He has contributed.
For a 5 year membership no he has not. The amount of resources this site has in terms of saving punters money and recommendations which he has had access to for over 5 years and not one single review. Or do you mean his one post where he made two recommendations 3 years ago which he still did not review?
This is not like a hobby membership or a book reading club. People lose money on shit punts, this endeavour is not cheap. All intel to get monies worth is appreciated. Just soaking up other peoples contributions and give so little back is awful. If he had at least a couple reviews no one would be getting on to him. However his few posts show experience.
I started punting in late 2014 and have since been with 18 escorts (one who is a regular). Most of my experiences have been positive but I've had one or two bad ones. It's the luck of the draw really.
Depending on finances, I usually see one escort a month. On rare occasions when I get a good paycheck, I might see two.
There's been times however when I've had long breaks from punting, once up to six months due to ill health.
I tend not to review the escorts I see as I'm often so busy with work I don't get the time.
He has no time to review escorts but time to benefit off others contributions. How do you defend this?
