Why on earth would you want to do that at a massage parlour you think might be legit. In my opinion not something any decent punter would even consider, could get you in a whole world of trouble.
You sound like a right boundary pusher.
I’m hearing some strong views so am thought policing myself
This was an idea and little more as really was curious to know the views here - wise members may well have just embarrassed me for having such sordid thoughts
To be clear, I was originally pondering about this in situations where the suggestion of extras - e.g reviews of an establishment (even if limited) suggest more has been on offer. I’ve been and reviewed a place like that recently where I might have been an entirely legit customer (and gave no signals to contrary) and the provider touched my sack and crack “accidentally” a few times but didn’t offer HE. And yet if I was bold enough to ask then more probably would have been forthcoming - admittedly I can’t be 100% certain but few 100% certainties exist in life.
e.g. a situation/establishment like this reviewed by moi recently -
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=323747.msg3373958#msg3373958 Maybe they wanted me to send them signals that I would be up for more
. I’m fairly shy so a discreet cock/ball ring would have told them this when their hands wandered there without me having to say anything.
Do you think wearing a toy, that should only be known about by looking or touching those areas, would be boundary pushing in establishments where more has been offered, if not to newbies or relatively shy customers - like the one I reviewed? Genuine question?
Boundary pushing is far from my style and I try not to take offence at being told I sound like one but that’s not easy. But, in all my years of massages I have never touched a masseuse before they touch me and tell me I can touch them in intimate areas, or propositioned one about extras (I leave that up to them to raise)! I’ve seen plenty of reviews from members here confessing to being more bold in massage situations. Their actions, rather than thoughts, haven’t been chastised but perhaps should be
I guess my use of “legit” is also confusing but I think Phoenix picks up on the distinction I should have drawn. Perhaps none of this changes the consensus expressed but maybe it does contextualise my thinking and suggestion a little bit which I’m sensitive enough to want to do. I wasn’t thinking about rocking up to a Bannatyne spa, which suggests nothing other than legit services, wearing a vibrating butt plug…