~DEE~ - The best yet. Perhaps even the best it can ever get.

[west8]

Luckily for me I didn't 'do the act' .. but it was close.

Moreover, it wasn't exactly a tranny, it was a Post-op TS.

Here 'she' is: External Link/Members Only

 

[Bigus Dickus]

Luckily for me I didn't 'do the act' .. but it was close.

Moreover, it wasn't exactly a tranny, it was a Post-op TS.

Here 'she' is: External Link/Members Only

 

I am not sure if I believe you or not!  You must have hosed down her tonsils though? Now that's a review that would be interesting!

 

[west8]

I am not sure if I believe you or not!  You must have hosed down her tonsils though? Now that's a review that would be interesting!

hahaha No comment!

I tell you what though: 'he/she' is fitter than many girls I have met ... ! 

Actually, although we met back in July (I think), would a review of a three-month-old encounter be acceptable?

If so, I'm up for it!

[Robster199]

Yeah. I'm a fan of fiction writing

[west8]

Yeah. I'm a fan of fiction writing

Judging by all the reviews you haven't posted, it seems like you have serious writer's block 

[Robster199]

Better writers block than spouting verbal diarrhea 

[dezzatheblue2]

Can see this thread being locked, slagging match again

[west8]

Jason made a very good point in his earlier post about the need for a consistent, logical and reliable system to better assess my punts by using a more comprehensive rating in my reviews.

He was right - and my solution has produced quite surprising results. I think the variable of ‘Value’ is an important one as it is the only way to accurately score based on the cost differential per punt.

PALS Rating Scale (0-40) + Value (0-10)

P - Personality
A - Attitude
L - Looks
S - Service

Emily - 9.5/10/9/10/8 – 46.5
Dee - 9/10/8/10/9 - 46
Maggie - 9/10/7/10/9 - 45
Mel - 10/9/9.5/8/7 - 43.5
Adele - 9/9/7/10/8 - 43
Nicole - 8/8/10/6.5/10 - 42.5
Lola - 9/9/6/9/9 - 42
Brooklyn - 9/9/9/7/7 - 41
Girlfriend Dior - 8/7/7/9/8 - 39


Now, the interesting thing about the above is how it compares (for me) with my personal ‘Hall of Fame’. Naturally, memories endure but I think any of us look back at our early punts with perhaps a certain nostalgia – and therefore it’s harder to be as accurate as with recent punts. That said, I’m happy my top two (both long retired) remain firmly in place, but also surprised that I find myself honestly assessing 3 of my AW punts higher than old favorites:


Pandora - 10/10/10/9/8 - 47
Nicole Foxxx - 10/10/9/9/8 - 46
Chantel - 10/8/9/9/8 - 44
Jessica - 8/9/10/9/6 - 42


From Review #10 onwards, I will include a ‘Current Top Five’ at the end of each subsequent review for two purposes:
1.)   To keep myself mindful of the standards I am reviewing against.
2.)   To demonstrate just how well a girl being reviewed compares to the very best.

If you guys can think of any way to improve this new scoring system, I’d welcome your suggestions.

[LL]

"tonguemanship"?
Who the fuck is this guy?
We haven't seen a more prolific London reviewer since Panel999 - but his reviews were actually enjoyable to read and he was a great guy.  I don't mind long reviews, with even a story to set the scene but this one is just drivel.  It reads like a cheesy romantic novel aimed at women - like this one.

Hidden Image/Members Only 
 

[west8]

"tonguemanship"?
Who the fuck is this guy?
We haven't seen a more prolific London reviewer since Panel999 - but his reviews were actually enjoyable to read and he was a great guy.  I don't mind long reviews, with even a story to set the scene but this one is just drivel.  It reads like a cheesy romantic novel aimed at women - like this one.

Yet another useful comment which adds zero to the thread. As mentioned elsewhere, if you don't like it, don't read it... 

Hope you feel better having said your piece though.

[monstar]

Much better west, the 'PALS' rating scale has my approval.

It is also testament to how important and indispensable UKP is to us punters searching for the next good punt, as the girls with numerous positive reviews here scored ratings to put them into your "hall of fame".

Personally I'm happy to see Emily at the top as she is set to be my next visit. 

[Tailpipe]

Yet another useful comment which adds zero to the thread. As mentioned elsewhere, if you don't like it, don't read it... 

Hope you feel better having said your piece though.

You are just pushing shit up hill , one by one pissing off member by member
Do you enjoy been disliked .

[mrhappypants]

Jason made a very good point in his earlier post about the need for a consistent, logical and reliable system to better assess my punts by using a more comprehensive rating in my reviews.

He was right - and my solution has produced quite surprising results. I think the variable of ‘Value’ is an important one as it is the only way to accurately score based on the cost differential per punt.

PALS Rating Scale (0-40) + Value (0-10)

P - Personality
A - Attitude
L - Looks
S - Service

Emily - 9.5/10/9/10/8 – 46.5
Dee - 9/10/8/10/9 - 46
Maggie - 9/10/7/10/9 - 45
Mel - 10/9/9.5/8/7 - 43.5
Adele - 9/9/7/10/8 - 43
Nicole - 8/8/10/6.5/10 - 42.5
Lola - 9/9/6/9/9 - 42
Brooklyn - 9/9/9/7/7 - 41
Girlfriend Dior - 8/7/7/9/8 - 39


Now, the interesting thing about the above is how it compares (for me) with my personal ‘Hall of Fame’. Naturally, memories endure but I think any of us look back at our early punts with perhaps a certain nostalgia – and therefore it’s harder to be as accurate as with recent punts. That said, I’m happy my top two (both long retired) remain firmly in place, but also surprised that I find myself honestly assessing 3 of my AW punts higher than old favorites:


Pandora - 10/10/10/9/8 - 47
Nicole Foxxx - 10/10/9/9/8 - 46
Chantel - 10/8/9/9/8 - 44
Jessica - 8/9/10/9/6 - 42


From Review #10 onwards, I will include a ‘Current Top Five’ at the end of each subsequent review for two purposes:
1.)   To keep myself mindful of the standards I am reviewing against.
2.)   To demonstrate just how well a girl being reviewed compares to the very best.

If you guys can think of any way to improve this new scoring system, I’d welcome your suggestions.

Your scale is suffering from a ceiling effect and I'd suggest you just used Jason's scale but that wouldn't sit comfortably with you would it?  I think your audience is demanding you share some of your wisdom by way of reviews from your more recent past; you wouldn't want to disappoint them and be excluded or ignored now would you?

Dave

[charming_red]

"tonguemanship"?
Who the fuck is this guy?
We haven't seen a more prolific London reviewer since Panel999 - but his reviews were actually enjoyable to read and he was a great guy.  I don't mind long reviews, with even a story to set the scene but this one is just drivel.  It reads like a cheesy romantic novel aimed at women - like this one.

I agree. Its just nauseating drivel.

[west8]

Much better west, the 'PALS' rating scale has my approval.

It is also testament to how important and indispensable UKP is to us punters searching for the next good punt, as the girls with numerous positive reviews here scored ratings to put them into your "hall of fame".

Personally I'm happy to see Emily at the top as she is set to be my next visit. 

Thanks a lot monstar. I'm really looking forward to your Emily review and I hope you have a lot of fun with her. Can't wait to return after half term.

You are just pushing shit up hill , one by one pissing off member by member
Do you enjoy been disliked .

It seems to me that a few members like to piss themselves off by getting overheated and failing to see I take a very, very light-hearted and self-deprecating approach to my reviews.

I am not here to enter a popularity content. If people don't like my reviews, they can skip them. I don't give a fuck.

Your scale is suffering from a ceiling effect and I'd suggest you just used Jason's scale but that wouldn't sit comfortably with you would it?  I think your audience is demanding you share some of your wisdom by way of reviews from your more recent past; you wouldn't want to disappoint them and be excluded or ignored now would you?

Exclusion is my middle name. You and I are like Marmite Dave: appreciated or detested. Reading through your Dee review that was conveniently bumped up by stayer, I can see that you also have no problem going 'against the grain'. Respect to you for that my good man.

I agree. Its just nauseating drivel.

Thanks. Glad you took the time to read it and share your (albeit limited) thoughts.

[hendrix]

I am not here to enter a popularity content. If people don't like my reviews, they can skip them. I don't give a fuck.

This, I understand and can agree with completely  

[PumpAction]

(i)   Since 1995, I would suggest circa 3,000 – 3,500 punts, so yes you are roughly correct. Some of my earliest punts were through an agency called 'Stansted escorts'.

If the average girl you saw charged £100ph that's £350,000 you've spent over the last twenty years. Judging by some of your posts i'm skeptical but well done if true. Did you ever do any famous porn escorts?

[thebigrunt]

I definitely agree that James999 has more than one profile 

[tonysoprano]

PALS Rating Scale (0-40) + Value (0-10)

P - Personality
A - Attitude
L - Looks
S - Service

This is just laughable. The sort of utter bollocks some student would think up while high or drunk. How old are you?

Seriously dude, you have far too much time on your hands.

[PumpAction]

I definitely agree that James999 has more than one profile 

If only he had more than one brain cell.

[west8]

This is just laughable. The sort of utter bollocks some student would think up while high or drunk. How old are you?

Interesting post 'tonysoprano', thanks.

I think I might actually adopt your proven method of ensuring punting success (1 positive / 3 negatives).

That 75% fail rate says two things:

1. You're a lazy cunt who can't be arsed to do any research before selecting a girl.
or
2. You're the sort of boring, complaining cunt who is never happy about anything.

My money is on 2.

As for the student rating system, I'm glad you like it. You're well qualified with the sort of nick a teenage gamer might choose.

Moreover, given your fail rate above, it's no small coincidence that 'tonysoprano' is an anagram of 'stay on porno'.

Sound advice there mate - save your cash and stay at home for your next wank / imaginary punt 

[Bigus Dickus]

 

(Reaches for the popcorn)

[mrhappypants]

Exclusion is my middle name. You and I are like Marmite Dave: appreciated or detested. Reading through your Dee review that was conveniently bumped up by stayer, I can see that you also have no problem going 'against the grain'. Respect to you for that my good man.

Thanks. It must be said that as a strategy for courting popularity and promoting harmony giving Dee a negative review had it's limitations.   . Seriously though to return to the topic, I was sad to see the way the review blew up which was not my intention, and I think something of a "face off" that was not of my making got out of hand.   Although I think your review is "generous" there is no doubting that Dee is a fine service provider and an attractive woman though the slightly conspiratorial tone of positive reviews around her and others who may be associated on here is something I am willing to call and challenge.  What provoked me about your review of Mel was the lack of balance and detail, a hall mark of touts on here. As I said in my review I had two good punts with her before.  I was trying to point out that a rough patch - a bleary punt in a scruffy spare room - was sub standard and put me off.  I was not trying to trash her reputation.  Actually, if it did anything at all to prompt her to turn it around then that is good thing and good luck to her.

Dave

[Mr Farkyhars]

PALS Rating Scale (0-40) + Value (0-10)

P - Personality
A - Attitude
L - Looks
S - Service

That looks a fair starting point - but I have two immediate suggestions.
One, if the others are given relative importance of 10, then Service should surely have an importance of 50, if not more - because Service is what we are there for and by itself makes the difference between a good and bad review.
Two, there are other factors which surely ought to be included, like geographical location and cleanliness of venue - although you might say those are not factors personal to the SP.

[west8]

That looks a fair starting point - but I have two immediate suggestions.
One, if the others are given relative importance of 10, then Service should surely have an importance of 50, if not more - because Service is what we are there for and by itself makes the difference between a good and bad review.
Two, there are other factors which surely ought to be included, like geographical location and cleanliness of venue - although you might say those are not factors personal to the SP.

Thanks for the feedback 

I started off with an ideal scale of 1-100, but thought it too broad and open for debate. Cleanliness / presentation I have decided to include generally within the boundaries of 'Service' and 'Value'. Location will also be factored in under 'Value' as a girl in Chelsea will obviously have greater overheads than her counterpart in Haringey, etc.

[mrhappypants]

You have reviewed "Suzi Lapdancer" positively on UKP. I met her back in the summer of 2013, and she was totally underwhelming
to say the least. Applying your own logic, aren't you then propagating a promotional agenda?

You again!  Actually if you want to put me to the trouble I can find you a series of posts I have made about Suzie recording my own experience of her deteriorating service and decline since I wrote my review, so it hardly has the look of a marketing campaign does it?

[west8]

You have reviewed "Suzi Lapdancer" positively on UKP. I met her back in the summer of 2013, and she was totally underwhelming
to say the least. Applying your own logic, aren't you then propagating a promotional agenda?

Dave pursuing a 'promotional agenda?' Yeah, he really promoted Dee in his review  Seriously?

Mr HP promoting any girl is about as likely as Redcab taking a job with the Romanian National Tourism Office.

[tonysoprano]

Interesting post 'tonysoprano', thanks.

I think I might actually adopt your proven method of ensuring punting success (1 positive / 3 negatives).

That 75% fail rate says two things:

1. You're a lazy cunt who can't be arsed to do any research before selecting a girl.
or
2. You're the sort of boring, complaining cunt who is never happy about anything.

My money is on 2.

As for the student rating system, I'm glad you like it. You're well qualified with the sort of nick a teenage gamer might choose.

Moreover, given your fail rate above, it's no small coincidence that 'tonysoprano' is an anagram of 'stay on porno'.

Sound advice there mate - save your cash and stay at home for your next wank / imaginary punt 

Haha being called a sad cunt from the forum's resident sad bellend is ironic to say the least. I'm sure the list of WG's  like Adele who have fucked you off as a total wanker will only grow.

I could waste my time writing 1000 word essays of nauseating, toe-curling bullshit and boasting about the 3000 whores I've shagged over the last 20 years. But then I'd look like a total cunt a bit like you.

As for research, one of your massively tedious recent threads involves walking down Edgware Road looking for sluts. I think that's more your level.

Perhaps you should save your bullshit for PNET where other sad fluffy cunts might be interested. In the meantime continue wasting your time writing bollocks and embarrassing yourself a little more with each passing day.

Now i'll put you on ignore so I don't ever had to read you massively cuntish opinions and you can sit there stroking your little cock wanking over yourself which is really what your "reviews" (if they can be called that) are all about aren't they?

Bye bye cunt.

[west8]

boasting about the 3000 whores I've shagged over the last 20 years

Like you just did you mean?

3000 whores and 3 reviews - 75% negative.

It's quite clear who the cunt is my cerebrally-challenged gangsta friend 

[Quesadilla]

Now i'll put you on ignore so I don't ever had to read you massively cuntish opinions and you can sit there stroking your little cock wanking over yourself which is really what your "reviews" (if they can be called that) are all about aren't they?

Bye bye cunt.

Can someone please tell me how to put someone on ignore? 

[Quesadilla]

Can someone please tell me how to put someone on ignore?

Ah, no worries, found it, bliss! Peace at last! 

[west8]

Can someone please tell me how to put someone on ignore?

Simplesoprano was speaking figuratively. That said, you could write a small script which will remove certain posts when you load a thread.

[OldAdmin]

Can someone please tell me how to put someone on ignore?

You can use this page to add usernames so their posts are hidden:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=lists;sa=ignore

[OldAdmin]

And time for this thread to be put to bed, too much bickering.