What is the correct way to expose a barebacker.

[lillythesavage]

New here, been feeling my way around, not punted during Covid to protect those around me but the itch is getting too strong too just scratch. Been a while since I punted a certain woman who is getting rave reviews, over 12 months, so cannot review and do not want to jump in and expose her with my first post.

My review would have been negative for the mentioned reason, I do not know whether to post a warning on the review threads or whether it is known and ignored because of service levels which were good up until a certain point.
Basically what is the advice of people been her for years, I do not want the wrath of regular posters, or fall foul of rules which I have read and will read again.

Seen threads jumped on for being barebackers on my tour around, but like I said she seems very popular here, do I or don,t I.

[PunterP]

Imo just do it as part of a review. You've seen the WG and as long as it's not a troll review, I don't see why there should be any backlash. For all you know, other people might have the same reasoning in their head and your post might be what has others posting their opinion.

[PunterP]

sorry just read that it's been over 12 months, maybe just post in regional discussion and see what happens esp if people aren't aware its a barebacker. I'd wanna know if someone was getting rave reviews and they might be doing BB. I doubt you'd get banned if you're not trolling

[Cupid Stuntz]

There is a post on most of the regions discussion page specifically for exposing bare backers.

Was this from a Girl you have seen who offered it during the punt or does / did she list it on her profile?

[pythondan]

I think with no reviews and limited posts there will many members who will question your credibility if you try to out a girl as a barebacker if there is no  supporting evidence from other sources.

If you feel that you really need to do it then it would probably be best to post a link to her profile and describe what happened then sit back and wait for the reaction.
 

[SpaceRaiderDave]

If as you say the lady is getting rave reviews you can make a post on one of those threads and give your thoughts based on the visit you had over 12 months ago. If yours is a common experience and she is as popular as stated others will chip in with their feedback.

[Captainhowdy666]

Some love the thought of stirring another mans yoghurt, even tucking in.
I’ll pass thanks.
If I was single I may dabble in BB but not while attached.

[Doc Holliday]

I think with no reviews and limited posts there will many members who will question your credibility if you try to out a girl as a barebacker if there is no  supporting evidence from other sources.

If you feel that you really need to do it then it would probably be best to post a link to her profile and describe what happened then sit back and wait for the reaction.

This ^

[usroads]

I think there are probably more UTC Barebackers than we realize so it's a difficult question to pin an answer to.
Same applies to UTC Anal - some SPs don't actually advertise all the services that are available.
A seperate UTC Bareback thread may be the answer - but dangerous for all.

[stevedave]

I think with no reviews and limited posts there will many members who will question your credibility if you try to out a girl as a barebacker if there is no  supporting evidence from other sources.

This.

Without any hard evidence, it's just an unsubstantiated allegation.

[lillythesavage]

I think with no reviews and limited posts there will many members who will question your credibility if you try to out a girl as a barebacker if there is no  supporting evidence from other sources.

If you feel that you really need to do it then it would probably be best to post a link to her profile and describe what happened then sit back and wait for the reaction.

This is exactly why I have not jumped in, it was a good while ago under a now defunct profile and I have no other evidence at all. It could be she has learned and no longer does. I do not feel the need to do it, and feeling my way around.
I asked the question here and reading the replies I think best to leave alone. I have no idea how to give more evidence and do not want to get into a " your word against mine scenario " with those that have reviewed or want to chip in.

I have had one PM from a concerned punter, asking if it was one of his reviews, it was not and I did not say who it was. Maybe if you are really concerned you could do the same.
Thank you to those that took the time to reply.

[myothernameis]

My review would have been negative for the mentioned reason,

I do not know whether to post a warning on the review threads or whether it is known and ignored because of service levels which were good up until a certain point.

I do not want the wrath of regular posters, or fall foul of rules which I have read and will read again.

You already have opened a can of worms, and some are likely to ask you, just post the details.  If you dont post something, what is the point of your thread, as this forum is about sharing, and not keeping things to your self

[SpaceRaiderDave]

I have had one PM from a concerned punter, asking if it was one of his reviews

It's hard to understand why any established member would be doing that as the probability is incredibly low and what benefit would it be to them even if it had been.

[MissWolf]

Gentlemen I believe the word you are looking for in relation to the OP is TROLL 

[Watts.E.Dunn]

Said this before and again!

You assume that ANY girl you are with is a barebacker, you just do not know what she gets up to all the time and who with, her pimp sergi, special clients, even boyfrinds or husband/partner.

So you use protection..

Women are wise to assume the same of any man they meet, they don't know what he may get up to either!..

[IAMBATMAN]

Definitely mention it in the review, you can also add the link to the barebacker thread of your region (NW has one not sure about the others).
You should probably wait a week or so before posting anything negative about a girl because it can have unforseen issues later such as negative feedback on AW for you and lying about you as revenge, I imagine lots of girls have issues with seeing anyone with bad feedback too. Also make sure your name on here is different to your AW account name

[Longshot]

I think there are probably more UTC Barebackers than we realize so it's a difficult question to pin an answer to.
Same applies to UTC Anal - some SPs don't actually advertise all the services that are available.
A seperate UTC Bareback thread may be the answer - but dangerous for all.

There is most definitely more UTC barebackers then we know about (hence the UTC)

Always assume every wg barebacks and take your own precautions accordingly.

[marcius2018]

There is most definitely more UTC barebackers then we know about (hence the UTC)

Always assume every wg barebacks and take your own precautions accordingly.

Amen to that!

[Horizontal pleasures]

 What is the correct way to expose a barebacker?
Take off her knickers ......

[Bush]

New here, been feeling my way around, not punted during Covid to protect those around me but the itch is getting too strong too just scratch.

Is the itch because she did bareback do you think 🤪

To put this to bed and give a chance for some solid advice based on robust information, without in anyway naming the escort, what is the evidence you have that leads you to suspect or know she engages in bareback sex ???

[Doc Holliday]

To put this to bed .....

    You'll learn.

[lillythesavage]

Is the itch because she did bareback do you think 🤪

To put this to bed and give a chance for some solid advice based on robust information, without in anyway naming the escort, what is the evidence you have that leads you to suspect or know she engages in bareback sex ???

I hope not, it was a good while ago lol, I only know what happened back then, I have no other evidence so taking the advice of the early replies and letting it go. Everyone makes mistakes and there is no mention in subsequent reviews.

I have seen this often looking around " barebacker  " on threads but as I am new and it was a good while ago I asked the question for advice rather than doing that.
The general sensible advice and yours is put it to bed unless more evidence appears, so that is what I will do.

[Horizontal pleasures]

I have seen this often looking around " barebacker  " on threads but as I am new and it was a good while ago I asked the question for advice rather than doing that.
The general sensible advice and yours is put it to bed unless more evidence appears, so that is what I will do.

I like that, discussing barebackers and the advice is to put them to bed  ....  and then jump in after them?

[Bush]

I hope not, it was a good while ago lol, I only know what happened back then, I have no other evidence so taking the advice of the early replies and letting it go. Everyone makes mistakes and there is no mention in subsequent reviews.

I have seen this often looking around " barebacker  " on threads but as I am new and it was a good while ago I asked the question for advice rather than doing that.
The general sensible advice and yours is put it to bed unless more evidence appears, so that is what I will do.

I admit to still being confused.....I haven’t been able to understand what makes you think the unnamed girls does BB, or is it that you know she does BB as you partook in BB with her. It would be good if you could clarify that and if it is a suspicion then let us know upon what evidence that suspicion is based.
If what ever you tell us is robust and undoubted then I personally think you should mention that on her last review so that members have the full information which they can use to judge whether a punt with the girl is a good idea.
But I do stress you should only ‘out’ if your intelligence on the lady is robust........but, thinking about it, if it isn’t robust info then you might have been best not to have mentioned it in the first place. All the above IMHO

[myothernameis]

I admit to still being confused.....I haven’t been able to understand what makes you think the unnamed girls does BB, or is it that you know she does BB as you partook in BB with her. It would be good if you could clarify that and if it is a suspicion then let us know upon what evidence that suspicion is based.
If what ever you tell us is robust and undoubted then I personally think you should mention that on her last review so that members have the full information which they can use to judge whether a punt with the girl is a good idea.
But I do stress you should only ‘out’ if your intelligence on the lady is robust........but, thinking about it, if it isn’t robust info then you might have been best not to have mentioned it in the first place. All the above IMHO

Sound advice for the OP, if he wont name the escort, can he at least explain himself, and for what reasons he thinks that escort frequents in bare back sex

[Jonestown]

I have had one PM from a concerned punter, asking if it was one of his reviews, it was not and I did not say who it was. Maybe if you are really concerned

You have only 9 posts, but you have access to forum PM facility, that must be a new concession to new members, it used to be that you had to have twenty or so posts.

[SpaceRaiderDave]

You have only 9 posts, but you have access to forum PM facility, that must be a new concession to new members, it used to be that you had to have twenty or so posts.

He is the receiver of the PM so I assume the sender must be an established member with more than 20 posts or is it the case both sides have to qualify for a PM conversation?

[myothernameis]

You have only 9 posts, but you have access to forum PM facility, that must be a new concession to new members, it used to be that you had to have twenty or so posts.

I think established members can pm, newly joined members, but the new members cant contact established members

[contentguy]

..... Been a while since I punted a certain woman who is getting rave reviews.....

This is exactly why I have not jumped in, it was a good while ago under a now defunct profile ....

The OP needs to to decide whether said SP is "getting rave reviews", or had a profile some time ago and is now no longer working "defunct".

The messages aren't consistent.

Guy

[MancTommy]

I think established members can pm, newly joined members, but the new members cant contact established members

That's correct. I was figuring my way around the site and found that out.

[daviemac]

You have only 9 posts, but you have access to forum PM facility, that must be a new concession to new members, it used to be that you had to have twenty or so posts.

Everybody can receive PMs but new members can't send PM's they can only respond to one's they receive. 

[bst]

You have only 9 posts, but you have access to forum PM facility, that must be a new concession to new members, it used to be that you had to have twenty or so posts.

It was actually me, and I messaged him hence he could reply in line with the reasons others have stated. I messaged OP as I have reviewed two of the most popular WGs in London from the second half of 2020. Was check if it was either of them.

The OP needs to to decide whether said SP is "getting rave reviews", or had a profile some time ago and is now no longer working "defunct".

The messages aren't consistent.

Guy

THIS

[saymyname]

I admit to still being confused.....I haven’t been able to understand what makes you think the unnamed girls does BB, or is it that you know she does BB as you partook in BB with her. It would be good if you could clarify that and if it is a suspicion then let us know upon what evidence that suspicion is based.
If what ever you tell us is robust and undoubted then I personally think you should mention that on her last review so that members have the full information which they can use to judge whether a punt with the girl is a good idea.
But I do stress you should only ‘out’ if your intelligence on the lady is robust........but, thinking about it, if it isn’t robust info then you might have been best not to have mentioned it in the first place. All the above IMHO

My read on his posts is that he barebacked the SP on his visit, which took place over 12 months ago. He recognises that he made a mistake and bareback is not something he wants to do again. I think his concern is that the visit was so long ago, and he has no further evidence, he is not sure whether he should name the lady - she may no longer provide this service or it might have been a one off.

The OP needs to to decide whether said SP is "getting rave reviews", or had a profile some time ago and is now no longer working "defunct".

The messages aren't consistent.

Guy

Again, my read is that the lady in question is a highly reviewed SP who previously used another AW profile, but now uses a new one which is active.

My general opinion is that the OP should name her as it is an issue of public health. He should caveat it with the information that he has provided. I think he has been open with his disclosures, so each member can assess for themselves his credibility. I am not sure how this is different from any other review or post.

[Jonestown]

I have reviewed two of the most popular WGs in London from the second half of 2020. Was check if it was either of them.

Which of your six do you rate as being among the most popular in London, just that only one of them that you have reviewed has a significant AW rating ?

[bst]

AW ratings? I would not necessarily use that as an indicator of a WG's popularity (some don't use the booking system) and any way the booking system is suspended now and was suspended during the entirety or said second half of 2020.

I was referring to N Natt and Lucy M and with their reviews on THIS site in mind. Both have double figure positives in the stated time frame which is pretty good going.

[funfungoodguy]

This link fits the thread, openly offered BB with original profile, on-going reputation for it (UTC?).
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=277878.0
And has a dusty phone today (seemingly ignorant of rapid spread of Covid in Eastern region).



Hidden Image/Members Only

[daviemac]

This link fits the thread, openly offered BB with original profile, on-going reputation for it (UTC?).
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=277878.0
And has a dusty phone today (seemingly ignorant of rapid spread of Covid in Eastern region).

This has nothing to do with this thread.

[Kev40ish]

This link fits the thread, openly offered BB with original profile, on-going reputation for it (UTC?).
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=277878.0
And has a dusty phone today (seemingly ignorant of rapid spread of Covid in Eastern region).



Hidden Image/Members Only

Where does it say anywhere she openly offered BB?

[funfungoodguy]

Apologies, then by all means delete the post if it doesn't fit.

But if you read back the previous threads there is a remark that she did offer it in her original profile, albeit some time ago.

[daviemac]

Apologies, then by all means delete the post if it doesn't fit.

But if you read back the previous threads there is a remark that she did offer it in her original profile, albeit some time ago.

The OP of this thread is talking about one specific escort, what makes you think the girl you linked to is that escort.