SummerSexy89 / Missblonde2076 - hoist on my own petard while TOFTT!

[Quesadilla]

Yawn. Was it necessary to revive this thread? The new link already posted should have been enough on this subject. So she's on tinder. Who cares?
Is your new attention-seeking review thread starting to flag a bit?

I care.

And I didn't revive it, I was just responding to the guy who did, and figured as she is back in business with a new profile that deliberately hides her face it was worth keeping that fresh in punters minds so they can avoid what happened to me.

If you don't care why are you bumping it?   

And if you really think I like the kind of attention that these negs get me then you're dumber than you look.

[Bigus Dickus]

And if you really think I like the kind of attention that these negs get me then you're dumber than you look.

It's a fair point to add your bit about the SP Q, but why the petty insults. Not a good idea when you are on double secret probation in here? 

[LL]

If you don't care why are you bumping it?   

And if you really think I like the kind of attention that these negs get me then you're dumber than you look.

Firstly that's a typical response from someone posting bollocks. Along the lines of "if you don't like it, don't read it". Well actually everybody here is allowed to pass judgement on the posts of others. If nobody ever called bullshit, and instead just ignored everything they didn't like, then this place would fill with bullshit fairly quickly.
The new link was already posted, why bring up all that other shit about her being on Tinder? And how would you know anyway? I think it's time you moved on!

As for "dumb". All I can say to that is that West8 was smart enough to take a hint after his [temporary] ban and clear off.

[James999]

Hopefully Admin can update to her new profile name 

Missblonde2076

[Belgarion]

Yawn. Was it necessary to revive this thread? The new link already posted should have been enough on this subject. So she's on tinder. Who cares?
Is your new attention-seeking review thread starting to flag a bit?

Was it necessary to respond to this thread? Your comments continue to bump it up

[Quesadilla]

It's a fair point to add your bit about the SP Q, but why the petty insults. Not a good idea when you are on double secret probation in here? 

You are absolutely right BD - always my problem here is rising to the bait from the trolls. Promised myself and Admin I'd only answer sensible questions on my reviews and put on ignore those obviously trying to get a rise. 

[smiths]

You are absolutely right BD - always my problem here is rising to the bait from the trolls. Promised myself and Admin I'd only answer sensible questions on my reviews and put on ignore those obviously trying to get a rise. 

What trolls have posted since Bob Dayley resurrected this thread?

[vw]

What trolls have posted since Bob Dayley resurrected this thread?

There is only one troll and its name begins with Q

[squeezebox]

her new profile

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Good spot, as she is on the Admins' blacklist..

External Link/Members Only

[Bobdayley]

Good spot, as she is on the Admins' blacklist..

External Link/Members Only

I have revived this topic and I will in the future unless the admin close it then I will have to open a new one 

She will get a life lesson for her lies and bad attitude 

[lewishamguy]

There is only one troll and its name begins with Q

+10000 

[Ben4454]

We should all book her and not turn up.

[Ali Katt]

Good spot, as she is on the Admins' blacklist..

External Link/Members Only

She has her own page as well, with all aliases listed and features.
External Link/Members Only

[Quesadilla]

What trolls have posted since Bob Dayley resurrected this thread?

As agreed with Admin I'm not here to post anything other than new reviews or responses to my existing reviews. There has always been a larger group of punters who have told me they find my reviews useful than those that don't and that's who I post here for.

I appreciate "troll" is a matter of perspective, but there are a handful of punters here that I have had run ins with in the past and they have made it clear they dislike me. I have zero interest in trying to change their minds, and as much respect for them as they have for me.  So when they post on one of my reviews with their opinions of how / what I should post, I consider it trolling.  In this instance LL who is now ignored. 

If anyone wants to have a sensible conversation they are more than welcome to come over to UKE but I'm not getting drawn into anything here that might get me banned again. 

[smiths]

As agreed with Admin I'm not here to post anything other than new reviews or responses to my existing reviews. There has always been a larger group of punters who have told me they find my reviews useful than those that don't and that's who I post here for.

I appreciate "troll" is a matter of perspective, but there are a handful of punters here that I have had run ins with in the past and they have made it clear they dislike me. I have zero interest in trying to change their minds, and as much respect for them as they have for me.  So when they post on one of my reviews with their opinions of how / what I should post, I consider it trolling.  In this instance LL who is now ignored. 

If anyone wants to have a sensible conversation they are more than welcome to come over to UKE but I'm not getting drawn into anything here that might get me banned again. 

LL is NOT a troll, your branding a punter who disagrees with you a troll.

[Belgarion]

LL did not come hereto engage in sensible debate. One wonders why a punter would be upset that a WG who stole from another punter is further exposed.

The whole idea is to prevent all punters from falling for her antics and it is a public service.

Why this offends anyone is a mystery to me

[StevenS]

So the semi ban simply results in more handbags, debateable reviews and promoting something called UKE...........

[SamLP]

LL made a valid point. The link to the profile was posted 6 months ago, it's already on the blacklist and wiki page. Q soaked up sympathy from all punters but his attitude is to insult any punter he disagrees with calling them trolls and acting like a petulant child claiming they are on his ignore list. Still waiting for him to somehow link his recent negative to this review as he has done to every other review he's posted up over the past week. I guess I'm also now going to be on the ignore list if I wasn't already 

[Quesadilla]

LL is NOT a troll, your branding a punter who disagrees with you a troll.

A punter I respect who disagrees with me is never a troll - always happy to take criticism on the chin. But when a punter clearly doesn't like me and has made that plain, and the only thing they have to offer is criticism of how I choose to punt / post - then I have absolutely no reason to listen to anything they have to say.

As you often say yourself Smiths - I post and punt to suit me (within the rules), not other posters/punters. They are entitled to think/say what they want, I am entitled to ignore them.

[Quesadilla]

LL made a valid point. The link to the profile was posted 6 months ago, it's already on the blacklist and wiki page. Q soaked up sympathy from all punters but his attitude is to insult any punter he disagrees with calling them trolls and acting like a petulant child claiming they are on his ignore list. Still waiting for him to somehow link his recent negative to this review as he has done to every other review he's posted up over the past week. I guess I'm also now going to be on the ignore list if I wasn't already 

As I said before - I'm only here to review/comment/answer sensible response to my reviews. That's the remit Admin gave me.  So anyone who - in my view - is just trying to stir - goes on my ignore list.  Purely for self-preservation.

[SamLP]

As I said before - I'm only here to review/comment/answer sensible response to my reviews. That's the remit Admin gave me.  So anyone who - in my view - is just trying to stir - goes on my ignore list.  Purely for self-preservation.

That's considering you are being sensible, but you tend to be rude & arrogant towards other posters who post something that you disagree with and when they react you claim the higher moral ground and indirectly insult them again with claims of troll etc.. You do tend to rub people up the wrong way. Smiths punts to suit himself but is respectful of other punters.

[lewishamguy]

As I said before - I'm only here to review/comment/answer sensible response to my reviews. That's the remit Admin gave me.  So anyone who - in my view - is just trying to stir - goes on my ignore list.  Purely for self-preservation.

And so what it goes if you put someone on ignore list? Is that a huge loss in the forum? Well you can pretend you're ignoring someone apparently you're reading the comments.

 

[Quesadilla]

That's considering you are being sensible, but you tend to be rude & arrogant towards other posters who post something that you disagree with and when they react you claim the higher moral ground and indirectly insult them again with claims of troll etc.. You do tend to rub people up the wrong way. Smiths punts to suit himself but is respectful of other punters.

Admin made a perfectly fair point when he started UKEscorting, Sam - he said some may just not be cut out for UKE and should stick to UKP.  That goes both ways.

Fully aware I rub some people here up the wrong way - believe me it REALLY goes both ways. I fully accept I am not "cut out for UKP" - and the only reason I'm here is to review. 

I have literally zero interest in coming back to UKP to engage in chit chat.  Anyone wants to chat happy to do it on UKE.

So I'm not going to respond to anything else here except sensible questions about my reviews. Not about how I post/punt. OK?

[SamLP]

I don't understand where UKP & UKE fits into this? When you are rude and disrespectful you will get a reaction. That's your main issue with the people that you've rubbed the wrong way. Has nothing to do with fitting into this or that site's ethos. Maybe you should just take your advice and ignore those you want to rather than retort and claim you will ignore them.

[Quesadilla]

I don't understand where UKP & UKE fits into this? When you are rude and disrespectful you will get a reaction. That's your main issue with the people that you've rubbed the wrong way. Has nothing to do with fitting into this or that site's ethos. Maybe you should just take your advice and ignore those you want to rather than retort and claim you will ignore them.

I disagree Sam - it has everything to do with site ethos.  This site has a different ethos when it relates to escorts than UKE which is why I've never fit in here and feel perfectly comfortable there.

I completely admire what UKP does in terms of reviews and sharing useful intel for punters - but there are very different boundaries here.  Exactly as per your point above - my problem has always been I'm not good at suppressing my reaction when I see rude/disrespectful behaviour and my reactions are what seem to rub people up the wrong way. We all "call it as we see it", I fully accept I just see it a whole lot differently to a large number of vocal punters here. Never the twain will meet so as you say, from here on I will just stick people straight on ignore without comment and stick to UKE apart from new reviews. This has now gotten way off topic.

[lukedavis]

Guys thanks for bumping this, i hadnt seen it. Perfectly legit to bump when there is new sighting etc. This was a shocker. 

[smiths]

A punter I respect who disagrees with me is never a troll - always happy to take criticism on the chin. But when a punter clearly doesn't like me and has made that plain, and the only thing they have to offer is criticism of how I choose to punt / post - then I have absolutely no reason to listen to anything they have to say.

As you often say yourself Smiths - I post and punt to suit me (within the rules), not other posters/punters. They are entitled to think/say what they want, I am entitled to ignore them.

Indeed you can ignore who you wish but calling LL a troll when he isn't but he IS a long standing punter on here isn't ignoring him is it. LL has been a very helpful punter on here over the years in my experience.

[Belgarion]

Indeed you can ignore who you wish but calling LL a troll when he isn't but he IS a long standing punter on here isn't ignoring him is it. LL has been a very helpful punter on here over the years in my experience.

I did not find LLs contribution to this thread helpful whatsoever. This thread has helped a lot of punters, coming here and whining about it being bumped is trolling.

[smiths]

I did not find LLs contribution to this thread helpful whatsoever. This thread has helped a lot of punters, coming here and whining about it being bumped is trolling.

LL is NOT a troll but if you want to believe he is that's up to you. I am not saying this thread being updated wasn't useful as I think it was, that doesn't make LL a long established poster on here a troll in my book.

[Belgarion]

Anyone can troll a post. What LL did was trolling.

[king tarzan]

Wtf is troll?
This bloody word keeps popping up!

[smiths]

Anyone can troll a post. What LL did was trolling.

I disagree he is a troll which is what Ques said he was.

[squeezebox]

I disagree he is a troll which is what Ques said he was.

IMO, LL's not a troll, just someone that speaks his mind. If a poster doesn't agree with anyone's POV, that's okay..We're all big enough and ugly enough to move on.

[Elsewhere]

Wtf is troll?
This bloody word keeps popping up!

Trolling as a verb is the act of making a post with the sole aim of pissing people off or causing controversy/argument
Troll as a noun is someone who does it.

Its an over-used phrase, but basically, its someone who is an arse-hole.

[king tarzan]

Trolling as a verb is the act of making a post with the sole aim of pissing people off or causing controversy/argument
Troll as a noun is someone who does it.

Its an over-used phrase, but basically, its someone who is an arse-hole.

Thanks

[NightKid]

Admin made a perfectly fair point when he started UKEscorting, Sam - he said some may just not be cut out for UKE and should stick to UKP.

He said the purpose of UKE and UKP are different and he didn't want those who did not understand that to veer it off course.
How perfectly predictable of you to make it sound inflammatory though. 

And Jesus Christ, since when the flying fuck did someone have to be "cut out" to join a fluffy fraternity? It's not hard to post like a soppy cuntstruck mug. 

[OldAdmin]

Putting this thread to sleep unless something new pops up.