Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Ten thousand girls reviewed.  (Read 1791 times)

Online Steely Dan

We missed a milestone the other day.  Yes we have 8167+ reviews of escorts this year alone.  But note the following profile page:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=10000
Contrast with this one (who is still fucking for money):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=1

We have reviewed 10,000 different AW girls.  Well done chaps.  And well done to Admin and Nik for fixing the links on many of them, and generally making it happen!  But this particular milestone is more down to you lot out there not being faithful to the OH nor to your regular, but always willing to TOFTT!

Offline cueball


"I would podge 10,000 girls"

"And I would podge 10,000 more"

"Just to be the man that podged 10,000 birds"

"To be knocking on those doors"

 :hi:

I knew there were a song about it somewhere

OldAdmin

  • Guest
I would ignore that specific counter.
The actual number of service providers as of writing is 9,672.
But it's not 100% accurate as the system currently depends on AW Profile ID, so a prossie with a past deleted AW profile could have more than one UKP Service Provider IDs.
Reviews that don't have AW profiles links are also not included in the SP database.
The whole system needs upgrading but I don't have time.

Yeboahsleftfoot

  • Guest
I would ignore that specific counter.
The actual number of service providers as of writing is 9,672.
But it's not 100% accurate as the system currently depends on AW Profile ID, so a prossie with a past deleted AW profile could have more than one UKP Service Provider IDs.
Reviews that don't have AW profiles links are also not included in the SP database.
The whole system needs upgrading but I don't have time.

So it's likely well over 10,000 girls reviewed including agency, vivastreet, backpage etc. and over 8,100 reviews this year is a great effort, I know of another site purporting to cater for punters which has a grand total of 959 reviews so far this year. The amount of effort to run the site and provide the service for free is remarkable, thanks.

Offline Brazilian Martian

So it's likely well over 10,000 girls reviewed including agency, vivastreet, backpage etc. and over 8,100 reviews this year is a great effort, I know of another site purporting to cater for punters which has a grand total of 959 reviews so far this year. The amount of effort to run the site and provide the service for free is remarkable, thanks.

That other site graveyard.net home of pimps and fantasists
959 reviews i bet all 959 were positive as well. Used to be good but it's had its day  :hi:

Yeboahsleftfoot

  • Guest
That other site graveyard.net home of pimps and fantasists
959 reviews i bet all 959 were positive as well. Used to be good but it's had its day  :hi:

Yep, not all positive BM but a fucking huge percentage reviewing girls in three particular establishments owned by the same person, remarkable that!

Jumanji Marmaduke

  • Guest
I would ignore that specific counter.
The actual number of service providers as of writing is 9,672.
But it's not 100% accurate as the system currently depends on AW Profile ID, so a prossie with a past deleted AW profile could have more than one UKP Service Provider IDs.
Reviews that don't have AW profiles links are also not included in the SP database.
The whole system needs upgrading but I don't have time.

I just registered with UKP and completely new to who-as. I was going to write my "hello looking for advice" post some time in the bext few days. One of the questions i had is how people use UKP to review agencies? I think the way the site links together "35 reviews for Amber" for all the AW girls is great. But it would be great if we had a similar thing for agency girls, and agencies themselves.

I'm in the North East, and from what i can tell from UKP Premium, Amour, and Allure are our agencies with the best reviews. But do people ever/would it annoy people if i started a post for an agency where i put together all the reviews for the girls they have working?

I know uk puntingwiki has something similar for one or two agencies but it seems like it gets outdated pretty quickly. How quickly would people say girls turn over or retire in this buisness?

Offline Marmalade

:hi:

I knew there were a song about it somewhere

Aye, from Scotland!

Yeboahsleftfoot

  • Guest
I just registered with UKP and completely new to who-as. I was going to write my "hello looking for advice" post some time in the bext few days. One of the questions i had is how people use UKP to review agencies? I think the way the site links together "35 reviews for Amber" for all the AW girls is great. But it would be great if we had a similar thing for agency girls, and agencies themselves.

I'm in the North East, and from what i can tell from UKP Premium, Amour, and Allure are our agencies with the best reviews. But do people ever/would it annoy people if i started a post for an agency where i put together all the reviews for the girls they have working?

I know uk puntingwiki has something similar for one or two agencies but it seems like it gets outdated pretty quickly. How quickly would people say girls turn over or retire in this buisness?

Your best bet is to ask in the North-East Forum or search for specific girls or agencies, welcome and happy punting.

Online Steely Dan

I just registered with UKP and completely new to who-as. I was going to write my "hello looking for advice" post some time in the bext few days. One of the questions i had is how people use UKP to review agencies? I think the way the site links together "35 reviews for Amber" for all the AW girls is great. But it would be great if we had a similar thing for agency girls, and agencies themselves.

I'm in the North East, and from what i can tell from UKP Premium, Amour, and Allure are our agencies with the best reviews. But do people ever/would it annoy people if i started a post for an agency where i put together all the reviews for the girls they have working?

I know uk puntingwiki has something similar for one or two agencies but it seems like it gets outdated pretty quickly. How quickly would people say girls turn over or retire in this buisness?
Quote
UKPunting Site Rules
« on: August 16, 2010, 11:35:30 pm »

- Reviews
Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads. Only sex workers can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency / establishment / brothel.
Basically, have a punt then review the punt.  Simples. Reviews of agency girls are very welcome.

And there is no reason to think punting wiki is out of date.  It is updated daily.  if you or anyone notice something wrong, please correct it or post on the appropriate local board and one of the kind PW Elves will fix it.

Online Steely Dan

...and I would podge 4836 girls and I would podge 4836 more. Hmm agree it doesn't sing.  Back to work boys.

Still, one prossie got the 10,000 badge!

Offline paul_2407

About 2,000 of those downed by punther undoubtedly

ickydicky

  • Guest
whatever the actual figure is its a fucken lot  :P ;)and a lot of fucking :yahoo: and how many uselss punts have been avoided. how many bullets dodged. how many phones of horrible hoors made dusty. fucken lots.

and how many punters directed to good punts. how many bargain bangs uncovered. fucken lots  :crazy: so here's to ukp.absolutely fabulous. :thumbsup:

Offline Grumpy Pumpy

+1.

Top top job. A hugely useful site. Massive massive thanks to admin for the effort and expertise that goes in to it

 :hi: :drinks:

Offline purple_t

Thanks admin and Nik for all your efforts
Thanks to everyone who has TOFTT and followed it up with a review.
Thanks to all the punters who aren't scared to leave a negative review to warn others.

TheNewSeeker

  • Guest
I think the way the site links together "35 reviews for Amber" for all the AW girls is great. But it would be great if we had a similar thing for agency girls, and agencies themselves.

I think some respondents to this have missed the question. The problem, as I see it is this (it may get techie). AW has a unique database user id for each profile. This id can be used for linking numerous profiles for the profile holder together, which is why we must use the id in our reviews.

The system comes unstuck when a WG sells/gives her profile to a new girl. However AW is so well used that the UKP community picks up profile swaps pdq (usually).

Other sites, e.g. agencies, do not have unique ids. The url might be e.g. myescortagency.com/emma. The whole text string could, in theory, serve as the identifier to link to a SP ID and therefore used to link reviews together.

However if emma left said agency, the website manager might just assign the next, or a future girl, to to the name emma. The new Emma would then inherit the previous one's reviews. This might not be picked up as readily as with AW due to the lower level of awareness.

It is a shame we can only do this review linking for AW girls and not say vivastreet and other sites. I think it could be done as I describe, but one caveat might be a complusory picture or more scraped off the girls site to help identify changes to the girls at a specific url

If anyone were willing to have a techie discussion on this we could create an off-topic RFC. It would require admin input, however, since only he knows what is possible to do with the backend tables. I'm sure volunteer php coders can be found :)