E d u a r d a

[Punter910]

Saw her before https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=285197.msg2968623#msg2968623 and after as well . In last meeting , she is well aware that she is popular here on UKP and was also told that she has her own preferences regarding people to see as per their size etc . Once done with business she would not like to see  me again as i have a biggy ..come'on i know its average..there was also a story of me resembling her dad ..well if someone shows her my review she will tell the true story. Looks like she  wants to be in business on her terms.

Her profile External Link/Members Only

[king tarzan]

Arrogant stroppy slut thanks to a lover or 2 on here

[marion70]

Saw her before https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=285197.msg2968623#msg2968623 and after as well . In last meeting , she is well aware that she is popular here on UKP and was also told that she has her own preferences regarding people to see as per their size etc . Once done with business she would not like to see  me again as i have a biggy ..come'on i know its average..there was also a story of me resembling her dad ..well if someone shows her my review she will tell the true story. Looks like she  wants to be in business on her terms.

Her profile External Link/Members Only

 Is this a review or a grievance? I think it is entirely up to the SF to provide service or not for whatever reason. OP looks like you are just jealous or pissed off for being ignored.

[Liverpool]

OP: where did you see her? Her location says London.

[Harry Monk]

Arrogant stroppy slut thanks to a lover or 2 on here

Think you're making some assumptions there, but no surprise.

I've never met her so can't have an educated opinion. SP's have the right not to see someone if they aren't compatible. Years ago a WG gave me that feedback after a meet and I understood why, no hard feelings.

Up to OP what review he leaves as long as it's honest IMO but in the end it is a WGs prerogative to do business on her terms. Once they have agreed to see someone they then should provide service advertised or agreed within reason.

[king tarzan]

Think you're making some assumptions there, but no surprise.

I've never met her so can't have an educated opinion. SP's have the right not to see someone if they aren't compatible. Years ago a WG gave me that feedback after a meet and I understood why, no hard feelings.

Up to OP what review he leaves as long as it's honest IMO but in the end it is a WGs prerogative to do business on her terms. Once they have agreed to see someone they then should provide service advertised or agreed within reason.

Takes money and gives shit service..
Why not say at the beginning I just want to see you??

[marion70]

Up to OP what review he leaves as long as it's honest IMO but in the end it is a WGs prerogative to do business on her terms. Once they have agreed to see someone they then should provide service advertised or agreed within reason.
[/quote]

 OP hasn't actually left a review at all. What he has done put in a grievance and poured his frustration on this post, very plain to see. I have seen the SP and reviewed her. She was probably the warmest escort I have seen, she was not perfect and I have pointed out that as well.

[Mrbenn2016]

This is not a review. It should be in the regional comments section or in a response context to the existing thread he has quoted or another review of her.

His complaint isn't consistent bad comms or withholding money.

First he implies he has seen her or been refused at a second meet. Then he ackowledges he hasn't.
He then says he is refused on size?
There is no such restrictions in her ad.
I am average to large and actually saw her.

Sounds like she picked up negative vibes.
As other Ops state in the current climate she can pick and choose who she sees.

It is not consistant with other reviews and the
Op has 6 negative reviews with one positive with negative connotations.

Just comes across as sour grapes.

Should be ignored or deleted

[Mrbenn2016]

Arrogant stroppy slut thanks to a lover or 2 on here

So you have seen her?

Very harsh desk top  assumption from a  "forum helper" 

She is good and popular hence the price rises.

The same could be said about any girl you have reviewed who has been "Sensational" and the amount of gushy emoticons you use.

[winkywanky]

OP purports to have seen her twice (no reviews) and then says she won't see him any more, on the basis of...well, nothing really  .

WG senses a little EAS and decides to stop it right there?

[marion70]

OP purports to have seen her twice (no reviews) and then says she won't see him any more, on the basis of...well, nothing really  .

WG senses a little EAS and decides to stop it right there?

 Think you are on the mark. She is a very affectionate girl (apparently to every punter) hence that affection might have been misinterpreted as real by OP. No reviews and I wonder why he was blocked. Must have a " Boogie Nights" Whalberg dick Lol 😆 😂