YOUNG_HOT_BLONDE - Outcall - Three C's in London

[honestbloke]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

To balance out my numbers (negative / positive reviews) I am posting a review of Grace.
In summary she is the three C's .. caviar, champagne, and Cartier diamonds all in one.
Sure we connected, there was chemistry, and we had time, but she is unparalleled in my opinion. I know I haven't posted many reviews but I've been around the block and some.

Details: Her rate
Location: Hotel of my choosing

She is intelligent, emotionally attentive, soft, calm, open, and fuxking beautiful. She has something special.
She is young and looks more like a late teenager than a 20 something women.
Her services list is accurate.
She is expensive, but so is your damn Ferrari (both the car and the share price, the share price was cheap when the company IPO'd .. if anyone bought then well done!).
Her review numbers on AW have flattened out, my assumption is she is meeting regular clients who book direct by phone. She lists her number online. She is also available less.
I flat refuse to add more details (her profile has a lot already) or listen / reply to any comments about bias. You can scream, shout, label and bang your heads against the wall all you like but thats fuxking life. Deal with it. Sometimes you guys can really get so melodramatic that I have to check BBC.com to make sure there hasn't been a complete fuxking meltdown in the male brain composition. Then I realise its just the normal male hormones that have collided in idiot space.
Ok, enough abusing you all. Happy to answer any questions if I feel I can. If I can't go see her and answer them yourself.

[Brazilian Martian]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[honestbloke]

Thanks Mr Martian

[livedangerous]

Like your style, your review made me chuckle... and I have had her HL for a while.  She has a few of the kinkier services on her list - do you know if everything from that menu is included? Or does she do a romanian 'extra charge' thing?
Thanks for sharing.

[LLPunting]

Congrats on your review being a perfect example of a meltdown in idiot space.

[Brazilian Martian]

Congrats on your review being a perfect example of a meltdown in idiot space.

  the three C's Lord give me strength.
Cavier,
champagne, and Cartier diamonds

[Jvosta]

Walked when I saw her. Looked like a chav.

[honestbloke]

Like your style, your review made me chuckle... and I have had her HL for a while.  She has a few of the kinkier services on her list - do you know if everything from that menu is included? Or does she do a romanian 'extra charge' thing?
Thanks for sharing.

Thanks. My understanding is she does not charge extras. You will need to inquire with her. Her communication is good.

[king tarzan]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

To balance out my numbers (negative / positive reviews) I am posting a review of Grace.
In summary she is the three C's .. caviar, champagne, and Cartier diamonds all in one.
Sure we connected, there was chemistry, and we had time, but she is unparalleled in my opinion. I know I haven't posted many reviews but I've been around the block and some.

Details: Her rate
Location: Hotel of my choosing

She is intelligent, emotionally attentive, soft, calm, open, and fuxking beautiful. She has something special.
She is young and looks more like a late teenager than a 20 something women.
Her services list is accurate.
She is expensive, but so is your damn Ferrari (both the car and the share price, the share price was cheap when the company IPO'd .. if anyone bought then well done!).
Her review numbers on AW have flattened out, my assumption is she is meeting regular clients who book direct by phone. She lists her number online. She is also available less.
I flat refuse to add more details (her profile has a lot already) or listen / reply to any comments about bias. You can scream, shout, label and bang your heads against the wall all you like but thats fuxking life. Deal with it. Sometimes you guys can really get so melodramatic that I have to check BBC.com to make sure there hasn't been a complete fuxking meltdown in the male brain composition. Then I realise its just the normal male hormones that have collided in idiot space.
Ok, enough abusing you all. Happy to answer any questions if I feel I can. If I can't go see her and answer them yourself.

What a complete 100% SUPER BULLSHIT REVIEW
THERE'S FUCKEN NOTHING APART FROM HIGH LIVING COMPARISONS
Absolutely 100% rubbish

[honestbloke]

Congrats on your review being a perfect example of a meltdown in idiot space.

Thanks LL.

[honestbloke]

Walked when I saw her. Looked like a chav.

To each their own. Burberry was once labeled a chav brand.

[honestbloke]

What a complete 100% SUPER BULLSHIT REVIEW
THERE'S FUCKEN NOTHING APART FROM HIGH LIVING COMPARISONS
Absolutely 100% rubbish

Oh King Tarzan time to go back to the apes for you

[blue]

This 'review' is useless and comes across as some fluffy crap!

[honestbloke]

This 'review' is useless and comes across as some fluffy crap!

Please refer to the second last paragraph in my review

[LLPunting]

What a complete 100% SUPER BULLSHIT REVIEW
THERE'S FUCKEN NOTHING APART FROM HIGH LIVING COMPARISONS
Absolutely 100% rubbish

Priceless irony!   

[blue]

Please refer to the second last paragraph in my review

No need, you obviously knew this review was rubbish hence your attempt to preclude any criticism. You have not given any details of the services you received which makes this a pointless review.

[mrhappypants]

Honestbloke,

External Link/Members Only

Following the summary as a format will make your reviews more useful.

[honestbloke]

No need, you obviously knew this review was rubbish hence your attempt to preclude any criticism. You have not given any details of the services you received which makes this a pointless review.

You are so right Blue 

[Callisto]

I'd rather a fluff review than no review, and Honest Bloke - living up perfectly to his name - did at least own the brevity. 

I'm intrigued by her facial looks, especially with this chavviness contention.  Her AW page doesn't quite tell me enough.  Is there a celebrity you reckon she closely resembles, OP?

[LLPunting]

Honestbloke,

External Link/Members Only

Following the summary as a format will make your reviews more useful.

No point MHP,
OP is clearly still fuck-drunk from his encounter with Y-H-B.  He deliberately posted a worthless review.
Clever bit of marketing by Y-H-B really as it drives the traffic to her profile either way.
The AW reviews look fairly genuine and most of her profile is well written clap-trap.  She betrays her efforts at "sophistication" with some bad choices of words.
She's clearly printing money at the expense of the lads at CW.  Good luck to her but she's too androgynous for my liking and I have no interest in pre-pubescent, "barely legal" type encounters.

[honestbloke]

I'd rather a fluff review than no review, and Honest Bloke - living up perfectly to his name - did at least own the brevity. 

I'm intrigued by her facial looks, especially with this chavviness contention.  Her AW page doesn't quite tell me enough.  Is there a celebrity you reckon she closely resembles, OP?

Celebrity .. hmmm, let me think about this and get back to you. The photos of her with the body stocking does provide some information but yeah it's not clear.

[honestbloke]

No point MHP,
OP is clearly still fuck-drunk from his encounter with Y-H-B.  He deliberately posted a worthless review.
Clever bit of marketing by Y-H-B really as it drives the traffic to her profile either way.
The AW reviews look fairly genuine and most of her profile is well written clap-trap.  She betrays her efforts at "sophistication" with some bad choices of words.
She's clearly printing money at the expense of the lads at CW.  Good luck to her but she's too androgynous for my liking and I have no interest in pre-pubescent, "barely legal" type encounters.

Oh my assumptions built on assumptions. Never a good thing. Leads to bad conclusions.
The last sentence is fair.

[sean70]

OP's review serves as a conversation piece only and that, I am afraid, is exactly what he/the forum got so job done 

So for the avoidance of doubt it is a review "in name only". There is nothing in it to enable a punter to take the plunge and he even states "....go see her and find out yourself"

So there you have it chaps. A bored punter looking for an online barney! 

[Dicky]

Another one of those 'I wont go into detail as a gentleman never reveals intimate details' type review 

OP you forgot to add 'treat her well, gents' 

[honestbloke]

OP's review serves as a conversation piece only and that, I am afraid, is exactly what he/the forum got so job done 

So for the avoidance of doubt it is a review "in name only". There is nothing in it to enable a punter to take the plunge and he even states "....go see her and find out yourself"

So there you have it chaps. A bored punter looking for an online barney! 

You are a criminal for partially and mis quoting my sentence. 
"Happy to answer any questions if I feel I can. If I can't go see her and answer them yourself."

[honestbloke]

Celebrity .. hmmm, let me think about this and get back to you. The photos of her with the body stocking does provide some information but yeah it's not clear.

Update: The link didn't work. Its the second last image on her gallery. Body stocking photo 1.

Sorry can't think of one (I'm not good with celebrities or names). The below photo is her and imo has enough to interpolate her features.
External Link/Members Only

[puntingpumping1920]

"Sure we connected, there was chemistry"
 
Hidden Image/Members Only

[sean70]

You are a criminal for partially and mis quoting my sentence. 
"Happy to answer any questions if I feel I can. If I can't go see her and answer them yourself."

OP I deliberately paraphrased your sentence rather than verbatim. It was, I have to admit, paraphrased to demonstrate the nonsense review .... no conversation piece and the online barney you was seeking. As I said job done

[Marmalade]

caviar, champagne, and Cartier

If you get all those for the measly fee why bother fucking her cunt hole as well?
But maybe you didn’t. Review seems a bit scant on facts.

[Marmalade]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

To balance out my numbers (negative / positive reviews) I am posting a review of Grace.
In summary she is the three C's .. caviar, champagne, and Cartier diamonds all in one.
Sure we connected, there was chemistry, and we had time, but she is unparalleled in my opinion. I know I haven't posted many reviews but I've been around the block and some.

Details: Her rate
Location: Hotel of my choosing

She is intelligent, emotionally attentive, soft, calm, open, and fuxking beautiful. She has something special.
She is young and looks more like a late teenager than a 20 something women.
Her services list is accurate.
She is expensive, but so is your damn Ferrari (both the car and the share price, the share price was cheap when the company IPO'd .. if anyone bought then well done!).
Her review numbers on AW have flattened out, my assumption is she is meeting regular clients who book direct by phone. She lists her number online. She is also available less.
I flat refuse to add more details (her profile has a lot already) or listen / reply to any comments about bias. You can scream, shout, label and bang your heads against the wall all you like but thats fuxking life. Deal with it. Sometimes you guys can really get so melodramatic that I have to check BBC.com to make sure there hasn't been a complete fuxking meltdown in the male brain composition. Then I realise its just the normal male hormones that have collided in idiot space.
Ok, enough abusing you all. Happy to answer any questions if I feel I can. If I can't go see her and answer them yourself.

Your first review was a review. The next two were just useless waffle filled with utter verbose shite. Try reading the how to write a review tips in the UKP Wiki.

[honestbloke]

Your first review was a review. The next two were just useless waffle filled with utter verbose shite. Try reading the how to write a review tips in the UKP Wiki.

Reminds me of an Eminem song
External Link/Members Only

[scutty brown]

In summary she is the three C's .. caviar, champagne, and Cartier diamonds all in one.

Written as if he's been sniffing the fourth "C" with a five pound note..........

[LLPunting]

Oh my assumptions built on assumptions. Never a good thing. Leads to bad conclusions.
The last sentence is fair.

Assumptions?  I made none, I stated opinions.  The conclusions are perfectly fine as subjective ones.  If they don't coincide with reality well I'm sure everyone else will happily move on (now that was an assumption with high likelihood of no bad conclusion).
You however made a whopping great big assumption about the petering out of her reviews.  And I'm sure punters here will be unimpressed with your deductive powers (but hey, that's my subjective assumption that I'm happy to own).

As you've offered to answer questions here are a few:

She has no list of services just one of likes, is this the list you state is accurate?
Did you partake in all of them to confirm they're all available?

Did you shower on arrival and did she only start the clock after you returned from it?

Any idea why she doesn't like outfit requests?

Assuming you didn't call her, per her rules, and messaged her some charming words to convince her to consider entertaining you, what do you think it was you wrote that won her over?

[LLPunting]

If you get all those for the measly fee why bother fucking her cunt hole as well?
But maybe you didn’t. Review seems a bit scant on facts.

Can't fuck if one doesn't have a cock.  I'm still poorly assuming that op is actually Y-H-B.

[honestbloke]

Can't fuck if one doesn't have a cock.  I'm still poorly assuming that op is actually Y-H-B.

I'm dying here 
You really are special

[honestbloke]

Assumptions?  I made none, I stated opinions.  The conclusions are perfectly fine as subjective ones.  If they don't coincide with reality well I'm sure everyone else will happily move on (now that was an assumption with high likelihood of no bad conclusion).
You however made a whopping great big assumption about the petering out of her reviews.  And I'm sure punters here will be unimpressed with your deductive powers (but hey, that's my subjective assumption that I'm happy to own).

As you've offered to answer questions here are a few:

1. She has no list of services just one of likes, is this the list you state is accurate?
2. Did you partake in all of them to confirm they're all available?

3. Did you shower on arrival and did she only start the clock after you returned from it?

4. Any idea why she doesn't like outfit requests?

5. Assuming you didn't call her, per her rules, and messaged her some charming words to convince her to consider entertaining you, what do you think it was you wrote that won her over?

I've numbered your questions
1. Yes, accurate
2. No comment.
3. My hotel, not relevent
4. No idea. I could speculate but not going to
5. I'm a nice guy

[LLPunting]

I've numbered your questions
1. Yes, accurate
2. No comment.
3. My hotel, not relevent
4. No idea. I could speculate but not going to
5. I'm a nice guy

Thx for numbering, you're such a nice guy 

[honestbloke]

Thx for numbering, you're such a nice guy 

Lol right back at you 

[Marmalade]

Its fucking pointless saying “her likes list is accurate” unless you’ve tried them all. There were too many to do in an hour. Better to say which services you asked for and were given. Unfortunately the OP is probably “too much of a fucking gentleman” to mention such things, having been raised on AW lapdog reviews. Fucking get a life mate, and a grip (not just of your cock), and separate prossie talk from punter talk, and you’ll be welcome. 

[honestbloke]

Written as if he's been sniffing the fourth "C" with a five pound note..........

Your comment made me think of this song
External Link/Members Only

[livedangerous]

Fucking get a life mate, and a grip (not just of your cock), and separate prossie talk from auto-censored, and you’ll be welcome. 

His review was welcome as far as I was concerned. It may not have been as explicit as I would have liked, but it's information nonetheless. I enjoy sharing reviews here and appreciate the forum's information and guidance but it doesn't always have to be  a confrontational shit fight...  does it?

[YidArmy]

His review was welcome as far as I was concerned. It may not have been as explicit as I would have liked, but it's information nonetheless. I enjoy sharing reviews here and appreciate the forum's information and guidance but it doesn't always have to be  a confrontational shit fight...  does it?

The only attempt at confrontation seems to come from the OP. I can't see anything informative just provocation as below.

You can scream, shout, label and bang your heads against the wall all you like but thats fuxking life. Deal with it. Sometimes you guys can really get so melodramatic that I have to check BBC.com to make sure there hasn't been a complete fuxking meltdown in the male brain composition. Then I realise its just the normal male hormones that have collided in idiot space.
Ok, enough abusing you all

To me, that just reads like he's come on here asking for a row (which he's getting). 

[livedangerous]

The only attempt at confrontation seems to come from the OP. I can't see anything informative just provocation as below.

To me, that just reads like he's come on here asking for a row (which he's getting). 

Fair point.  On the other hand, when I'm writing a positive review about an SP who I actually liked, I often wonder if it's going to devolve into a bun fight that ends up getting me banned for being fluffy or whatever... This place can be a little harsh sometimes, don't you think?

[LLPunting]

His review was welcome as far as I was concerned. It may not have been as explicit as I would have liked, but it's information nonetheless. I enjoy sharing reviews here and appreciate the forum's information and guidance but it doesn't always have to be  a confrontational shit fight...  does it?

His "review" amounts to "Hey, did you check this girl out?  I think she's hot, trust me she's amazing.  She costs a lot but go try her out."

Here's a really useful tip for you, go try External Link/Members Only, there're so many hot and sexy women you can fuck there.

[livedangerous]

His "review" amounts to "Hey, did you check this girl out?  I think she's hot, trust me she's amazing.  She costs a lot but go try her out."

Here's a really useful tip for you, go try External Link/Members Only, there're so many hot and sexy women you can fuck there.

Thanks for the tip   

[LLPunting]

Fair point.  On the other hand, when I'm writing a positive review about an SP who I actually liked, I often wonder if it's going to devolve into a bun fight that ends up getting me banned for being fluffy or whatever... This place can be a little harsh sometimes, don't you think?

You won't be branded fluffy if you stick to the non-hyperbolic facts.

This place is only intolerant if you're stupid, a freeloader, a tout, a fanboy, a troll.  If you think this place is unjustly harsh at times perhaps you shouldn't be getting out of bed, ever.

[Brazilian Martian]

You won't be branded fluffy if you stick to the non-hyperbolic facts.

This place is only intolerant if you're stupid, a freeloader, a tout, a fanboy, a troll.  If you think this place is unjustly harsh at times perhaps you shouldn't be getting out of bed, ever.

Agreed

[YidArmy]

Fair point.  On the other hand, when I'm writing a positive review about an SP who I actually liked, I often wonder if it's going to devolve into a bun fight that ends up getting me banned for being fluffy or whatever... This place can be a little harsh sometimes, don't you think?

Well, it will be harsh if you post with the intention of creating conflict, which i think is what the OP intended here. This isn't a review, it's more of a provocation..a sort of 'call her or fuck off' which to me is factually worthless. On top of that it's openly insulting to members and offers little value other than the AW link.

[HailWood]

The review told me fuck all but it did make me laugh - thanks Honestbloke

[LLPunting]

The only attempt at confrontation seems to come from the OP. I can't see anything informative just provocation as below.

To me, that just reads like he's come on here asking for a row (which he's getting). 

He's not "asking", he trolling.

There are plenty of prettier, sexier, hornier, porn-starier women reviewed here and/or to be found on AW, GT, VS, BP and agency sites at her price point and below, especially when you consider the fussiness of Y-H-B and her possible chaviness.