Rule clarification - can punters ask SP's in the forum for a booking?

[daviemac]

Apologies, noted. I must have misunderstood the rules, find them to be ambiguous so trying to piece things together via evidence from other mods. Let you all deal with it 

There's nothing ambiguous about the rules and digging up quotes from mods that were posted years ago before the rules changes only serves to complicate matters.

[Blackpool Rock]

There's nothing ambiguous about the rules and digging up quotes from mods that were posted years ago before the rules changes only serves to complicate matters.

Seems a bit suspect IMO Davie, quoting a post 2 and a half years old from CT who was at the time a Mod but hasn't posted for over 2 years and no longer shows as being a Mod in the page headers.

How / why would someone have looked for or searched for that quote unless they already knew it was posted but he's only been a member since Feb 

Coincidentally he reviews in Y&H region the same as the banned OP, 5 posts since June of which 2 are on this thread but he suddenly gets active now once the OP is banned and similar writing style to the OP
My gut thinking is it's a 2nd account 

[jamiekinkxxx]

Seems a bit suspect IMO Davie, quoting a post 2 and a half years old from CT who was at the time a Mod but hasn't posted for over 2 years and no longer shows as being a Mod in the page headers.

How / why would someone have looked for or searched for that quote unless they already knew it was posted but he's only been a member since Feb 

Coincidentally he reviews in Y&H region the same as the banned OP, 5 posts since June of which 2 are on this thread but he suddenly gets active now once the OP is banned and similar writing style to the OP
My gut thinking is it's a 2nd account 

I think you could be on to something BR 

[wilbers]

I just hope he doesn't now fixate on Ruth, I've a horrible feeling he might get obsessed following her responses to him

So, the OP is destined to remain Ruth-less?




How has no one made that pun until now.  I don't know who this particular Ruth is, but I presume has been mentioned on other threads.

[daviemac]

So, the OP is destined to remain Ruth-less?




How has no one made that pun until now.  I don't know who this particular Ruth is, but I presume has been mentioned on other threads.

The reason is most people don't see the funny side of a punter who could be a danger to that particular escort trying to book her.

[Lou2019]

So, the OP is destined to remain Ruth-less?




How has no one made that pun until now.  I don't know who this particular Ruth is, but I presume has been mentioned on other threads.

 

[Fuzzyduck]

The guy is a troll.  He deliberately posted nonsense to provoke angry/frustrated responses for his own amusement. Notice how he provoked everyone who responded, even the ones sympathetic to him.

Replying to him or attempting to debate him only made the guy on his "STI Ranking" thread trolls us more. He doubled down on this thread to "ask" if it was OK to book a SP from here.

Had Davie not intervened he'd still be at it and laughing his head off whilst everyone would get angrier and frustrated by his postings.

Typical troll behaviour.

There's a lot to suggest he's an attention-seeking troll. I mean it's really not hard to find this SP's phone number if you have any common sense. But he doesn't seem to have much. Two other SPs have called him out as a bit of a c**t on the other thread and he's asking about openly making a booking with someone else? WTF? I hope Ruth has her radar on.

The lack of social awareness, inability to read the room and blaming all his woes on being a victim does make me wonder if something else is going on upstairs. His poor missus is what I'm thinking. Assuming she's real.