Meeting declined because of membership here

[xxlmuscles]

Hi, I recently tried to arrange a meeting with a WG on AW.
She declined the meeting saying that she did not want to meet with anyone who thought it was OK to review their performance on a chat forum!!!

Anyone else had this problem?

[Blue Suede Goo]

She asked you if you were on UKP?

[geordieman]

Hi, how did she know you were a member of UKP?  Do you use the same username on AW?  If she offered a good service she should be keen to prove it and have a good positive review on this site to encourage more punters for her!

[xxlmuscles]

She sent an email saying she would not meet with me because I was a member of a review WG forum

[Blue Suede Goo]

But how did she know?
 

[GreyDave]

 

What was the WWII phrase "Lose lips don't suck tits"

As Baldkrick was told by the Boss deign every thing

[puntingpumping1920]

A/W members reviews girls. I wonder why she advertises her services there 
 
You shouldn't of told her your a member of UKpunting during your booking. If you want to tell her the best time is post punt during a casual conversation.

[Blue Suede Goo]

A/W members reviews girls. I wonder why she advertises her services there 
 
You shouldn't of told her your a member of UKpunting during your booking. If you want to tell her the best time is post punt during a casual conversation.

Completely agree

[hungrypunt]

Link ?

[Zeusthedoc]

But how did she know?
 

+1

[Bud$]

I don't think we'll get an answer to how she knew nor who the girl was ie. a link - infuriating post/topic - not much point is there in starting it in the first place

[Lizzie_Lockhart]

A/W members reviews girls. I wonder why she advertises her services there 
 
You shouldn't of told her your a member of UKpunting during your booking. If you want to tell her the best time is post punt during a casual conversation.

Regarding this, AW doesn't allow guys to comment on one another's feedback.  I had a positive review here on an old AW profile and other guys who hadn't seen me were making negative comments about my looks... It can be quite damaging tbh. I know I was put off seeing forum dwellers for a while after that, as the name calling went unchallenged I believed it was part of the forum mentality.  Now I know there are arseholes from all walks of life and don't let it bother me. 

Some girls though do struggle to separate their sense of self worth from their escorting persona if this makes sense? And having what they believe to be a good service criticized can damage their self esteem.  If it's coming from the client himself it can be a good learning tool, or that's how I now look at it.  Seeing negative comments from randoms is another matter entirely.

For the OP, I'd recommend not mentioning your membership here.  Depending on how you tell them (if you did tell her) SPs may believe you're trying to suggest they go above and beyond what you're paying for or risk a negative review.  Not saying that is the case at all, but nuance is often lost though text/email.  If you use the same AW name as your UKP name I would suggest changing one.  What she doesn't know won't hurt her, though if she states on her profile she will not see UKP members, I'd look for someone else

x

[hungrypunt]

If she declined the meeting after accepting the booking then it deserves a neg.
But as previous poster says, maybe she would have gotten a good review anyway ??

[Corus Boy]

Seems like the OP may have made a couple of basic errors enabling her to find out but fair doos to the OP he has posted a number of reviews and not been shy to post Negative reviews.

[joe diddley]

OP uses the same username as he does on AW, I would guess. She probably used the search engine hear to find his reviews.

[puntingpumping1920]

Regarding this, AW doesn't allow guys to comment on one another's feedback.  I had a positive review here on an old AW profile and other guys who hadn't seen me were making negative comments about my looks... It can be quite damaging tbh. I know I was put off seeing forum dwellers for a while after that, as the name calling went unchallenged I believed it was part of the forum mentality.  Now I know there are arseholes from all walks of life and don't let it bother me. 

Some girls though do struggle to separate their sense of self worth from their escorting persona if this makes sense? And having what they believe to be a good service criticized can damage their self esteem.  If it's coming from the client himself it can be a good learning tool, or that's how I now look at it.  Seeing negative comments from randoms is another matter entirely.

x

 
 
I understand where your coming from, but OP said "she did not want to meet with anyone who thought it was OK to review their performance". A/W members can review performance

[Zeusthedoc]

OP uses the same username as he does on AW, I would guess. She probably used the search engine hear to find his reviews.

she needs to be a member to use the search facility, no?

[Lizzie_Lockhart]

 
 
I understand where your coming from, but OP said "she did not want to meet with anyone who thought it was OK to review their performance". A/W members can review performance

This is true but I think the feedback system is different on AW to the review system here. Feedback tends to be one line and SPs can choose whether or not to display the Field Reports which go into the kind of details seen here in Reviews.

I understand this does weigh in the SP's favour and why this forum is necessary, but for the girls out there who go for the more enigmatic "You're paying for my time, anything that happens is the choice of 2 consenting adults" kind of vibe may feel uncomfortable having all the gory details divulged in public.  Especially if it's going to be a topic of discussion as in my original reply.  I don't agree with the above, but a lot of girls see UKP the same way it was portrayed in the recent VICE article. 

x

[kamu]

Hi, I recently tried to arrange a meeting with a WG on AW.
She declined the meeting saying that she did not want to meet with anyone who thought it was OK to review their performance on a chat forum!!!

Anyone else had this problem?

Sounds stuck up to buggery. Probably best avoided anyway.

As above though; how did she know your on UKP? Same nickname?

[lewisjones23]

name her

[xxlmuscles]

This was the lady in question.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I never mentioned UKP in any of my correspondence. But it's not hard since I use the same nick name.

[Happyjose]

This is true but I think the feedback system is different on AW to the review system here. Feedback tends to be one line and SPs can choose whether or not to display the Field Reports which go into the kind of details seen here in Reviews.

I understand this does weigh in the SP's favour and why this forum is necessary, but for the girls out there who go for the more enigmatic "You're paying for my time, anything that happens is the choice of 2 consenting adults" kind of vibe may feel uncomfortable having all the gory details divulged in public.  Especially if it's going to be a topic of discussion as in my original reply.  I don't agree with the above, but a lot of girls see UKP the same way it was portrayed in the recent VICE article. 

x

Fortunately, it's a buyers market, and as UKP continues to grow, WG's are going to have to accept reviews as part of the ecosystem, particularly if they take their trade seriously. Worth remembering that this is a punters site, and if prossies don't like what's written here, don't read it. It's the locker room, and things said here are not for your benefit (though if you do a decent job that can be a useful consequence).

[hungrypunt]

I almost called her yesterday

Im sure she had another prossie profile too a while back, called Emily Rhapsody if i remember right or she has changed it to this name and does just rub and tug now

[OakTree]

This was the lady in question.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I never mentioned UKP in any of my correspondence. But it's not hard since I use the same nick name.

You know you can change your nickname on AW.

[Zeusthedoc]

This was the lady in question.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I never mentioned UKP in any of my correspondence. But it's not hard since I use the same nick name.

interesting given she has 2 reviews, both positive!

[Corus Boy]

Scarily the OP's username also links to;

External Link/Members Only

[munterhunter]

Hi, I recently tried to arrange a meeting with a WG on AW.
She declined the meeting saying that she did not want to meet with anyone who thought it was OK to review their performance on a chat forum!!!

Anyone else had this problem?

It's really nothing to get excited about. This isn't the only site where a wg can be reviewed.  If a wg gives a decent service then she has nothing to fear about being reviewed anywhere.  I've known women who gives good service but prefer not to be reviewed for discretion purposes and I've respected that. The wg in this case for whatever reason decided against meeting you that's her choice there are plenty of oyher women out there who will meet you just book one of them.

[bigmanbigman]

Just change your a.w. name or do a phone booking

[Desimonic]

yup link plz

[Bud$]

This was the lady in question.
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I never mentioned UKP in any of my correspondence. But it's not hard since I use the same nick name.

And she's in Caernarfon and that's why. If you are too then it will be obvious. There would only be 1 punter who lives there anyway
   

[daviemac]

yup link plz

Link to what    

If you mean the SP the OP's talking about he's posted one.   

[mrfishyfoo]

Happens to me all the time as I too have the same AW username as what I have on UKP.

For this reason I now DO NOT initiate contact through AW and instead text/phone a lass first. This means no number on AWank no chance of a booking but ask me if I'm bothered !!!

I've said it before and I'll say it again.....it's a 2 edged sword as it means some lasses I will never get to see BUT it also means that the clever lasses will google my username when the AWank booking goes through.The lasses that then find out that I'm a forum member and know I'll review them fuck my brains out. There are exceptions but that will always be the case.

My last red card is for a lass who figured out I was on here after she accepted a booking from me. Her loss !!!!

Before anyone gets on their high horse about having different usernames on here and on AWank NO THANK YOU !!!! I like it just the way it is as I really don't give a shit about the dumb cunts that are scared of reviewers. TBH I really don't want to see a lass who chooses not to see me when she figures out I am a forum member. Plenty more fish in the pond and all that.

......and there are always the agencies that don't actually care as they see all publicity as good publicity.

EDIT:

My ideal booking is when I text then ring a lass and AWank never comes into the equation. Much easier like that IMHO.

[threechilliman]

This is true but I think the feedback system is different on AW to the review system here. Feedback tends to be one line and SPs can choose whether or not to display the Field Reports which go into the kind of details seen here in Reviews.

I understand this does weigh in the SP's favour and why this forum is necessary, but for the girls out there who go for the more enigmatic "You're paying for my time, anything that happens is the choice of 2 consenting adults" kind of vibe may feel uncomfortable having all the gory details divulged in public.  Especially if it's going to be a topic of discussion as in my original reply.  I don't agree with the above, but a lot of girls see UKP the same way it was portrayed in the recent VICE article. 

x

SP's can choose whether to display field reports on their profile but if you search field reports by SP, they all appear.

tcm

[Desimonic]

Link to what    

If you mean the SP the OP's talking about he's posted one.

sry delay in post

[Lizzie_Lockhart]

SP's can choose whether to display field reports on their profile but if you search field reports by SP, they all appear.

tcm

Thanks tcm, I didn't know that. I deliberately keep some off my profile as they sound too much like an extract from Mills & Boon lol

X

[Zeusthedoc]

Scarily the OP's username also links to;

External Link/Members Only

this is a black man in currently plying his trade in athens...charging in dollars...

[The Owl]

Sometimes it can get a bit rough on here and that's bound to put off some escorts, it's just a fact of life. Sometimes a few forum users get personal for reasons we could spend forever debating whether they were being fair and then an escort might respond on Twitter or her AW blog painting x thousand forum users with the same brush. However business is business so even an anti-UKP escort is bound to service a UKP member at some point, probably give him genuine positive feedback and be none the wiser that he uses or posts on this forum unless he makes it blatantly obvious.


Sometimes I think after a bit of rough forum commentary it's a lot better for everyone to take a moment to calm down and think before they respond. It can make the difference between being able to respond appropriately on the forum geared towards punters or solidifying a couple of people's opinions in the eyes of many whilst getting a life time ban.

[Scotpunter]

I'd be wary of any SP who is reluctant to be reviewed. Provide a good service and they dont need to worry.

[Mansell]

You know you can change your nickname on AW.

+1   Never use the same name on AW, also never mention  UKP to the girl. Basic stuff really. 

[James999]

Hi, I recently tried to arrange a meeting with a WG on AW.
She declined the meeting saying that she did not want to meet with anyone who thought it was OK to review their performance on a chat forum!!!

Well you're a bell end for leting her know in the first place 

[Brazilian Martian]

Well you're a bell end for leting her know in the first place 

Some guys just never learn  he is a bellend. The worse kind for me are the ones that let prossies know about this site after the punt & then promise to leave a positive  review.

[puntingpumping1920]

Some guys just never learn  he is a bellend. The worse kind for me are the ones that let prossies know about this site after the punt & then promise to leave a positive  review.

 
I believe there is nothing wrong in telling a whore during post punt that you will write a review on the service she provided.
 

[Tricky Dickie]

I believe there is nothing wrong in telling a whore during post punt that you will write a review on the service she provided.

I agree. I think it's a little more suspect if the member can be easily identified in advance though. Perhaps he does get a better service. I'm sure that's good for him. It does mean there has to be question mark over any positive reviews he posts though.

It's a bit like a newspaper resteraunt critic booking a table in his own name. How confident can you be in the review?

[mrfishyfoo]

I'd be wary of any SP who is reluctant to be reviewed. Provide a good service and they dont need to worry.

Hammer...nail...head 

[Big Bad R]

Well you're a bell end for leting her know in the first place 

Even more of a bell end if you let her know before the punt with the objective of getting a 'better' service 

[ClarkeOfTheCourse]

Even more of a bell end if you let her know before the punt with the objective of getting a 'better' service 

Don't give the OP that much credit, he probably uses his regular phone and email for contacting prossies as well as the same user name for here, Awank and other punting forums. You can't teach stupid. 

[Brazilian Martian]

 
I believe there is nothing wrong in telling a whore during post punt that you will write a review on the service she provided.

Well I'm not about that life !!!! I find it strange for a punter to mention to a prossie post punt that they plan to leave her positive review.

[bearcat69]

I have a different AW name than the one I have on here, but in a recent negative review I posted, some WK's put two and two together and speculated on linking my usernames based on feedback I'd left. Not going to lie, this did piss me off quite a bit. I don't want the two things linked because I wouldn't want a prossie knowing I'm anything other than an ordinary punter, for not wanting it to affect the booking in any way. I suspect maybe some possible behind the scenes skullduggery.. but don't really know and could never prove anything.. but lets just say the link was made by an obvious fanboy suspiciously quickly. But the point is for me, if the fanboys could make the link so easily so could the prossies by reading our reviews on here, talking to each other and putting things together. I know there is the advice of waiting for a certain amount of time before posting reviews and changing certain things to put the prossie of the scent, but I like to write my reviews in detail whilst the memory is still fresh in my mind. I use a separate number and email address for punting btw, and do everything I can to be as discrete as possible, but where there is a fanboy with a strong enough will to snoop into your shit, they will always find a way..

Point for me, I feel I learnt a lot from posting that review. I agree with the feeling that if the WG figures out you're a reviewer on here and doesn't want to accept a booking for you, well yeah, you know what fuck them (or don't fuck them to be more precise). That's their choice and their right if that's how they want to do things, but they are only losing out on my business, and that is just fine by me. I'll just simply take my money to a whore who will be happy to take my money and not mess about worrying about all that bollocks. Punting should be simple, you phone up the girl, arrange a time, meet her, pay her, fuck her and then fuck off. If there is anymore faff than that now, then I just won't bother with it.

[daviemac]

I like to write my reviews in detail whilst the memory is still fresh in my mind and do everything I can to be as discrete as possible,

Just a thought, write and save your review on a word document (in a secure file) then copy and paste into your post when ready, that way you can leave time between punt and review.     

[bearcat69]

Just a thought, write and save your review on a word document (in a secure file) then copy and paste into your post when ready, that way you can leave time between punt and review.     

Thanks for the idea. It is something I should probably try to do in the future. Need to learn a bit of patience I guess.

But then again, how long do I wait? A month? Two months? Half a year? At what point does the review then become irrelevant?

I posted a review of a girl I saw 4 months after I punted her. 3 months after posting the review she's suddenly posting in the review saying some one sent her the review, and going on about 'inaccuracies'