So on that logic it doesn't matter why they do it or how they came to do it as long as you can fuck them you're happy? Yes?
Nice to see you so supportive of trafficking, no surprise
I don’t think anyone on here supports trafficking, Miss Wolf.
There’s a big difference between being trafficked (no choice) and choosing it cos you’re broke. I wouldn’t go as far as to condone making it an obligatory suggestion at the job centre either ffs.
Some folk seem to be overthinking the reasons why someone chooses to escort. There’s a big grey area between ‘unable to eat’ and ‘wanting to eat better’. Do you have the same lifestyle as you did before escorting?
Probably not. It is almost impossible for a punter to guess the reasons — and most prossies would say it’s none of his business. If there’s a suspicion of being pimped there’s ways of saying no, and reporting it. There’s not the same option to say ‘I think she was at the food bank last week.’
There’s also a big difference between saying ‘maybe more women will escort cos they’re desperate” and
hoping that. The first is a statistical probability, a statement of fact, or a reasonable guess. It’s not the same as saying you
want women to be desperate and so take up escorting. An abolitionist could have made the first statement exactly the same as a punter.
Even if the OP
meant that — which I wouldn’t particularly condone — he’s not presumably in a position to reduce or increase the number of ‘desperate’ women doing it anyway. Neither, probably, would he be able to tell when arriving at a punt.
The judgmental attitude of some people is just getting virtuous about a hypothetical of a hypothetical.
In the unlikely event that a punter expressed a truly morally corrupt attitude (eg condoning trafficking, or encouraging poverty) then I hope he would be duly chastised. Unless that happens could I politely suggest people stop jumping on him? (That would particularly apply to you if a WG is making accusations against punters, wouldn’t it.)