Sugar Babies
Massage

Author Topic: Seeking.com (Scotland)  (Read 155678 times)

Offline ik8133

Any guys on seeking.com?  Just wondering if you'd like to share any info on the current status especially round the Aberdeen area?  Was a member for a month just over a year ago.

Any guys on seeking.com?  Just wondering if you'd like to share any info on the current status especially round the Aberdeen area?  Was a member for a month just over a year ago.

Happy to do the same for same for girls in Edinburgh and Glasgow too. Feel free to to message me and I'm willing to discuss, swap and share any info that I have.. 

Offline Batpunt

On seeking myself, found a few profiles that also have AW accounts!

Some girls are pretty realistic on it and others have watched too
Many movies lol

Does anyone have any links to Glasgow area working girls on the site?

Thanks

Just joined there to see what the script is. Birds are sending me messages but I can't read them?

So in order to read messages I need go pay 70 quid a month to upgrade my account?

Aye sounds mint!

Offline Name Not Found

Just joined there to see what the script is. Birds are sending me messages but I can't read them?

So in order to read messages I need go pay 70 quid a month to upgrade my account?

Aye sounds mint!

Pretty standard stuff for any kind of dating site. Where have you been for the last 10 years?  :sarcastic:  Most of the messages will be fakes BTW, just to tempt you to join.

Pretty standard stuff for any kind of dating site. Where have you been for the last 10 years?  :sarcastic:  Most of the messages will be fakes BTW, just to tempt you to join.

Haha never been on tinder let alone this thought i would give it a shot.

I thought at least u would of got to read messages and converse and premium membershjp would of been for like PG type content etc.

Cannie believe folk would pay £70 a month for that dross

Offline Name Not Found

Haha never been on tinder let alone this thought i would give it a shot.

I thought at least u would of got to read messages and converse and premium membershjp would of been for like PG type content etc.

Cannie believe folk would pay £70 a month for that dross

Don't think you can say it's 'dross' until you've tried it. Plenty of people seem to get a lot of action form it, although I understand you do need to be prepared to spend big usually. Not one fo us Scottish cheapskates maybe.

Offline FBman78

I believe a member from here Vivago has had great success via seeking.com in South America, but he doesn't use it in Europe.

Offline The Man With No Name

Don't think you can say it's 'dross' until you've tried it. Plenty of people seem to get a lot of action form it, although I understand you do need to be prepared to spend big usually. Not one fo us Scottish cheapskates maybe.

Presuming this is actually the case, having to pay any sort of "membership fee" to initially to contact prossies - to then have to pay them in one way or another, in order to fuck them - is ripping the pish.

As for online dating as a whole, there's good reason why free apps like Tinder are far more popular than chargeable ones. Accordingly, you get far more choice on them too. A lot is also to with the ease and simplicity of such apps, being very much like hooking up with a stranger in a bar - or at least as close possible. This being the more established (and still more accepted) way, is why most girls on them are usually looking for something more than casual sex. But you still get a reasonable proportion of (generally younger) ones that do just want a hookup, even if it's not over-obvious from their profile. Which is another appeal of such apps' simplicity - it's easy for people to use as they want, for varying versions of whatever they want, often very dependent on how they see and how much they like the particular person they're matched with and talking to.

For me, therefore, it's either Tinder (or equivalent), or calling a hooker on a proper hooker site and giving her cash for go on her fanny. Any of these halfway houses are simply designed to make money, predominantly off naive blokes who just want to get their end away - promising such, yet delivering fuck-all.

Offline Name Not Found

Well obviously, yes, something that's free is going to be more popular than something that looks substantially the same, but there's a place for all the different apps and sites. Look at seeking-arrangements; there's no way I'd pay a small fortune for a potential hook up with a young thing that openly wants to extract vast amounts of cash from me for some 'companionship', but there's clearly a large market of blokes out there that want more than a Tinder hook-up and are prepared to pay for it. I just wish I had their disposable income (although I'd just spend it on more WGs instead)

,, giving her cash for a go on her fanny.

My new favourite description for what we do  :D
« Last Edit: March 18, 2019, 04:54:02 pm by Name Not Found »

Offline The Man With No Name

but there's clearly a large market of blokes out there that want more than a Tinder hook-up and are prepared to pay for it. I just wish I had their disposable income (although I'd just spend it on more WGs instead)

You mean there's a large market of rich cunts - far too old, fat and/or ugly to get a Tinder hookup, who're prepared to pay to delude themselves?

Because rather than just doing what you or I simply would in that situation, that's what it comes down to.

Offline Name Not Found

far too old, fat and/or ugly to get a Tinder hookup,

I qualify on at least two of those counts (I'm not fat). I have to take whatever options I can find (although I'm fucked if I'm paying a fortune for them  :lol:)

Offline The Man With No Name

I qualify on at least two of those counts (I'm not fat). I have to take whatever options I can find (although I'm fucked if I'm paying a fortune for them  :lol:)

But again, the difference is that you're not sad enough to convince yourself that something a third of your age, with more tits than taste, actually wants to be seen in public with you - despite the fact you're paying for her to avoid getting a proper job.

Offline Snoozy

Tinder is a bit of an issue if you have a partner though. SA is a bit hit or miss, had some cracking meets a few years back. Just rejoined and it’s full of princesses and dreamers.

Hi Genuine guy here who has met someone on SA -I am 50 plus -she is 28 -works well for both of us especially as she can host daytime and she is very discreet -however there are a lot on there with unrealistic expectations [1000 per month !!ffs ]

Offline Name Not Found

So how much are you paying her, and what do you get for it?

Presuming this is actually the case, having to pay any sort of "membership fee" to initially to contact prossies - to then have to pay them in one way or another, in order to fuck them - is ripping the pish.

As for online dating as a whole, there's good reason why free apps like Tinder are far more popular than chargeable ones. Accordingly, you get far more choice on them too. A lot is also to with the ease and simplicity of such apps, being very much like hooking up with a stranger in a bar - or at least as close possible. This being the more established (and still more accepted) way, is why most girls on them are usually looking for something more than casual sex. But you still get a reasonable proportion of (generally younger) ones that do just want a hookup, even if it's not over-obvious from their profile. Which is another appeal of such apps' simplicity - it's easy for people to use as they want, for varying versions of whatever they want, often very dependent on how they see and how much they like the particular person they're matched with and talking to.

For me, therefore, it's either Tinder (or equivalent), or calling a hooker on a proper hooker site and giving her cash for go on her fanny. Any of these halfway houses are simply designed to make money, predominantly off naive blokes who just want to get their end away - promising such, yet delivering fuck-all.

True mate. Never wanted to get back involved but clearly having to pay 70 odd quid a month to see a message and properly converse with someone is dross in my book.

I appreciate people may have good meets from this but it looks as if u need to pay a monthly membership fee on top of paying any potential genuine people on it for 'favours'.

Having registered and seen what the script was I swiftly deleted the account.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2019, 11:25:44 am by Micky5633 »

Offline The Man With No Name

Tinder is a bit of an issue if you have a partner though. SA is a bit hit or miss, had some cracking meets a few years back. Just rejoined and it’s full of princesses and dreamers.

Oh undoubtedly. You never realise what a small place the world is until you put yourself on the internet.

To be honest, in this day and age, I really don't see the point in shacking up any form if you aren't completely sexually satisfied with what you have. The day you no longer are, is the day you should move on. But that's just me and a whole different argument, for a whole different context.

I really just don't see the point in the hassle and expense of keeping a steady hoor. I realise some well-moneyed, older blokes might think it suits them, but I still think they're deluding themselves. Half the point of punting is the freedom to shag a different hot bird every night. Besides, I've found that the decent, honest WGs to whom I have returned for repeat visits, are as friendly, welcoming and as close as I'd ever want from any casual shag.

That's why if I was going steady with anyone - and the other positives of the relationship did somehow outweigh my still-wanting libido - it'd always the anonymous safety of PAYP for me.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2019, 12:47:39 pm by The Man With No Name »

Offline Snoozy

To be honest, in this day and age, I really don't see the point in shacking up any form if you aren't completely sexually satisfied with what you have. The day you no longer are, is the day you should move on. But that's just me and a whole different argument, for a whole different context.

I really just don't see the point in the hassle and expense of keeping a steady hoor.

For me personally it's variety that does it for me, I'd never be happy with just the missus but someone has to do the ironing.

I treated the girls on sa exactly the same as a hooker, pay per meet and straight to the point. Used to be the case on there you could get a meet with a 20 year old stunner for 3 or 4 hours for 100-150. Rarely met the same one more than twice. It's not worth the effort now, since I rejoined in the last week I've had nothing apart from pic sellers, a pig who would need to pay me and a couple of fruit loops that think I'm going to pay 1500 a month to take them to dinner.

Offline The Man With No Name

I'd never be happy with just the missus but someone has to do the ironing.

Nobody "needs" to do any ironing. I'd say this sentence perfectly encapsulates our very differing positions on the issue.

Quote
Used to be the case on there you could get a meet with a 20 year old stunner for 3 or 4 hours for 100-150.

But in any event, I'm sure you'll forgive me for finding this hard to believe. :rolleyes:

Offline Kev40ish


But in any event, I'm sure you'll forgive me for finding this hard to believe. :rolleyes:

It’s easy to dismiss it.
When I am staying in Glasgow, I’ll always arrange to meet a girl from SA.
I personally prefer an overnight and that is easily achievable. It does however take a lot of time, chatting to them, they don’t think of themselves as escorts, but they are still looking for an arrangement that rewards them.

If you can invest the time chatting and sweet talking them it is worth it.

Offline The Man With No Name

they don’t think of themselves as escorts, but they are still looking for an arrangement that rewards them.

They're clearly almost as deluded as Theresa May then.

Quote
If you can invest the time chatting and sweet talking them it is worth it.

And you're clearly even more deluded than Theresa May. Does this not defeat the whole fucking point of punting?

And what d'you cough for one of these all-nighters? After muttering enough sweet-nothings that'd get most blokes, under 40 with their own hair and teeth, into the pants of five hot birds on civvy street...

By the way, I'm actually starting to think these seeking.com fuckers are actually pretty ingenious. It seems they've managed to convince a significant portion of both really thick hoors and really thick punters to pay them money....all in order to convince themselves they're not actually hoors and punters. It's brilliant! :lol:
« Last Edit: March 21, 2019, 01:25:58 am by The Man With No Name »

Offline Snoozy

Nobody "needs" to do any ironing.

But in any event, I'm sure you'll forgive me for finding this hard to believe. :rolleyes:

I am a thick hoor. No idea what you mean by no one needs to do the ironing. Are you the naked rambler?

Understand you dont believe, just giving my experience of the site.

Offline FBman78

At £70 a month TMWNN has a point about the Seeking founders. There must be thousands of people paying it world wide meaning an annual turnover of over £1million.  Now even with overheads profits must be about 50 - 70%.

Offline Name Not Found

At £70 a month TMWNN has a point about the Seeking founders. There must be thousands of people paying it world wide meaning an annual turnover of over £1million.  Now even with overheads profits must be about 50 - 70%.


Welcome to the world of capitalism. Make a tempting product, find some needy customers,  minimum overheads, maximum revenue. No different from any other business.

Offline bobdavid

At £70 a month TMWNN has a point about the Seeking founders. There must be thousands of people paying it world wide meaning an annual turnover of over £1million.  Now even with overheads profits must be about 50 - 70%.

£1million profit? He was making £20million in 2017 ... and the prices have only gone in one direction since.

Offline FBman78

£1million profit? He was making £20million in 2017 ... and the prices have only gone in one direction since.

I couldn't be arsed researching and went on the presumption not that many folk would spunk up that much cash a month.  Looks like there is millions of them then.

Offline bobdavid

I couldn't be arsed researching and went on the presumption not that many folk would spunk up that much cash a month.  Looks like there is millions of them then.

When I've used SA, I've usually paid around £140 for a 3-hour session. Looking at your reviews on UKP you paid a prossie £120 for 30 minutes.. now, I'm sure she was good - but, holy hell, at £1 per 15 seconds, well... a fool and his money as you say  :lol: :wackogirl: :lol:

Offline Name Not Found

When I've used SA, I've usually paid around £140 for a 3-hour session. Looking at your reviews on UKP you paid a prossie £120 for 30 minutes.. now, I'm sure she was good - but, holy hell, at £1 per 15 seconds, well... a fool and his money as you say  :lol: :wackogirl: :lol:

Conveniently forgetting your membership fees I see  :P

Offline bobdavid

Conveniently forgetting your membership fees I see  :P

I just dip in and out of SA every 6 months. Pay once, engage with many, collect numbers, move over to WhatsApp.. and then bow out of SA. £11-12/month ... or, effectively, around £3-4 on top of my £140 PPM. Not bad for 3 hours I'd say?

Though I realise that you might think the extra £24 for a 3-hour punt instead of half an hour might be excessive .. but, for me, it's well worth the money.

And.. with the money I save, I can get a prossie to join my SB and I for an hour - just add £100 to the meet.

 Truth is most of us wake up in the morning and want a punt, without all that pre-planning, and know mostly what you are getting, If we wanted to Jump through all those hoops, we would get a civvy, which is a lot cheaper.  :cool:

Offline Name Not Found

I just dip in and out of SA every 6 months. Pay once, engage with many, collect numbers, move over to WhatsApp.. and then bow out of SA. £11-12/month ... or, effectively, around £3-4 on top of my £140 PPM. Not bad for 3 hours I'd say?

Though I realise that you might think the extra £24 for a 3-hour punt instead of half an hour might be excessive .. but, for me, it's well worth the money.

And.. with the money I save, I can get a prossie to join my SB and I for an hour - just add £100 to the meet.

Nicely done. Seems like a sensible approach. So what proportion of the girls on SA would you say are basically just looking for easy money for casual sex? Last time I had a look around there were far too many that seemed to be after a sugar-daddy that would fund their expensive lifestyle. Couldn't be bothered trying to weed out the ones that were actually just 'proper' WGs.


Offline bobdavid

Nicely done. Seems like a sensible approach. So what proportion of the girls on SA would you say are basically just looking for easy money for casual sex? Last time I had a look around there were far too many that seemed to be after a sugar-daddy that would fund their expensive lifestyle. Couldn't be bothered trying to weed out the ones that were actually just 'proper' WGs.

It's not the 'proper' WGs that I look for. I try to find just the ones who are at Uni, busy with study, fancy being with a more experienced guy, and need financial help so that they don't need to work at Costa Coffee every spare minute they have... those are the best. No rules sheets, no tick sheets of what they like or don't like ...

And, I hate the movie, but 50 Shades of Grey seems to have helped a ton in opening a lot of girls up to that sort of thing too.

Offline bbj1980

Are there much in the Aberdeen’s area? Can’t find any granted I’ve not paid membership

Offline Clattypats

Are there much in the Aberdeen’s area? Can’t find any granted I’ve not paid membership
Love a good fantasist!...  :rolleyes:

Offline FBman78

When I've used SA, I've usually paid around £140 for a 3-hour session. Looking at your reviews on UKP you paid a prossie £120 for 30 minutes.. now, I'm sure she was good - but, holy hell, at £1 per 15 seconds, well... a fool and his money as you say  :lol: :wackogirl: :lol:

When did I say a fool and his money???? You like being a cunt I take it?

Offline fedor

I'm on seeking. TBH the site has been outstanding for me, so much so that since I joined i've pretty much stopped using AW. I have 2 girls I see regularly (in an arrangement sense) and have met with about 10 since I joined at the start of December, the value for money is pretty incredible. The first girl is incredibly hot, like 10/10 hot. The only working girl in Glasgow that can compete with her in that department is Arianna who is of course also seriously hot.

She comes down to my house every couple of weeks or so and stays over for £200. So I can either pay 120-150 for an hour, or fuck all evening and the next morning for 200. The second girl is also hot and we get on really well, she will come down for the entire weekend and I will give her £100 to help out will bills etc. There is also a 3rd girl I see at least twice a week, we have a deal for £20 blow and goes.  :D
« Last Edit: March 27, 2019, 09:32:16 am by fedor »

Offline bushman

I'm on seeking. TBH the site has been outstanding for me, so much so that since I joined i've pretty much stopped using AW. I have 2 girls I see regularly (in an arrangement sense) and have met with about 10 since I joined at the start of December, the value for money is pretty incredible. The first girl is incredibly hot, like 10/10 hot. The only working girl in Glasgow that can compete with her in that department is Arianna who is of course also seriously hot.

She comes down to my house every couple of weeks or so and stays over for £200. So I can either pay 120-150 for an hour, or fuck all evening and the next morning for 200. The second girl is also hot and we get on really well, she will come down for the entire weekend and I will give her £100 to help out will bills etc. There is also a 3rd girl I see at least twice a week, we have a deal for £20 blow and goes.  :D
For some reason I find this hard to believe. I truly want too but just can't.

Offline Name Not Found

For some reason I find this hard to believe. I truly want too but just can't.

I know what you mean. If you're the sort of guy who's attractive enough to young, hot, women to get them to travel and sleep with you for a relatively small amount of money, why wouldn't you just pick up civvies? Something doesn't quite ring true.

I'd need to hear a lot more about the hookup process before I'd see it as plausible.

Offline fedor

For some reason I find this hard to believe. I truly want too but just can't.

Fact is im not interested in a relationship right now, i split from my ex last year and simply can be bothered with the hassle. I like the honesty of aw and sa. I guess i'm in a pretty good situation that way, im still young enough, reasonably good looking, in reasonable shape, and have a bit of cash.

If nothing else you can all see did a fair bit of punting till the end of the year then stopped. I guess you could also read my aw feedback for what its worth  :unknown:
« Last Edit: March 27, 2019, 11:24:11 pm by fedor »

Offline FBman78

For some reason I find this hard to believe. I truly want too but just can't.

Thing is that's a few members claiming similar so maybe not entirely unbelievable.  Seems a bit unconventional yes but possible too.

Offline ik8133

For some reason I find this hard to believe. I truly want too but just can't.

You can join for free which enables you to view the girls profiles and let them see yours and lets you see what's out there.  Personally I've only had a couple of social meets, one I didn't fancy and the other her circumstances changed so no longer needed a sugar daddy.  What I will say, is that there is a mixture on there from ones looking for romance, casual hook ups, some may not want paid and basically part time escorts.  It is time consuming and corresponding with some of them once you get them on WhatsApp is fun and exciting, especially then they send photos.  It just depends what floats you boat really, there is more of a connection as you are corresponding more.  You may be lucky and meet with girls described on this thread, you may not, but's that part of the fun.   

You can join for free which enables you to view the girls profiles and let them see yours and lets you see what's out there.  Personally I've only had a couple of social meets, one I didn't fancy and the other her circumstances changed so no longer needed a sugar daddy.  What I will say, is that there is a mixture on there from ones looking for romance, casual hook ups, some may not want paid and basically part time escorts.  It is time consuming and corresponding with some of them once you get them on WhatsApp is fun and exciting, especially then they send photos.  It just depends what floats you boat really, there is more of a connection as you are corresponding more.  You may be lucky and meet with girls described on this thread, you may not, but's that part of the fun.   


That’s pretty much my experience. Actually dated two girls on it, one insisted on going 50/50 on everything. But it’s also draining when you deal with the scammers and the naive. But worth a go.

Offline FBman78


That’s pretty much my experience. Actually dated two girls on it, one insisted on going 50/50 on everything. But it’s also draining when you deal with the scammers and the naive. But worth a go.

Seems more suited to the singletons then due to the time required.

Seems more suited to the singletons then due to the time required.

Most of the girls say the majority of guys they speak to are married, but they’re also the most likely to be timewasters. But I think on the whole you’re right, it’s more like a “manageable” relationship, or if you’re married an affair you think won’t get serious.

Problem is, bit like escorts, young girls can be dadt wee selfish idiots at times and they end up giving you the run around because they haven’t learned the value of good manners yet

Offline The Man With No Name

You can join for free which enables you to view the girls profiles and let them see yours and lets you see what's out there.  Personally I've only had a couple of social meets, one I didn't fancy and the other her circumstances changed so no longer needed a sugar daddy.  What I will say, is that there is a mixture on there from ones looking for romance, casual hook ups, some may not want paid and basically part time escorts.  It is time consuming and corresponding with some of them once you get them on WhatsApp is fun and exciting, especially then they send photos.  It just depends what floats you boat really, there is more of a connection as you are corresponding more.  You may be lucky and meet with girls described on this thread, you may not, but's that part of the fun.   

Sounds exactly like the time-consuming hassle and bore of Tinder then. But at least with Tinder, you're not charged to ask girls if they want to fuck, nor are you charged even more when they actually do.

I might explore this further, but everything I've seen from the site so far - and read here - very much makes it seem like the shite halfway house that satisfies neither end, that I'd always presumed.

Older, fatter/uglier or married punters might not have such a clear choice. But for those of us still young, single and good-looking enough to pull something decent on a night out, the options have always been obvious:

You either put up with the time, hassle - potentially average-looking/potentially stunning, potentially awesome sex/potentially crap sex - and the massive mixed bag of all the other shite that goes with civvy street shagging - whether it be via Tinder, more serious dating apps, hanging around bars or another other means for free...

                                                                                                   ------- or --------

You pay for the convenience and assurance of getting a hot girl and a good shag (confirmed by UKP, or past visits) with the right punt.


There is no in-between with the benefits of both. There aren't even any compromises. Seeking.com suggests there are only varying hybrids with all the worst aspects of both.

You also need to look at it from the birds' perspective - the key to any case is usually in the motive of the other party. While there may be a few relatively level-headed girls on there who will accept the fact they're basically whoring - but aren't so reliant on the income that they're happy to charge less to ride guys they actually quite like - these will be very few and far between.

Far more will be made up with varying amounts and degrees of smug hoors who think they're too high class for hooring sites and charge accordingly, and civvy girls who've effectively mistaken it for a conventional dating platform. And then there's the massive crowd of tidy but daft, vain wee lassies of 19-22, who like the idea of being paid to be physically adored - but don't realise there's a massive difference between hooring themselves on Instagram amongst their internet "friends" for social currency, attention and adulation - then actually swallowing spunk for money.

The vast majority of profiles, however, will simply be scams where some cunt in the Philippines takes your money in return for fake pics - and that's only if it's a live scam that actually replies.

Everything in this game (and life) benefits from a perspective of perpetual cynicism. If a girl simply wants a shag (and very few do in relation to blokes), then she hasn't far to go to the nearest pub to drop her knickers. If she fancies getting paid to do so, and is worth getting paid to do so at standard whoring rates, there's a queue of us round the block to facilitate that also. So as I'm sure you've guessed by now, the chance of finding anything in between, in my view, is so rare it simply wouldn't be worth the time and effort to seek it out.

Offline Sha99er

Right so........

Having been following this thread for a wee while and being sick of the tripe we've got in Aberdeen right now with all the fucking Roms on the go I decided to have a wee flutter at this Seeking.com malarkey.

So registered on the site and paid my £70 notes for the month, if anyone else does it immediately go to settings and deselect autorenewal or you'll find yourself paying for another month.

So a week in I've got four birds on the go on Whatsapp one of thems even a Domme for my kinkier days!

Had my first meet last night from 5PM yesterday till 11 AM this morning, took her out till about 7PM last night had something to eat then back to the room till 11AM this morning. a proper wee goer as well definately one of the best meets I've had!

So yea, I'm liking what I'm seeing of this so far time will tell though.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2019, 12:45:32 pm by Toonzer »

Offline Name Not Found

Had my first meet last night from 5PM yesterday till 11 AM this morning, took her out till about 7PM last night had something to eat then back to the room till 11AM this morning. a proper wee goer as well definately one of the best meets I've had!

Are you paying her, or is this a 'relationship'?

Offline Sha99er

Nope paid her £400 for the overnight, which for something like 16 hours 14 of which was in bed wasn't bad really, shagged her all over the fucking place as well totally got my moneys worth TBH a wee pocket rocket this one like..

 She's definately one I'll be seeing again.