British girls with crap pictures.

[pokenn]

Is it just me or do most British girls have the most awful pictures on AW. it's not expensive to get good photos and often they could get a good amateur photographer to do them for free. The Romanians and other EE's often seem to have professional looking pics that show them at their best.

I suppose I shouldn't moan too much. If they had great pics they would be more busy and put up their prices.

[Sienna_Bronze]

I prefer the selfie, no photoshop type pics. Alot of these professional photos have been altered to much for my liking. And I imagine the actual girl looks very different from the one in the pics.

[Andre 3000]

I also prefer natural shots. Even if the wg has make up on it's a lot better than the pro shoot.

The photoshop is excessive on most of the final pictures. Most WG's must go to the same guy as he makes them look like dead eyed plastic dolls.

Absolutely horrible stuff.

[cunnyhunt]

The Romanians and other EE's often seem to have professional looking pics that show them at their best.

From experience it is because they are not the girls that open the door. 

[thewonderingdick]

The reason the Romamians have good photos that make them look at their best is because the photos are fake, and stolen for foreign porn sites

[CBPaul]

The reason the Romamians have good photos that make them look at their best is because the photos are fake, and stolen for foreign porn sites

Yep. They also have a tendency to mix photos up, one or two real ones and a few found on the net showing the tits n arse they would rather have.

Kevin needs to take lessons in using a camera though. Sergei is pretty good with the real photos, he manages to get the whole prossie in shot, but Kevin keeps cutting the girls head off.

[Taggart]

I've said time and time again, many of these girls do not have a clue how to market themselves. After all, they are selling sex.

I get put off by pictures that are postage stamp size, fuzzy, indistinct as to what the body shape is, and many selfies are distored wide angle shots. There are also those who try and show more but conceal the fact they are fat or have a baby belly.

They use poor quality phones, too mean to ask someone with some level of photograhic knowledge. And having done portraits and other people pics, I can tell you, it's not easy. You certainly do not 'point and shoot' for best results.

But there are some that are an utter turnoff, as per this link:
External Link/Members Only

Bright yellow condom? A whale? Yuk.  No thanks

Or this where you cannot make any sensible decision: External Link/Members Only

Now a decent pic, where the SP is being honest, yet discrete as regards face is this: External Link/Members Only

Not difficult, is it?

[Stiltskin]

I added this British girl (Lux Lucie) to my hotlist when she was in my area, hoping she'd add more pictures. She's been active since 2009 and only ever had a single rubbish image on her profile, yet she has what looks like a genuine feedback score of 82!

Maybe she has some good pics in in private gallery, but personally I'd never book a girl that didn't have some decent free pictures to look at.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Taggart]

Maybe it's the A levels that bring them in.
I know what you mean. There's no ryhme or reason.

[serge]

British amateur porn tends to also  be very poorly made when compared to the germans for instance. Just look at any porn tube site and compare.