Each to their own, but I'd recommend that you wind your neck in a bit until you learn to accept the fact that others have a different opinion than you. To imply that there is such a thing as "objective" beauty in this context, or that anyone who thinks that this girl is good looking or beautiful is therefore not being "objective" because you don't think that she is, is at best misguided and at worst, just plain stupid.
Mate, of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder and not all muslims are terrorists. Let's skip this philosophical bullsh!t....
I assure you, since you saw Delisha most recently, we both don't know what she really looks like without her hazel eye contacts, collagen lip injections and ten pounds of foundation. This is a classic example of pulling the bird in the nightclub only to realize she looks totally different without her makeup the following morning. I am pretty sure she is not pretty without all the special effects, can you at least tell me the real colour of her eyes?
Maybe I expected a blonde as per the photos only to realize she is a brunette whose blonde highlights need a serious touch up. The photos are misleading and this is one of the biggest isssues when using agencies. If I wanted a wanted a brunette, I would have booked one....
I mb a bit more tan than you so had to wash all that makeup residue off my face and chest --> maybe something you didn't have to deal with idk.....
And as fluffy reviews aren't well recvd on this board as I even had skeptics lurking about my Suzy Cortez review, it really is a matter of degrees of freedom when writing for others, the general audience. For me, the more unnatural a girl looks, the more you should discount that beauty.
What is your criteria, can you honestly say you would want to pick this girl up at the pub? I'd rather bang serena williams after 4 hours of tennis bc i know what i am getting
