How do you rate these women?

[Cheshuk]

Posts on a thread of a member looking for a stunner raised a question of what is hot.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=371669.0

Some people seem to think everyones standard are totally different and others like myself think there's a generally accepted level of hot with odd anomalies who think otherwise.

I picked 3 famous-ish girls of each hair colour (sorry ginger) I think the vast majority will agree are stunners 8+

Curious what people rate these 3 girls, for me they're 9,9 & 9 left to right

How do others rate them out of 10 left to right?

If you say 7 or below please attach a picture of what you consider a 9

(just based on the pictures attached, not on how they look now or if the image is enhanced)


Note:
If you think the posts pointless you don't need to participate.
If it should be enough topic chat I apologise, I couldn't decide which category fitted it best since it is kinda putting related.
If it already exist again, apologies.

[Cheshuk]

Can you not attach images to posts here? it won't allow it

[Iloveoral]

Testing



Hidden Image/Members Only

Looks ok to me
Is it the file type?
Some photos I upload aren’t recognised sometimes due the the file type, if so I screenshot so it converts to a jpg as a quick and simple fix

[Cheshuk]

Testing



Hidden Image/Members Only

Looks ok to me
Is it the file type?
Some photos I upload aren’t recognised sometimes due the the file type, if so I screenshot so it converts to a jpg as a quick and simple fix

Must be an issue on my end, using Safari on Mac. Never been an issue before but won't attach anything now. Will try now

[Cheshuk]

These 3

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Cheshuk]

Testing



Hidden Image/Members Only

Looks ok to me
Is it the file type?
Some photos I upload aren’t recognised sometimes due the the file type, if so I screenshot so it converts to a jpg as a quick and simple fix

Thanks ILO screenshooting them works

[Iloveoral]

Thanks ILO screenshooting them works

[Bat]

I’d rate all of them very highly and if I had to order them then I’d put the black hair first and the blonde third. Only because the blonde looks a little ‘plastic’, maybe just photoshop image softening.

[PilotMan]

The problem with those pictures, apart from being low res is that they have all been photoshopped, they all have that generic Photoshop look about them. Thin nose, perfect eyebrows, cat eyes, high cheekbones etc etc.

Try adding some higher res pictures and ones that aren't photoshopped.

[Cheshuk]

The problem with those pictures, apart from being low res is that they have all been photoshopped, they all have that generic Photoshop look about them. Thin nose, perfect eyebrows, cat eyes, high cheekbones etc etc.

Try adding some higher res pictures and ones that aren't photoshopped.

Maybe but I think they'll do for the purpose of the post its not going in a scientific journal, plus unrealistic shopping may serve the purpose better just seeing what people generally think

[RandomGuy99]

Scores out of 10 are pointless and degrading.  You have some on here saying they never shag less than an 8;

A good or excellent SP isn't just about looks.

Forget the scores

[Bat]

A good or excellent SP isn't just about looks.

Totally agree with this!

[JustaPunter]

What people find attractive is very personal

As an example I wouldn’t rate any of those ladies in the attached pictures.

No doubt many would have a different viewpoint

[alabama1]

Scores out of 10 are pointless and degrading.  You have some on here saying they never shag less than an 8;

A good or excellent SP isn't just about looks.

Forget the scores

No, but it's the most important factor for me. Don't understand also why you think that scoring WG's is degrading, this is a review site after all. I doubt that a WG seeing her score on here would feel degraded. Annoyed or pissed off maybe, if she had a low score. If you had any self worth, would you feel degraded if you scored low at work. 

[shagmore]

And try adding ones without fake tits

[hendrix]

The blonde is the only one I'd consider (depending on service level)

[webpunter]

Scores out of 10 are pointless and degrading.  You have some on here saying they never shag less than an 8;

A good or excellent SP isn't just about looks.

Forget the scores

Indeed, however never anything bigger than a 14
Edit:  at a stretch, 12-14 fine

[PilotMan]

Scores out of 10 are pointless and degrading. 

The OP is trying to understand peoples subjective opinions - how is that degrading?

[billybobsmith]

The brunette has a sort of Megan Fox type look, but nothing special.  The other two I don't find the slightest bit attractive.

If I had a choice between any of them, I'd have a wank

[Kelgon85]

It is Megan Fox, and the blonde one is pornstar Briana Banks. Shame that Megan Fox doesn't really look like that anymore. She's had so much work done over the years.

[sensualencounter]

The OP is trying to understand peoples subjective opinions - how is that degrading?

By grading their looks. It’s pretty much the meaning of the word. De-grade - downgrade.

One person’s 8 is another person’s 2. It’s so subjective and yet every now and again someone tries to come up with a “but this person MUST be at least an 8”.

And anyway, what is it the OP actually wants grading? The face, the tits, the body, the legs, the arse, the arms, the feet, the pussy, the stamina, the oral, the anal, the handjob, the stroking, the voice, the kissing???? It’s endless and every single aspect is subjective, so stupid, especially to come up with one single grade overall imo..

Taking the OPs three examples, there are some things about all of them I find incredibly attractive but also some things I don’t. But ffs we’re not at a livestock market, despite many punters best attempts to treat women as pieces of meat.

[Liverpool]

The 3rd picture, Gemma Massey in her early years was ridiculously attractive. Not so much now.

[southern punter]

Blonde is a walk for me, other two are hot

[billybobsmith]

At the end of the day, we all grade (even if subconsciously) women on looks, tits, legs, feet, hips, eyes, hair, lips etc. even if we're not using a number system.

As I said, I don't find any of them attractive from those pictures. 
Megan Fox looked quite nice when I was watching one of the Transformers movies the other day, but as with most women, some pictures make them look seriously hot, others where you might not look twice at them in the street.

[PilotMan]

By grading their looks. It’s pretty much the meaning of the word. De-grade - downgrade.

In your haste to flame someone, and be righteous AGAIN (habit of yours).

Grading is grading - De-Grade or downgrade is not "pretty much" the meaning of the word grade - you conveniently forgot about UP-grade!

[wristjob]

A good or excellent SP isn't just about looks.

Absolutely, and I would even say when you get a good one there often isn't a type. the best ones are all about their differences and uniqueness, and for me it's the personality and chemistry that makes them worth repeat visits.

[PilotMan]

Absolutely, and I would even say when you get a good one there often isn't a type. the best ones are all about their differences and uniqueness, and for me it's the personality and chemistry that makes them worth repeat visits.

The OP isn't asking what makes them a good SP - he's asking purely about looks and trying to find out what other people find attractive, just on looks, no other intrinsic qualities.

[Gynaemyte]

Dark haired girl in the coat looks very sultry and natural.
But I'm very conventional -

[Cheshuk]

The OP isn't asking what makes them a good SP - he's asking purely about looks and trying to find out what other people find attractive, just on looks, no other intrinsic qualities.

Its actually funny how much the responses are not aligned with the question I asked, just 3 scores and a picture of what people consider top tier looks.

Service/personality and all other points are assumed to be equal

I don't think I'll get what i'm looking for but appreciate you trying to put it back on track

[sensualencounter]

In your haste to flame someone, and be righteous AGAIN (habit of yours).

Grading is grading - De-Grade or downgrade is not "pretty much" the meaning of the word grade - you conveniently forgot about UP-grade!

Not flaming anyone but if you feel hot, then go with it. But I will flame you if you like. You clearly don’t get that the OPs question in the first instance is totally subjective. He hasn’t even described what he is grading (de or up). Just “hot”. Tits make a woman hot to some. Or any other thing on my list and many many more. But within “hot tits” someone’s hot tits will not be someone else’s.

Now, if he’s purely talking about facial beauty, then he should have said so. But even that is completely subjective. Therefore, it is stupid imo.

And yet again, if you think I’m just “being righteous” then one person’s superiority and condescension is another person’s uncomplicated belief in their own thoughts being correct and fair. You have the sad ability to be unable to disagree with me without resorting to trying to belittle my thoughts. Now isn’t that the righteous that you wish to belittle me with?  Chill out and one day you might realise that people are allowed to have differing opinions to yourself. Good luck because it’s quite a cool place to be when that happens 

[Hotdogboy88]

In your haste to flame someone, and be righteous AGAIN (habit of yours).

Grading is grading - De-Grade or downgrade is not "pretty much" the meaning of the word grade - you conveniently forgot about UP-grade!

I wouldn’t waste your time mate be a troll. He’s reviewed people and graded them the hypocrisy of it is staggering. He/she is as predictable as they come.

[sensualencounter]

Its actually funny how much the responses are not aligned with the question I asked, just 3 scores and a picture of what people consider top tier looks.

Service/personality and all other points are assumed to be equal

I don't think I'll get what i'm looking for but appreciate you trying to put it back on track

So maybe be clearer about what you are talking about rather than just “hot”? Hot means many different things to many different people.

[sensualencounter]

I wouldn’t waste your time mate be a troll. He’s reviewed people and graded them the hypocrisy of it is staggering. He/she is as predictable as they come.

If you think I’m a troll, report me. Trolling isn’t tolerated here so stand by your convictions and report away if you’re that bothered. Otherwise, I’d suggest that your post is rather more inflammatory and of zero value to this thread and hence way more troll-like. If you don’t like my comments then challenge them in discussion and I’ll be happy to debate sensibly like adults or just move on. That feels far more mature than your post. But each to their own.

[bigden40]

Isn’t grading women pretty much the purpose of this forum? 

[RandomGuy99]

Isn’t grading women pretty much the purpose of this forum? 

Yes, but reducing them to a single number isn't good.

That's why I stopped giving scores for looks, acting ability, etc. Best to give descriptions.

An SP who isn't for you may be ideal for another SS.

[mills_and_bhuna]

Isn’t grading women pretty much the purpose of this forum? 

Not really.
We're grading them on whether their service is commensurate with giving them a hefty chunk of our hard earned cash.
Their attractiveness is going to be mentioned because it is partly what makes us want to do whatever we want to do (with them).
But give me a 4 or a 5 with a nice personality and a desire to see me happy when I leave than an 8 or a 9 who doesn't give a shit beyond the contents of my wallet.
Any. Day. Of. The. Week.

[RandomGuy99]

And my view on 3 you posted is:

1. Has massive fake boobs which look like they're stretching her skin way too kuch, zo it would be a no from me

2. Looks more than natural, so I'd prefer to see her.

3. Bad photo so difficult to say, but I llike brunettes so I'd have no objections.

As they're all models I'd probably avoid as I prefer to see normal women. Model like women make me feel shit as I'm not in their league.

[jimbobted]

None of them do anything for me  .

[Hornydevil666]

The problem with these AW profile pictures is that they are photo shopped especially the pics that look like they have been done in a studio etc

Is like seeing a nice BMW on Autotrader, calling to see if it's still avail, travelling to buy it and it's actually a Nissan micra they are selling,

but you still have a little RIDE in it.😜

[mr.bluesky]

The picture of the dark haired girl in the middle is surely actress Megan Fox  haven't seen her profile on adultwork 

[RandomGuy99]

The picture of the dark haired girl in the middle is surely actress Megan Fox  haven't seen her profile on adultwork 

Her profile comes and goes. She seems to work every other Thursday.

[wristjob]

Still pictures rarely work for me.

Top blonde looks terrible. Too fake, nasty boobs. Jordan pre boob jobs was 10, post boob jobs and all the other work hard to see her better than a 6, if that.
The girl in the coat looks nice, but the coat covers up a lot.
Pic 3 is nice but hard to say what she actually looks like.

I guess some people like the fake, made up and probably photoshopped look. Some people like the natural look more. I don't know how much crossover there is there, more artificial is better for 1 person and worse for another. Uncanny valley.

[southcoastpunter]

Some people seem to think everyones standard are totally different and others like myself think there's a generally accepted level of hot with odd anomalies who think otherwise.

I picked 3 famous-ish girls of each hair colour (sorry ginger) I think the vast majority will agree are stunners 8+

Curious what people rate these 3 girls, for me they're 9,9 & 9 left to right

well i think your theory that most guys have the same "likes as you" is blown out the water. Like some others, I would not describe any lady with fake boobs as "a stunner". It just goes to show, we are all different and in reviews, i don't think terms like "stunner" or "attractive" is helpful but reference as to whether they look like their profile pics or not is imo much more useful.

It follows that i don't think scoring ladies is helpful either.  (As to whether its de-grading - it might depend who you ask. Perhaps most women would have a different view to us guys. I think its one of the reasons why Mumsnet hate us so much because we score women in this way. )

[Hotdogboy88]

I would choose middle girl first ( a solid 9 out of 10 ) Bottom girl quite a distant 2nd ( 5 out of 10) and top girl 3rd (5out of 10)
But I’d happily shag them all. 

[Cheshuk]

well i think your theory that most guys have the same "likes as you" is blown out the water. Like some others, I would not describe any lady with fake boobs as "a stunner". It just goes to show, we are all different and in reviews, i don't think terms like "stunner" or "attractive" is helpful but reference as to whether they look like their profile pics or not is imo much more useful.

It follows that i don't think scoring ladies is helpful either.  (As to whether its de-grading - it might depend who you ask. Perhaps most women would have a different view to us guys. I think its one of the reasons why Mumsnet hate us so much because we score women in this way. )

Ngl very surprised by the results, cheers to those who contributed

[Al R]

Honestly don’t think I’d be rushing to book any of those 3 if I saw them on AW. Maybe the middle girl. As others have mentioned fake tits are a turn off for me.

If I described someone at stunning it’d be relevant to my taste, not what someone else rates as attractive.

I prefer petite, small(ish) boobs, pretty face but girl next door looks also work.

I can’t post photos from my phone but I’d rate someone like Foxy Di far more attractive than any of the three in the op.

[Hotdogboy88]

Let’s be honest in general we all have roughly the same tastes. If we got 200 models size 12 and below and lined them up against 200 size 14 and above we all arrive at pretty much the same answer maybe the answer odd 10% difference.

Which is why hot attractive girls are used to lure in wales in whatever field the business is trying in. We all know they’re beautiful women and there’s munters. Just like there is with men it’s just the way the world works. And we grade day In day out by buying products and services advertised by hot women. It’s how humans are built. Like it or not it’s a fact. 

[Cheshuk]

Let’s be honest in general we all have roughly the same tastes. If we got 200 models size 12 and below and lined them up against 200 size 14 and above we all arrive at pretty much the same answer maybe the answer odd 10% difference.

Which is why hot attractive girls are used to lure in wales in whatever field the business is trying in. We all know they’re beautiful women and there’s munters. Just like there is with men it’s just the way the world works. And we grade day In day out by buying products and services advertised by hot women. It’s how humans are built. Like it or not it’s a fact. 

That's what I thought initially but seems otherwise from responses, unless you're saying we all only agree on dress size?

[PilotMan]

Let’s be honest in general we all have roughly the same tastes. If we got 200 models size 12 and below and lined them up against 200 size 14 and above we all arrive at pretty much the same answer maybe the answer odd 10% difference.

Which is why hot attractive girls are used to lure in wales in whatever field the business is trying in. We all know they’re beautiful women and there’s munters. Just like there is with men it’s just the way the world works. And we grade day In day out by buying products and services advertised by hot women. It’s how humans are built. Like it or not it’s a fact. 

+1

[mr.bluesky]

Her profile comes and goes. She seems to work every other Thursday.

  inbetween filming the  "Transformers" movies
Imagine how much she would charge 😳