Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: would you leave money in your will to an escort  (Read 2964 times)

Offline Deepstroker

Leave a WG money in my will? WTF for? I dont have my bin man/postman or similar in my will. Maybe an arrangement could be made. You visit a WG once a week for life and in return they get a copy of your will to produce when you snuff it?

Online NightKid

I did think it was a strange thread, even fake. But on looking at the OP's profile he just seems like a gentleman who is seriously out of touch with reality - and possibly desperate to be loved. He imagines prostitutes are little angels just for doing their job.

Yes, I realise that's there nothing technically wrong with his proposal. But when you consider the amount of ill will that's bound to be generated by doing so, then I think there's a very strong case against it ... hence my initial remark.
If the OP's intention is merely to reward these women for 'enriching' his life, then why not gift it now while he can control the money's traceability instead of purposely inciting controversy with a public document?

I've seen first-hand how ugly inheritance issues like these can get, very quickly. So all I have left to say on the matter is: don't be remembered as the arse who started it all.

Seriously, there's nothing 'wrong' with someone doing whatever they want with their life: but imagining you are making it count for something rather than actually doing so is an opportunity missed. There are many life-expanding possibilities one can use money for before one dies. If the gentleman feels his life has been overwhelmingly enhanced by fucking prostitutes there are one or two charities that are fighting for prostitutes rights and trying to stop abolitionist legislation. But he is a punter, not a prostitute. Why not consider something that his own life has stood for. What did you do in your life that had value to others? There is probably something. Carry on doing it after you're dead.

btw, with respect to someone who is maybe very elderly, fluffy reviews are maybe 'sweet', but for others reading them, it is not really 'value' they contain on UKP as much as 'msg' and maybe a little entertainment content.

No disagreements there, and very well said.  :thumbsup:  :hi:

Probably not, but have to disagree with you profusely Benson re them blowing it.  Most of the WG'S I have seen are savvy savers!  That said, it depends on the WG, but they aren't all scatty spendaholics!  Iv'e seen some renovate houses, buy holiday homes, privately educate their kids etc - so some are good with their cash.

I'm sorry but, putting aside your comments for a minute, wasn't there a previously banned member with the same username? Perhaps you might want to make yourself known to Admin first.

Offline smiths

Yes, I realise that's there nothing technically wrong with his proposal. But when you consider the amount of ill will that's bound to be generated by doing so, then I think there's a very strong case against it ... hence my initial remark.
If the OP's intention is merely to reward these women for 'enriching' his life, then why not gift it now while he can control the money's traceability instead of purposely inciting controversy with a public document?

I've seen first-hand how ugly inheritance issues like these can get, very quickly. So all I have left to say on the matter is: don't be remembered as the arse who started it all.

No disagreements there, and very well said.  :thumbsup:  :hi:

I'm sorry but, putting aside your comments for a minute, wasn't there a previously banned member with the same username? Perhaps you might want to make yourself known to Admin first.

That banned poster was called Whore Of Babylon without the "the". ;)

DogFace36

  • Guest
  I'd imagine that Sergei, Tyrone and Wayne will be very appreciative of your generosity.

The whore of Babylon

  • Guest
I wasn't aware of that Knightkid - cheers!.  But i'm sure admin will know that our IP addresses aren't the same, so not overly concerned.  Just annoyed slightly as I thought I was being original!  Haven't seen the username on the site before.