I find it curious that paloma, and many posters on the wg site, have a model of a punter they will see. Any deviation from this and 'don't see and block' comes into effect. Instant judgement, no attempt to check the punter out with further questions.
At the same time, the list of dusty phones is a mile long. As is the one about being hard up financially.
Well the thing is about being independent, is that we get to choose who we see. Anyone who we don’t want to see usually gets blocked. I’d say a model punter is one that is punctual, clean, polite and doesn’t fall in love with me or make needy ‘first of the day’ requests. I decline these requests because quite frankly, I’m a bit fucking busy to decline bookings and pussy foot around clients who are distressed at the fact that I MAY have had sex before them. Showers exist for that reason.
Are you talking about my personal phone? Because if so, yes it’s a crying shame.
I would like to know where you got your evidence from to form that conclusion though, and how WGs simply being choosy with who they see has a direct correlation with a dusty phone and being destitute? Usually someone is picky because they can afford to be, as they say beggars can’t be choosers, so if someone was ‘hard up financially’, I don’t think they’d be very picky on who they let fuck them for cash. A dusty phone is usually because someone is shit at their job, is transparent about what they provide, or their pussy stinks.
I hope I gave OP the answer to his question. I don’t know a single WG who likes this request, but of course I can’t speak for everyone