He was a fluffy and a tout clear as day to me.
Anyway that never got him and his mates putting the idea about admin in his head that he posted got him banned.
But only to you and no one else. You have destroyed this thread with your unfounded suspicions. Even on the other thread you were the only prosecutor, lots of other members disagreed with you then as they do now. But you do this so often.
You are a bully VW. And your intellect could be used so much for the better to encourage people on contribute. But when they see this sort of nonsence that you pour out in your arrogance - you can see why we have too many lurkers ( which admittedly is being dealt with). The environment that you create comes across as openly hostile and you do have influence as leading poster. Newbies just dont want to be involved in personnal attacks. I dont want to get involved in personnal attacks- even on you.
I'd like to see you do something extraordainary and reconsider this decision, get it reversed and hopefully we can benifit from further reviews from a committed punter.
We are supposed to be all contributing in a positive way as we all want the same thing (I hope). We should be able to this in a better way with out one senior poster acting alone as prosecutor when others are not in agreement.
The sites ethos is about punting reviews. I'm on board with this. We all have different styles of reviews. Mine certainly varies. There should be latitude for punters to write reviews in a style they are happy with. But at least they do the review which is more than most. I want to encourage members to have the confidence to do a review and if I'm not happy I will ask for more info and hopefully be constructive in any critisism.
[/quote]
Anyway that never got him and his mates putting the idea about admin in his head that he posted got him banned.
[/quote]
This was a minor infringement but you did set him up for the fall.....
And lets be honest if you didnt get him this time there would have been the next thread for you to start again.
