Just read the 4 new pages in this thread and I'm sitting here dumbstruck. Emo? Old? No FK? LOL
Did anyone stop to consider that the blurred photo might simply be a shit quality picture? I saw it a few days after I met her and wondered several times what people would think when seeing it.
It's inevitable that a girl with 26 positive and no neutral or negatives is going to get a negative or neutral at some point. There are few exceptions. It was just a matter of time.
The issue for me is not that she's had a negative, it's that this review coincided with another negative from what turned out to be a malicious stalker, and the meeting apparently happened "a few months back". The timing does indeed seem a little suspicious.
Also the OP can't seem to get his facts straight. One minute he's saying she's 35-39, then in the next breath he's moved to 32, or 35-35. Is he an age expert I ask??
He also states that the girl he saw was considerably older than the girl in the blurred angel photo, which I know to be Emily, as it was taken only a couple of weeks ago during her duo day with Michelle.
So I can only conclude that either he hasn't actually seen Emily, or like the banned Stalker perhaps he has something to hide.
Given that Emily tends to take her first timer bookings via AW, might be pertinent to ask the OP to supply proof of the meeting for Admin to validate.