services which is usually a "must have" for me!

[JimmySW]

Has anyone seen this girl?

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

At least one of those photos has been used in a Friday Ad - not sure about the rest - if it looks too good to be true ......................

ps she looks a lot more than 5'5" to me?

[pantherblue]

dont like profiles with the pictures on them always odd,, whats wrong with natural non photo session ones ?

[DrConners]

dont like profiles with the pictures on them always odd,, whats wrong with natural non photo session ones ?

All of her pictures have been put through the 'photoshop wringer'

Smoothing, filters, blurring ect - I accept the need for anonimity in a WG's life but these actually put me off 

I'm not saying she would be a crap service provider mind you 

[Shortandsensible]

Yeh looked at it a couple of times, but was waiting to see if someone else would go first. I’ve recently seen someone local but not been reviewed on here yet, Will review in the next week.

[scutty brown]

the third photo turns up in a full colour version on these two profiles, one in London, one Florence

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

she's also on the books of Admirals Escorts in London, profile dates from 2015 so the photos are a few years old
External Link/Members Only
that says she's Brazilian, not Italian

I'm inclined to think the photos on the AW profile have been pinched, but its not clear cut - especially as photo 1 isn't among those I've found. The answer is probably that they've all been stolen from an earlier source that the search engines can't index

[Mickeyp]

No - but i think i must try to. Don't know how I have missed her AW profile till now.

For what its worth, her AW feedback includes positives from 2 punters that, whilst I don't know them personally, i do know them as long time local punters who have seen girls I have seen and therefore I am happy that they are genuine punters and their feedback on her will be genuine.

So I am hopefully that she could be a good one. Only down side for me is that she doesn't include owo in her list of services which is usually a "must have" for me!

Yes I have to agree and have really tended to stick to massages with HE.   I've only punted the once so far just a couple of weeks ago  (still need to do the review) and that was for the oral not intercourse so I'm really just looking for girls that provide CIM.  I know hers doesn't but loved the look of her but from the comments maybe they photos are not so genuine.

[oo]

I saw her a few months ago. Let me reassure you, that is her in the photos. She is a fantastic looking girl. Drinks on arrival, beautiful location, very central. She told me she was from Sicily, although I can't be sure this was true. Ended with a shared shower. Excellent. I am considering returning.

[Shortandsensible]

I saw her a few months ago. Let me reassure you, that is her in the photos. She is a fantastic looking girl. Drinks on arrival, beautiful location, very central. She told me she was from Sicily, although I can't be sure this was true. Ended with a shared shower. Excellent. I am considering returning.

Can you do a full proper review please?

[buccdriver]

The gallery photo in the blue dress was one that was also used on the old Dorsex site. For a short while she had a profile on there: until she got unsatisfactory reports and disappeared.

[DrConners]

I saw her a few months ago. Let me reassure you, that is her in the photos. She is a fantastic looking girl. Drinks on arrival, beautiful location, very central. She told me she was from Sicily, although I can't be sure this was true. Ended with a shared shower. Excellent. I am considering returning.

Let me reassure you, that is two pointless statements in one post. 

she's also on the books of Admirals Escorts in London, profile dates from 2015 so the photos are a few years old
External Link/Members Only
that says she's Brazilian, not Italian

I'm inclined to think the photos on the AW profile have been pinched, but its not clear cut - especially as photo 1 isn't among those I've found. The answer is probably that they've all been stolen from an earlier source that the search engines can't index

Can you do a full proper review please?

+1

Although as oo has been a member since March 2011 I think looking at his previous contributions either a very part time punter or more likely just prefers to lurk & leech.

As Mr sensible says, put up  review please 

I won't be holding my breath though 

The gallery photo in the blue dress was one that was also used on the old Dorsex site. For a short while she had a profile on there: until she got unsatisfactory reports and disappeared.

Cheers for the info 

Maybe the profile has been sold on to another Brazilian waste of space 

Those profile pictures are pure works of fiction 

[oo]

I don't have time, nor inclination to write a long report. You must just trust me. Incidentally, although very active up until 2012, I was then diagnosed with cancer so had 5 years where visiting ladies was physically impossible. I now arrange visits very occasionally. SO WIND YOUR NECK IN Dr. You are effectively calling me a liar which I find very offensive!!!!

[scutty brown]

I don't have time, nor inclination to write a long report. You must just trust me. Incidentally, although very active up until 2012, I was then diagnosed with cancer so had 5 years where visiting ladies was physically impossible. I now arrange visits very occasionally. SO WIND YOUR NECK IN Dr. You are effectively calling me a liar which I find very offensive!!!!

On this site we don't have to trust anyone, and frequently we don't.
In this case the photos are proven to be at least five years old and the girls origin very uncertain. You could be telling the truth, you could be the girl's pimp playing the sympathy card. We don't know, but until the case is proven I'll remain a cynic and regard the profiles as fake

[oo]

If you don't trust anyone, what's the point of this site?

[scutty brown]

If you don't trust anyone, what's the point of this site?

We trust those who have established themselves with reliable accurate feedback which fits the established accumulated knowledge of the site.
In this case your comments are at variance with what we've found out about the photos, making your claims hard to believe.
From our point of view you've been a member for years with little or now contribution, and now for some reason post on this thread making a claim that seems unlikely. If you had established a reliable history you might get believed, but you haven't

[Fuzzyduck]

I don't have time, nor inclination to write a long report. You must just trust me. Incidentally, although very active up until 2012, I was then diagnosed with cancer so had 5 years where visiting ladies was physically impossible. I now arrange visits very occasionally. SO WIND YOUR NECK IN Dr. You are effectively calling me a liar which I find very offensive!!!!

I find it offensive that someone with next to zero credibility should be astonished that other people doubt his honesty in an anonymous online forum where there is a lot of deception and bullshit. Why should anyone believe you had to deal with cancer? It may be true but it also might not be. I hope you see the point that credibility is earned here not assumed.

No-one was asking for a long report. A modest edit of what you've already written would have been totally appreciated. It would have taken you 2 minutes.

[oo]

In the case of this girl look at her AW feedback from many members with a large number of feedbacks, two of whom we were told in an earlier post, are well known on here. All of the "evidence" that you say my post is at variance with, is purely speculative. All I can tell you is I visited her and that is her in the photos. The outfit she is wearing in her gallery photos in AW was what she was wearing when I visited her in November. So, unless she is very careful with her clothes or has identical outfits, those photos are, at least very recent. Simple way to resolve this is put your money where your mouth is an visit her.
On your edited point, what modest edit?

[scutty brown]

At this point I think its important to note that the current profile and gallery photos are NOT the ones in use when this thread started. They've been changed and may even show a different girl.
If you want to see what was there before, follow my links to the other sites

[oo]

..and I have looked at those photos and that is most definitely the same girl.

[Fuzzyduck]

On your edited point, what modest edit?

You could have taken what you had already written, embellished the details on physical description, offered up a brief summary of services given and highlighted where she excelled or didn't, and confirmed the price paid/time booked. Absolutely no need to pen a lengthy narrative like some very amateur romance writers on here.

[oo]

Having tried to be helpful, I have been accused of being a liar, a pimp and lying about having had cancer. Really makes one feel welcome. Read the field reports on AW, they would all express what I would say.

[oo]

At this point I think its important to note that the current profile and gallery photos are NOT the ones in use when this thread started. They've been changed and may even show a different girl.
If you want to see what was there before, follow my links to the other sites

I note that all 88 of your reviews are for girls in the North West of England. I can't understand why you're getting so involved in a discussion on a girl who is a couple of hundred miles away from where you usually punt and who, it would appear is considerably more up market.

[scutty brown]

What or where I choose to post has got fuck all to do with you. Its an open forum, anyone can post anywhere. No regional tribalism here (except in Newcastle but that's another story)
In this case the OP asked for help identifying the girl, I pointed out the photos then in use were at least five years old and probably stolen. So far I've seen nothing that would make me change that view.
If you don't like that, tough shit.

[Fuzzyduck]

Having tried to be helpful, I have been accused of being a liar, a pimp and lying about having had cancer. Really makes one feel welcome. Read the field reports on AW, they would all express what I would say.

No-one has accused you of any of those things. They have only pointed out the challenges of believing what you read on the internet. To that point, if you really believe that AW field reports are an accurate reflection of the truth, then you are not just entitled, but naive, and an idiot. These are accusations by the way, if you are still struggling to comprehend the difference.

[oo]

What or where I choose to post has got fuck all to do with you. Its an open forum, anyone can post anywhere. No regional tribalism here (except in Newcastle but that's another story)
In this case the OP asked for help identifying the girl, I pointed out the photos then in use were at least five years old and probably stolen. So far I've seen nothing that would make me change that view.
If you don't like that, tough shit.

It does when you choose to insult me and accuse me of lying.

[oo]

No-one has accused you of any of those things. They have only pointed out the challenges of believing what you read on the internet. To that point, if you really believe that AW field reports are an accurate reflection of the truth, then you are not just entitled, but naive, and an idiot. These are accusations by the way, if you are still struggling to comprehend the difference.

I note that, like Scutty Brown, none of your reviews are for the Bournemouth area, indeed London and Surrey seem to be your stomping ground. It strikes me as strange that, like him you're getting so involved in a discussion of someone you are unlikely to see and of whom you cannot give first hand knowledge. Do I believe AW field reports? I first visited a WG in 2003 and since then have visited 108 different girls, a few on many occasions. By careful study, mainly of AW feedback and reports, I have only had a couple of disasters (one was an agency girl not on AW, the other turned out to be a druggy who was a last minute following a letdown) so, if one uses ones common sense you can, to a large extent, rely on AW reports. Why should they be any less reliable than those on here?

[scutty brown]

It does when you choose to insult me and accuse me of lying.

No, I haven't insulted you yet. I haven't accused you of lying, though now you suggest it  I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case. Your comments simply appear inconsistent with what we know.
I also find strange your sudden interest in this girl given your past history of non-involvement, which does bring your motives into question

[oo]

No, I haven't insulted you yet. I haven't accused you of lying, though now you suggest it  I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case. Your comments simply appear inconsistent with what we know.
I also find strange your sudden interest in this girl given your past history of non-involvement, which does bring your motives into question

"Inconsistent with what we know"? What do you know, other than there are photos of her working in the past in other places under different names and there is doubt about he nationality. Very common things among WGs. You actually know nothing for certain, whereas I do, that is her in the photos. I just checked in yesterday and saw you casting doubt about her authenticity. I know you are wrong so why shouldn't I correct what I know to be wrong?

[scutty brown]

. ...............I first visited a WG in 2003 and since then have visited 108 different girls, a few on many occasions. By careful study, mainly of AW feedback and reports, I have only had a couple of disasters (one was an agency girl not on AW, the other turned out to be a druggy who was a last minute following a letdown) so, if one uses ones common sense.you can, to a arge extent, rely on AW reports. Why should they be any less than those on here?

If you can't see that the AW feedback for this girl is nothing more than a competition in hagiography by a bunch of shysters looking for freebies then you're even more out of touch with reality than I thought. AW feedback is inherently corrupt

[oo]

If you can't see that the AW feedback for this girl is nothing more than a competition in hagiography by a bunch of shysters looking for freebies then you're even more out of touch with reality than I thought. AW feedback is inherently corrupt

..and where is your proof? I recognise many of those leaving feedback not only from AW but from the now defunct, local forum Dorsex. Having visited this lady I know the field reports are accurate. What do you base your judgement upon their voracity upon?

[Fuzzyduck]

I note that, like Scutty Brown, none of your reviews are for the Bournemouth area, indeed London and Surrey seem to be your stomping ground. It strikes me as strange that, like him you're getting so involved in a discussion of someone you are unlikely to see and of whom you cannot give first hand knowledge. Do I believe AW field reports? I first visited a WG in 2003 and since then have visited 108 different girls, a few on many occasions. By careful study, mainly of AW feedback and reports, I have only had a couple of disasters (one was an agency girl not on AW, the other turned out to be a druggy who was a last minute following a letdown) so, if one uses ones common sense you can, to a large extent, rely on AW reports. Why should they be any less reliable than those on here?

I note that none of your reviews are in the Bournemouth area. If you could disentangle yourself from your blinkered self-rightousness, you'll see I've not made any comment on the SP. My comments are about an entitled member who clearly has the time to write a review (presumably you were lying earlier, or were you just mistaken?), who clearly has benefited from UKP, yet has the arrogance to say he doesn't have any inclination to write a review when another member politely asked him to.

[scutty brown]

..and where is your proof? I recognise many of those leaving feedback not only from AW but from the now defunct, local forum Dorsex. Having visited this lady I know the field reports are accurate. What do you base your judgement upon their voracity upon?

If you can't see that for yourself then nothing I say is going to remove your blinkers.

[oo]

If you can't see that for yourself then nothing I say is going to remove your blinkers.

I don't think I've actually benefited from UKPunting, how could I if I've used it so little? I just checked in, saw something I knew to be wrong and tried to correct it. Surely part of the reason for this site. Why resort to insults?

[beachboy]

I have seen her - for once aw feedback is accurate. She is very good.

yes her gallery photos are awful - I think they are her in them even the ones you traced to Italy.

I think she has had a breast enlargement since though.

Reluctant to do reviews - I once did a negative review on a girl on Dorsetsex many years ago who I still see from time to time now in a social setting I'm hoping she's forgotten the review!

[Fuzzyduck]

I have seen her - for once aw feedback is accurate. She is very good.

yes her gallery photos are awful - I think they are her in them even the ones you traced to Italy.

I think she has had a breast enlargement since though.

Reluctant to do reviews - I once did a negative review on a girl on Dorsetsex many years ago who I still see from time to time now in a social setting I'm hoping she's forgotten the review!

Does that mean you won't? Given what happened to that arrogant prick oo, why did you even raise your head above the parapet? Did oo ask the Dorsetsex massif for backup?

[beachboy]

no just wanted to add my voice to those saying that Joy is worth seeing.despite the strange photos.

[scutty brown]

The more posts on this thread, the more convinced I am its all bollocks.
The gallery photos all have obscured faces, yet unobscured ones are on these two profiles of a girl in Bristol named Suri (yes I realise thats Irus backwards)
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

From the watermarks there must have been a Vivastreet account as well

three different phone numbers
AW          07845096028
Escort46  07491807462
Adultlook  07568772451

why obscure the AW photos? Smells of fakery

[beachboy]

it is bizarre - shes attractive and skilled - she'd get plenty of work from 1 profile.

she hasn't logged into her aw (bournemouth) profile for a week I see

is she somewhere else using another profile?

[southcoastpunter]

Why do so many threads have to end in agression between guys? Why can't we see a little more respect of others views?


[/quote]

If you can't see that the AW feedback for this girl is nothing more than a competition in hagiography by a bunch of shysters looking for freebies then you're even more out of touch with reality than I thought. AW feedback is inherently corrupt

Scutty -I and i think most guys agree that some, maybe most, AW feedback has to be viewed with caution but not all AW feedback is lies, wrong, or corrupt as you claim. Don't you leave any AW feedback? I do and its all honest. In this case, as i said earlier in this thread there is AW feedback from 2 local punters who have punted in the Bournemouth area for several years, have seen 4 or 5 girls that I have, have made similar comments on AW about the girls as I did - and hence I trust that they are genuine punters and frankly and with respect, I trust their feedback more than yours - as i don't know you from Adam. i think your comments about AW feedback are sweeping generalisations. Maybe in larger towns/cities its difficult to get to "know" other local punters because of much higher numbers but in the Bournemouth area, its much easier.

Did oo ask the Dorsetsex massif for backup?

Fuzzyduck - why did you have to ask such a question? The Dorsex website (very separate and different to Dorset-sex) disappeared 4 or so years ago. It was primarily very local to Bournmeouth and Poole area and was very good - similar to here but obviusly much smaller but also much more respectful to other members. On this thread, I am 95% confident there are at least 3 ex-members who have commented and tried to be helpful. I am one of the 3 and noone has  asked me to do any "backup"

Anyway, back to the lady - i don't know anything about her (other than as stated above)

[southcoastpunter]

 On this thread, I am 95% confident there are at least 3 ex-members who have commented and tried to be helpful. I am one of the 3 and noone has  asked me to do any "backup"

Should have added that  oo was not one of the 3 and as far as I know he was not a member of Dorsex .

[Fuzzyduck]

Why do so many threads have to end in agression between guys? Why can't we see a little more respect of others views?

I agree. It's tedious and creates a toxicity that is to no-ones benefit except the trolls. oo's initital contribution was well intentioned but overly gushing and borderline touting IMO. However, he turned out to be an entitled prick who doesn't want to contribute to the site. People who behave like that are often called out on it. I thought the banning was harsh but not unsurprising if he slags UKP off.

Fuzzyduck - why did you have to ask such a question? The Dorsex website (very separate and different to Dorset-sex) disappeared 4 or so years ago. It was primarily very local to Bournmeouth and Poole area and was very good - similar to here but obviusly much smaller but also much more respectful to other members. On this thread, I am 95% confident there are at least 3 ex-members who have commented and tried to be helpful. I am one of the 3 and noone has  asked me to do any "backup"

I did mean Dorsex although Beachboy quoted Dorsetsex. I looked at it a few times when I had a few punts in Bournemouth years ago. Also a party there once. VelvetPussies? Anyway, the site seemed cliquey, a bit fluffy though more honest than p*****net. oo made reference to Dorsex to back up his claims and then another long standing but low contributing member comes out of the woodwork also with very positive comments on the SP and a reluctance to review/contribute.

Your own comments to scutty confirms there is residual cliquiness from ex-Dorsex members. Personally I don't think that's a bad thing since, as you say, you can trust other AW reviews from known members. However, that's of little help to people who aren't in the "club" and want to punt in Dorset.

[Mickeyp]

Well I was going to TOFTT with her but sadly after checking she doesn't do OWO which is a must for me really. 

[Pussi]

I know I'm bumping an old thread but the pictures especially the second/third one is defo SURI who used to work out of Bournemouth and London.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=11319

All the pictures on this thread are of the real Naughty Suri from a few years ago. However this Joy username I'm not sure if it's stolen pics but different girl. Defo not Italian as she was Brazilian. However same pricing structure to my knowledge. Services are the same so it could be her. Trying to contact her but no avail

[samsmith101]

she is definately real, saw her recently, she is just using a different profile, she is suri naughty, a great girl, currently working in bournemouth from a place near the main park in bournemouth. Classy.

[southcoastpunter]

That is good to know Samsmith. Please do a proper review on her for all members benefit!

[Dorsetpunter]

That is good to know Samsmith. Please do a proper review on her for all members benefit!

+1 please do a review as she looks just my type so i'm definitely interested, and you get to break your review duck...

[nigel4498]

I arranged to meet her in Bournemouth last October (2019)
She cancelled in good time with a genuine reason.
Never managed to rearrange and doubt if I'll get to see her now.

[patdavies]

managed to get a booking with her tonight we update today/tomorrow

[patdavies]

scratch that one of my regs offered me a deal i couldnt refuse sorry lads