Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: BUBBLE BUTT, BIG ASS, BIG BOOTY, PAWG, CULO GRANDE  (Read 1001161 times)

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 26, 2019, 11:15:33 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

Courtesy of Woiczeck

@ Dream Kimberly @

External Link/Members Only

Girl  Just like her pics, smokes herion I reckon as her teeth seem to have that tell tell stain around the edges - or looks like it anyway.  OMFG dat ass!  She let me in and led me to the room, she was wearing a crop top and mickey mouse shorts that showed off her round curvy ass - bubble butt for sure C - i reckon.  she has a bit of a husky voice and works alongside this girl External Link/Members Only.

Action  So I confirmed with the maid services, OWO, CIM and cum twice in 30 mins for £50.  The first thing I did was put her on the bed on all fours and just slapped dat ass.  And watch it the jiggle the fuck all over the place.  OMG she reminds of Bianca bum-bum (it might even be here).
 - she has thick thighs and pinned her down in mish and fucked her hard - she can take pounding - I blew it and then turned over for a massage, had to hand her the bottle of oil!!

Once I got bored I told her to blow me - and she got the condom out, clearly one of those no OWO on the second pop.  But tbh, OW was better than OWO!!  Wasnt long before I got hard again and I told her this time I wanted to doggy it.  In my mind, if the service was shit I though at least Ill hate fuck the hell out of her ass!!!!  ands that just what I did - I felt like i was pounding away for like 5-7 mins!  Oh yeah, in doggy I would feel her stubbly outside of her legs scratching the inside of my legs!!!! Anyway then got bored and asked for a shower.

This girl is a P&D - If she had put a little more effort in I would have given it a neutral but she was quite disinterested.  I probably would go back just to see that damn ass!! but only for a 15 mins sesh.


Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


The FS Scale

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 26, 2019, 11:38:21 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 12:03:44 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

Courtesy of Woiczeck

@ Dream Kimberly @


Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


The FS Scale

Hidden Image/Members Only

and to think i intentionally have been avoiding her cause i thought she took high angle pics to hide a gut and no ass


Offline Marmalade

I must be a lone voice of dissent on this thread.

Having made a minor comment once, I am constantly reminded that there are “new replies”.

But the real downside in my humble opinion is that the ridiculous monumental listings of AW addresses end up in the UKP search results.

What the fuck is the point of searching for info on ‘blondkatka’ for instance, only to find that some person with time on his hands listed her URL together with hundreds of fucking others.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

It’s more useless than a softporn wank thread. “Oh if I don’t like it I don’t have to read it”. Bollocks. Apart from misleading the search engine that would be the same argument that is used to support any fluffie trash threads. “Oh but people like it” isn’t an excuse either: it does fuck all to help punters actually get value for money in real time punts. It’s like those troll threads saying “what does anybody think about...” (listing some random AW address) only this thread lists hundreds. No reviews. Nobody even just commenting on a punt. Just drooling and wanking.

Any other UKP features that contributors to this thread would like to fuck up?  :hi:

Offline Marmalade

I mean what the fuck good is this:

AW :

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only++


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


                        
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

                        
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

                  
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


                        
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only





THE IDEAL:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only



TOWARDS THE UPPER LIMIT:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

And which then autogenerated:

Quote
review(s) found for Missy Persiana booty linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative)
10 review(s) found for sexycaroline1 linked to in above post (10 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
7 review(s) found for Angela big ass  linked to in above post (3 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative)
3 review(s) found for Ms.Chanel linked to in above post (2 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)
32 review(s) found for @LondonLucyXXX linked to in above post (28 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative)
14 review(s) found for GirlfriendLara linked to in above post (10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative)
7 review(s) found for SHINE LUNA linked to in above post (2 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative)
2 review(s) found for English pippajayne linked to in above post (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)
8 review(s) found for .CURVY KIM. linked to in above post (5 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative)
3 review(s) found for Poshenglishtart linked to in above post (2 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)
9 review(s) found for CurvyBustyKatrina linked to in above post (6 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)
2 review(s) found for BubbleButtMartina linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
1 review(s) found for PORN=QUEEN=BABE linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
1 review(s) found for SENSUAL=DANILA linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
1 review(s) found for Submissive Tight  linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
3 review(s) found for Sweet Surprise  linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
9 review(s) found for YOUNG_BLAST linked to in above post (2 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative)
9 review(s) found for Toni_Toni linked to in above post (7 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative)
10 review(s) found for BigbootyLayla linked to in above post (5 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative)
6 review(s) found for luscious emily linked to in above post (6 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
8 review(s) found for BritBustyBrooke linked to in above post (5 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative)
1 review(s) found for AMBERJONESUK linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
2 review(s) found for Sexy NewYork  linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
9 review(s) found for THE BADDEST XXX linked to in above post (1 positive, 1 neutral, 7 negative)
1 review(s) found for Gaby deluxe linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
17 review(s) found for GORGEOUS__GIRL linked to in above post (12 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative)
1 review(s) found for vanesa deluxe linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
2 review(s) found for FRUITY EMILI linked to in above post (0 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative)
6 review(s) found for Vivienne Diamant linked to in above post (5 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)
1 review(s) found for HOT CURVY LIA linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
24 review(s) found for Sensual Tanya x linked to in above post (10 positive, 6 neutral, 7 negative)
2 review(s) found for Aniroc linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
1 review(s) found for Bella wet linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
5 review(s) found for BUSTY RAQUEL linked to in above post (4 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
6 review(s) found for DivaSEXY4U linked to in above post (6 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
9 review(s) found for tyffany Thais linked to in above post (1 positive, 4 neutral, 4 negative)
5 review(s) found for Exotic Alessandra linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative)
1 review(s) found for YOUNG_FIRE 21 linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
11 review(s) found for Juicy chloe k linked to in above post (8 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)
5 review(s) found for JULIE-28 linked to in above post (2 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)
10 review(s) found for Tayla Brazil linked to in above post (10 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
3 review(s) found for NathaliaMattosBrazil linked to in above post (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
4 review(s) found for  SophiaDeluxe linked to in above post (2 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative)
6 review(s) found for Aliyah’s Secret linked to in above post (1 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative)
1 review(s) found for ANGEL_NAKITA_LOVE linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
7 review(s) found for DeepThroatLola. linked to in above post (3 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative)
2 review(s) found for Sweet-Diva linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
2 review(s) found for HOT CURVY BIANCA linked to in above post (1 positive,


Online GMontag

I must be a lone voice of dissent on this thread.

Having made a minor comment once, I am constantly reminded that there are “new replies”.

But the real downside in my humble opinion is that the ridiculous monumental listings of AW addresses end up in the UKP search results.

What the fuck is the point of searching for info on ‘blondkatka’ for instance, only to find that some person with time on his hands listed her URL together with hundreds of fucking others.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

It’s more useless than a softporn wank thread. “Oh if I don’t like it I don’t have to read it”. Bollocks. Apart from misleading the search engine that would be the same argument that is used to support any fluffie trash threads. “Oh but people like it” isn’t an excuse either: it does fuck all to help punters actually get value for money in real time punts. It’s like those troll threads saying “what does anybody think about...” (listing some random AW address) only this thread lists hundreds. No reviews. Nobody even just commenting on a punt. Just drooling and wanking.

Any other UKP features that contributors to this thread would like to fuck up?  :hi:
Very good point Marmalade and largely I agree with you.There are some posts where the listings, even the posting of multiple pictures just makes it look like a wank thread and can be irritating when one is looking for commentary on the lady, service etc.

Having said that, it can be a good place to start for those interested in the type of lady who fit the criteria, which one cant get by just looking at reviews. There are similar threads on Orientals, Red Head etc. So it does serve as a sort of index. For the lurkers and those not willing to contribute its a treasure trove though.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 03:05:59 pm by GMontag »

Offline last_days_of_logan

I must be a lone voice of dissent on this thread.

Having made a minor comment once, I am constantly reminded that there are “new replies”.

But the real downside in my humble opinion is that the ridiculous monumental listings of AW addresses end up in the UKP search results.

What the fuck is the point of searching for info on ‘blondkatka’ for instance, only to find that some person with time on his hands listed her URL together with hundreds of fucking others.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

It’s more useless than a softporn wank thread. “Oh if I don’t like it I don’t have to read it”. Bollocks. Apart from misleading the search engine that would be the same argument that is used to support any fluffie trash threads. “Oh but people like it” isn’t an excuse either: it does fuck all to help punters actually get value for money in real time punts. It’s like those troll threads saying “what does anybody think about...” (listing some random AW address) only this thread lists hundreds. No reviews. Nobody even just commenting on a punt. Just drooling and wanking.

Any other UKP features that contributors to this thread would like to fuck up?  :hi:

That doesnt make much sense as far as the level of inconvenience, like seriously would have thought that it was a non starter

when you search and the results come up...its probably one or two posts  of it that come up. It cant be that hard for you to scroll down a couple of posts surely?  :D

but clearly the voice of decent is heard, you are one of them that dont feel the need to have ANY categorisation of any sort , be it newbies / big tits / escorts with free porn vids / new comers / take one for the team threads. Essentially limiting us to just reviews and ... not sure what else. i feel like that limits the experience of this place and what it can truly be used for....like threads like this....

I personally like the categorisation and grouping of the accounts / profiles (which i am sure is obvious considering how often i'm here  :D)
« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 06:19:54 pm by last_days_of_logan »

Offline last_days_of_logan

Very good point Marmalade and largely I agree with you.There are some posts where the listings, even the posting of multiple pictures just makes it look like a wank thread and can be irritating when one is looking for commentary on the lady, service etc.

Having said that, it can be a good place to start for those interested in the type of lady who fit the criteria, which one cant get by just looking at reviews. There are similar threads on Orientals, Red Head etc. So it does serve as a sort of index. For the lurkers and those not willing to contribute its a treasure trove though.

right...so the long listing thing has been put the bed for quite some time now...people dont do it anymore, but the pics make sense for properity and indexing. girls change profiles all the time and profiles get deleted etc. if there weren't pics there would be hard evidence to track back information on looks and body type etc. plus it saves time having to click the link to make a decision

So the scrolling down on posts is really hard for people, i never would have thought / guessed...first world problems IMO

maybe the solution would be for those complaining to have a word with the main man and ask him to do to the results the same thing he did with the reviews? i.e shrink it to just the title? (but that would be incredibly hard if the search result took you back to a page and not the actual thread title)

i dont know what the issue is, i like the way this place is run / functioning personally.

As for your second sentence , agree with most of that

"For the lurkers and those not willing to contribute its a treasure trove though."

Such a true statement as well..... its annoying but their traffic is the base of the sites popularity

Offline Global_Punter

right...so the long listing thing has been put the bed for quite some time now...people dont do it anymore, but the pics make sense for properity and indexing. girls change profiles all the time and profiles get deleted etc. if there weren't pics there would be hard evidence to track back information on looks and body type etc. plus it saves time having to click the link to make a decision

So the scrolling down on posts is really hard for people, i never would have thought / guessed...first world problems IMO

maybe the solution would be for those complaining to have a word with the main man and ask him to do to the results the same thing he did with the reviews? i.e shrink it to just the title? (but that would be incredibly hard if the search result took you back to a page and not the actual thread title)

i dont know what the issue is, i like the way this place is run / functioning personally.

As for your second sentence , agree with most of that

"For the lurkers and those not willing to contribute its a treasure trove though."

Such a true statement as well..... its annoying but their traffic is the base of the sites popularity


+ 1 the thread is for Bubble Butt contenders, which is a difficult criteria ( without pictures + vids ) there's limited information for a punt.

I'd rather pay £5 - £12 to determine if an SP meets the criteria than travel or spend £150 - £200 reluctantly due to lack of empirical evidence

Back in the day Admiral & HOD was a waste of my time & money, due to lack of proper proof prior to booking, there was lots of photoshopping & unverified site reviews that was misleading.

In a nutshell the pictures & clips from this thread has been helpful in my decision making - I've got a booking tomorrow with an SP, without post and pictures from x 2 punters I would have been left in the dark.

Once the information is not excessive and on point it's welcomed ( me think )

Enjoy the hobby folks  :hi:
     

Offline Global_Punter

I mean what the fuck good is this:

And which then autogenerated:


I concur with you on this one, quite a lot of info that generates more irrelevant data   

Offline Marmalade

I concur with you on this one, quite a lot of info that generates more irrelevant data

Exactly. If it were information gleaned on a punt then that clearly that is valuable: but most of it isn't...

Offline Sirmixalott

Courtesy by way of TS&W

Name and pic added

Sensual Ebano - if pics are genuine  :unknown:

AW Alert: The authenticity or legitimacy of this member's profile has been brought into question. Please exercise caution

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Saw here today. Legit profile. Maid operates her phone though. She can speak English at a semi decent level but she Cuban black apparently. She's what she is in her pics. A bit of an older butterface with an outrageous bubble butt. In doggy style and prone bone you can have some fun with he. Outrageously thick.. And natural.

Review to come when I next have time. But a good P & D just for the ass alone.

Offline last_days_of_logan

Saw here today. Legit profile. Maid operates her phone though. She can speak English at a semi decent level but she Cuban black apparently. She's what she is in her pics. A bit of an older butterface with an outrageous bubble butt. In doggy style and prone bone you can have some fun with he. Outrageously thick.. And natural.

Review to come when I next have time. But a good P & D just for the ass alone.

 ;) :D

just kidding. so if you flipped her it would be decent?

Offline peter purves

I must be a lone voice of dissent on this thread.

Having made a minor comment once, I am constantly reminded that there are “new replies”.

But the real downside in my humble opinion is that the ridiculous monumental listings of AW addresses end up in the UKP search results.

What the fuck is the point of searching for info on ‘blondkatka’ for instance, only to find that some person with time on his hands listed her URL together with hundreds of fucking others.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

It’s more useless than a softporn wank thread. “Oh if I don’t like it I don’t have to read it”. Bollocks. Apart from misleading the search engine that would be the same argument that is used to support any fluffie trash threads. “Oh but people like it” isn’t an excuse either: it does fuck all to help punters actually get value for money in real time punts. It’s like those troll threads saying “what does anybody think about...” (listing some random AW address) only this thread lists hundreds. No reviews. Nobody even just commenting on a punt. Just drooling and wanking.

Any other UKP features that contributors to this thread would like to fuck up?  :hi:

Sorry, I am not sure I understand the point here or what you are getting at specifically?

For you to cite Punther's geneology which is nearly 3 years old to prove your point is not a relevant argument.

Furthermore, when Punther created the thread the genealogy was very relevant because it was current. I would argue even 3 years later it still has relevance, for those profiles that are still existing.

As for further information about the WGs with regard to punts etc, punters have come forward and given details, to suggest otherwise would be misleading. However, and more importantly, this is what the review section is for. If there are no reviews forthcoming then it has nothing to do with this thread.

Finally this thread is for those seeking Bubble Butts. Punther outlines this in the beginning of his carefully crafted charter.

To conclude, I am of the school that it is probably best not to criticise threads if one is not willing to make the effort to improve the thread one is criticising.

« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 10:39:25 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

That doesnt make much sense as far as the level of inconvenience, like seriously would have thought that it was a non starter

when you search and the results come up...its probably one or two posts  of it that come up. It cant be that hard for you to scroll down a couple of posts surely?  :D

but clearly the voice of decent is heard, you are one of them that dont feel the need to have ANY categorisation of any sort , be it newbies / big tits / escorts with free porn vids / new comers / take one for the team threads. Essentially limiting us to just reviews and ... not sure what else. i feel like that limits the experience of this place and what it can truly be used for....like threads like this....

I personally like the categorisation and grouping of the accounts / profiles (which i am sure is obvious considering how often i'm here  :D)

Good point!!

Mutatis Mutandis!!

You are totally correct to surmise if we follow things through to their logical conclusion. We would have to do away with all those threads which are akin to the Bubble Butt thread like: Mixed Race Hottie, Oriental Hottie, Best, Bum, Best Tits on AW and the list goes on and on.

« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 10:37:36 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

External Link/Members Only  this is her new profile

Name and pic added

candicedeepthroat86

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only


In the profile, it suggests she is 34G

Is this the same WG or a profile switch as the ones below?

Do you know?

Cheers!!

No censors board check!!

Missbigbuttcandice

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Has she just changed her profile pics? Cos I can't find that pic in her profile...
Anyway her Verification is accessible...
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Does look so!!



« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 10:53:36 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

advent9206

  • Guest
Thanks for the confirmation!!

How does she compare to Sexy.Vivien?

+1 on knowing more about the sexy.vivien comparison.

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 11:25:20 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 27, 2019, 11:46:55 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

Courtesy by way of TS&W

Name added + AW profile warning

AW Alert: The authenticity or legitimacy of this member's profile has been brought into question. Please exercise caution.

haliyathecurvydiva

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 28, 2019, 12:35:40 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Sirmixalott

;) :D

just kidding. so if you flipped her it would be decent?

Hehe.. I was typing on my phone! Def a she.. even if she is ugly.

But yeah, her body is great. Her waist to ass ratio is very good. And the "shelf" on the booty is VERY pronounced. Only girl i've seen that compares is Kenya Phucket. In fact, this one, has a slightly thicker ass. Although KP is/was smoother and better looking.

Offline Global_Punter

Hehe.. I was typing on my phone! Def a she.. even if she is ugly.

But yeah, her body is great. Her waist to ass ratio is very good. And the "shelf" on the booty is VERY pronounced. Only girl i've seen that compares is Kenya Phucket. In fact, this one, has a slightly thicker ass. Although KP is/was smoother and better looking.


I wont be mad if FK or DFK was not on the menu  :sarcastic:

Best to shag her in Doggy or put a pillow over her face in MISH while you pump away ( just apologies later that it wasn't intentional )
 

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 28, 2019, 09:54:09 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 28, 2019, 10:16:36 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline BoShek

Sorry, I am not sure I understand the point here or what you are getting at specifically?

For you to cite Punther's geneology which is nearly 3 years old to prove your point is not a relevant argument.

Furthermore, when Punther created the thread the genealogy was very relevant because it was current. I would argue even 3 years later it still has relevance, for those profiles that are still existing.

As for further information about the WGs with regard to punts etc, punters have come forward and given details, to suggest otherwise would be misleading. However, and more importantly, this is what the review section is for. If there are no reviews forthcoming then it has nothing to do with this thread.

Finally this thread is for those seeking Bubble Butts. Punther outlines this in the beginning of his carefully crafted charter.

To conclude, I am of the school that it is probably best not to criticise threads if one is not willing to make the effort to improve the thread one is criticising.

+1
This guys punts skinny wgs in Scotland. This a London bubble butt thread. Please just go back under your bridge  :dash: :dash:

Offline BoShek

Sade Rose External Link/Members Only

Saw her recently in near Warren Street. She's gotten thicker since her porn days (now retired) C-D on the FS scale.
She a bit aloof but was a good fuck as she gives you full access of her body.
Surprised she doesn't have more reviews for a cheap former pornstar.

She was reported to be a barebacker but not hints of it. I guess in some ways she was always as she did porn.

Will have review at some point.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline GodofDestruction

External Link/Members Only  can someone place post the pics of this girl. i'm new to this site and i do not know how to upload the gallery pics on here

Offline Global_Punter

« Last Edit: June 29, 2019, 05:22:01 pm by Global_Punter »

Offline peter purves

Sade Rose External Link/Members Only

Saw her recently in near Warren Street. She's gotten thicker since her porn days (now retired) C-D on the FS scale.
She a bit aloof but was a good fuck as she gives you full access of her body.
Surprised she doesn't have more reviews for a cheap former pornstar.

She was reported to be a barebacker but not hints of it. I guess in some ways she was always as she did porn.

Will have review at some point.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only



Sade Rose-work sex VIDEO

External Link/Members Only

AW profile pic

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

Sade Rose

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 30, 2019, 12:10:31 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline peter purves

Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline peter purves

External Link/Members Only

I am very sceptical of this one.

No name on the profile. VS ad runs as:

New Mixed Race In Town For Your Pleasures
Posted by Vivastreet_2451708721

Tel: 07749 384377

Old St and Clerkenwell - EC1V

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 30, 2019, 04:54:24 am by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

I am not sure if this is a WG with a new profile or someone new on the London scene.

The Don  :hi: can you assist here??


Potential!!

Hottie Fatima x

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 30, 2019, 03:31:25 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline peter purves

Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline Global_Punter

Big Batty Ivy is back for a couple days :dance:

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only


Nice, profile says price may have now changed ? did it ? I'm lazy to go back to my review to verify.

Has anyone confirmed it's really her ?

Offline peter purves

« Last Edit: June 30, 2019, 09:54:07 pm by peter purves »
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline BoShek

Nice, profile says price may have now changed ? did it ? I'm lazy to go back to my review to verify.

Has anyone confirmed it's really her ?

Yeah £10 increased in prices and I guess that doens't include her extras :dash:
Not confirmed but no reason to believe that it's not her.
She been doing the odds days

Offline TPNTR

Yeah £10 increased in prices and I guess that doens't include her extras :dash:
Not confirmed but no reason to believe that it's not her.
She been doing the odds days

Maybe she'll give an old client the old price? She looks nice enough, though her reviews are 60/40.

Offline Global_Punter



Yeah £10 increased in prices and I guess that doens't include her extras :dash:
Not confirmed but no reason to believe that it's not her.
She been doing the odds days


I'm not surprised with the £10 hike, as her phone will be ringing non stop..

No second thoughts of plunging from my end  :P