Your Amber - Kings Cross

[Expl1cit]

Link:  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Fee: £100 / hour

This is a Neutral review borderlining on a Negative because a) the profile description is fucking misleading and b) the agency who manages her leaves NO gaps between bookings, and tries to downgrade you to a 30 minute booking to maximise profilts.  Its 80 notes for 30min but a more reasonable 100 for 60min.

Positives
Amber is a lovely girl, very friendly and facially attractive.  She appears to be a genuine 21yo Polish girl who provided a decent OWO and FK/DFK throughout.

Negatives
AW description says she has a tiny waist... NO.  Claims she is fully waxed with silky skin... NO.  Offers an Amazing DTBJ... NO.  Works at a dancer and is flexible.... NO.  Claims she is tight... FUCK NO.

Overall a pretty disappointing punt for me.  Inexperienced girl who doesn't match her description, very average fuck.  She needs to seriously up her game and leave that agency.

[The_Don]

Its your review, punt and rating.

But it read more negative than neutral, IMO.

I've been to this location a few times and the W/G are a very mixed bunch.

I've also noted the maids (when they deals with comms) can be poor. Back to back or bumping punters booking and discretion is lacking (compared to what it use to be).

So much so, I now give this location a wide birth. Shame really, as its location is convenient for tube travelers. Some punters that prefer late evening or weekend punts. With out the traffic, C.C and parking hassles that exist in some places with in London at present. 

[Expl1cit]

Its your review, punt and rating.
But it read more negative than neutral, IMO.

Indeed

It takes a serious issue for me to leave a Negative review.  Amber is a lovely girl who tried her best to please, but fell short of my personal expectations and more importantly her AW description, hence the Neutral.  I could have walked but decided to stay.  She was my Plan B that evening as I got tied up earlier so missed out on Plan A who I really wanted to see so that made things slightly worse and I wasn't in the horniest mood.  What really swung this to a neutral for me was I had another punt later that same evening which was really awesome and put the earlier punt into better context

[holland]

Link:  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Fee: £100 / hour

This is a Neutral review borderlining on a Negative because a) the profile description is fucking misleading and b) the agency who manages her leaves NO gaps between bookings, and tries to downgrade you to a 30 minute booking to maximise profilts.  Its 80 notes for 30min but a more reasonable 100 for 60min.

Positives
Amber is a lovely girl, very friendly and facially attractive.  She appears to be a genuine 21yo Polish girl who provided a decent OWO and FK/DFK throughout.

Negatives
AW description says she has a tiny waist... NO.  Claims she is fully waxed with silky skin... NO.  Offers an Amazing DTBJ... NO.  Works at a dancer and is flexible.... NO.  Claims she is tight... FUCK NO.

Overall a pretty disappointing punt for me.  Inexperienced girl who doesn't match her description, very average fuck.  She needs to seriously up her game and leave that agency.

This should be a negative review imo as well.
You walked away very disappointed and you didn't get what you paid for. It doesn't matter if she is a lovely girl. The reviews are to help punters not the girls.

[Expl1cit]

This should be a negative review imo as well.
You walked away very disappointed and you didn't get what you paid for. It doesn't matter if she is a lovely girl. The reviews are to help punters not the girls.

Interestingly your last review for Rita was a Neutral which in other peoples opinion, should be a negative because she lied about DFK and OWO according to you! You will come back and say yeah but I enjoyed the punt and you left disappointed so there is a difference.  There is no difference! The rating itself is actually not important but the content of the review.  Both our reviews were factual and rated according to how we felt.  Fellow punters can read the review description and make a judgement on whether or not to visit the escort in question - as I did with your review of Rita and had a fucking fantastic punt but the reviewer decides on the rating, nobody else!

PS - the main reason I left disappointed from Amber was that I thought instead of spending an hour with her, I could have fucked Rita again 

[holland]

Interestingly your last review for Rita was a Neutral which in other peoples opinion, should be a negative because she lied about DFK and OWO according to you! You will come back and say yeah but I enjoyed the punt and you left disappointed so there is a difference.  There is no difference! The rating itself is actually not important but the content of the review.  Both our reviews were factual and rated according to how we felt.  Fellow punters can read the review description and make a judgement on whether or not to visit the escort in question - as I did with your review of Rita and had a fucking fantastic punt but the reviewer decides on the rating, nobody else!

PS - the main reason I left disappointed from Amber was that I thought instead of spending an hour with her, I could have fucked Rita again 

The rating it's very important that's why is there!
It's your time and money. If you happy to paid 100 pounds and leave disappointed it's your business but obviosly you will find many people in here who don't agree with it.

[holland]

Gents,

This is a message i just received from the op

Rather than post a reply on the main forum, i'll just say, its my fucking review and i'll leave whatever rating I decide, not what you think is appropriate!

I'll reply in here.

Op you can rate your review they way you want but you cannot aspect that we all agree with it.
This is a public blog and we all have right to express our opinions and experiences.