kendraaxo Hamilton

[Dingdong]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

New profile, says Glasgow, actually Hamilton.  No feedback. Profile limited.
Why am I thinking about it?  Young, Scottish etc,
Anyone any info on her, would be much appreciated

[FBman78]

Reminds me of a bird from years ago in Hamilton, think her name was Little Lori or something like that, wee lass tidy looking but was a thief it transpired from another forum.  Might be might not.

[J_H]

How can you tell from just looking at her tits? LOL!

Little Lori hung out in Kirkmuirhill - very tidy piece, possibly the sexiest looking WG I've come across (not literally) - was desperate to fuck her, but the stories on here put me well off.

[youngatheart]

According to her profile she is READY TO FUCK but shagging isn't on her "enjoys" list !!

Enjoys:

15 Mins "quickie"
BDSM
BDSM (giving)
BDSM (receiving)
Being Filmed
Lapdancing
Massage
MMF 3Somes
Modeling
Moresomes
Naturism/Nudism
Oral
Oral without (at discretion)
Oral without Protection
   

[myothernameis]

How can you tell from just looking at her tits? LOL!

Little Lori hung out in Kirkmuirhill - very tidy piece, possibly the sexiest looking WG I've come across (not literally) - was desperate to fuck her, but the stories on here put me well off.

That escort is not little lori, as you can see by the photos I have posted, little lori has some tattoos

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[J_H]

Cheers. I take it Lori is in fact out of the game now?

[bellamy1403]

Been trying to get in contact with kendra recently but with very slow and unhelpful replies, will let you know if any progress is made or a meet is arranged

[bellamy1403]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

New profile, says Glasgow, actually Hamilton.  No feedback. Profile limited.
Why am I thinking about it?  Young, Scottish etc,
Anyone any info on her, would be much appreciated

30 min incall with kendra done and dusted. Overall a positive for me, good looking lass, will write and post my review when im home

[Kinkylad89]

Cheers. I take it Lori is in fact out of the game now?

Yep, loved up with her boyfriend has been for a few years now

[Courtney]

Yep, loved up with her boyfriend has been for a few years now

WTactualF?! Are you the ugly guy in the picture or something? Why would you know her social media and post it here? (this looks like Facebook)

Posting WGs (retired or not) personal social media content is against site rules.

[Uncle Buck]

Yep, loved up with her boyfriend has been for a few years now

It’s definitely should be against site rules. More importantly, it’s bang out of order and shows you up for the fucking arse hole you undoubtedly are.

Irresponsible and downright pitiful. Twat.......

[Courtney]

It’s definitely should be against site rules. More importantly, it’s bang out of order and shows you up for the fucking arse hole you undoubtedly are.

Irresponsible and downright pitiful. Twat.......

As daviemac said before, it makes it easier if you don’t quote the content.

You should still have time to edit it out.

P.s. Done for you now.

[myothernameis]

Yep, loved up with her boyfriend has been for a few years now

Yeh, I can confirm this was or could be the boyfriend, but on another punting forum, not the one we can't name, but one that was glasgow based

The topic of the boyfriend came up a few times, so he could have been her pimp at the time, and was known for being a nasty piece of work, so dont know if there still together

[Kinkylad89]

WTactualF?! Are you the ugly guy in the picture or something? Why would you know her social media and post it here? (this looks like Facebook)

Posting WGs (retired or not) personal social media content is against site rules.

Because I know her and the social media info wasn’t in the picture so it was simply just a picture just like any other picture posted so get off your high horse

[90125]

It’s definitely should be against site rules. More importantly, it’s bang out of order and shows you up for the fucking arse hole you undoubtedly are.

Irresponsible and downright pitiful. Twat.......

Pic removed .... but why quote it 

[Kinkylad89]

Let’s go round removing all verification pictures as if they wanted the public they would keep them public.  AW is a form of 18+ social media

[Courtney]

Because I know her and the social media info wasn’t in the picture so it was simply just a picture just like any other picture posted so get off your high horse

...you are sounding more dodgy by the minute.

It doesn’t matter what you remove, read the rules you moron:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

[Kinkylad89]

...you are sounding more dodgy by the minute.

It doesn’t matter what you remove, read the rules you moron:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

As below please read yourself states.

“ such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.”

Real name - there was none
Personal social networking profile - no profile show
Photos from messenger providers such as whatsapp - wasn’t from any messenger service

Doesn’t state no photos from social media so don’t try and bend the rules. If they wanna change the rules that’s fine but stated in clear English has not broken any of those 3 rules

[Courtney]

As below please read yourself states.

“ such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.”

Real name - there was none
Personal social networking profile - no profile show
Photos from messenger providers such as whatsapp - wasn’t from any messenger service

Doesn’t state no photos from social media so don’t try and bend the rules. If they wanna change the rules that’s fine but stated in clear English has not broken any of those 3 rules

...at the end of the day Admin has removed it. So there. If you disagree you can fuck off somewhere else. Sounds like you are just trying to make excuses for yourself.

[Kinkylad89]

Admins free to do as they please but why try claim rules not followed when no such rule. 

[daviemac]

As below please read yourself states.

“ such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.”

Real name - there was none
Personal social networking profile - no profile show
Photos from messenger providers such as whatsapp - wasn’t from any messenger service

Doesn’t state no photos from social media so don’t try and bend the rules. If they wanna change the rules that’s fine but stated in clear English has not broken any of those 3 rules

I'm not sure what you're finding so difficult to understand about the rules - such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.

Edit

What was I thinking in recommending we give you a chance.     

[myothernameis]

Let’s go round removing all verification pictures as if they wanted the public they would keep them public.  AW is a form of 18+ social media

No Facebook and Adult Work, are completely different media sites

Facebook is family and friends based, and we dont go looking for sex on facebook, escorts might bein facebook, but this means you dont stalk them, or even friend request

Adult Work is straightforward for us, and we know what's it all about, and not everyone appreciates our past times, so linking someone facebook profile, can be picked by anyone is is on here as a guest.  So you could have someone from the press, and because you ost a picture, taken form her facebook page, it leads the press back to her, and her friends

[Kinkylad89]

I'm not sure what you're finding so difficult to understand about the rules - such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.

Edit

What was I thinking in recommending we give you a chance.     

The English language teaches us in that sentence the “and” is separating the 2 points don’t twist the English language to suit you point

[myothernameis]

Admins free to do as they please but why try claim rules not followed when no such rule. 

There was a rule which covered private photos, which include sites like facebook, photos sent over your phone, were also of limits

So you could only copy photos from adult site, where the escort has posted them, so therefore in the public domain, and viewable to a adult audience

I believe the rules changed when UKP was taken over by the new owner, so this might explain, why you cant find them

What was I thinking in recommending we give you a chance.     

I think the best thing for Kinkylad89, is just to let this go, dont post any more comments, trying to justify himself

[daviemac]

There was a rule which covered private photos, which include sites like facebook, photos sent over your phone, were also of limits

So you could only copy photos from adult site, where the escort has posted them, so therefore in the public domain, and viewable to a adult audience

I believe the rules changed when UKP was taken over by the new owner, so this might explain, why you cant find them

I think the best thing for Kinkylad89, is just to let this go, dont post any more comments, trying to justify himself

There's no helping some people, all he had to do was accept that private photos are not allowed to be posted.   

[myothernameis]

There's no helping some people, all he had to do was accept that private photos are not allowed to be posted.   

I wouldn't be surprised if he knew lori real name, and her facebook page, as this is the only way the photo can be obtained

I learned her real name back in 2010, but this was through someone creating a fake facebook profile, and posted her real name, even at one time she worked locally to me