suzy cortez

[TheRuiner]

In fact Link7, the only person on this thread who seems obsessed with this SPs "celebrity status" (or lack of it) is you. I certainly couldn't give a toss and my comments were based on her looks/services alone.

[peter purves]

In fact Link7, the only person on this thread who seems obsessed with this SPs "celebrity status" (or lack of it) is you. I certainly couldn't give a toss and my comments were based on her looks/services alone.

I have to agree with this

His writing style and sarcasm (or lack of it), condescension to others, and the very points (not just this one about Suzy Cortez) that he seems to 'value' seems reminiscent of another poster here.

I wonder if it is multiple accounts going on here. 

[Link7]

Oh dear, I'm making enemies!
 
Look, you guys are right, I'm wrong. Can't say fairer than that. Sorry to those who I offended. Please don't report me to admin.

(P.S. - Peter, I'm flattered that my writing style has intrigued you enough to analyse it not only here, but in other places. Thanks for your attention )

[peter purves]

Oh dear, I'm making enemies!
 
Look, you guys are right, I'm wrong. Can't say fairer than that. Sorry to those who I offended. Please don't report me to admin.

(P.S. - Peter, I'm flattered that my writing style has intrigued you enough to analyse it not only here, but in other places. Thanks for your attention )

It's seems so obvious, but this thread more than most of what you have written has brought it to the fore tbh... So please don't flatter yourself

[Link7]

It's seems so obvious, but this thread more than most of what you have written has brought it to the fore tbh... So please don't flatter yourself

Sincerest apologies. I didn't mean to upset you. It's only the Internet, fella. Won't say another word about her.

Out of interest, who do I remind you of?

[peter purves]

Sincerest apologies. I didn't mean to upset you. It's only the Internet, fella. Won't say another word about her.

Out of interest, who do I remind you of?

You can say as much words to me as you like. As I suggested, I liked your line of reasoning, thinking etc.

On cyberspace I try my best not to take things personally and where possible to stick to the facts. This can help conversation to go smoothly. This is what I was referring to when I was discussing arguing from emotions and not rationality regarding Suzy Cortez.

So in this instance why should the issue of a WG (that you know I do not rate that highly, nor for her prized possession of her rear) create discord between two people discussing whether Ms. Cortez has a 'celebrity status' up and beyond an average 'Joe-sephine WG?'

It shouldn't...Should it??

 

[Brazilian Martian]

This whole thread should be locked, I'm not saying your obsessed with her Peter or anything like that. But when ever threads about her get started they always lead to arguments or accusations.

It's like guys lose all sense of reality and when ever people call them out about it it leads to either bannings or temporary bans

Sunil_N tried to sabotage one of her negative reviews
Honest Punter has attacked me in the past for talking negative about her.
I'm sure there are a few other guys that hate the fact she is criticised by myself and others I have no issue with her getting positive reviews, but what fucking gets my back up is when punters act like saps and leave overly fluffed up reviews such I feel honored to of met her or I've fucked a famous woman 

[Link7]

You can say as much words to me as you like. As I suggested, I liked your line of reasoning, thinking etc.

On cyberspace I try my best not to take things personally and where possible to stick to the facts. This can help conversation to go smoothly. This is what I was referring to when I was discussing arguing from emotions and not rationality regarding Suzy Cortez.

So in this instance why should the issue of a WG (that you know I do not rate that highly, nor for her prized possession of her rear) create discord between two people discussing whether Ms. Cortez has a 'celebrity status' up and beyond an average 'Joe-sephine WG?'

It shouldn't...Should it??

 

Agreed. I can't believe we let Suzy come between us. In time, I hope we can all move forward from this. 

You did just accuse me of having multiple accounts, though. Allegedly based on analysis of my posts in multiple threads. You describe it as 'obvious'. Seems fair to ask who you believe I am?

[Brazilian Martian]

In fact Link7, the only person on this thread who seems obsessed with this SPs "celebrity status" (or lack of it) is you. I certainly couldn't give a toss and my comments were based on her looks/services alone.

Well then you might as well add my name to the list as well, as i always argue when people say she's a celebrity as it's fucking stupid and it's something that was started by a banned punter who had real Personal issues.

[Link7]

Cheers BM - but I personally dont want this to be locked. Feel totally in control of what I'm posting. Won't say anything abusive or get myself banned.

An accusation has been made and I'd like it to be substantiated.

[Brazilian Martian]

Cheers BM - but I personally dont want this to be locked. Feel totally in control of what I'm posting. Won't say anything abusive or get myself banned.

An accusation has been made and I'd like it to be substantiated.

I hear that but accusations get made all the time, I've been called a tout and pimp and also recently a white knight the funny thing is when you ask these people for hard evidence they seem to go quite.

When ever i make accusations i always follow it up with proof screen shots of posts the person may of posted 

[peter purves]

Well then you might as well add my name to the list as well, as i always argue when people say she's a celebrity as it's fucking stupid and it's something that was started by a banned punter who had real Personal issues.

Sorry BM but you have not been on the thread arguing the point and alienating others on here - that is the key difference.

[peter purves]

If we can...

I think Suzy Cortez is a 'celebrity'. I am defining that term by 1. being in the media and that 2.the media would not report her in their papers if they did not think she could sell papers

Is she is a celebrity like Muhamamd Ali or MJ...Obviously not!!

However, she is a 'celebrity' which is bigger than most WGs even if she charges at a lower rate.

Please feel free to critique my thinking, then I will be open to think about the suggestion that I may have been wrong.

 

[Link7]

I hear that but accusations get made all the time, I've been called a tout and pimp and also recently a white knight the funny thing is when you ask these people for hard evidence they seem to go quite.

Yeah ok, I will leave this now...not asking for hard evidence, genuinely just curious who he thinks I am. He said it like he's been watching me for a while. And apparently it's obvious? Spit it out then

Peter - I really don't know why you're so upset. I genuinely don't think I did anything that bad to you  I just spoke back to you and imo defeated your argument with sound logic. You reacted by saying I've alienated you and now slinging mud about multiple accounts.

I'm checking out. BM you were right, it seems very strange things happen on UKP if anybody questions Suzy Cortez.

[TheRuiner]

Well then you might as well add my name to the list as well, as i always argue when people say she's a celebrity as it's fucking stupid and it's something that was started by a banned punter who had real Personal issues.

Right. Good for you. And as my own stance is "I couldn't give a flying fuck whether a WG I have never met nor have plans to meet is on some kind of mental fame richter scale of people I don't know" I'll leave you to it.

[peter purves]

If we can...

I think Suzy Cortez is a 'celebrity'. I am defining that term by 1. being in the media and that 2.the media would not report her in their papers if they did not think she could sell papers

Is she is a celebrity like Muhamamd Ali or MJ...Obviously not!!

However, she is a 'celebrity' which is bigger than most WGs even if she charges at a lower rate.

Please feel free to critique my thinking, then I will be open to think about the suggestion that I may have been wrong.

 

Others may have stopped but on I go...

There is one other point which needs to be corrected, she is not as cheap as being suggested.

The maximum I've seen her advertised is £120 for 30 mins, though usually it is £100 for 30 mins or £200/hr. I cannot remember seeing
an ad in excess of £200 for the hour whether on BP or AW

She has priced hereself toward the higher end of WG pricing.

These are the facts which we have before us.

[Brazilian Martian]

Others may have stopped but on I go...

There is one other point which needs to be corrected, she is not as cheap as being suggested.

The maximum I've seen her advertised is £120 for 30 mins, though usually it is £100 for 30 mins or £200/hr. I cannot remember seeing
an ad in excess of £200 for the hour whether on BP or AW

She has priced hereself toward the higher end of WG pricing.

These are the facts which we have before us.

REALLY is it that important to have the last word on this thread like this

[peter purves]

REALLY is it that important to have the last word on this thread like this

If it was just mud-slinging, hurling abuse etc which I try hard to avoid on cyberspace then I would wholehearted agree with you. Hence why I chose not to respond to Link7

However, as I see it, this is not about having the last word. Personally for me it is about determining the facts.

Due to 'emotions', I think we have lost sight of the 'facts' surrounding Suzy Cortez, I mentioned it earlier in the thread and I was not understood. However, the whole thread has now been 'hi-jacked' as a result of it.

[Brazilian Martian]

If it was just mud-slinging, hurling abuse etc which I try hard to avoid on cyberspace then I would wholehearted agree with you. Hence why I chose not to respond to Link7

However, as I see it, this is not about having the last word. Personally for me it is about determining the facts.

Due to 'emotions', I think we have lost sight of the 'facts' surrounding Suzy Cortez, I mentioned it earlier in the thread and I was not understood. However, the whole thread has now been 'hi-jacked' as a result of it.

This whole thread is bullshit, not sure why op started a new thread about her he has been a member since 2014 hes not a noob, he easily could of searched via her reviews and found her profile ?

[Candyman]

There have been lesser known people to have appeared in celeb big brother from what I've heard (never watch that programme so cant give specifics). She is certainly no A-lister but I'm pretty sure if she were to have the profile name Suzy Cortez and advertise who she was then she could get away with charging higher rates, same as porn stars who escort or, hypothetically, if any glamour model/big brother contestant were to also. I'm not sure why Link7 finds this difficult to understand, as I've said I wouldn't pay higher rates for her but can see why others would.

She is up with a few agencies under different names, have a look through London Escort Guide. Here is one for 600ph: External Link/Members Only

[peter purves]

There have been lesser known people to have appeared in celeb big brother from what I've heard (never watch that programme so cant give specifics). She is certainly no A-lister but I'm pretty sure if she were to have the profile name Suzy Cortez and advertise who she was then she could get away with charging higher rates, same as porn stars who escort or, hypothetically, if any glamour model/big brother contestant were to also. I'm not sure why Link7 finds this difficult to understand, as I've said I wouldn't pay higher rates for her but can see why others would.

She is up with a few agencies under different names, have a look through London Escort Guide. Here is one for 600ph: External Link/Members Only

£600 

I will choose to refrain from commenting - as much as I want to here. Hopefully he does not feel the need to illicit a response towards me.

What I will say whether you wish to see her or not choose is irrelevant to the conversation (ie the facts) - though I do appreciate why you feel the need to state so.

Cheers !!

[Link7]

There have been lesser known people to have appeared in celeb big brother from what I've heard (never watch that programme so cant give specifics). She is certainly no A-lister but I'm pretty sure if she were to have the profile name Suzy Cortez and advertise who she was then she could get away with charging higher rates, same as porn stars who escort or, hypothetically, if any glamour model/big brother contestant were to also. I'm not sure why Link7 finds this difficult to understand, as I've said I wouldn't pay higher rates for her but can see why others would.

She is up with a few agencies under different names, have a look through London Escort Guide. Here is one for 600ph: External Link/Members Only

Hi mate. Fully understand what you have said. Happy to explain myself to you. No offence meant whatsoever.

To me your argument seems circular. Let me give an example. Say I post a back page ad, with a picture of Shakira. I put the name 'Jane' and advertise £200 an hour. Since Shakira is famous, people would recognise her anyway, right? Even if they didn't, she's very attractive. So she could 'get away with' charging more than £200 in any event.

What you seem to be saying is this: If the ad were to say 'I AM Shakira' at the top. Then she could get away with charging more, because she has advertised who she is. Wouldn't the fact of needing to advertise who she is tend to show that people do not recognise her? In which case she cannot be famous, and therefore why should the name add value? Logically, I didn't follow.

I think SC can get away with charging higher rates, in any event, because she is attractive. The ad you have posted of £600/hr  'Anny' actually demonstrates my point, more than it does yours. 

[Brazilian Martian]

Hi mate. Fully understand what you have said. Happy to explain myself to you. No offence meant whatsoever.

To me your argument seems circular. Let me give an example. Say I post a back page ad, with a picture of Shakira. I put the name 'Jane' and advertise £200 an hour. Since Shakira is famous, people would recognise her anyway, right? Even if they didn't, she's very attractive. So she could 'get away with' charging more than £200 in any event.

What you seem to be saying is this: If the ad were to say 'I AM Shakira' at the top. Then she could get away with charging more, because she has advertised who she is. Wouldn't the fact of needing to advertise who she is tend to show that people do not recognise her? In which case she cannot be famous, and therefore why should the name add value? Logically, I didn't follow.

I think SC can get away with charging higher rates, in any event, because she is attractive. The ad you have posted of £600/hr  'Anny' actually demonstrates my point, more than it does yours. 

 
Fantastic response

[peter purves]

Fantastic response

Sorry BM,the logic is flawed, I am not going to question your motives to defend Link 7 whenever you can

What is happening here is

Hidden Image/Members Only

[peter purves]

Sorry BM,the logic is flawed, I am not going to question your motives to defend Link 7 whenever you can. Notwithstanding that you went to Admin to report that this post be locked, presumably to 'protect' Link7 - a most strange thing to do IMHO

What is happening here is

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Brazilian Martian]

Sorry BM,the logic is flawed, I am not going to question your motives to defend Link 7 whenever you can

What is happening here is

Hidden Image/Members Only

I'm not defending him at all he's a big boy and has been on this forum a long time. Like I've said he's one of my favourite posters he says it straight up how it is. But please show me posts how I'm defending him  it's similar to how you defended Avogadrosnumber !! What exactly happened to him he got banned for being previously banned. Or the fact that you seemed to be very chummy with that toss post carlsen aka mollyalloy who was a white knight fluff pot.

Or when you even suggested that I had alterior motives when i questioned Avogadrosnumber review of Charissa 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[peter purves]

I'm not defending him at all he's a big boy and has been on this forum a long time. Like I've said he's one of my favourite posters he says it straight up how it is. But please show me posts how I'm defending him  it's similar to how you defended Avogadrosnumber !! What exactly happened to him he got banned for being previously banned. Or the fact that you seemed to be very chummy with that toss post carlsen aka mollyalloy who was a white knight fluff pot.

Or when you even suggested that I had alterior motives when i questioned Avogadrosnumber review of Charissa 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Cheers,


You are defending him by

1. Jumping in - and trying to take the 'heat' of him by suggesting that you also question (the inference here is that you must be 'guilty' also) Suzy Cortez celebrity status when another punter had a go at him. You were not even in the debate up to this point.

2. Yesterday your insistence in the form of a criticism that I needed to have the last word when I clearly showed the fact that Suzy Cortez charges towards the higher rate. There was no acknowledgement from you on my point and that factually it cannot be refuted. While we are on this point, I do not think you have given a working definition of 'celebrity' so we can test the validity of your contention regarding Suzy Cortez

3. Going to Admin to get the thread stopped, if not bad enough - crucially only when Link 7 was being 'blasted' by another punter but not before

4. That you have not said anything to favour any other poster on this thread leads me to my conclusions.

As to your other points, in a debate it is a clever tactic to bring up 'smokescreens' that deflect away from the 'facts'. Nonetheless I feel this time round I will address them.

Charissa - When I was cross-examining Charissa to find out what the truth is? It appeared you did not want me to because you objected, just like a good solicitor and suggested "I was putting words into her mouth", when I was not, I was merely reiterating what she said and asking her to clarify her point. At best you should have come back and asked me 'Why am I following this line of reasoning?' as opposed to making the false assumption that I was putting words in her mouth? So in this respect I had no other alternative but to suggest, you were surrounding like her ".


Carlsen - I 'liked' Carlsen because whether he is a fluffy or not, he provided useful information. For me this is what this forum is about.

I have said it before in our last arguement when you jumped to the aide of another punter which did not involve you. So this is the second time now, I find myself in an argument with you when I had none over another punter viz

You are a valuable member of this board, and you make good contributions, but sadly you also spoil it on many occasions regrettably IMHO (and as others have suggested also).

[peter purves]

The bottom (excuse the pun  ) line - whether one 'likes' or 'hates' Suzy Cortez is that she is a 'celebrity' and/or has 'celebrity status' and even though she does not use this for her pricing, she could use it to charge more, if this is the choice she desired.

I cannot see why such a position is so difficult to comprehend based soley on the 'facts'??

One other fact is that she is not 'cheap' on AW and BP as previously suggested.

[grandaddybadman]

Hey, all I wanted to know is if the woman has retired because she needs a good cardio session with a man like me to Keep her sexy ass in shape.

[Brazilian Martian]

Cheers,


You are defending him by

1. Jumping in - and trying to take the 'heat' of him by suggesting that you also question (the inference here is that you must be 'guilty' also) Suzy Cortez celebrity status when another punter had a go at him. You were not even in the debate up to this point.

2. Yesterday your insistence in the form of a criticism that I needed to have the last word when I clearly showed the fact that Suzy Cortez charges towards the higher rate. There was no acknowledgement from you on my point and that factually it cannot be refuted. While we are on this point, I do not think you have given a working definition of 'celebrity' so we can test the validity of your contention regarding Suzy Cortez

3. Going to Admin to get the thread stopped, if not bad enough - crucially only when Link 7 was being 'blasted' by another punter but not before

4. That you have not said anything to favour any other poster on this thread leads me to my conclusions.

As to your other points, in a debate it is a clever tactic to bring up 'smokescreens' that deflect away from the 'facts'. Nonetheless I feel this time round I will address them.

Charissa - When I was cross-examining Charissa to find out what the truth is? It appeared you did not want me to because you objected, just like a good solicitor and suggested "I was putting words into her mouth", when I was not, I was merely reiterating what she said and asking her to clarify her point. At best you should have come back and asked me 'Why am I following this line of reasoning?' as opposed to making the false assumption that I was putting words in her mouth? So in this respect I had no other alternative but to suggest, you were surrounding like her ".


Carlsen - I 'liked' Carlsen because whether he is a fluffy or not, he provided useful information. For me this is what this forum is about.

I have said it before in our last arguement when you jumped to the aide of another punter which did not involve you. So this is the second time now, I find myself in an argument with you when I had none over another punter viz

You are a valuable member of this board, and you make good contributions, but sadly you also spoil it on many occasions regrettably IMHO (and as others have suggested also).

Now this will be my last post to you the others you suggested I could make a list of 4 members Honestpunter, Honolulu, King tarzan and one other who i will not even bother agknowledge .
I could go easily list the shit that i have caught them out on, Honestpunter took offence to me talking about Suzy then said I'm upset because I got knocked back from her because she does not see black men. Honolulu is another basket case who took offence when i clearly stated that a prossie he saw in tooting was in her forties when he claimed she was in her late twenties. Now for the the tarzan character when he first came back i actually liked his reviews and posts but it became clear he was posting for attention and clearly touting Angela or what ever other prossie he talks about. Also their was the other guy who I butted heads with Bud$ who turned out to be a fucking white tosser who also got his marching order'.

It's funny how most of the posters who have issues with me always tend to have a issue with me calling out their bullshit or exposing their lies in someway.



As for you peter if only you put as much effort into posting positive reviews as you do always trying to be the smartest guy on this forum. As i and another punter stated in January you do have a way of coming across really smarmy and instead of asking questions in a straight up manner, you do it in I'm smarter than you kind of way. 

Now I asked for this thread to be shut down because it's bullshit thread which started by OP for reasons which I don't believe are genuine.

Also as for the others who dnt like my posts they always have the option to place me on their ignore list like i have done with others.

[Bassman]

Now this will be my last post to you the others you suggested I could make a list of 4 members Honestpunter, Honolulu, King tarzan and one other who i will not even bother agknowledge .
I could go easily list the shit that i have caught them out on, Honestpunter took offence to me talking about Suzy then said I'm upset because I got knocked back from her because she does not see black men. Honolulu is another basket case who took offence when i clearly stated that a prossie he saw in tooting was in her forties when he claimed she was in her late twenties. Now for the the tarzan character when he first came back i actually liked his reviews and posts but it became clear he was posting for attention and clearly touting Angela or what ever other prossie he talks about. Also their was the other guy who I butted heads with Bud$ who turned out to be a fucking white tosser who also got his marching order'.

It's funny how most of the posters who have issues with me always tend to have a issue with me calling out their bullshit or exposing their lies in someway.



As for you peter if only you put as much effort into posting positive reviews as you do always trying to be the smartest guy on this forum. As i and another punter stated in January you do have a way of coming across really smarmy and instead of asking questions in a straight up manner, you do it in I'm smarter than you kind of way. 

Now I asked for this thread to be shut down because it's bullshit thread which started by OP for reasons which I don't believe are genuine.

Also as for the others who dnt like my posts they always have the option to place me on their ignore list like i have done with others.

Good post  in aggreeance.

 

[peter purves]

Good post  in aggreeance.

I am afraid it is not because he has not addressed the points I raised. This is how you have conversations/debates on the internet, not go off on a waffle about some other un-related subject(s).

Every now  again we get posts like this:

"Good post!!". It is just empty rhetoric and it usually contains only a few words because the point cannot be argued successfully. So it becomes almost like the school playground stuff (viz I am going to side with my best friend against his enemy like a good old lap-dog to his master).

We have seen BM do it earlier in the afternoon without critically thinking and/or understanding what appears to be said.

You've now joined the club - I wonder who next will come forward with a 'Good post' line but not able to refute the basis of the argument that two punters have suggested with regard to Ms. Cortez.

[peter purves]

Hey, all I wanted to know is if the woman has retired because she needs a good cardio session with a man like me to Keep her sexy ass in shape.

  



Another fine mess you got me into Stanley

Hidden Image/Members Only

She has not retired just keep an eye for her on BP 

[socksfellan2]

Hey, all I wanted to know is if the woman has retired because she needs a good cardio session with a man like me to Keep her sexy ass in shape.

Holy shit, I don't know why fellas are arguing here...

Answer to your question: She's still around. You can find her on BP, under escorts. Look for "Juliety" using the search function.

[peter purves]

Holy shit, I don't know why fellas are arguing here...

Answer to your question: She's still around. You can find her on BP, under escorts. Look for "Juliety" using the search function.

Egos!! - in one word 

[peter purves]

Double post - Excuse me!!

[peter purves]

Errr 

Best leave it there

Back to the footy 

[peter purves]

As for you peter if only you put as much effort into posting positive reviews as you do always trying to be the smartest guy on this forum. As i and another punter stated in January you do have a way of coming across really smarmy and instead of asking questions in a straight up manner, you do it in I'm smarter than you kind of way. 

Let's see if I can 'drag' one more thought out of you here  .

Is it I am trying to be swarmy or smarter, than everyone else here  etc etc or is this how you interpret and perceive me, from my writing style??

If it is the former (something in my character makes me swarmy etc). Then please do not forget that there was a poster who surmised the very worst about you based strictly "on what you have written" here.

I think you get the point!!

[Brazilian Martian]

Let's see if I can 'drag' one more thought out of you here  .

Is it I am trying to be swarmy or smarter, than everyone else here  etc etc or is this how you interpret and perceive me, from my writing style??

If it is the former (something in my character makes me swarmy etc). Then please do not forget that there was a poster who surmised the very worst about you based strictly "on what you have written" here.

I think you get the point!!

Peter honestly GO FUCK YOURSELF no offence meant of course    you're a wind up merchant who's going on my ignore list now.

[peter purves]

Peter honestly GO FUCK YOURSELF no offence meant of course    you're a wind up merchant who's going on my ignore list now.

Oh dear!! 

[Link7]

Peter honestly GO FUCK YOURSELF no offence meant of course    you're a wind up merchant who's going on my ignore list now.

For the avoidance of doubt: +1

[peter purves]

For the avoidance of doubt: +1

Oh dear!! 

[Bassman]

For the avoidance of doubt: +1

Hey man you can't post like that, it's an empty rhetoric... PMSL.

I had typed a long reply but thought what's the point. It isn't about defending a forum member (although BM and I have both basically been accused of being pimps so I feel like I'm part of the club lol) but but just showing aggreance in the comments made hoping maybe you'd think about things.

As much as you Peter liken things to being similar to the playground. What do you think you do with your constant attempt to get in the last word and posting like your the most intelligent person here. You're guilty of the same.

This is how this conversation about her celebrity should've gone:
"she's a celeb"
"no she's not"
"why do you think she isn't"
"cos xyz"
"ok would you bang tho"
"yeah!/nope"

That's how a regular convo should go. For some reason you post like we're in a court of law. Fuck that shit man.

i don't know how to put you in an ignore list Peter but i can see why people want to.

Sorry if this post doesn't meet your court of law standards but I've don't want to waste to much time building a defence case for my posts as I have to attend a do for my employees amongst my pears in the industry.
Hidden Image/Members Only
Lol

[Anadin]

The bottom (excuse the pun  ) line - whether one 'likes' or 'hates' Suzy Cortez is that she is a 'celebrity' and/or has 'celebrity status' and even though she does not use this for her pricing, she could use it to charge more, if this is the choice she desired.

I cannot see why such a position is so difficult to comprehend based soley on the 'facts'??

One other fact is that she is not 'cheap' on AW and BP as previously suggested.

Yup, I'll plus one that as that seems to be what's happening.

[Brazilian Martian]

Hey man you can't post like that, it's an empty rhetoric... PMSL.

I had typed a long reply but thought what's the point. It isn't about defending a forum member (although BM and I have both basically been accused of being pimps so I feel like I'm part of the club lol) but but just showing aggreance in the comments made hoping maybe you'd think about things.

As much as you Peter liken things to being similar to the playground. What do you think you do with your constant attempt to get in the last word and posting like your the most intelligent person here. You're guilty of the same.

This is how this conversation about her celebrity should've gone:
"she's a celeb"
"no she's not"
"why do you think she isn't"
"cos xyz"
"ok would you bang tho"
"yeah!/nope"

That's how a regular convo should go. For some reason you post like we're in a court of law. Fuck that shit man.

i don't know how to put you in an ignore list Peter but i can see why people want to.

Sorry if this post doesn't meet your court of law standards but I've don't want to waste to much time building a defence case for my posts as I have to attend a do for my employees amongst my pears in the industry.
Hidden Image/Members Only
Lol

 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Candyman]

Hi mate. Fully understand what you have said. Happy to explain myself to you. No offence meant whatsoever.

To me your argument seems circular. Let me give an example. Say I post a back page ad, with a picture of Shakira. I put the name 'Jane' and advertise £200 an hour. Since Shakira is famous, people would recognise her anyway, right? Even if they didn't, she's very attractive. So she could 'get away with' charging more than £200 in any event.

What you seem to be saying is this: If the ad were to say 'I AM Shakira' at the top. Then she could get away with charging more, because she has advertised who she is. Wouldn't the fact of needing to advertise who she is tend to show that people do not recognise her? In which case she cannot be famous, and therefore why should the name add value? Logically, I didn't follow.

I think SC can get away with charging higher rates, in any event, because she is attractive. The ad you have posted of £600/hr  'Anny' actually demonstrates my point, more than it does yours. 

This is a good point. I disagree with the fact that she was posting clear photos of herself though. From what I remember there were no clear shots of her face and distinguishing features like her tattoos were all hidden unless I'm mistaken, they were mostly focused on her ass for obvious reasons. That's why I think she wasn't using her name or any celeb status.

Also the fact she isnt immediately recognisable to most doesnt mean she cant still use her name to improve her popularity. Punters could read who she is, google suzy cortez and then be more likely to want to see her despite not knowing who she was in the first place as what happened with me

[Azucar D Artagnan]

Sorry if this post doesn't meet your court of law standards but I've don't want to waste to much time building a defence case for my posts as I have to attend a do for my employees amongst my pears in the industry.
Hidden Image/Members Only
Lol

+1 

She aint a celebrity ,  she is a Fucking Ho 

She is not a celebrity in the UK because she has never done anything apart from Whore her self and no one  Euroland person has ever heard of her .

In Brasil no one has really heard of her because she never had a career or did anything there . Winning a Bunda competition does not make you a celebrity . She has never been a Musa @ Carnival nor has she even won any competition for Rainha or Passista at any Escola da Samba . Piranhas  do Funk are more celebrity than she is & they are nothing but they have Gigs and earn money . If you have little experience of Brasil then you cannot realise how many girls have won competitions for having great Bundas and being able to shake them whilst walking on a cat walk .

Generating stories about yourself having interaction will Messi does not make you a celebrity . 2 weeks after you have sold your fake story no one is going to pay you for your time .

Winning Miss Universe would have made her a celebrity . Having a career like Ivete Sangalo or Bethe Carvalho would make her a celebrity being an actriz in a Brasilian TV Soap or TV presenter would make you one .

If she made a P.A. in Brasil the MC would have to explain to the audience what she had won and what her name was otherwise no one would know why she was at the event .

Having your pic in Google images is not confirmation that you are a celebrity .

If she had some celebrity she could have stayed in South America and caught her own " Big Fish " to pay her bills for life.

She is probably from Uruguay or Argentina and spent 6 months in Sao Paulo at her middle class families real estate investment before the Bunda Comp 

[Anadin]

How is this debate still going on.

Is she's a real notable celeb,  no not there's no agreed criteria for that. She's sorta instafamous. Some people in Euroland clearly know who she is.

Supposedly almost famous enough to make it onto celeb big brother, that's about it.