Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Aurelian Diva escort  (Read 2067 times)

sunnylee

  • Guest
Met Aurella today, place a nice flat in Gloucester Road. Girl almost same as in picture, very friendly, limited English, looks early twenties . Services provided are dfk, Owo, cim,deepthroat . I asked for rimming when she started licking the base of my balls and she said it's extra. She is all natural with a fantastic arse. Nowadays I can only come once in an hour. After lots of oral, I fucked her in doggy until I came, I had 20minutes left and opted for a massage for the rest of the time. Left before 5min to time since another punter is due.
External Link/Members Only


« Last Edit: December 24, 2017, 06:26:00 pm by sunnylee »

Offline hw189

I guess you mean this escort:
External Link/Members Only

Although you may be OK with your time being cut by 5 minutes, I OTOH would not be pleased at all and would mark down a review for that reason alone. £200 p/h is not cheap. On the proviso that you arrived on time, this lady should have given you your full hour. An excuse like 'another punter is due' as what you described the escort gave you is simply not good enough reason either for the escort or the agency. This just proves that the escort is either lazy / ripping off skank and / or the agency is bad with their time management.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2017, 11:43:55 am by hw189 »

sunnylee

  • Guest
Yes, that's the one.
Not the girls mistake nor agencies , I was late by 15 min due to train problems, all trains were only up to South Kensington and was held up quite a bit,  and had a 10,12 min walk to the place from South Kensington .I let them know I was held up. If it is was later than 15minutes, probably it would be cancelled.  Sorry I didn't mention it in review.  Girl is pretty and friendly
« Last Edit: December 25, 2017, 12:02:35 pm by sunnylee »

Offline YoungBrom

Hi OP. Would you say this girl looked very much like her pics? And it's her height accurate?

Offline king tarzan

I had horrendous experience with akkulina
But I will give the agency benefit of the doubt as about 2 super honeys take my fancy and are very reasonably priced like if they were on adultworks. ..

Akkulina far as I can see has very rightly been removed..
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline YoungBrom

I had horrendous experience with akkulina
But I will give the agency benefit of the doubt as about 2 super honeys take my fancy and are very reasonably priced like if they were on adultworks. ..

Akkulina far as I can see has very rightly been removed..

Which might those be?

This agency also lists some girls as NOT RECOMMENDED TO OTHER AGENCIES... so Diva might just be one agency to trust

sunnylee

  • Guest
Hi OP. Would you say this girl looked very much like her pics? And it's her height accurate?
Photos are airbrushed obviously, but she is almost same as far as I can remember, her height is accurate, I am only 5,7 and she was taller than me. Nice body and arse.

Offline hw189

Which might those be?

This agency also lists some girls as NOT RECOMMENDED TO OTHER AGENCIES... so Diva might just be one agency to trust

Means jack all IMO; Writing such a statement is just playing on punter's sentiment to make the agencies look trustworthy and reliable. I have noticed several times in the past that when a girl receives a negative review on here (KT's review on Akkulina as example), that girl has gone into oblivion never to be found on their site again (or a name and picture set change).
« Last Edit: December 27, 2017, 01:58:16 pm by hw189 »