I have to admit... I thought there was some kind of unwritten rule that if you came back, didn’t cause trouble, and carried on contributing you could get away with a previous banning. It’s been a running joke for a while that bigman was 306 and he’s never even acknowledged it. Guess I was wrong look forward to his next incarnation. Do we call him out straight away or let him get a few posts first? I’m afraid to say it’ll be obvious when it happens....
I thought this too - Mr Keen was here long before me & was a returning banned member apparently. I think it was when he posted "I shouldn't be a member of this forum" that Admin gave him a bullet.
was called long before that
Nigel & VW spotted him back in September it seems
It's not my site & I'm just happy to have access to others posts/reviews sharing information on WG's but if a banned member can learn to play by the rules & most importantly contribute honest & accurate reviews then I personally would appreciate their contributions.
To give a good example IMO Kamu was an excellent reviewer, source of information & sarcastic hilarity whereas a poor example of unbanning a member would be RX8 Racer - just a fucking dickhead. I'd like to think I know the difference (maybe I do, maybe I don't)
As I said it's not my forum hence not my choice.