Positive? Negative? or Neutral? I can't decide!

[Expl1cit]

I had a punt this afternoon which I was very much looking forward too for some time.  On paper at least, she ticked all the right boxes and pre-punt comms were flirtatious - she even sent me a text shortly before the proposed meet, giving me a couple of options on what my preferred outfit would be for her to wear - something i've never had a WG ask me, unless I have specified a particular uniform.

Door opens and she was as expected - fit, tanned, gorgeous and welcoming.  No mention of money upfront which I always appreciate as its a change from the usual money and 5 minute stash disappearance.  Conversation flowed well and we got into the action about 10 minutes into the booking, starting with kissing, follwed by the famous fl0atab1lity RO which usually has manyWG's clenching the sheets & smiling.   I usually allow 10-15 mins of a 1 hour booking for this - I find it loosens and lubricates them up nicely for sex and puts them in a better mood and reduces my mental blockage in ensuring some sort of mutual pleasure in a session.

For whatever reason, she stopped the RO after 10 mins and got a bit edgy when I asked if everything was ok - a seemingly normal question I thought.  I had my first mini argument with a WG or infact with any girl during mish but we brushed it off and carried on fucking haha, we got into a good rythem.  Switched to CG and I was enjoying letting her take control - I zoned out - as I usually do in punts and most real life situations and she didn't like that and said it was difficult to fuck a corpse or words to that affect.  I've been called a few things in my time, but a fucking corpse - it was very funny.

Once I lose interest, there is no bringing me back to the moment so half way into the booking, we mutually part ways with only half the hourly fee requested.

Positives - fit as fuck and great sex.
Neutrals - edgy and too easy to hit the wrong buttons
Negatives - slightly loopy

I'm leaning towards a positive, with a neutral reservation on her personality but I don't know!

[webpunter]

How many profiles on AW ?  Let me try & guess which one 

[Expl1cit]

How many profiles on AW ?  Let me try & guess which one 

No need to guess - you'll just need to wait until the review is posted. 

If you want to guess, my AW search criteria is simple.  1) Female  2) Escort  3) London  4) Verified  5) Nationality: Romania Exclude  6) Upper Age 30  5) Caucassian White and 6) Natural Breasts

[maxxblue]

Sometimes it's not straightforward to rate a WG as positive, negative or neutral, as often there are some things that went well and others not so well.

The rule of thumb I adopt in deciding an overall rating is how I feel coming away from the punt. If I come away from a punt with a smile on my face then it is a positive. If I feel shit, then it is a negative. If I don't come away with a smile on my face, but don't feel shit, then it is a neutral.

However, in most cases it is quite clear cut.

[webpunter]

Twas but jestin'

[Rod trotter]

Did you come away happy??

Easy decision from what you said, not great but not bad

NEUTRAL

[Deanomarco]

The acid test I always apply is- did I enjoy it and would I return, if yes then I give it a positive. As long as you're clear on what you thought was good and bad it doesn't matter what rating you give it, as a review is subjective. however if I'm undecided then I'd plump for a neutral.

[stevedave]

I'd say neutral from the sounds of it. If you had a barney with her, she's criticised you, and you've called time before the end before popping, I don't see how it can be a positive...I'm even talking myself out of a neutral 

[smiths]

I'd say neutral from the sounds of it. If you had a barney with her, she's criticised you, and you've called time before the end before popping, I don't see how it can be a positive...I'm even talking myself out of a neutral 

Would be a negative off me, a WG arguing and criticising me isn't what I require when punting.

[Arley Hall]

The rule of thumb I adopt in deciding an overall rating is how I feel coming away from the punt. If I come away from a punt with a smile on my face then it is a positive. If I feel shit, then it is a negative. If I don't come away with a smile on my face, but don't feel shit, then it is a neutral.

That is exactly how I judge punts - i.e. by my emotional state at the end. You can only really say how it was for you. I don't feel I need to take on the responsibility of giving a rating that will be valid for all punters. A girl's overall rating can only be judged by reading a selection of reviews from different reviewers.

Having said that, I wouldn't feel good at the end if there had been any kind of 'attitude' (never mind an argument) during the punt. But that's just me.

[vw]

Sounds negative to me, seems she ruined it for you and sounds like diabolical punt with a nice body !

As you said was like fucking a corpse !  If necrophilia is you thing maybe a positive for the extra !

Anyway as long as the review is accurate punters can make up their own minds whether to see or not !

[James999]

It sounds like it was going ok till you bored the fuck out of her by licking her fanny for 10 mins and she started to think you were weird, the part where you talk about the famous float RO etc kinda supports that theory.

Perhaps take a book of a Kindle for the girls to read in future 

[Sir Lance-a-lot]

I would have called this a negative, except for that partial refund.  That's an unusual gesture, and I think she deserves to be nudged up to a Neutral for good ethics.

[vw]

I would have called this a negative, except for that partial refund.  That's an unusual gesture, and I think she deserves to be nudged up to a Neutral for good ethics.

He hadn't paid her, he held the cards, wouldn't bump to a neutral for that, doubt he would have got anything if paid on arrival, she had to be reasonable to get something.

[RedKettle]

sounds like a negative to me but with enough written in the review to give readers of it a good insight into the reasons for that and what she is like.

[ClarkeOfTheCourse]

I would rate this as a negative too. She needs to realise that this is a job and not about her enjoying herself, she has to give the impression that she is to the customer at all times unless an unreasonable request is made, because that is what she is being paid to do

[Bangers and Gash]

Would be a negative off me, a WG arguing and criticising me isn't what I require when punting.

+1

You paid her top dollah to do a simple job, and she fell short. 100% negative, everytime. 

[smiths]

+1

You paid her top dollah to do a simple job, and she fell short. 100% negative, everytime. 

Absolutely Bangers, with my zero tolerance policy nowadays there is NO leeway with a WG whatsoever for any reason.

[stevedave]

Would be a negative off me, a WG arguing and criticising me isn't what I require when punting.

Yeah actually, in hindsight, I agree.

[RedKettle]

clear consensus developing!! 

[LL]

Does it really matter what rating you give? As long as you provide all the info in the review I mean. Which you have done. In fact all that's missing in your opening post is her profile link - put that in and that's your review complete. The rating you decide - is a mere formality.

[tesla]

I disagree the rating is important, some people will only read negative or neutral reviews. Some positive reviews can read more like a an ego trip for the reviewer rather than an objective assessment of the punt.

[LL]

I disagree the rating is important, some people will only read negative or neutral reviews. Some positive reviews can read more like a an ego trip for the reviewer rather than an objective assessment of the punt.

The rating is highly subjective and the opinion of the reviewer. Or it should be. We don't usually review first and then take a vote on what the rating should be as floaty is attempting.

If people are only reading reviews of a certain rating then they're missing out. What I consider to be a positive experience may not be the same for you or anybody else. This is why I try to give as much details as I can remember along with my own "token" rating based on my personal preferences. The reader should take the review as a whole (and not just the rating) or not bother at all.

[smiths]

The rating is highly subjective and the opinion of the reviewer. Or it should be. We don't usually review first and then take a vote on what the rating should be as floaty is attempting.

If people are only reading reviews of a certain rating then they're missing out. What I consider to be a positive experience may not be the same for you or anybody else. This is why I try to give as much details as I can remember along with my own "token" rating based on my personal preferences. The reader should take the review as a whole (and not just the rating) or not bother at all.

I didn't feel as though I was taking a vote LL, just posting my opinion, punters obviously have to decide for themselves what rating to give.

[sirbonkalot]

Too bad mate,and you had been looking forward to it for a while as well !!
My opinion is if we had an argument during sex it would be just the same as sex with then OH, and there you cant just get up and leave it all behind !!!
Neutral to negative in my mind

[AlwaysLooking]

Think I'd be in the Neutral to Negative camp for this one, but more towards the Negative. I generally don't really care how fit they are, if they start to have a go at me, or criticise me (hey I'm no sex god I know that, but at least make me feel like one or at worst I'm your best fuck of the day) then sorry but they're plenty more WG's out there that I'm sure will take my cash.

[LL]

I didn't feel as though I was taking a vote LL, just posting my opinion, punters obviously have to decide for themselves what rating to give.

Yep, sorry - didn't mean to cause any offence. You are entitled to post your opinion.
It's the topic itself I find a bit odd as if the OP is worried he'll get his rating "wrong" so has to run it past us first. I don't think it's worth worrying about.

[SamLP]

It's the topic itself I find a bit odd as if the OP is worried he'll get his rating "wrong" so has to run it past us first. I don't think it's worth worrying about.

It's not the first time he's done that.. or commented on his "magnificent" oral skills. Reminds me of johnnyboy69. I get complimented by the girls I see quite a lot, but they're paid to make me feel good, and if indeed they were genuine I wouldn't brag about it on a punting forum.

[Expl1cit]

It's the topic itself I find a bit odd as if the OP is worried he'll get his rating "wrong" so has to run it past us first. I don't think it's worth worrying about.

With respect, I don't give a fuck what individual or the collective opinion is of UKP members that I need to run anything past the forum first.  It was a question, and I appreciate all responses to that question.  Those who try to intellectualise too much and 'read between the lines' - possibly have a little too much time on their hands.

[poseidon]

It depends how you feel about the punt + whether you would recommend her to others.

It looks like the punt itself wasn't what you hoped for, yet she refunded you half the money. I would have teetered closer to neutral than negative. My first punt was great and since became a benchmark for how I rate punts. If I don't go away feeling happy for the rest of the day, it's not positive

[johnny34]

The fact you were looking forward to this booking but left half way through after losing interest can only have one result: Negative. If you include all the facts as you see them in your review people can make there own minds up.

[smiths]

Yep, sorry - didn't mean to cause any offence. You are entitled to post your opinion.
It's the topic itself I find a bit odd as if the OP is worried he'll get his rating "wrong" so has to run it past us first. I don't think it's worth worrying about.

No offence taken. I agree with you, its not something I would of posted up as a thread myself.