Sildenafil and Tadalafil are only licenced for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension which is a relatively rare cause of hypertension. Is that your diagnosis?
Morning Doc .Are you saying Sildenafil isn't licensed for treatment of erectile dysfunction in the UK?
I said that in my own experience, I found Viagra to work better... i.e. for me. If you take the difference in composition for Viagra and Mylan branded Sildenafil for example, the latter does not use lactose as a part of it's inactive ingredients i.e. a bulking agent, wheres as Viagra does use it. Lactose can affect individuals in different ways (not necessarily lactose intolerant) and can affect how medication is absorbed.
The problem with sildenafil (be it Viagra or generic) is its hugely variable absorption rate. This the main reason people report variations in response. Tadalafil is much better in this respect because its absorption is much less effected by stomach contents.
Regarding non active ingredients etc in Sildenafil these are of no real significance in terms of effectiveness of the active ingredient. The problem with sildenafil (be it Viagra or generic) is its hugely variable absorption rate. This the main reason people report variations in response. Tadalafil is much better in this respect because its absorption is much less effected by stomach contents.
You also wrote effected instead of affected, but I won't tell anyone
Doc, any comments on size related dosing i take 100 mg a punt but very large physcial build.I hear thats relavent to do other drungs, maybe the same with Viagra and its associates?.
The popular form of course is very marketable, easy to package and keeps well. If they started selling the chewable mint tablets that have gone down very well in some countries and which are absorbed a bit faster, freshen the breath, and are not quite as stable once out the packet, they'd be accused of "pandering to party-people".