Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Client Eye  (Read 42288 times)

Offline simping

Messaged a touring SP who declined to see me as I don't pay deposits...

Curious, I asked her how she knew that, she then goes on to  mention Client Eye. Downloaded and checked what's been reported about me. Pretty mundane tbh...so my question to you: what's been said about you? (If you have the app)


Offline YoungPunter

I just downloaded it and searched for my number and the result is that I am a timewaster :scare:

Offline Rick2468

Nothing has been posted about me. I was expecting to see something as I tried to make a booking with Anastasia Lux which didn't go ahead and she flipped out (so unlike her....) and said she was going to add my number to a well known site. I searched for myself on SAAFE but no reports. Hadn't heard about client eye but thankfully not on there either. I can change number easily if need be.

Offline Captainhowdy666

Damn that client eye could get folk into trouble if they used their personal mobiles.

Offline simping

Damn that client eye could get folk into trouble if they used their personal mobiles.

They're ppl who use their personal numbers for punting??? the audacity lmao

Offline simping

I just downloaded it and searched for my number and the result is that I am a timewaster :scare:

Haha who have you been messing with?  :D

Offline simping

Nothing has been posted about me. I was expecting to see something as I tried to make a booking with Anastasia Lux which didn't go ahead and she flipped out (so unlike her....) and said she was going to add my number to a well known site. I searched for myself on SAAFE but no reports. Hadn't heard about client eye but thankfully not on there either. I can change number easily if need be.

First time hearing about SAAFE, checked if I was on there and nothing (thank god).

Offline contentguy

First time hearing about SAAFE, checked if I was on there and nothing (thank god).

I checked my punting sim which expired at some point last year due to lack of use.
It's showing me as a no-show in December in an area that I've never punted in.

Perhaps the number's been re-allocated to a time waster!

Offline pa5151

I'm not on there and time wasting is my middle name  :hi:

Offline contentguy

I'm not on there and time wasting is my middle name  :hi:

You could report yourself  :)

Offline Rick2468

You could report yourself  :)

On a similar note, presumably we could big ourselves up? "Rick2468 is a Casanova I recommend offering 50% discount as you would have so much fun with him."

Equally you could have a situation where a jealous ex puts your number in maliciously. But who is going to check random mates numbers.

Offline rhub9

Seems like this could be a great tool for punters?

Step 1. Install app on your punting phone.

Step 2. When calling to book, leave a report against the number... e.g. one of:
 - never answers...always goes to voicemail
 - only responds to texts
 - deposit scammer
 - calls/texts you back, do NOT USE from your PERSONAL NUMBER

Or even:
 - great booking, see UKP for my review
 - etc.

Step 3. Now before calling for a punt you can check the number quickly on the app and see if they're a known goodie or a bad egg...

The wonders of modern technology eh??

Offline LLPunting

Have reported myself as a long-schlonged charmer with a wicked tongue.  They still won't take my calls.

I think the app needs a new release.

Offline winkywanky

Have reported myself as a long-schlonged charmer with a wicked tongue.  They still won't take my calls.

I think the app needs a new release.


Have you thought about releasing your own App LLP, perhaps entitled Loaded Mature Lotharios?

Offline LLPunting


Have you thought about releasing your own App LLP, perhaps entitled Loaded Mature Lotharios?

I was thinking "Loving Irrational Moneyed Punters" might do the trick.

Offline winkywanky

I was thinking "Loving Irrational Moneyed Punters" might do the trick.


Straight from the wrist  ;)  :D

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 533
  • Likes: 55
Seems like this could be a great tool for punters?

Step 1. Install app on your punting phone.

Step 2. When calling to book, leave a report against the number... e.g. one of:
 - never answers...always goes to voicemail
 - only responds to texts
 - deposit scammer
 - calls/texts you back, do NOT USE from your PERSONAL NUMBER

Or even:
 - great booking, see UKP for my review
 - etc.

Step 3. Now before calling for a punt you can check the number quickly on the app and see if they're a known goodie or a bad egg...

The wonders of modern technology eh??

I will be making Client Eye aware of this! This app is for our safety not for you to fuck around with, unbelievable  :mad:

Offline Vigor

I will be making Client Eye aware of this! This app is for our safety not for you to fuck around with, unbelievable  :mad:

Hud I bus and calm doon love

Offline tynetunnel

This just in from our West Country correspondent:

Hud I bus and calm doon love

 :D

Offline Dopedj

Seems like this could be a great tool for punters?

Step 1. Install app on your punting phone.

Step 2. When calling to book, leave a report against the number... e.g. one of:
 - never answers...always goes to voicemail
 - only responds to texts
 - deposit scammer
 - calls/texts you back, do NOT USE from your PERSONAL NUMBER

Or even:
 - great booking, see UKP for my review
 - etc.

Step 3. Now before calling for a punt you can check the number quickly on the app and see if they're a known goodie or a bad egg...

The wonders of modern technology eh??
You are just a big fool. The tool is for the protection/safety of escorts, not for twats like yourself to belittle the app. With this issue of safety for women in the news, you would think you will be intelligent enough to take ur foolishness elsewhere.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2021, 08:10:10 pm by Dopedj »

Offline Billy no mates

I’m not on there.

I mean that’s great, but I was hoping for something like “gorgeous silver fox, with devilish wit, and a charming smile”

 :D

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 533
  • Likes: 55
You are just a big fool. The tool is for the protection/safety of escorts, not for twats like yourself to belittle the app. With this issue of safety for women in the news, you would think you will be intelligent enough to take ur foolishness elsewhere.

thank you I thought I was being over sensitive

Offline Londontiger

I will be making Client Eye aware of this! This app is for our safety not for you to fuck around with, unbelievable  :mad:

Babe there is nothing to say in the app development that its for ladies only. It says used to report numbers, so anyone can add a number in and report if its suspicious.

Also looking at the way it is developed I don't see a way for the developer to change the code to make it just for working ladies. Its open source so available to all.
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline LLPunting

I will be making Client Eye aware of this! This app is for our safety not for you to fuck around with, unbelievable  :mad:

The intent of the app is laudable and to be supported but:

How does Client Eye verify the truth or validity of each report?  Clients don't turn up for many valid reasons other than deliberately wasting a woman's time by pretending to book.  Whilst it's good manners to notify if you can't make it there is no contractual obligation. 

What are the consequences for malicious posting?

As they are capturing and processing private information they are subject to GDPR/DPA regulation.  What is the process for deleting information at the request of the punter?

Offline garfield

If you have been using your own phone for punting and its listed on here it might be wise to be add your wife / girlfriends number with some made up bollocks, might be a way out if you’re found out

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 533
  • Likes: 55
Babe there is nothing to say in the app development that its for ladies only. It says used to report numbers, so anyone can add a number in and report if its suspicious.

Also looking at the way it is developed I don't see a way for the developer to change the code to make it just for working ladies. Its open source so available to all.

BABE! any idiot would know it’s for our safety, so STFU with that nonsense

Offline garfield

I will be making Client Eye aware of this! This app is for our safety not for you to fuck around with, unbelievable  :mad:

How would making a punters phone number public for “timewasting” be for anyones safety?

What sort of safe guards are in place to stop this being abused?

Offline Londontiger

BABE! any idiot would know it’s for our safety, so STFU with that nonsense

Baby don't worry. Stay Calm. I know its their for your safety. My Point is that their is nothing in the code my sexy babe that client eye can change to stop people from downloading and accessing.
Its open source so available to the public, Boris can even download it if he wanted to. People misuse all sorts of applications. Its the way the internet and world works.

As long as your using it correctly its fine. xxx
Banned reason: Multiple Profiles - James, James021, Londontiger, wearegreat
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline cotton

Babe there is nothing to say in the app development that its for ladies only. It says used to report numbers, so anyone can add a number in and report if its suspicious.

Also looking at the way it is developed I don't see a way for the developer to change the code to make it just for working ladies. Its open source so available to all.
I presumed it was designed for hookers and they had to register and be verified as legit hookers to be able to submit data but if its just an open register that anyone can use then thats interesting.
Looking in the "questions and answers" section it says ;
Q: Who can use the ClientEye app ?
A: Users who take enquiries by phone or work in an area & support services can all benefit from our apps reporting systems.
So thats anyone  :unknown:

Offline mrfishyfoo

You are just a big fool. The tool is for the protection/safety of escorts, not for twats like yourself to belittle the app. With this issue of safety for women in the news, you would think you will be intelligent enough to take ur foolishness elsewhere.

If only we could all live such a rose tinted life.  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

That app is also used by malicious cunts that post shite on it about punters to cause them grief.  :dash: :dash:
 
He's contributed how many reviews to your ZERO.  :unknown: :unknown:

Suggest you try adding some too.  :hi: :hi:


Offline mrfishyfoo

The intent of the app is laudable and to be supported but:

How does Client Eye verify the truth or validity of each report?  Clients don't turn up for many valid reasons other than deliberately wasting a woman's time by pretending to book.  Whilst it's good manners to notify if you can't make it there is no contractual obligation. 

What are the consequences for malicious posting?

As they are capturing and processing private information they are subject to GDPR/DPA regulation.  What is the process for deleting information at the request of the punter?

It doesn't.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

I had my old number posted on it by a cunt of a pimp after I walked on his podge. Caused me no end of grief till I worked out what had happened.


Offline Yankee41

Ive been told mine says im abusive, and time waster, a lobbyist for something or other among other things. I tend to see the same girls over and over now and they dont complain so i guess i dont care.  Im pretty sure i know who wrote it though since ive only ever been accused of being a lobbyist for something by one girl.  I still dont know what she was going on about. She is also the only person to ever block me on whatsapp. 
« Last Edit: March 15, 2021, 09:16:16 pm by Yankee41 »

Offline tynetunnel

I presumed it was designed for hookers and they had to register and be verified as legit hookers to be able to submit data but if its just an open register that anyone can use then thats interesting.
Looking in the "questions and answers" section it says ;
Q: Who can use the ClientEye app ?
A: Users who take enquiries by phone or work in an area & support services can all benefit from our apps reporting systems.
So thats anyone  :unknown:

Including me!  :hi:

Offline LLPunting

It doesn't.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

I had my old number posted on it by a cunt of a pimp after I walked on his podge. Caused me no end of grief till I worked out what had happened.

Indeed, so it's no better than "Trip badviser" or "Exspurt reviews" et al.  Potentially a whole load of anonymous codswallop splodged all over far fewer genuine reports about genuinely distasteful persons.

Offline mrfishyfoo

Indeed, so it's no better than "Trip badviser" or "Exspurt reviews" et al.  Potentially a whole load of anonymous codswallop splodged all over far fewer genuine reports about genuinely distasteful persons.

IMHO it's a good concept that's been very poorly executed.  :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:


Offline Bloody foreigner

I checked once in the past and there was nothing.
Now is showing one record, that I’m user of this forum... I think I need to change style of my reviews.

Offline Mr Doodle

I have searched he well known open source repositories and can't find the source code, so I don't think it is open source. It is freely downloadable, and there appear to be few, if any restrictions on who can use it and what for. Going to its website makes interesting reading, including it detects positive reviews and removes them;

Here's an interesting one in their Q&A/FAQs:
Q: Could contacts use the system for malicious reasons?
A: No, our reporting system is open without a registration requirement, contacts could use the system and try making false positive reports for themselves, however as we only allow bad date information to appear any positive reports would be deleted.

Reading this, by malicious, they mean fake positive report and they only keep bad date (I think they meant to write data, and then really meant to write reports). So, how does allowing ungreistered and unverified users keep malicious reports (which shoudl really mean fake bad reports) about people out? Haven't worked that one out yet.

The site's Q&A also babbles on about various other things:

At the top of its page, it makes this statement:
NSTANT CALL & SMS SAFETY NOTIFICATIONS:
Instant Report Notifications. Anonymously report and share Timewasters, Call/SMS Pests, No Shows, Abusive contacts with other app users. Works Worldwide.

One out of three or four identified usages is actually about safety - the rest is about annoyances - and yes - potential revenue loss.  No problem with that, either tbh.. it is a business at the end of the day...

The idea is indeed laudable... and while it is poorly executed, I think that poor execution is not a bad thing in one sense. Stopping baseless vindictive reviews is nigh on impossible - how can the software really know (well, I can think of a couple of measures, but that would be around edge cases). But, if we expect to have a report made for the most minor indiscretion, I dunno, such as being 5 mins late, well, it could be argued that is better for the SPs to be provided with poorer view of the client than a better one.. better to be safe than sorry.

They do allude in the following Q&A to be careful of the reviews. However, they make the point that if a phone number has multiple reviews, they all should be from different users, so one to watch out for...
Q: Should i believe all the description details in the reports ?
A: We advise all users to use their own judgement when seeing a contact based upon other users previous experiences of them, reports appearing BOLD have come from verified users. If a number has numerious reports they will have come from numerious users.

All in all, I would give it a 5 out of 10.

On GDPR, they are skatingon thin ice. If, using the phone number, one can identify who the owner of it is (e.g. an internet search - mine does), then publishing it without the owner's permission is probbaly not a smart move. But, the Info Commission Officer has much more to worry about.



Offline Palomaxxxxxx

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 117
  • Likes: 0
I don’t think punters realise how dangerous this job is, it’s not always easy cash and a bed of roses...The law forces us to work alone and if a punter does come and attack you the response from the police is not always great. Even then it will probably be thrown into the magistrates court along with petty crimes.

I’ve reported some violent encounters on there, which probably saved another WG from going through the same thing. Of course the punter will say it’s ‘malicious’ though and it never happened. Who’s going to admit to raping and smacking up prostitutes?

I get that it’s easy to download and report someone, but it does say at the top to use your own judgment and experience. Which I do. Just because a punter wasted one WGs time doesn’t mean he’ll waste mine. But in my experience, I’ve not yielded much success when giving them a chance.
Banned reason: Untrustworthy
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Dopedj

Mr doodie , u have no idea what you are talking about at all. And you have idea how the law works in relations to sex work or sexual assault towards them.

Offline LLPunting

Mr doodie , u have no idea what you are talking about at all. And you have idea how the law works in relations to sex work or sexual assault towards them.

What are you criticising, most of his post is quoting from the very dodgy FAQ of the app, so are you in fact criticising the app developer?

Offline Mr Doodle

Mr doodie , u have no idea what you are talking about at all. And you have idea how the law works in relations to sex work or sexual assault towards them.


Maybe you could give us the benefit of your learned (for your benefit, in this context, pronounced learn-erd) knoweldge, experience, and insight. And then relate it to my post, as I don't recall, nor on re-reading alluding to anything but that app and (thanks, LLP), its claims.

For your benefit, I will keep it simple. I did give it a pass though, because even though there could be malicious or inaccurate posts - or they aren't related to threats or actual violence, it is "better to be safe than sorry".,. In other words, if I had a bad review on there that was malicious and SP decided against seeing me for it, well, too bad for me, but that is better than a SP being denied the opportunity to learn of my potential violence and able to make a decision on whether she wants to risk it or not.

@Palomaxxxxxx - I am sorry to hear of your (and others') expereince - it should not be tolerated, nor should the police be dismissive of your claims. Yes, I do know it happens. This is unfortuantely due to myths perpetuated about both sexual assault offences, the SPs, and the industry as a whole. And I agree, the industry should be legalised - it is not as though out legislators refrain from utilising the services of the industry, either. If we look to the Australian model, it is a very safe and secure system, where it is not only legal but minimum health, safety and security regulations must be met. When I was last there, the only real violence reported (and probably achievable) is against the still illegal street prostituion scene, but the police have time to focus their efforts more in protecting the girls than putting them away. As far as I understand, sex trafficking has virtually stopped there (I am sure there is still some there... but no where near the levels prior). Of course, punting there is more mechanical, but I would put that down to a cultural thing than the legalising of brothel based service provision.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2021, 08:09:40 am by Mr Doodle »

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
Maybe you could give us the benefit of your learned (for your benefit, in this context, pronounced learn-erd) knoweldge, experience, and insight. And then relate it to my post, as I don't recall, nor on re-reading alluding to anything but that app and (thanks, LLP), its claims.

For your benefit, I will keep it simple. I did give it a pass though, because even though there could be malicious or inaccurate posts - or they aren't related to threats or actual violence, it is "better to be safe than sorry".,. In other words, if I had a bad review on there that was malicious and SP decided against seeing me for it, well, too bad for me, but that is better than a SP being denied the opportunity to learn of my potential violence and able to make a decision on whether she wants to risk it or not.

@Palomaxxxxxx - I am sorry to hear of your (and others') expereince - it should not be tolerated, nor should the police be dismissive of your claims. Yes, I do know it happens. This is unfortuantely due to myths perpetuated about both sexual assault offences, the SPs, and the industry as a whole. And I agree, the industry should be legalised - it is not as though out legislators refrain from utilising the services of the industry, either. If we look to the Australian model, it is a very safe and secure system, where it is not only legal but minimum health, safety and security regulations must be met. When I was last there, the only real violence reported (and probably achievable) is against the still illegal street prostituion scene, but the police have time to focus their efforts more in protecting the girls than putting them away. As far as I understand, sex trafficking has virtually stopped there (I am sure there is still some there... but no where near the levels prior). Of course, punting there is more mechanical, but I would put that down to a cultural thing than the legalising of brothel based service provision.

Does legalisation mean the government can control the services offered?

What I find with CE is that 75% of the time behaviour agrees with the report, I also find it reassuring that I am not imagining and that my gut feeling seems to match with other's experience. BTW I check after I have had initial contact, at point of speaking the only influence is that of the person making contact.

I can confirm there are some real issues out there not only in person, but things such as harassment on a daily basis which can be from afar not to mention the leg-pullers and game players.


Offline LLPunting

I don’t think punters realise how dangerous this job is, it’s not always easy cash and a bed of roses...The law forces us to work alone and if a punter does come and attack you the response from the police is not always great. Even then it will probably be thrown into the magistrates court along with petty crimes.

I’ve reported some violent encounters on there, which probably saved another WG from going through the same thing. Of course the punter will say it’s ‘malicious’ though and it never happened. Who’s going to admit to raping and smacking up prostitutes?

I get that it’s easy to download and report someone, but it does say at the top to use your own judgment and experience. Which I do. Just because a punter wasted one WGs time doesn’t mean he’ll waste mine. But in my experience, I’ve not yielded much success when giving them a chance.

Paloma,  anyone paying attention to this site will be clearly aware of dangers for SPs because in our varied discussions we've talked about various troubles from people other than pimp/management.  We also call out described/admitted behaviour that would appear to be a threat to SP safety.

In trying to understand how "reliable" Client Eye might be it struck me that it seems to be unnecessary. National Ugly Mugs runs their own alert system that allows anonymous reporting, sends sms/email alerts and can be searched.  So apart from the "it's an app" aspect that can be downloaded by anyone Client Eye is replicating NUM which is an established an supposedly credible organisation for SPs.  Given NUM supports Client Eye, is it in fact commissioned by NUM?
The registration process for NUM alerts can be completely anonymous, like CE, with some kind of "manual" verification but it's incredibly obscure as to how they confirm you're who you are with no validation data held by them.

NUM were supposedly working in 2016 with the Police to ensure that genuine reports of assault etc were shared with the Police for proper investigation, so did this fail if you're saying that SPs still aren't being treated fairly wrt to these serious crimes?

Criticising a very dodgily founded app that compromises punter security and privacy based on "hearsay" rather than enforceable fact as well as an unexplained means of avoiding exploitation that threatens your security because it can be manipulated, is valid and cause for concern for all those wishing to safeguard SPs.  It does not really help SPs as much as gives them more cause to worry because you may get alerted about a number but by the app's own advice, you just have to think about whether you want to proceed based on any number of anonymous reports, "verified source" or not, which may or may not be true or apply to the actual person using that number at the time.


1) Anyone can register, so any malevolent punter or SP could register, no number required.

2) You can choose to share your contacts list but that would place client "names" and numbers in the hands of the app developers so those clients whose data was shared by SPs without consent would have cause for claim of misuse of data.  SPs holding contact details could be subject to GDPR.

3) If they are only recording the "trouble-maker's" phone number and whatever complaint there is against them then arguably they may get away with not complying with GDPR/DPA wrt to the trouble-maker's rights provided that number is not traceable back to them.  If a car number plate is recorded then that certainly places them slap bang in GDPR territory, if the car is registered/insured against a real person.  If the app is publishing/broadcasting slanderous information whether by false accusation or if the number is for an innocent who doesn't punt but then becomes associated with using prostitutes then there's all kinds of personal privacy issues that may ensue.  So the very reckless manner in which they are passing information is a hazard.

4)  Sure there are nutters who won't bother to change their numbers and try to keep calling, or worse of course they could keep coming round, but then if the SP doesn't move the nutter doesn't need to call for new address info.  Of course the wily nutters will change numbers and find the SP again.  So what are SPs really being protected from?  Nuisance idiots rather than serious threats?
Likewise for criminals preying on SPs.

5)  If the Police are failing to properly investigate an assault, robbery or worse rape then that's not for some ramshackle app to play vigilante like a digital Charles Bronson, that's for the affected SP to seek responsible assistance to get the police to act. 

There are a bunch more concerns...

We don't want any (honest) SP to come to harm but treading on the rights of your clients is not the way to go about it.

Offline LLPunting

Does legalisation mean the government can control the services offered?

What I find with CE is that 75% of the time behaviour agrees with the report, I also find it reassuring that I am not imagining and that my gut feeling seems to match with other's experience. BTW I check after I have had initial contact, at point of speaking the only influence is that of the person making contact.

I can confirm there are some real issues out there not only in person, but things such as harassment on a daily basis which can be from afar not to mention the leg-pullers and game players.

Thanks Strawberry for your experience.   :drinks:

75% is good but that's 25% in error.  If this 75% is you screening texts or voicemails that are either threatening or seem odd and subsequently agree with reports for those numbers when you check and you're otherwise proceeding to talk to and meet "convincing" callers, what is the app actually saving you?  It seems as though you're still having to use your own judgement to screen all contacts.   :unknown:

And what of that 25%, in what way do they not match your experience?

Offline Mr Doodle

Does legalisation mean the government can control the services offered?

Not in anyway that I know that doesn't already technically apply by law.. For example, in England and Wales, there is no such thing as consenting to a battery (ie. an application of unlawful force). Therfore, intheory, slapping a woman's posterior while going for it, is indeed illegal. In practice, though, who's going to stop that between consenting adults (FWIW, I don';t get turned on by it.. just using it as an example.. the other obvious is the B&D/S&M activities). The law in  Aus (well each state is different) requires the government (each state) H&S executive to inspect both legal and illegal brothels with the prime purpose of ensuring safety (they do not prosecute illegal brothels unless they refuse to go legal within a certain period of time). BTW, many , if not all licenced brothels in one state has mics in the rooms and security listening in and ready to intervene if required. They do take SP's safety seriously.

Quote
What I find with CE is that 75% of the time behaviour agrees with the report, I also find it reassuring that I am not imagining and that my gut feeling seems to match with other's experience. BTW I check after I have had initial contact, at point of speaking the only influence is that of the person making contact.

I can confirm there are some real issues out there not only in person, but things such as harassment on a daily basis which can be from afar not to mention the leg-pullers and game players.

I don't dispute that... which is my comment about better to be safe than sorry... But there are possible ramifications if used outside warning of violence... As an example, it can out someone for being a timewaster who didn't want to be outed.. A balance has to be struck.

Offline mrfishyfoo

I don’t think punters realise how dangerous this job is, it’s not always easy cash and a bed of roses...The law forces us to work alone and if a punter does come and attack you the response from the police is not always great. Even then it will probably be thrown into the magistrates court along with petty crimes.

I’ve reported some violent encounters on there, which probably saved another WG from going through the same thing. Of course the punter will say it’s ‘malicious’ though and it never happened. Who’s going to admit to raping and smacking up prostitutes?

I get that it’s easy to download and report someone, but it does say at the top to use your own judgment and experience. Which I do. Just because a punter wasted one WGs time doesn’t mean he’ll waste mine. But in my experience, I’ve not yielded much success when giving them a chance.

INCORRECT !!!  :timeout: :timeout:

You are LEGALLY allowed a maid as long as you are not keeping a brothel.

External Link/Members Only

You should know better and clearly need to do more research.  :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

If you are the only person who provides sexual services in a
property, with or without the help of a non-working maid, the
premises is not a brothel.

All the info you need is on release.org.uk

External Link/Members Only


Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
Thanks Strawberry for your experience.   :drinks:

75% is good but that's 25% in error.  If this 75% is you screening texts or voicemails that are either threatening or seem odd and subsequently agree with reports for those numbers when you check and you're otherwise proceeding to talk to and meet "convincing" callers, what is the app actually saving you?  It seems as though you're still having to use your own judgement to screen all contacts.   :unknown:

And what of that 25%, in what way do they not match your experience?

The person goes ahead with the booking, and or is not odd or threatening.

Quite a few are not actually out and out threatening, they simply appear to be TW and that is often not black and white there is a lot of grey area regards time wasting and game playing.

The reassurance as well as potential forewarning once I have taken the initial enquiry makes the app valuable to me.

Offline LLPunting

The person goes ahead with the booking, and or is not odd or threatening.

Quite a few are not actually out and out threatening, they simply appear to be TW and that is often not black and white there is a lot of grey area regards time wasting and game playing.

The reassurance as well as potential forewarning once I have taken the initial enquiry makes the app valuable to me.

Thanks again  :drinks:

It can screen your calls/sms but it appears you've prevent that, any particular reason?

The forewarning being that the reports suggest something different to your sense of the conversation you had with the punter?

Offline unclepokey

I'd not heard of this app until this thread so I thought I'd see what it said about me.

I entered my punting 'phone number and was returned a nil report.
My punting name yielded the following:
1/21 call/sms pest, Wakefield, Just wasting time.
3/21 abusive, London,Keeps texting from different numbers even after refusing to meet him.

The facts are that I know not any individual from Wakefield  neither, in fact, do I know anything about Wakefield (although I believe it's in Yorkshire). Furthermore, I could not text "from various different numbers" as I have but the one punting phone. Even more, if a woman says 'NO' to me I just don't feckin' bother further. (see1/21 above).

I'm not, therefore, in any way thinking that this app is of any serious use to SPs and that au contraire it's a free factory for troublemakers.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2021, 11:22:04 am by unclepokey »

Offline David1970

I'd not heard of this app until this thread so I thought I'd see what it said about me.

I entered my punting 'phone number and was returned a nil report.
My punting name yielded the following:
1/21 call/sms pest, Wakefield, Just wasting time.
3/21 abusive, London,Keeps texting from different numbers even after refusing to meet him.

The facts are that I know not any individual from Wakefield  neither, in fact, do I know anything about Wakefield (although I believe it's in Yorkshire). Furthermore, I could not text "from various different numbers" as I have but the one punting phone. Even more, if a woman says 'NO' to me I just don't feckin' bother further. (see1/21 above).

I'm not, therefore, in any way thinking that this app is of any serious use to SPs and that au contraire it's a free factory for troublemakers.

That’s really bad, I suppose there is no way you can rectify the misinformation on the site?