Adele had great exposure from UKP and IMO made her an extremely lot of bookings & money after a stack of positive reviews.
A WG cannot and should not dictate to a punter to post or not to post a review - She should not have it BOTH ways - The reviews to make her 1 of the most popular WG in London and then a few months later does not want all the attention and reviews..
I have also heard several rumours from several members AND WG who she worked with that she eventually did not like the UKP reviews as it caused her a lot of stress to try and keep coming up to +100% Positives all the time as she dreaded someone on UKP giving her a negative -
This in turn caused her several issues which in the end apparently made her decide to leave London and go to Germany.
Now is this the fault of all the ''TITS'' that gave her positive reviews. I will let UKP members decide for themselves.
I remember reading that a while ago. It seems that no one remembers this? UKP made her, and UKP broke her. If she came back, she wouldn't want it publicised here.
It's ironic that password says that the reviews gave her the attention but doesn't understand why she didn't want it in the end. If you think you were doing her a favour by giving all those reviews, then it looks like you shot yourself in the foot. Sometimes not everyone wants attention. If she eventually becomes a doctor and is outed that she was legendary wg once upon a time, then her hard work would be wasted.
AFAIK, she wasn't fearing a negative, it was the fact that anyone could write a review and she couldn't stop them, even if they saw her or not. Hell, I could write a negative review now and she wouldn't be able to do anything about it. I could also write a positive and get the fluffs blowing up my inbox with PMs.